Commitments and Contingencies	12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2022
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	Commitments and Contingencies Indemnification Subject to certain limitations, the Company is obligated to indemnify its current and former directors, officers and employees with respect to certain litigation matters and investigations that arise in connection with their service to the Company. These obligations arise under the terms of its certificate of incorporation, its bylaws, applicable contracts, and Delaware and California law. The obligation to indemnify generally means that the Company is required to pay or reimburse these individuals’ reasonable legal expenses and possibly damages and other liabilities incurred in connection with these matters. Legal The Company is named from time to time as a party to lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business related to its sales, marketing, and the provision of its services and equipment. Actions filed against the Company include commercial, intellectual property, customer, common-law negligence, and labor and employment related claims, including complaints of alleged wrongful termination and potential class action lawsuits regarding alleged violations of federal and state wage and hour and other laws and other types of lawsuits. Loss Contingencies The Company regularly reviews outstanding legal claims, actions, and enforcement matters to determine if accruals for expected negative outcomes of such matters are probable and can be reasonably estimated. On February 17, 2023, a jury in the U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division, issued a verdict against the Company, in favor of CPI Security Systems, Inc. (“CPI”) for $49.7 million of compensatory damages and an additional $140 million of punitive damages in a lawsuit filed by CPI in 2020 regarding alleged historical practices by certain Vivint sales personnel. Based on advice and analysis by legal counsel, the Company believes the verdict is not legally or factually supported and intends to pursue post-judgment remedies and file an appeal and will continue to examine all legal options available to it. The Company has determined that a range of loss with respect to this litigation is probable (as such term is defined in ASC 450-20-20) and has in the fourth quarter of 2022 accrued an estimated liability of $10.8 million. The accrual reflects the low end of the range of potential loss of $10.8 million up to the verdict amount. This estimated range is based on management’s best judgment after consultation with legal counsel. The Company had accruals for loss contingencies (inclusive of the matter discussed above) of approximately $22.3 million and $8.2 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The Company evaluates its outstanding legal and regulatory proceedings and other matters each quarter to assess its loss contingency accruals, and makes adjustments in such accruals, upward or downward, as appropriate, based on facts and circumstances and consultation with counsel. The Company’s accruals for loss contingencies will be adjusted in the future based upon developments and in light of the uncertainties involved in such matters, the ultimate resolution of these matters could materially differ from the accruals that the Company has recorded. Regulatory Matters In addition, from time to time the Company is subject to examinations, investigations and/or enforcement actions by federal and state licensing and regulatory agencies and may face the risk of penalties for violation of financial services, consumer protections and other applicable laws and regulations. For example, in 2019, the Company received a subpoena in connection with an investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) concerning potential violations of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act (“FIRREA”). In January 2021, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the DOJ that resolved this investigation. As part of this settlement, the Company paid $3.2 million to the United States. The Company also has received a civil investigative demand from the staff of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) concerning potential violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) and the “Red Flags Rule” thereunder, and the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”). In April 2021, the Company entered into a settlement with the FTC that resolved this investigation. As part of this settlement, which was approved by a federal court on May 3, 2021, the Company paid a total of $20 million to the United States. and agreed to implement various additional compliance related measures. The Company is currently in the process of administering the terms of this settlement, which include multiple undertakings by the Company. The Company has been endeavoring to comply with these undertakings and the demands on management and costs incurred in connection with these undertakings may be substantial. The Company has been engaged in ongoing discussions with the staff of the FTC regarding the Company’s compliance with the terms of the settlement. In addition, in accordance with the settlement, the Company is required to undergo biennial assessments by an independent third-party assessor who will review the Company’s compliance programs and provide a report to the FTC staff on the Company’s ongoing compliance with the settlement (“Stipulated Order”). During the three months ended March 31, 2022, the Company completed its first biennial assessment required by the Stipulated Order and received a report with no findings of non-compliance by the assessor. Further, although Vivint is only required by the Order to conduct biennial assessments, Vivint has voluntarily and proactively elected to conduct quarterly audits utilizing the same appointed Assessor. These quarterly audits will each focus on roughly 25% of the Order's requirements. As of December 31, 2022 the Company has completed the first two quarterly audits, each of which resulted in reports with no findings of non-compliance by the Assessor. U.S. Customs and Border Protection is investigating the Company’s historical compliance with regulations relating to duties and tariffs in connection with its import of certain products from outside the U.S. The Company is cooperating with this investigation.The Company also receives inquiries, including civil investigative demands (“CIDs”), from various State Attorneys General, typically from their respective consumer protection or consumer affairs divisions. In general, litigation and enforcements by regulatory agencies can be expensive and disruptive to normal business operations. Moreover, the results of legal proceedings and enforcement actions are difficult to predict and the costs incurred can be substantial. The Company believes the amounts accrued in its financial statements to cover these matters are adequate in light of the probable and estimated liabilities. Factors that the Company considers in the determination of the likelihood of a loss and the estimate of the range of that loss in respect of legal and enforcement matters include the merits of a particular matter, the nature of the matter, the length of time the matter has been pending, the procedural posture of the matter, how the Company intends to defend the matter, the likelihood of settling the matter and the anticipated range of a possible settlement. Because such matters are subject to many uncertainties, the ultimate outcomes are not predictable and there can be no assurances that the actual amounts required to satisfy alleged liabilities from the matters described above will not exceed the amounts reflected in the Company’s financial statements or that the matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

Subject to certain limitations, the Company is obligated to indemnify its current and former directors, officers and employees with respect to certain litigation matters and investigations that arise in connection with their service to the Company. These obligations arise under the terms of its certificate of incorporation, its bylaws, applicable contracts, and Delaware and California law. The obligation to indemnify generally means that the Company is required to pay or reimburse these individuals’ reasonable legal expenses and possibly damages and other liabilities incurred in connection with these matters.

The Company is named from time to time as a party to lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business related to its sales, marketing, and the provision of its services and equipment. Actions filed against the Company include commercial, intellectual property, customer, common-law negligence, and labor and employment related claims, including complaints of alleged wrongful termination and potential class action lawsuits regarding alleged violations of federal and state wage and hour and other laws and other types of lawsuits.

On February 17, 2023, a jury in the U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division, issued a verdict against the Company, in favor of CPI Security Systems, Inc. (“CPI”) for $49.7 million of compensatory damages and an additional $140 million of punitive damages in a lawsuit filed by CPI in 2020 regarding alleged historical practices by certain Vivint sales personnel. Based on advice and analysis by legal counsel, the Company believes the verdict is not legally or factually supported and intends to pursue post-judgment remedies and file an appeal and will continue to examine all legal options available to it.

The Company has determined that a range of loss with respect to this litigation is probable (as such term is defined in ASC 450-20-20) and has in the fourth quarter of 2022 accrued an estimated liability of $10.8 million. The accrual reflects the low end of the range of potential loss of $10.8 million up to the verdict amount. This estimated range is based on management’s best judgment after consultation with legal counsel.

The Company had accruals for loss contingencies (inclusive of the matter discussed above) of approximately $22.3 million and $8.2 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The Company evaluates its outstanding legal and regulatory proceedings and other matters each quarter to assess its loss contingency accruals, and makes adjustments in such accruals, upward or downward, as appropriate, based on facts and circumstances and consultation with counsel. The Company’s accruals for loss contingencies will be adjusted in the future based upon developments and in light of the uncertainties involved in such matters, the ultimate resolution of these matters could materially differ from the accruals that the Company has recorded.

In addition, from time to time the Company is subject to examinations, investigations and/or enforcement actions by federal and state licensing and regulatory agencies and may face the risk of penalties for violation of financial services, consumer protections and other applicable laws and regulations. For example, in 2019, the Company received a subpoena in connection with an investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) concerning potential violations of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act (“FIRREA”). In January 2021, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the DOJ that resolved this investigation. As part of this settlement, the Company paid $3.2 million to the United States. The Company also has received a civil investigative demand from the staff of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) concerning potential violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) and the “Red Flags Rule” thereunder, and the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”). In April 2021, the Company entered into a settlement with the FTC that resolved this investigation. As part of this settlement, which was approved by a federal court on May 3, 2021, the Company paid a total of $20 million to the United States. and agreed to implement various additional compliance related measures. The Company is currently in the process of administering the terms of this settlement, which include multiple undertakings by the Company. The Company has been endeavoring to comply with these undertakings and the demands on management and costs incurred in connection with these undertakings may be substantial. The Company has been engaged in ongoing discussions with the staff of the FTC regarding the Company’s compliance with the terms of the settlement. In addition, in accordance with the settlement, the Company is required to undergo biennial assessments by an independent third-party assessor who will review the Company’s compliance programs and provide a report to the FTC staff on the Company’s ongoing compliance with the

settlement (“Stipulated Order”). During the three months ended March 31, 2022, the Company completed its first biennial assessment required by the Stipulated Order and received a report with no findings of non-compliance by the assessor. Further, although Vivint is only required by the Order to conduct biennial assessments, Vivint has voluntarily and proactively elected to conduct quarterly audits utilizing the same appointed Assessor. These quarterly audits will each focus on roughly 25% of the Order's requirements. As of December 31, 2022 the Company has completed the first two quarterly audits, each of which resulted in reports with no findings of non-compliance by the Assessor. U.S. Customs and Border Protection is investigating the Company’s historical compliance with regulations relating to duties and tariffs in connection with its import of certain products from outside the U.S. The Company is cooperating with this investigation.The Company also receives inquiries, including civil investigative demands (“CIDs”), from various State Attorneys General, typically from their respective consumer protection or consumer affairs divisions. In general, litigation and enforcements by regulatory agencies can be expensive and disruptive to normal business operations. Moreover, the results of legal proceedings and enforcement actions are difficult to predict and the costs incurred can be substantial.

The Company believes the amounts accrued in its financial statements to cover these matters are adequate in light of the probable and estimated liabilities. Factors that the Company considers in the determination of the likelihood of a loss and the estimate of the range of that loss in respect of legal and enforcement matters include the merits of a particular matter, the nature of the matter, the length of time the matter has been pending, the procedural posture of the matter, how the Company intends to defend the matter, the likelihood of settling the matter and the anticipated range of a possible settlement. Because such matters are subject to many uncertainties, the ultimate outcomes are not predictable and there can be no assurances that the actual amounts required to satisfy alleged liabilities from the matters described above will not exceed the amounts reflected in the Company’s financial statements or that the matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.