On May 3, 2023, a private securities class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company, its former Chief Executive Officer, Tom Gentile III, and its Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Mark J. Suchinski. An Amended Complaint was filed on December 19, 2023, and a Second Amended Complaint was filed, with leave of the Court, on March 12, 2024. The lawsuit was brought on behalf of certain purchasers of securities of the Company, who allege purported misstatements and omissions concerning alleged faulty production controls and alleged quality and safety issues (the “Securities Class Action”). The specific claims in the Securities Class Action include (i) violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder against all defendants, and (ii) violations of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act against the individual defendants. The plaintiffs seek monetary damages. The Company believes that the claims in this lawsuit are without merit and intends to defend against them vigorously.

Spirit is also involved in litigation in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals (“Appellate Court”) with its former Chief Executive Officer, Larry Lawson over Lawson’s disputed violation of a restrictive covenant in his retirement and consulting agreement. On October 19, 2021, the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas (the “District Court”) ruled in favor of Lawson and awarded him $44.8 for benefits withheld in connection with the disputed violation, as well as post-judgment interest at the rate of 4.25%.

Spirit appealed the judgment to the Appellate Court. On February 27, 2023, the Appellate Court issued an opinion reversing the District Court decision and concluding that Lawson had violated the terms of the restrictive covenant and remanded for the District Court to address whether the restrictive covenant that Lawson violated was enforceable under Kansas law. On June 15, 2023, the District Court held that the restrictive covenant was enforceable as a matter of Kansas law. The District Court entered judgment in favor of Spirit on June 27, 2023. Lawson appealed the District Court’s latest decision, and this matter was argued before the Appellate Court on March 19, 2024. Spirit will continue to defend its position vigorously on appeal. A liability for the full amount of the award issued on October 19, 2021, plus accrued interest through March 28, 2023, was recognized and remains accrued in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2023 and March 28, 2024.

From time to time, in the ordinary course of business, the Company receives certain requests for information from government agencies in connection with their regulatory or investigational authority. The Company has received information and document requests related to the January 5, 2024 Alaska Airlines incident, the B737 MAX 9 door plug, and safety and quality processes in the B737 MAX line production. These include requests to assist the government in investigations or audits, including by the FAA, as a party representative to a National Transportation Safety Board investigation, grand jury subpoenas from the Department of Justice, and subpoenas or examination requests from the SEC and the Attorney General of the State of Texas. The Company reviews such requests and notices and takes appropriate action. Additionally, the Company is subject to federal and state requirements for protection of the environment, including those for disposal of hazardous waste and remediation of contaminated sites. As a result, the Company is required to participate in certain government investigations

In addition to the items addressed above, from time to time, the Company is subject to, and is presently involved in, litigation, legal proceedings, or other claims arising in the ordinary course of business. While the final outcome of the matters cannot be predicted with certainty, considering, among other things, the meritorious legal defenses available, the Company believes that, on a basis of information presently available, none of these items, when finally resolved, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s long-term financial position or liquidity.

The Company receives, and is currently subject to, customer and vendor claims arising in the ordinary course of business, including, but not limited to, those related to product quality and late delivery. The Company accrues for matters when losses are deemed probable and reasonably estimable. In evaluating matters for accrual and disclosure purposes, the Company takes into consideration multiple factors including without limitation its historical experience with matters of a similar nature, the specific facts and circumstances asserted, the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome, and the severity of any potential loss. Any accruals deemed necessary are reevaluated at least quarterly and updated as matters progress over time.

During the first quarter, the Company updated its estimated cost to satisfy customer firm orders on the A350 and A220 programs. Based on these estimates, and management’s evaluation of key macroeconomic assumptions including the probability that these performance obligations would be exercised, management determined that it is probable each of these programs' performance obligations will extend beyond the period of time for which the Company has recorded forward losses. The key changes are based upon two primary factors, the change in strategic pricing conversations with our customer, Airbus, and incremental firm orders Airbus secured on the A350 and A220 programs. As a result, Company recorded incremental forward losses in the first quarter of $168.3 on the A350 and A220 programs for production of expected firm orders through January 2030. Additional losses beyond what has been reserved could occur if there are unexpected changes to current assumptions in macroeconomic factors relevant to the Company's cost to complete all firm orders, ongoing pricing discussions with its customers, and increases to our customers’ firm orders. As a result, while the Company does not believe incremental losses beyond those currently recorded are evident, it is reasonably possible one or more of these programs could be performed at a loss incremental to forward losses previously recorded for production outside of the timeframe or for orders that may be placed in addition to those assessed as of March 28, 2024, highlighted above. The Company continues to evaluate all options to reduce or eliminate recorded forward losses prospectively, including, but not limited to, continued active negotiations with its A220 and A350 customer, regarding, among other things, elements of price.

The Company has entered into customary indemnification agreements with its directors, and its bylaws and certain executive employment agreements include indemnification and advancement provisions. Under the bylaws and any applicable agreement, the Company agrees to indemnify individuals against claims arising out of events or occurrences related to that individual’s service as the Company’s agent or the agent of any of its subsidiaries to the fullest extent legally permitted.

Provisions for estimated expenses related to service and product warranties and certain extraordinary rework are evaluated on a quarterly basis. These costs are accrued and are recorded to unallocated cost of goods sold. These estimates are established using historical information on the nature, frequency, and average cost of warranty claims, including the experience of industry peers. In the case of new development products or new customers, the Company considers other factors including the experience of other entities in the same business and management judgment, among others. Service warranty and extraordinary work is reported in current liabilities and other liabilities on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The warranty balance presented in the table below includes unresolved warranty claims that are in dispute in regard to their value as well as their contractual liability. The Company estimated the total costs related to some of these claims; however, there is significant uncertainty surrounding the disposition of these disputed claims and as such, the ultimate determination of the provision’s adequacy requires significant management judgment. The amount of the specific provisions recorded against disputed warranty claims was $2.3 as of March 28, 2024 and December 31, 2023. These specific provisions represent the Company’s best estimate of probable warranty claims. Should the Company incur higher than expected warranty costs and/or discover new or additional information related to these warranty provisions, the Company may incur additional charges that exceed these recorded provisions. The Company utilized available information to make appropriate assessments, however the Company recognizes that data on actual claims experience is of limited duration and therefore, claims projections are subject to significant judgment. The amount of the reasonably possible disputed warranty claims in excess of the specific warranty provision was $3.4 as of March 28, 2024 and December 31, 2023.