v3.24.0.1
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
9 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2023
Dec. 31, 2022
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS    
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

NOTE 5 - FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company applies fair value accounting for all assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and the market-based risk measurements or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, such as risks inherent in valuation techniques, transfer restrictions and credit risk. For certain instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable, and accrued expenses, it was estimated that the carrying amount approximated fair value because of the short maturities of these instruments.

Fair value is estimated using various valuation models, which utilize certain inputs and assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The inputs and assumptions used in valuation models are classified in the fair value hierarchy as follows:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.

Level 2: Quoted market prices for similar instruments in an active market; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations inputs of which are observable and can be corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs and assumptions that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the asset and liability. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.

In determining the appropriate hierarchy levels, the Company analyzes the assets and liabilities that are subject to fair value disclosure. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to their fair value measurement.

​

The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis by fair value hierarchy at September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022:

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

September 30, 2023

    

​

Level 1

    

​

Level 2

    

Level 3

    

Total

US Treasury Bills

 

$

10,818,051

 

$

—

​

$

—

​

$

10,818,051

Total US Treasury Bills Asset

 

$

10,818,051

 

$

—

​

$

—

​

$

10,818,051

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

December 31, 2022

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

    

Total

US Treasury Bills

​

$

9,992,900

​

$

—

​

$

—

​

$

9,992,900

Total US Treasury Bills Asset

​

$

9,992,900

​

$

—

​

$

—

​

$

9,992,900

​

NOTE 6 - FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company applies fair value accounting for all assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and the market-based risk measurements or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, such as risks inherent in valuation techniques, transfer restrictions and credit risk. For certain instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable, and accrued expenses, it was estimated that the carrying amount approximated fair value because of the short maturities of these instruments.

Fair value is estimated using various valuation models, which utilize certain inputs and assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The inputs and assumptions used in valuation models are classified in the fair value hierarchy as follows:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.

Level 2: Quoted market prices for similar instruments in an active market; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations inputs of which are observable and can be corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs and assumptions that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the asset and liability. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.

In determining the appropriate hierarchy levels, the Company analyzes the assets and liabilities that are subject to fair value disclosure. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to their fair value measurement.

​

The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis by fair value hierarchy at December 31, 2022 and 2021:

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

December 31, 2022

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

    

Total

US Treasury Bills

 

$

9,992,900

 

$

—

​

$

—

​

$

9,992,900

Total US Treasury Bills Asset

 

$

9,992,900

 

$

—

​

$

—

​

$

9,992,900

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

December 31, 2021

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

    

Total

2020 Notes warrants

​

$

—

​

$

—

​

$

373,599

​

$

373,599

Total Warrant Liability

​

$

—

​

 

—

​

$

373,599

​

$

373,599

​

The following shows the movement of the warrant liability balance during the year ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

    

Bridge Financing

    

2020 Note

​

​

Warrants

​

Warrants

Beginning Balance January 1, 2021

​

$

—

​

$

—

Warrant value at issuance (recorded as warrant liability expense)

​

​

3,783,079

​

​

894,113

Change in Fair value of warrants

​

 

8,627,651

​

 

(520,514)

Reclassification of warrant liability to an equity instrument

​

 

(12,410,730)

​

 

—

Ending Balance December 31, 2021

​

$

—

​

$

373,599

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Change in Fair value of warrants

​

​

—

​

​

(77,237)

Reclassification of warrant liability to an equity instrument

​

​

—

​

​

(296,362)

Ending Balance December 31, 2022

​

$

—

​

$

—

​

The Investor Exchange Warrant issued to the Investor on the Merger date was determined to be an equity-classified instrument, and accordingly the warrant liability on such date of approximately $12.4 million was reclassified to additional paid in capital. The Exchange Warrants issued to the 2020 Noteholders effective as of March 13, 2022 were determined to be an equity-classified instrument, and accordingly the warrant liability on such date of $296,362 was reclassified to additional paid in capital on that date.