•Non-cancelable contracts that provide the supplier with a substantive substitution right regarding the property, plant and equipment used to fulfill the contract, which do not meet the definition of a lease for accounting purposes under ASC Topic 842.


(In thousands)	Non-Lease		Capital
	Non-Cancelable		Expenditure
	Contracts		Commitments
Future minimum payments:
2024	$	170,301	$	51,423
2025	149,394		20,314
2026	82,730		10,509
2027	67,596		8,129
2028	50,513		9,003
Thereafter	223,534		40,745
Total	$	744,068	$	140,123

The Company and its subsidiaries are involved in certain legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business and, as required, have accrued an estimate of the probable costs for the resolution of those claims for which the occurrence of loss is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. These estimates have been developed in consultation with counsel and are based upon an analysis of potential results, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies. It is possible, however, that future results of operations for any particular period could be materially affected by changes in the Company’s assumptions or the effectiveness of its strategies related to these proceedings. Additionally, due to the inherent uncertainty of litigation, there can be no assurance that the resolution of any particular claim or proceeding would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

Although the Company is involved in a variety of legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, a large portion of the Company’s litigation arises in the following contexts: commercial disputes, employment and benefits related claims, land use and zoning disputes, governmental fines, intellectual property claims and tax disputes.

Prior to the Company’s separation from iHeartCommunications, Inc. in 2019, two former employees of Clear Media Limited (“Clear Media”), a former indirect, non-wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, were convicted in China of certain crimes, including the crime of misappropriation of Clear Media funds, and sentenced to imprisonment after a police investigation. The Company is not aware of any litigation, claim or assessment pending against the Company in relation to this proceeding.

The Company advised both the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) of the investigation of Clear Media. Subsequent to the announcement that the Company was considering a strategic review of its stake in Clear Media, in March 2020, the Company received a subpoena from the staff of the SEC and a Grand Jury subpoena from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York in connection with the investigation of Clear Media. In May 2020, the Company finalized the sale of its 50.91% stake in Clear Media.

As previously disclosed, the Company engaged with the SEC and the DOJ regarding the potential resolution of this matter and, during the first quarter of 2022, recorded an estimated liability of $7.1 million related to such matter. Having reached an agreement in principle with the SEC to settle the claims against the Company, and based on the Company’s expectations relating to a definitive order, the Company recorded an incremental liability of $19.0 million for the second quarter of 2023 to equal the full amount of the expected settlement payment. In September 2023, the Company reached a settlement with the SEC. Without admitting or denying the underlying allegations, the Company agreed to pay a total of approximately $26.1 million in disgorgement, civil penalties and prejudgment interest to the SEC in a series of installments over the next year, of which approximately $13 million was paid in October 2023. In connection with the settlement, the DOJ declined to pursue any charges against the Company related to this matter.

In various areas in which the Company operates, out-of-home advertising is the object of restrictive and, in some cases, prohibitive zoning and other regulatory provisions, either enacted or proposed. The impact to the Company of loss of displays due to governmental action has been somewhat mitigated by Federal and state laws mandating compensation for such loss and constitutional restraints.