As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on
1933 Act File No. 033-11387
1940 Act File No. 811-04984
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
| REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 | ☒ | |
| Pre-Effective Amendment No. | ☐ | |
| Post-Effective Amendment No. 426 | ☒ | |
| and/or | ||
| REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 | ☒ | |
| Amendment No. 426 | ☒ | |
| (Check appropriate box or boxes.) |
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
220 East Las Colinas Boulevard, Suite 1200
Irving, Texas 75039
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (817) 391-6100
Gregory J. Stumm, President
220 East Las Colinas Boulevard
Suite 1200
Irving, Texas 75039
(Name and Address of Agent for Service)
With copies to:
Kathy K. Ingber, Esq.
K&L Gates LLP
1601 K Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20006-1600
It is proposed that this filing will become effective (check appropriate box)
| ☒ | immediately upon filing pursuant to paragraph (b) |
| ☐ | on (date) pursuant to paragraph (b) |
| ☐ | 60 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) |
| ☐ | on (date) pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) |
| ☐ | 75 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) |
| ☐ | on (date) pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of Rule 485 |
If appropriate, check the following box:
| ☐ | This post-effective amendment designates a new effective date for a previously filed post-effective amendment. |
![]() |
|
American Beacon
|
|
|
Share Class
|
||
|
|
Y
|
R6
|
R5
|
|
American Beacon Ninety One Emerging Markets Equity Fund
|
ZEMAX
|
ZEMRX
|
ZEMIX
|
|
Back Cover
|
|
|
American Beacon
Ninety One Emerging Markets Equity FundSM |
![]() |
|
Share Class
|
Y
|
R6
|
R5
|
|
Maximum sales charge imposed on purchases (as a percentage of offering price)
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum deferred sales charge (as a percentage of the lower of original offering price or redemption proceeds)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Class
|
Y
|
R6
|
R5
|
|
Management Fees
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) Fees
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Other Expenses1
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses2
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Fee Waiver and/or expense reimbursement3
|
(
%)
|
(
%)
|
(
%)
|
|
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
| 1 |
| 2 | The Fund is the successor to the Ninety One Emerging Markets Equity Fund (the “Predecessor Fund”), pursuant to a reorganization that occurred on February 21, 2025 (“Closing Date”), in which the Y Class and R5 Class shares of the Fund adopted the financial statements and performance history of the A Shares and I Shares, respectively, of the Predecessor Fund. The Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses of the Fund’s Y Class and R5 Class shares do not correlate to the ratio of expenses to average net assets provided in the Financial Highlights for the A Shares and I Shares, respectively, of the Predecessor Fund, but instead reflect the Fund’s estimated expenses. |
| 3 | American Beacon Advisors, Inc. (the “Manager”) has contractually agreed to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses of the Fund’s Y Class, R6 Class, and R5 Class shares, as applicable, through |
|
Share Class
|
1 Year
|
3 Years
|
|
Y
|
$
|
$
|
|
R6
|
$
|
$
|
|
R5
|
$
|
$
|
|
■
|
Common Stock Risk. The value of a company’s common stock may fall as a result of factors affecting the company, companies in the same industry or sector, or the financial markets overall. Common stock generally is subordinate to preferred stock upon the liquidation or bankruptcy of the issuing company.
|
|
■
|
Depositary Receipts Risk. Depositary receipts are subject to certain of the risks associated with investing directly in foreign securities, including, but not limited to, currency exchange rate fluctuations, political and financial instability in the home country of a particular depositary receipt, less liquidity, more volatility, less government regulation and supervision and delays in transaction settlement.
|
|
■
|
U.S. Dollar-Denominated Foreign Stocks Traded on U.S. Exchanges Risk. Foreign (non-U.S.) companies that list their stocks on U.S. exchanges may be exempt from certain accounting and corporate governance standards that apply to U.S. companies that list on the same exchange. Performance of these stocks can be impacted by political and financial instability in the home country of a particular foreign company, and delisting of these stocks could impact the Fund‘s ability to transact in such securities and could significantly impact their liquidity and market price.
|
|
■
|
China Investment Risk. Investing in securities of Chinese issuers involves certain risks and considerations not typically associated with investing in securities of U.S. issuers, including, among others, more frequent trading suspensions and government interventions (including by nationalization of assets), currency exchange rate fluctuations or blockages, limits on the use of brokers and on foreign ownership, different financial reporting standards, higher dependence on exports and international trade, vulnerability to competition from other emerging economies in Asia, potential for increased trade tariffs, embargoes, sanctions and other trade limitations, and custody risks associated with programs used to access Chinese securities.
Confiscatory taxation, potentially frequent changes in the law, and political, economic or social instability or other developments could adversely affect and significantly diminish the values of the Chinese companies in which the Fund invests. The securities markets of China are emerging markets characterized by a relatively small number of equity issues and relatively low trading volume, resulting in decreased liquidity, greater price volatility, and potentially fewer investment opportunities. Internal social unrest or confrontations with other neighboring countries, including military conflicts in response to such events, may also disrupt economic development in China and result in a greater risk of currency fluctuations, currency non-convertibility, interest rate fluctuations and higher rates of inflation. Adverse changes to the economic conditions of its primary trading partners may adversely affect China’s economy and the Fund’s investments. China’s economy also may be adversely impacted by a reduction in spending on Chinese products and services. In addition, if China were to exert its authority so as to alter the economic, political, or legal structures, or the existing social policy of Hong Kong or Taiwan, investor and business confidence in Hong Kong or Taiwan could be negatively affected, which in turn could negatively affect markets and business performance and have an adverse effect on the Fund’s investments. |
|
■
|
China A-Shares. Purchase and ownership of China A-Shares is generally restricted to Chinese investors and are only accessible to foreign investors who are Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors (“QFIIs”) or who participate in the Shanghai-Hong Kong and Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect Programs (“Stock Connect”). The existence of a liquid trading market for China A-Shares may depend on whether there is supply of, and demand for, China A-Shares. The exchanges on which China A-Shares are traded are undergoing development and the market capitalization of, and trading volumes on, the exchanges on which China A Shares are traded may be lower than those in more developed financial markets. Comparatively lower trading volumes may well result in potential illiquidity in the securities markets and have an adverse impact on the prices of Chinese securities in which the Fund invests. Market volatility, trading suspensions or government intervention with respect to individual issuers, and settlement difficulties in the China A-Shares markets may result in significant fluctuation in the prices of the securities traded on such markets and thereby changes in the Fund’s net asset value.
|
|
■
|
Investing Through Stock Connect. The Fund may invest in China A-Shares (shares of publicly traded companies based in mainland China) listed and traded on the Shanghai Stock Exchange through the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect program, as well as China A-Shares listed and traded on the Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect program (collectively, “Stock Connect”), or other stock exchanges in China which may participate in Stock Connect from time to time or in the future. Trading through Stock Connect is subject to a number of restrictions that may affect the Fund’s investments and returns. Stock Connect A-shares generally may not be sold, purchased or otherwise transferred other than through Stock Connect in accordance with applicable rules. There can be no assurance as to the program’s continued existence or whether future developments regarding the program may restrict or adversely affect the Fund’s investments or returns. Because certain transactions through Stock Connect may not be subject to certain investor protection programs, the Fund may be exposed to the risks of default of the broker(s) they engage in their trading in China A-Shares.
|
|
■
|
Pacific Basin Securities Risk. The Pacific Basin region includes countries in various stages of economic development. Many Pacific Basin countries are considered undeveloped or developing and may be subject to greater social, political and economic instability than is the case in the U.S. and Western European countries. In addition, the region has historically been prone to natural disasters, the occurrence of which could negatively impact the economy of any country in the region. The economies of most countries in this region are heavily dependent on international trade and are accordingly affected by protective trade barriers and the economic conditions of their trading partners. These economies may depend upon only a few industries and/or exports of primary commodities and, therefore, are vulnerable to changes in commodity prices. The securities markets in the Pacific Basin may be substantially smaller, less liquid and more volatile than the major securities markets in the U.S., which may affect the Fund’s ability to acquire or dispose of securities at the price and time it wishes. Changes in the value of those countries’ currencies against the U.S. dollar will result in corresponding changes in the U.S. dollar value of the Fund’s assets denominated in those currencies.
|
|
■
|
Recent Market Events Risk. Both U.S. and international markets have experienced significant volatility in recent months and years. As a result of such volatility, investment returns may fluctuate significantly. Moreover, the risks discussed herein associated with an investment in the Fund may be increased.
Although interest rates were unusually low in the U.S. and abroad for a period of time, in 2022, the U.S. Federal Reserve (the “Federal Reserve”) and certain foreign central banks began to raise interest rates as part of their efforts to address rising inflation. The Federal Reserve and certain foreign central banks have started to lower interest rates, though economic or other factors, such as inflation, could stop such changes. It is difficult to accurately predict the pace at which interest rates might change, the timing, frequency or magnitude of any such changes in interest rates, or when such changes might stop or again reverse course. Additionally, various economic and political factors could cause the Federal Reserve or foreign central banks to change their approach in the future and such actions may result in an economic slowdown in the U.S. and abroad. Unexpected changes in interest rates could lead to significant market volatility or reduce liquidity in certain sectors of the market. Deteriorating economic fundamentals may, in turn, increase the risk of default or insolvency of particular issuers, negatively impact market value, cause credit spreads to widen, and reduce bank balance sheets. Any of these |
|
could cause an increase in market volatility, reduce liquidity across various markets or decrease confidence in the markets. High public debt in the U.S. and other countries creates ongoing systemic and market risks and policymaking uncertainty. There is no assurance that the U.S. Congress will act to raise the nation’s debt ceiling; a failure to do so could cause market turmoil and substantial investment risks that cannot be fully predicted. Unexpected political, regulatory and diplomatic events within the U.S. and abroad may affect investor and consumer confidence and may adversely impact financial markets and the broader economy.
Some countries, including the U.S., have adopted more protectionist trade policies. Slowing global economic growth, imposition of tariffs and resulting impacts on global prices and supply chains; the rise in protectionist trade policies, inflationary pressures, changes to some major international trade agreements, risks associated with trade negotiations between countries and regions, including the U.S. and certain foreign nations, political or economic dysfunction within some nations, including the U.S., and dramatic changes in commodity and currency prices could have adverse effects that cannot be foreseen at the present time. In addition, if the U.S. dollar continues to be strong, it may decrease foreign demand for U.S. assets, which could have a negative impact on certain issuers and/or industries. Tensions, war, or open conflict between nations, such as between Russia and Ukraine, in the Middle East or in eastern Asia could affect the economies of many nations, including the United States. The duration of ongoing hostilities in the Middle East and between Russia and Ukraine, and any sanctions and related events cannot be predicted. Those events present material uncertainty and risk with respect to markets globally and the performance of the Fund and its investments or operations could be negatively impacted. Regulators in the U.S. have adopted a number of changes to regulations involving the markets and issuers, some of which apply to the Fund. The full effect of various newly adopted regulations is not currently known. Certain of these changes could limit the Fund’s ability to pursue its investment strategies or make certain investments, or may make it more costly for the Fund to operate, which may impact performance. Additionally, it is possible that recently adopted regulations could be further revised or rescinded, which creates material uncertainty on their impact to the Fund. Economists and others have expressed increasing concern about the potential effects of global climate change on property and security values. Certain issuers, industries and regions may be adversely affected by the impacts of climate change in ways that cannot be foreseen, including on the demand for and the development of goods and services and related production costs, and the impacts of legislation, regulation and international accords related to climate change, as well as any indirect consequences of regulation or business trends driven by climate change. |
|
■
|
Exchange-Traded Funds (“ETFs”) Risk. Because ETFs are listed on an exchange, they may be subject to trading halts, may trade at a premium or discount to their net asset value (“NAV”) and may not be liquid. An ETF that tracks an index may not precisely replicate the returns of that index, and an actively-managed ETF’s performance will reflect its adviser’s ability to make investment decisions that are suited to achieving the ETF’s investment objectives. Future legislative or regulatory changes, including changes in taxation, could impact the operation of ETFs.
|
|
■
|
Government Money Market Funds Risk. Investments in government money market funds are subject to interest rate risk, credit risk, and market risk. Interest rate risk is the risk that rising interest rates could cause the value of such an investment to decline. Credit risk is the risk that the issuer, guarantor or insurer of an obligation, or the counterparty to a transaction, may fail or become less able or unwilling, to make timely payment of interest or principal or otherwise honor its obligations, or that it may default completely.
|
|
■
|
Information Technology Sector Risk. The Information Technology sector includes companies engaged in software and services, technology hardware and storage peripherals, electronic equipment and components, and semiconductors and semiconductor equipment. Information technology companies face intense competition, both domestically and internationally, which may have an adverse effect on profit margins. Information technology companies may have limited product lines, markets, financial resources or personnel. The products of information technology companies may face rapid product obsolescence due to technological developments and frequent new product introduction, unpredictable changes in growth rates and competition for the services of qualified personnel. Failure to introduce new products, develop and maintain a loyal customer base or achieve general market acceptance for their products could have a material adverse effect on a company’s business. Companies in the Information Technology sector also may be subject to increased government scrutiny or adverse government or regulatory action. Additionally, companies in the Information Technology sector are heavily dependent on intellectual property and the loss of patent, copyright or trademark protections may adversely affect the profitability of these companies. The market prices of information technology-related securities tend to exhibit a greater degree of market risk and sharp price fluctuations than other types of securities. These securities may fall in and out of favor with investors rapidly, which may cause sudden selling and dramatically lower market prices.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
Inception Date
|
1 Year
|
5 Years
|
Since Inception
|
|
R5 Class
|
|
|
|
|
|
Returns Before Taxes
|
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Returns After Taxes on Distributions
|
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Returns After Taxes on Distributions and Sales of Fund Shares
|
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
|
Inception Date
|
1 Year
|
5 Years
|
Since Inception
|
|
Share Class (Before Taxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y
|
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
5 Years
|
Since Inception
|
|
Index (Reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes, other than withholding taxes, as noted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSCI® Emerging Markets Index (USD)*
|
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
| * | Reflects the reinvestment of dividends after the deduction of withholding taxes, using a tax rate applicable to non-resident individuals who do not benefit from double taxation treaties. |
|
Ninety One North America, Inc.
|
Archie Hart
Portfolio Manager1 Since Fund Inception (2018)2 |
Varun Laijawalla
Portfolio Manager1 Since 20233 |
| 1 | The positions shown for each of the portfolio managers are held with Ninety One UK Ltd., a participating affiliate of Ninety One North America, Inc. |
| 2 | Predecessor Fund inception date. |
| 3 | Includes Predecessor Fund. |
|
|
New Account
|
Existing Account
|
|
|
Share Class
|
Minimum Initial Investment Amount
|
Purchase/Redemption Minimum by Check/ACH/Exchange
|
Purchase/Redemption Minimum by Wire
|
|
Y
|
$100,000
|
$50
|
None
|
|
R6
|
None
|
$50
|
None
|
|
R5
|
$250,000
|
$50
|
None
|
|
■
|
The American Beacon Ninety One Emerging Markets Equity Fund has a non-fundamental policy to invest under normal circumstances at least 80% of its net assets (plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes) in equity securities of emerging market companies, and in other instruments, such as shares of exchange traded funds (“ETFs”), that have economic characteristics similar to such securities.
|
|
■
|
develops overall investment strategies for the Fund,
|
|
■
|
selects and changes sub-advisors,
|
|
■
|
allocates assets among sub-advisors,
|
|
■
|
monitors and evaluates the sub-advisor’s investment performance,
|
|
■
|
monitors the sub-advisor’s compliance with the Fund’s investment objectives, policies, and restrictions,
|
|
■
|
oversees the Fund’s securities lending activities and actions taken by the securities lending agent to the extent applicable, and
|
|
■
|
directs the investment of the portion of the Fund’s assets that the sub-advisor determines should be allocated to short-term investments.
|
|
■
|
ETFs. The Fund may purchase shares of ETFs. ETFs trade like a common stock, and passive ETFs usually represent a fixed portfolio of securities designed to track the performance and dividend yield of a particular domestic or foreign market index. Typically, the Fund will purchase passive ETF shares to obtain exposure to all or a portion of the stock or bond market. As a shareholder of an ETF, the Fund would be subject to its ratable share of the ETF’s expenses, including its advisory and administration expenses, in addition to the Fund’s own fees and expenses.
|
|
■
|
Government Money Market Funds. The Fund may invest cash balances in government money market funds that are registered as investment companies under the Investment Company Act, including a government money market fund advised by the Manager, with respect to which the Manager also receives a management fee. If the Fund invests in government money market funds, the Fund becomes a shareholder of that investment company. As a result, Fund shareholders will bear their proportionate share of the expenses, including, for example, advisory and administrative fees of the government money market funds in which the Fund invests, such as advisory fees charged by the Manager to any applicable government money market funds advised by the Manager, in addition to the fees and expenses Fund shareholders directly bear in connection with the Fund’s own operations. Shareholders also would be exposed to the risks associated with government money market funds and the portfolio investments of such government money market funds, including the risk that a
|
|
government money market fund’s yield will be lower than the return that the Fund would have received from other investments that provide liquidity. Investments in government money market funds are not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency.
|
|
■
|
Foreign Currencies
|
|
■
|
Foreign Currency-Denominated Securities
|
|
■
|
Common Stock. Common stock generally takes the form of shares in a corporation which represent an equity or ownership interest. Holders of common stock generally have voting rights in the issuer and are entitled to receive common stock dividends when, as and if declared by the company’s board of directors. Returns on common stock investments consist of any dividends received plus the amount of appreciation or depreciation in the value of the stock. Common stock normally occupies the most subordinated position in an issuer’s capital structure. It ranks below preferred stock and debt securities in claims for dividends and for assets of the company in a liquidation or bankruptcy. Common stock may be traded via an exchange or over-the-counter. Over-the-counter stock may be less liquid than exchange-traded stock.
|
|
■
|
Depositary Receipts. American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”) are U.S. dollar-denominated receipts representing interests in the securities of a foreign issuer. ADRs typically are issued by domestic banks and trust companies and represent the deposit with the bank of the securities of a foreign issuer. Depositary receipts may not be denominated in the same currency as the securities into which they may be converted. Investing in depositary receipts entails substantially the same risks as direct investment in foreign securities. In addition, the Fund may invest in unsponsored depositary receipts, which are implemented by a depositary bank with no direct involvement of the foreign issuers, and the issuers are not obligated to disclose material information about the underlying securities to investors in the United States. Ownership of unsponsored depositary receipts may not entitle the Fund to the same benefits and rights as ownership of the underlying securities or of sponsored depositary receipts, which are implemented in collaboration with the foreign issuers. GDRs may be offered in one or more foreign countries and represent the deposit with a foreign bank of securities of a foreign issuer. EDRs, which are sometimes called Continental Depositary Receipts, are issued in Europe in bearer form and are traded in European securities markets.
|
|
■
|
U.S. Dollar-Denominated Foreign Stocks Traded on U.S. Exchanges. Non-U.S. companies may list their common stock on U.S. exchanges subject to meeting the relevant exchange’s listing requirements and U.S. regulatory requirements applicable to non-U.S. companies that list their shares in the U.S.
|
|
■
|
ETFs. The Fund may invest in ETFs. ETFs trade like a common stock, and passively-managed ETFs usually represent a fixed portfolio of securities designed to track the performance and dividend yield of a particular domestic or foreign market index. ETF shares typically are purchased and redeemed through in-kind purchases and redemptions, and trade on a stock exchange at market prices, which may differ from an ETF’s NAV. Typically, the Fund would purchase passive ETF shares to obtain exposure to all or a portion of the stock or bond market. As a shareholder of an ETF, the Fund would be subject to its ratable share of the ETF’s expenses, including its advisory and administration expenses. An investment in an ETF generally presents the same primary risks as an investment in a conventional mutual fund (i.e., one that is not exchange-traded) that has the same investment objective, strategies and policies but also presents some additional risks due to being exchange-traded. The price of an ETF can fluctuate within a wide range.
|
|
■
|
Government Money Market Funds. The Fund can invest free cash balances in registered open-end investment companies regulated as government money market funds under the Investment Company Act to provide liquidity or for defensive purposes. The Fund could invest in government money market funds rather than purchasing individual short-term investments. If the Fund invests in government money market funds, shareholders will bear their proportionate share of the expenses, including for example, advisory and administrative fees, of the government money market funds in which the Fund invests, including advisory fees charged by the Manager to any applicable government money market funds advised by the Manager. Although a government money market fund is designed to be a relatively low risk investment, it is not free of risk. Despite the short maturities and high credit quality of a government money market fund’s investments, increases in interest rates and deteriorations in the credit quality of the instruments the government money market fund has purchased may reduce the government money market fund’s yield and can cause the price of a government money market security to decrease. In addition, a government money market fund is subject to the risk that the value of an investment may be eroded over time by inflation.
|
|
■
|
Common Stock Risk. The value of a company’s common stock may fall as a result of factors directly relating to that company, such as decisions made by its management or decreased demand for the company’s products or services. A stock’s value may also decline because of factors affecting not just the company, but also companies in the same industry or sector. The price of a company’s stock may also be affected by changes in financial markets that are relatively unrelated to the company, such as changes in interest rates, exchange rates or industry regulation. Companies that pay dividends on their common stock generally only do so after they invest in their own business and make required payments to bondholders and on other debt and preferred stock. Therefore, the value of a company’s common stock will usually be more volatile than its bonds, other debt and preferred stock. Common stock
|
|
generally is subordinate to preferred stock upon the liquidation or bankruptcy of the issuing company. In the event of an issuer’s bankruptcy, there is substantial risk that there will be nothing left to pay common stockholders after payments, if any, to bondholders and preferred stockholders have been made.
|
|
■
|
Depositary Receipts Risk. The Fund may invest in securities issued by foreign companies through ADRs. These securities are generally subject to many of the same risks of investing in the foreign securities that they evidence or into which they may be converted, including, but not limited to, currency exchange rate fluctuations, political and financial instability in the home country of a particular depositary receipt, less liquidity, more volatility, less government regulation and supervision and delays in transaction settlement. There may be an imperfect correlation between the market value of depositary receipts and the underlying foreign securities. In addition, because the underlying securities of depositary receipts trade on foreign exchanges at times when the U.S. markets are not open for trading, the value of the securities underlying the depositary receipts may change materially at times when the U.S. markets are not open for trading, regardless of whether there is an active U.S. market for shares of the Fund. Depositary receipts may be sponsored or unsponsored. Unsponsored depositary receipts are organized independently, without the cooperation of the issuer of the underlying securities. As a result, there may be less information available about the underlying issuer than there is about an issuer of sponsored depositary receipts and the prices may be more volatile than if such instruments were sponsored by the issuer. Any distributions paid to the holders of depositary receipts are usually subject to a fee charged by the depositary. Holders of depositary receipts may have limited voting rights, and investment restrictions in certain countries may adversely impact the value of depositary receipts because such restrictions may limit the ability to convert the equity shares into depositary receipts and vice versa. Such restrictions may cause the equity shares of the underlying issuer to trade at a discount or premium to the market price of the depositary receipts.
|
|
■
|
U.S. Dollar-Denominated Foreign Stocks Traded on U.S. Exchanges Risk. Foreign (non-U.S.) companies that list their stocks on U.S. exchanges may be exempt from certain accounting and corporate governance standards that apply to U.S. companies that list on the same exchange. Foreign stocks traded on U.S. exchanges transact and settle in U.S. dollars, but performance of these stocks can be impacted by political and financial instability in the home country of a particular foreign company. To the extent the Fund invests in U.S. dollar-denominated foreign stocks traded on U.S. exchanges, delisting of these stocks could impact the Fund‘s ability to transact in such securities and could significantly impact their liquidity and market price. In addition, the Fund would have to seek other markets in which to transact in such securities which would also increase the Fund’s costs.
|
|
■
|
China Investment Risk. Investing in securities of Chinese issuers, including A-Shares, involves certain risks and considerations not typically associated with investing in securities of U.S. issuers, including, among others, more frequent trading suspensions and government interventions (including by nationalization of assets), currency exchange rate fluctuations or blockages, limits on the use of brokers and on foreign ownership, different financial reporting standards, higher dependence on exports and international trade, vulnerability to competition from other emerging economies in Asia, potential for increased trade tariffs, embargoes, sanctions and other trade limitations, and custody risks associated with programs used to access Chinese securities.
The Chinese government may intervene or seek to control the operations, structure, or ownership of Chinese companies. In the past, the Chinese government has from time to time taken actions that influence the prices at which certain goods may be sold, encourage companies to invest or concentrate in particular industries, induce mergers between companies in certain industries, and compel private companies to publicly offer their securities in an effort to increase or continue the rate of economic growth, control the rate of inflation, or otherwise regulate economic expansion. In addition, expropriation, including nationalization, confiscatory taxation, potentially frequent changes in the law, natural disasters and public health crises, restrictions on foreign ownership of Chinese securities, and political, economic or social instability or other developments could adversely affect and significantly diminish the values of the Chinese companies in which the Fund invests. |
|
The securities markets of China are emerging markets characterized by a relatively small number of equity issues and relatively low trading volume, resulting in decreased liquidity, greater price volatility, and potentially fewer investment opportunities. The Chinese securities markets generally continue to experience inefficiency, volatility and pricing anomalies resulting from governmental influence and a lack of publicly available information. In addition, there is less regulation and monitoring of the securities markets and the activities of investors, brokers and other participants in China than in the United States. Accordingly, issuers of securities in China are not subject to the same degree of regulation as those in the United States with respect to such matters as insider trading rules, tender offer regulation, stockholder proxy requirements and the requirements mandating timely and accurate disclosure of information. As companies in the China region may not be subject to the same disclosure, accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards and practices as U.S. companies, investors may have imperfect information on Chinese investments. There may be significant obstacles to obtaining information necessary for investigations into or litigation against Chinese companies and shareholders may have limited legal remedies.
Stock markets in China are in the process of change and further development. This may lead to trading volatility and difficulties in the settlement and recording of transactions and interpretation and application of the relevant regulations. Custodians may not be able to offer the level of service and safekeeping in relation to the settlement and administration of securities in China that is customary in more developed markets. In particular, there is a risk that a Fund may not be recognized as the owner of securities that are held on behalf of a Fund by a sub-custodian. Significant portions of the Chinese securities markets may become rapidly illiquid, as Chinese issuers have the ability to suspend the trading of their equity securities, and have shown a willingness to exercise that option in response to market volatility and other events. The liquidity of Chinese securities may shrink or disappear suddenly and without warning as a result of adverse economic, market or political events, or adverse investor perceptions, whether or not accurate. Export growth continues to be a major driver of China’s rapid economic growth. Reduction in spending on Chinese products and services, institution of tariffs or other trade barriers or a downturn in any of the economies of China’s key trading partners may have an adverse impact on the Chinese economy. The United States has entered into a partial trade agreement with China that reduced some U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods while boosting Chinese purchases of American goods. However, this agreement left in place a number of existing tariffs, and it is unclear whether further trade agreements may be reached in the future. These actions may trigger a significant reduction in international trade, the oversupply of certain manufactured goods, substantial price reductions of goods and possible failure of individual companies and/or large segments of China’s export industry, which could have a negative impact on a Fund’s performance. Events such as these and their consequences are difficult to predict and it is unclear whether further tariffs may be imposed or other escalating actions may be taken in the future. In addition, adverse changes to the economic conditions of China’s primary trading partners, such as the United States, Japan and South Korea, could adversely impact the Chinese economy, and a slowdown in other significant economies of the world may adversely affect economic growth in China. Internal social unrest or confrontations with other neighboring countries, including military conflicts in response to such events, may also disrupt economic development in China and result in a greater risk of currency fluctuations, currency non-convertibility, interest rate fluctuations and higher rates of inflation. In addition, if China were to exert its authority so as to alter the economic, political, or legal structures, or the existing social policy of Hong Kong or Taiwan, investor and business confidence in Hong Kong or Taiwan could be negatively affected, which in turn could negatively affect markets and business performance and have an adverse effect on the Fund’s investments. |
|
■
|
China A-Shares. Purchase and ownership of China A-Shares is generally restricted to Chinese investors and are only accessible to foreign investors who are Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors (“QFIIs”) or who participate in the Shanghai-Hong Kong and Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect Programs (“Stock Connect”). The Fund may obtain exposure to the China A-Share market by either investing directly or by investing in participatory notes issued by banks, broker-dealers and other financial institutions, or other structured or derivative instruments that are designed to replicate, or otherwise provide exposure to, the performance of China A-Shares. The existence of a liquid trading market for China A-Shares may depend on whether there is supply of, and demand for, China A-Shares. The exchanges on which China A-Shares are traded are undergoing development and the market capitalization of, and trading volumes on the exchange on which China A Shares trade may be lower than those in more developed financial markets. Comparatively lower trading volumes may well result in potential illiquidity in the securities markets and have an adverse impact on the prices of Chinese securities in which the Fund invests. Market volatility, trading suspensions or government intervention with respect to individual issuers, and settlement difficulties in the China A-Shares markets may result in significant fluctuation in the prices of the securities traded on such markets and thereby changes in the net asset value of the Fund. The Fund may invest in China A Shares through the use of a Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor (“QFII”) license. There are rules and restrictions under current QFII regulations including rules on remittance of principal, investment restrictions, lock-up periods, and repatriation of principal and profits. Due to Chinese legal restrictions on repatriation of assets, proceeds from sales of China A-Shares cannot be immediately received by the Fund. The sub-advisor’s QFII status could be revoked, in which case the Fund may not be able to invest in Chinese securities and may required to dispose of its holdings, which would likely have a material adverse effect on the Fund.
|
|
■
|
Investing Through Stock Connect. The Fund may invest in China A-shares listed and traded through Stock Connect, or on such other stock exchanges in China which participate in Stock Connect from time to time or in the future. Trading through Stock Connect is subject to a number of restrictions that may affect a Fund’s investments and returns. For example, trading through Stock Connect is subject to daily quotas that limit the maximum daily net purchases on any particular day, which may restrict or preclude the Fund’s ability to invest in Stock Connect A-shares. In addition, investments made through Stock Connect are subject to trading, clearance and settlement procedures that are relatively untested in China, which could pose risks to the Fund. Furthermore, securities purchased via Stock Connect will be held via a book entry omnibus account in the name of Hong Kong Securities Clearing Company Limited (“HKSCC”), Hong Kong’s clearing entity, at the China Securities Depository and Clearing Corporation Limited (“CSDCC”). The Fund’s ownership interest in Stock Connect securities will not be reflected directly in book entry with CSDCC and will instead only be reflected on the books of its Hong Kong sub-custodian. The Fund may therefore depend on HKSCC’s ability or willingness as record-holder of Stock Connect securities to enforce the Fund’s shareholder rights. Chinese law did not historically recognize the concept of beneficial ownership; while Chinese regulations and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange have issued clarifications and guidance supporting the concept of beneficial ownership via Stock Connect, the interpretation of beneficial ownership in China by regulators and courts may continue to evolve. Moreover, Stock Connect A-shares generally may not be sold, purchased or otherwise transferred other than through Stock Connect in accordance with applicable rules. There can be no assurance as to the program’s continued existence or whether future developments regarding the program may restrict or adversely affect the Fund’s investments or returns. In addition, the application and interpretation of the laws and regulations of China and Hong Kong, and the rules, policies or guidelines published or applied by relevant regulators and exchanges in respect of the Stock Connect program, are uncertain, and they may have a detrimental effect on the Fund’s investments and returns. Because certain transactions through Stock Connect may not be subject to certain investor protection programs, the Fund may be exposed to the risks of default of the broker(s) they engage in their trading in China A Shares.
|
|
■
|
Pacific Basin Securities Risk. The Pacific Basin region includes countries in various stages of economic development. Many Pacific Basin countries are considered undeveloped or developing and may be subject to greater social, political and economic instability than is the case in the U.S. and Western European countries. This may include the influence of authoritarian governments and military involvement in decision-making, popular unrest, ethnic, religious and racial disaffection, and hostilities with neighboring countries. In addition, the region has historically been prone to natural disasters, the occurrence of which could negatively impact the economy of any country in the region. The economies of most countries in this region may be heavily dependent on international trade and may accordingly be affected by protective trade barriers and the economic conditions of their trading partners. These economies may depend to a significant degree upon only a few industries and/or exports of primary commodities and, therefore, be vulnerable to changes
|
|
in commodity prices that, in turn, may be affected by a variety of factors. Furthermore, many of the Pacific Basin economies may be characterized by higher inflation than other economies, frequent currency fluctuations, devaluations, or restrictions, and less efficient markets.
The securities markets in the Pacific Basin may be substantially smaller, less liquid and more volatile than the major securities markets in the U.S., and many companies traded on stock exchanges in the region may be smaller and less seasoned than companies whose securities are traded on stock exchanges in the U.S. The limited liquidity of securities markets in the Pacific Basin may also affect a Fund’s ability to acquire or dispose of securities at the price and time it wishes to do so. Changes in the value of those countries’ currencies against the U.S. dollar will result in corresponding changes in the U.S. dollar value of a Fund’s assets denominated in those currencies. Some countries prohibit or impose substantial restrictions on investments in their capital markets, particularly their equity markets, by foreign entities such as a Fund. There can be no assurance that the Fund will be able to obtain required governmental approvals in a timely manner. In addition, changes to restrictions on foreign ownership of securities subsequent to a Fund’s purchase of such securities may have an adverse effect on the value of such shares. Certain countries may restrict investment opportunities in issuers or industries deemed important to national interests. |
|
■
|
Recent Market Events Risk. Both U.S. and international markets have experienced significant volatility in recent months and years. As a result of such volatility, investment returns may fluctuate significantly. Moreover, the risks discussed herein associated with an investment in the Fund may be increased. Deteriorating economic fundamentals may increase the risk of default or insolvency of particular issuers, negatively impact market value, increase market volatility, cause credit spreads to widen, reduce bank balance sheets and cause unexpected changes in interest rates. Any of these could cause an increase in market volatility, reduce liquidity across various sectors or markets or decrease confidence in the markets. Historical patterns of correlation among asset classes may break down in unanticipated ways during times of high volatility, disrupting investment programs and potentially causing losses.
Although interest rates were unusually low in the U.S. and abroad for a period of time, in 2022, the U.S. Federal Reserve (the “Federal Reserve”) and certain foreign central banks began to raise interest rates as part of their efforts to address rising inflation. The Federal Reserve and certain foreign central banks have started to lower interest rates, though economic or other factors, such as inflation, could stop such changes. It is difficult to accurately predict the pace at which interest rates might change, the timing, frequency or magnitude of any such changes in interest rates, or when such changes might stop or again reverse course. Additionally, various economic and political factors could cause the Federal Reserve or foreign central banks to change their approach in the future as such actions may result in an economic slowdown both in the U.S. and abroad. Unexpected changes in interest rates could lead to significant market volatility or reduce liquidity in certain sectors of the market. It is difficult to predict the impact on various markets of significant interest rate changes or other significant policy changes. Some countries, including the U.S., have adopted more protectionist trade policies. Slowing global economic growth, imposition of tariffs and resulting impacts on global prices and supply chains; the rise in protectionist trade policies, inflationary pressures, changes to some major international trade agreements, risks associated with trade negotiations between countries and regions, including the U.S. and certain foreign nations, political or economic dysfunction within some nations, including the U.S., and dramatic changes in commodity and currency prices could have adverse effects that cannot be foreseen at the present time. In addition, if the U.S. dollar continues to be strong, it may decrease foreign demand for U.S. assets, which could have a negative on certain issuers and/or industries. Tensions, war or open conflict between nations, such as between Russia and Ukraine, in the Middle East or in eastern Asia could affect the economies of many nations, including the United States. The duration of ongoing hostilities and any sanctions and related events cannot be predicted. Those events present material uncertainty and risk with respect to markets globally and the performance of the Fund and its investments or operations could be negatively impacted. Regulators in the U.S. have adopted a number of changes to regulations involving the markets and issuers, some of which apply to the Fund. The full effect of various newly adopted regulations is not currently known. Certain of these changes could limit the Fund’s ability to pursue its investment strategies or make certain investments, or may make it more costly for the Fund to operate, which may impact performance. Additionally, it is possible that recently adopted regulations could be further revised or rescinded, which creates material uncertainty on their impact to the Fund. Further, advancements in technology may also adversely impact market movements and liquidity and may affect the overall performance of the Fund. For example, the advanced development and increased regulation of artificial intelligence may impact the economy and the performance of the Fund. As artificial intelligence is used more widely, the value of the Fund’s holdings may be impacted, which could impact the overall performance of the Fund. High public debt in the U.S. and other countries creates ongoing systemic and market risks and policymaking uncertainty. There is no assurance that the U.S. Congress will act to raise the nation’s debt ceiling; a failure to do so could cause market turmoil and substantial investment risks that cannot be fully predicted. Unexpected political, regulatory and diplomatic events within the U.S. and abroad may affect investor and consumer confidence and may adversely impact financial markets and the broader economy. Certain illnesses spread rapidly and have the potential to significantly and adversely affect the global economy. The impact of epidemics and/or pandemics that may arise in the future could negatively affect the economies of many nations, individual companies and the global securities and commodities markets, including their liquidity, in ways that cannot necessarily be foreseen at the present time and could last for an extended period of time. China’s economy, which has been sustained through debt-financed spending on housing and infrastructure, appears to be experiencing a significant slowdown and growing at a lower rate than prior years. Due to the size of China’s economy, such a slowdown could impact financial markets and the broader economy. Economists and others have expressed increasing concern about the potential effects of global climate change on property and security values. Impacts from climate change may include significant risks to global financial assets and economic growth. A rise in sea levels, an increase in powerful storms and/or a climate-driven increase in sea levels or flooding could cause coastal properties to lose value or become unmarketable altogether. Certain issuers, industries and regions may be adversely affected by the impacts of climate change in ways that cannot be foreseen, including on the demand for and the development of goods and services and related production costs, and the impacts of legislation, regulation and international accords related to climate change, as well as any indirect consequences of regulation or business trends driven by climate change. Regulatory changes and divestment movements tied to concerns about climate change could adversely affect the value of certain land and the viability of industries whose activities or products are seen as accelerating climate change. Losses related to climate change could adversely affect, among others, corporate issuers and mortgage lenders, the value of mortgage-backed securities, the bonds of municipalities that depend on tax or other revenues and tourist dollars generated by affected properties, and insurers of the property and/or of corporate, municipal or mortgage-backed securities. |
|
■
|
Exchange-Traded Funds (“ETFs”) Risk. Because ETFs are listed on an exchange, they may be subject to the following risks that do not apply to conventional funds: (1) the market price of an ETF’s shares may trade at a discount or premium to its NAV; (2) an active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained; or (3) trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem such action appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally. An ETF that tracks an index may not precisely replicate the returns of that index and may not be permitted to sell poorly performing stocks that are included in its index. An actively-managed ETF’s performance will reflect its adviser’s ability to make investment decisions that are suited to achieving the ETF’s investment objectives. Future legislative or regulatory changes, including changes in taxation, could impact the operation of ETFs.
|
|
■
|
Government Money Market Funds Risk. Investments in government money market funds are subject to interest rate risk, credit risk, and market risk. Interest rate risk is the risk that rising interest rates could cause the Fund’s investment to lose value. A decline in short-term interest rates or a low interest rate environment would lower a government money market fund’s yield and the return on the Fund’s investment. Credit risk is the risk that the issuer, guarantor or insurer of an obligation, or the counterparty to a transaction, may fail or become less able or unwilling, to make timely payment of interest or principal or otherwise honor its obligations, or that it may default completely. There is the risk that the issuers or guarantors of securities owned by a government money market fund, including securities issued by U.S. Government agencies, which are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government, will default on the payment of principal or interest or the obligation to repurchase securities from the government money market fund. This could cause the government money market fund’s NAV to decline below $1.00 per share, which would cause the Fund’s investment to lose value.
|
|
■
|
Information Technology Sector Risk. The Information Technology sector includes companies engaged in internet software and services, technology hardware and storage peripherals, electronic equipment instruments and components, and semiconductors and semiconductor equipment. Information Technology companies face intense competition, both domestically and internationally, which may have an adverse effect on profit margins. Information Technology companies may have limited product lines, markets, financial resources or personnel. The products of Information Technology companies may face rapid product obsolescence due to technological developments and frequent new product introduction, unpredictable changes in growth rates and competition for the services of qualified personnel. Failure to introduce new products, develop and maintain a loyal customer base or achieve general market acceptance for their products could have a material adverse effect on a company’s business. Companies in the Information Technology sector may be subject to increased government scrutiny or adverse government or regulatory action. Additionally, companies in the Information Technology sector are heavily dependent on intellectual property and the loss of patent, copyright and trademark protections may adversely affect the profitability of these companies. The market prices of Information Technology-related securities tend to exhibit a greater degree of market risk and sharp price fluctuations than other types of securities. These securities may fall in and out of favor with investors rapidly, which may cause sudden selling and dramatically lower market prices.
|
|
■
|
The MSCI® Emerging Markets Index (USD) captures large and mid cap representation across 24 Emerging Markets countries. With 1,252 constituents as of December 31, 2024, the index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each country. The MSCI® Emerging Markets Index (USD) returns reflect invested dividends net of withholding taxes, but reflect no deduction for fees, expenses, or other taxes.
|
|
First $5 billion
|
0.35%
|
|
Next $5 billion
|
0.325%
|
|
Next $10 billion
|
0.30%
|
|
Over $20 billion
|
0.275%
|
|
American Beacon Fund
|
Expiration Date
|
Y Class
|
R6 Class
|
R5 Class
|
|
American Beacon Ninety One Emerging Markets Equity Fund
|
February 21, 2028
|
0.92%
|
0.82%
|
0.85%
|
|
■
|
How long you expect to own the shares;
|
|
■
|
How much you intend to invest;
|
|
■
|
Total expenses associated with owning shares of each class;
|
|
■
|
Whether you plan to take any distributions in the near future; and
|
|
■
|
Availability of share classes.
|
|
|
New Account
|
Existing Account
|
|
|
Share Class
|
Minimum Initial Investment Amount
|
Purchase/Redemption Minimum by check/ACH/Exchange
|
Purchase/Redemption Minimum by Wire
|
|
Y
|
$100,000
|
$50
|
None
|
|
R6
|
None
|
$50
|
None
|
|
R5
|
$250,000
|
$50
|
None
|
|
• Your name/account registration
|
|
• Your account number
|
|
• Type of transaction requested
|
|
• Fund name(s) and fund number(s)
|
|
• Dollar amount or number of shares
|
|
Internet
|
www.americanbeaconfunds.com
|
|
|
Phone
|
To reach an American Beacon representative call 1-800-658-5811, option 1
|
|
|
Mail
|
American Beacon Funds
PO Box 219643
Kansas City, MO 64121-9643
|
Overnight Delivery:
American Beacon Funds
801 Pennsylvania Ave., Suite 219643
Kansas City, MO 64105-1307
|
|
■
|
ABA# 0110-0002-8; AC-9905-342-3,
|
|
■
|
Attn: American Beacon Funds,
|
|
■
|
the fund name and fund number, and
|
|
■
|
shareholder account number and registration.
|
|
|
New Account
|
Existing Account
|
|
|
Share Class
|
Minimum Initial Investment Amount
|
Purchase/Redemption Minimum by check/ACH/Exchange
|
Purchase/Redemption Minimum by Wire
|
|
Y
|
$100,000
|
$50
|
None
|
|
R6
|
None
|
$50
|
None
|
|
R5
|
$250,000
|
$50
|
None
|
|
■
|
with a request to send the proceeds to an address or commercial bank account other than the address or commercial bank account designated on the account application, or
|
|
■
|
for an account whose address has changed within the last 30 days if proceeds are sent by check.
|
|
Share Class
|
Account Balance
|
|
Y
|
$25,000
|
|
R6
|
$0
|
|
R5
|
$75,000
|
|
■
|
The Fund, its officers, trustees, employees, or agents are not responsible for the authenticity of instructions provided by telephone, nor for any loss, liability, cost or expense incurred for acting on them.
|
|
■
|
The Fund employs procedures reasonably designed to confirm that instructions communicated by telephone are genuine.
|
|
■
|
Due to the volume of calls or other unusual circumstances, telephone redemptions may be difficult to implement during certain time periods.
|
|
■
|
liquidate a shareholder’s account at the current day’s NAV per share and remit proceeds via check if the Fund or a financial institution is unable to verify the shareholder’s identity within three business days of account opening,
|
|
■
|
seek reimbursement from the shareholder for any related loss incurred by the Fund if payment for the purchase of Fund shares by check does not clear the shareholder’s bank, and
|
|
■
|
reject a purchase order and seek reimbursement from the shareholder for any related loss incurred by the Fund if funds are not received by the applicable wire deadline.
|
|
■
|
Send a letter to American Beacon Funds via the United States Post Office,
|
|
■
|
Speak to a Customer Service Representative on the phone after you go through a security verification process. For residents of certain states, contact cannot be made by phone but must be in writing or through the Fund’s secure web application,
|
|
■
|
Access your account through the Fund’s secure web application,
|
|
■
|
Cashing checks that are received and are made payable to the owner of the account.
|
|
American Beacon Funds
P.O. Box 219643 Kansas City, MO 64121-9643 1-800-658-5811 www.americanbeaconfunds.com |
|
■
|
shares acquired through the reinvestment of dividends and other distributions;
|
|
■
|
systematic purchases and redemptions;
|
|
■
|
shares redeemed to return excess IRA contributions; or
|
|
■
|
certain transactions made within a retirement or employee benefit plan, such as payroll contributions, minimum required distributions, loans, and hardship withdrawals, or other transactions that are initiated by a party other than the plan participant.
|
|
■
|
Reinvest All Distributions. You can elect to reinvest all distributions by the Fund in additional shares of the distributing class of that Fund.
|
|
■
|
Reinvest Only Some Distributions. You can elect to reinvest some types of distributions by the Fund in additional shares of the distributing class of that Fund while receiving the other types of distributions by that Fund by check or having them sent directly to your bank account by ACH (“in cash”).
|
|
■
|
Receive All Distributions in Cash. You can elect to receive all distributions in cash.
|
|
■
|
Reinvest Your Distributions in shares of another American Beacon Fund. You can reinvest all of your distributions by the Fund on a particular class of shares in shares of the same class of another American Beacon Fund that is available for exchanges. You must have an existing account in the same share class of the selected fund.
|
|
Type of Transaction
|
Federal Tax Status
|
|
Dividends from net investment income*
|
Ordinary income**
|
|
Distributions of the excess of net short-term capital gain over net long-term capital loss*
|
Ordinary income
|
|
Distributions of net gains from certain foreign currency transactions*
|
Ordinary income
|
|
Distributions of the excess of net long-term capital gain over net short-term capital loss (“net capital gain”)*
|
Long-term capital gains
|
|
Redemptions or exchanges of shares owned for more than one year
|
Long-term capital gains or losses
|
|
Redemptions or exchanges of shares owned for one year or less
|
Net gains are taxed at the same rate as ordinary income; net losses are subject to special rules
|
| * | Whether reinvested or taken in cash. |
| ** | Except for dividends that are attributable to ‘‘qualified dividend income,’’ if any. |
|
American Beacon Ninety One Emerging Markets Equity FundSM
|
|||||
|
|
Y Class(1)
|
||||
|
|
Year Ended October 31, 2024
|
Year Ended October 31, 2023
|
Year Ended October 31, 2022
|
Year Ended October 31, 2021
|
Year Ended October 31, 2020
|
|
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Year
|
$8.82
|
$8.03
|
$12.80
|
$10.97
|
$10.70
|
|
Income from Investment Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income (Loss)*
|
0.28
|
(0.02)
|
0.09
|
0.13
|
0.16
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)
|
2.08
|
0.81
|
(3.93
)
|
1.81
|
0.39
|
|
Total from Investment Operations
|
2.36
|
0.79
|
(3.84
)
|
1.94
|
0.55
|
|
Dividends and Distributions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
(0.01
)
|
–
|
(0.16
)
|
(0.11
)
|
(0.28
)
|
|
Capital Gains
|
–
|
–
|
(0.77
)
|
–
|
–
|
|
Total Dividends and Distributions
|
(0.01
)
|
–
|
(0.93
)
|
(0.11
)
|
(0.28
)
|
|
Net Asset Value, End of Year
|
$11.17
|
$8.82
|
$8.03
|
$12.80
|
$10.97
|
|
Total Return†
|
26.80
%
|
9.84
%
|
(32.22
)%
|
17.70
%
|
5.09
%
|
|
Ratios and Supplemental Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets, End of Year (Thousands)
|
$4
|
$3
|
$3
|
$17
|
$14
|
|
Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets
|
1.10
%
|
1.09
%
|
1.10
%
|
1.10
%
|
1.10
%
|
|
Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets(Excluding Waivers and Reimbursements)
|
1.32
%
|
1.75
%
|
1.42
%
|
1.52
%
|
1.92
%
|
|
Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets
|
2.68
%
|
(0.24
)%
|
0.80
%
|
0.99
%
|
1.54
%
|
|
Portfolio Turnover Rate
|
68
%
|
48
%
|
29
%
|
111
%
|
55
%
|
|
(1)
|
Prior to the reorganization on February 21, 2025, the Y Class was known as A Shares.
|
|
*
|
Per share calculations were performed using average shares for the period.
|
|
†
|
Total return is for the period indicated and has not been annualized. Returns shown do not reflect the deductions of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares.
|
|
|
Amounts designated as “—” are either not applicable, $0 or have been rounded to $0.
|
|
American Beacon Ninety One Emerging Markets Equity FundSM
|
|||||
|
|
R5 Class(1)
|
||||
|
|
Year Ended October 31, 2024
|
Year Ended October 31, 2023
|
Year Ended October 31, 2022
|
Year Ended October 31, 2021
|
Year Ended October 31, 2020
|
|
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Year
|
$8.75
|
$8.05
|
$12.83
|
$10.99
|
$10.72
|
|
Income from Investment Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income*
|
0.16
|
0.15
|
0.29
|
0.20
|
0.18
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)
|
2.17
|
0.66
|
(4.11
)
|
1.78
|
0.40
|
|
Total from Investment Operations
|
2.33
|
0.81
|
(3.82
)
|
1.98
|
0.58
|
|
Dividends and Distributions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
(0.22
)
|
(0.11
)
|
(0.19
)
|
(0.14
)
|
(0.31
)
|
|
Capital Gains
|
–
|
–
|
(0.77
)
|
–
|
–
|
|
Total Dividends and Distributions
|
(0.22
)
|
(0.11
)
|
(0.96
)
|
(0.14
)
|
(0.31
)
|
|
Net Asset Value, End of Year
|
$10.86
|
$8.75
|
$8.05
|
$12.83
|
$10.99
|
|
Total Return†
|
26.95
%
|
10.00
%
|
(32.04
)%
|
18.00
%
|
5.32
%
|
|
Ratios and Supplemental Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets, End of Year (Thousands)
|
$330,063
|
$256,066
|
$128,942
|
$106,391
|
$56,863
|
|
Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets
|
0.85
%
|
0.85
%
|
0.85
%
|
0.85
%
|
0.85
%
|
|
Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets (Excluding Waivers and Reimbursements)
|
1.07
%
|
1.09
%
|
1.15
%
|
1.29
%
|
1.65
%
|
|
Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets
|
1.54
%
|
1.67
%
|
2.80
%
|
1.52
%
|
1.74
%
|
|
Portfolio Turnover Rate
|
68
%
|
48
%
|
29
%
|
111
%
|
55
%
|
|
(1)
|
Prior to the reorganization on February 21, 2025, the R5 Class was known as I Shares.
|
|
*
|
Per share calculations were performed using average shares for the period.
|
|
†
|
Total return is for the period indicated and has not been annualized. Returns shown do not reflect the deductions of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares.
|
|
|
Amounts designated as “—” are either not applicable, $0 or have been rounded to $0.
|
|
By Telephone:
|
Call
1-800-658-5811 |
|
By Mail:
|
American Beacon Funds
P.O. Box 219643 Kansas City, MO 64121-9643 |
|
By E-mail:
|
americanbeaconfunds@ambeacon.com
|
|
On the Internet:
|
|
American Beacon is a registered service mark of American Beacon Advisors, Inc. The American Beacon Funds and American Beacon Ninety One Emerging Markets Equity Fund are service marks of American Beacon Advisors, Inc.
|
![]() |
|
ACH
|
Automated Clearing House
|
|
|
Advisers Act
|
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended
|
|
|
American Beacon or Manager
|
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.
|
|
|
Beacon Funds or Trust
|
American Beacon Funds
|
|
|
Board
|
Board of Trustees
|
|
|
Brexit
|
The United Kingdom’s departure from the European Union
|
|
|
Capital Gains Distributions
|
Distributions of realized net capital gains
|
|
|
CDSC
|
Contingent Deferred Sales Charge
|
|
|
CFTC
|
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
|
|
|
CPO
|
Commodity Pool Operator
|
|
|
Denial of Services
|
A cybersecurity incident that results in shareholders or service providers being unable to access electronic systems
|
|
|
Distributor
|
Resolute Investment Distributors, Inc.
|
|
|
Dividends
|
Distributions from the Fund’s net investment income
|
|
|
DRD
|
Dividends-received deduction
|
|
|
EU
|
European Union
|
|
|
FCA
|
UK Financial Conduct Authority
|
|
|
FHLB
|
Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
Forwards
|
Forward Currency Contracts
|
|
|
GNMA
|
Government National Mortgage Association
|
|
|
Internal Revenue Code
|
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
|
|
|
Investment Company Act
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended
|
|
|
IRA
|
Individual Retirement Account
|
|
|
IRS
|
Internal Revenue Service
|
|
|
Junk Bonds
|
High yield, non-investment grade bonds
|
|
|
LOI
|
Letter of Intent
|
|
|
Management Agreement
|
The Fund’s Management Agreement with the Manager
|
|
|
Model
|
Proprietary Mathematical Quantitative Model
|
|
|
Moody’s
|
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.
|
|
|
NAV
|
Fund’s net asset value
|
|
|
NDF
|
Non-deliverable foreign currency forward contract
|
|
|
NYSE
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
|
|
Other Distributions
|
Distributions of net gains from foreign currency transactions
|
|
|
OTC
|
Over-the-Counter
|
|
|
QDI
|
Qualified Dividend Income
|
|
|
REIT
|
Real Estate Investment Trust
|
|
|
RIC
|
Regulated Investment Company
|
|
|
SAI
|
Statement of Additional Information
|
|
|
SEC
|
Securities and Exchange Commission
|
|
|
State Street
|
State Street Bank and Trust Company
|
|
|
SVP
|
Signature Validation Program
|
|
|
UGMA
|
Uniform Gifts to Minors Act
|
|
|
UK
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
UTMA
|
Uniform Transfers to Minors Act
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Ticker
|
||
|
Share Class
|
Y
|
R6
|
R5
|
|
American Beacon Ninety One Emerging Markets Equity Fund
|
ZEMAX
|
ZEMRX
|
ZEMIX
|
|
■
|
Government Money Market Funds. The Fund may invest cash balances in money market funds that are registered as investment companies under the Investment Company Act, including money market funds that are advised by the Manager. Money market funds invest in highly-liquid, short-term instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, and debt securities with high credit ratings and short-term maturities, such as U.S. Treasuries. A “government money market fund” is required to invest at least 99.5% of its total assets in cash, U.S. government securities, and/or repurchase agreements that are fully collateralized by government securities or cash. Government securities include any security issued or guaranteed as to principal or interest by the U.S. government and its agencies or instrumentalities. By investing in a money market fund, the Fund becomes a shareholder of that money market fund. As a result, Fund shareholders indirectly bear their proportionate share of the expenses of the money market funds in which the Fund invests in addition to any fees and expenses Fund shareholders directly bear in connection with the Fund’s own operations. These expenses may include, for example, advisory and administrative fees, including advisory fees charged by the Manager to any applicable money market funds advised by the Manager. These other fees and expenses are reflected in the Fees and Expenses Table for the Fund in its Prospectus, if applicable. Shareholders also would be exposed to the risks associated with money market funds and the portfolio investments of such money market funds, including that a money market fund’s yield will be lower than the return that the Fund would have derived from other investments that would provide liquidity. Although a money market fund is designed to be a relatively low risk investment, it is not free of risk. Despite the short maturities and high credit quality of a money market fund’s investments, increases in interest rates and deteriorations in the credit quality of the instruments the money market fund has purchased can cause the price of a money market security to decrease and may reduce the money market fund’s yield. In addition, a money market fund is subject to the risk that the value of an investment may be eroded over time by inflation. Factors that could adversely affect the value of a money market fund’s shares include, among other things, a sharp rise in interest rates, an illiquid market for the securities held by the money market fund, a high volume of redemption activity in a money market fund’s shares, and a credit event or credit rating downgrade affecting one or more of the issuers of securities held by the money market fund. There can be no assurance that a money market fund will maintain a $1.00 per share net asset value (“NAV”) at all times.
|
|
■
|
Government Obligations. Government obligations may include U.S. Treasury securities, Treasury inflation-protected securities, and other debt instruments backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, or debt obligations of U.S. Government-sponsored entities.
|
|
■
|
Forward Foreign Currency Contracts. The Fund may enter into forward foreign currency contracts (“forward currency contracts”), which are a type of derivative instrument, for a variety of reasons. A forward currency contract involves an obligation to purchase or sell a specified currency at a future date, which may be any fixed number of days from the date of the contract agreed upon by the parties at a price set at the time of the contract. Because these forward currency contracts normally are settled through an exchange of currencies, they are traded in the interbank market directly between currency traders (usually large commercial banks) and their customers.
|
|
Forward currency contracts may serve as long hedges. For example, the Fund may purchase a forward currency contract to lock in the U.S. dollar price of a security denominated in a foreign currency that it intends to acquire. Forward currency contract transactions also may serve as short hedges. For example, the Fund may sell a forward currency contract to lock in the U.S. dollar equivalent of the proceeds from the anticipated sale of a security or from a dividend or interest payment on a security denominated in a foreign currency.
|
|
The Fund may enter into forward currency contracts to sell a foreign currency for a fixed U.S. dollar amount approximating the value of some or all of its respective portfolio securities denominated in such foreign currency. In addition, the Fund may use forward currency contracts when the sub-advisor wishes to “lock in” the U.S. dollar price of a security when the Fund is purchasing or selling a security denominated in a foreign currency or anticipates receiving a dividend or interest payment denominated in a foreign currency.
|
|
The Fund may enter into forward currency contracts for the purchase or sale of a specified currency at a specified future date either with respect to specific transactions or with respect to portfolio positions in order to minimize the risk to the Fund from adverse changes in the relationship between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies.
|
|
The Fund may use forward currency contracts to seek to hedge against, or profit from, changes in the value of a particular currency by using forward currency contracts on another foreign currency or a basket of currencies, the value of which the sub-advisor believes will have a positive correlation to the values of the currency being hedged. When hedging, use of a different foreign currency magnifies the risk that movements in the price of the forward contract will not correlate or will correlate unfavorably with the foreign currency being hedged.
|
|
In addition, the Fund may use forward currency contracts to shift exposure to foreign currency fluctuations from one country to another. For example, if the Fund owned securities denominated in a foreign currency that the sub-advisor believed would decline relative to another currency, it might enter into a forward currency contract to sell an appropriate amount of the first foreign currency, with payment to be made in the second currency. Transactions that involve two foreign currencies are sometimes referred to as “cross hedging.” Use of a different foreign currency magnifies the Fund’s exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.
|
|
The Fund also may enter into forward currency contracts for non-hedging purposes if a foreign currency is anticipated to appreciate or depreciate in value, but securities denominated in that currency do not present attractive investment opportunities and are not held in the Fund’s investment portfolio.
|
|
The cost to the Fund of engaging in forward currency contracts varies with factors such as the currency involved, the length of the contract period and the market conditions then prevailing. Because forward currency contracts usually are entered into on a principal basis, no fees or commissions are involved. When the Fund enters into a forward currency contract, it relies on the counterparty to make or take delivery of the underlying currency at the maturity of the contract. Failure by the counterparty to do so would result in the loss of any expected benefit of the transaction.
|
|
Sellers or purchasers of forward currency contracts can enter into offsetting closing transactions, similar to closing transactions on futures, by purchasing or selling, respectively, an instrument identical to the instrument sold or bought, respectively. Secondary markets generally do not exist for forward currency contracts, however, with the result that closing transactions generally can be made for forward currency contracts only by negotiating directly with the counterparty. Thus, there can be no assurance that the Fund will in fact be able to close out a forward currency contract at a favorable price prior to maturity. In addition, in the event of insolvency of the counterparty, the Fund might be unable to close out a forward currency contract at any time prior to maturity. In either event, the Fund would continue to be subject to market risk with respect to the position, and would continue to be required to maintain a position in the securities or currencies that are the subject of the hedge or to maintain cash or securities.
|
|
The precise matching of forward currency contract amounts and the value of securities whose U.S. dollar value is being hedged by those contracts involved generally will not be possible because the value of such securities, measured in the foreign currency, will change after the forward currency contract has been established. Thus, the Fund might need to purchase or sell foreign currencies in the spot (cash) market to the extent such foreign currencies are not covered by forward contracts. The projection of short-term currency market movements is extremely difficult, and the successful execution of a short-term hedging strategy is highly uncertain.
|
|
The Fund bears the risk of loss of the amount expected to be received under a forward currency contract in the event of the default or bankruptcy of a counterparty. If such a default occurs, the Fund may have contractual remedies pursuant to the forward currency contract, but such remedies may be subject to bankruptcy and insolvency laws which could affect the Fund’s rights as a creditor.
|
|
At the maturity of a forward contract, the Fund may sell the portfolio security and make delivery of the foreign currency, or it may retain the security and either extend the maturity of the forward contract (by “rolling” that contract forward) or may initiate a new forward contract. If the Fund retains the portfolio security and engages in an offsetting transaction, the Fund will incur a gain or a loss (as described below) to the extent that there has been movement in forward contract prices. If the Fund engages in an offsetting transaction, it may subsequently enter into a new forward contract to sell the foreign currency.
|
|
Should forward prices decline during the period between the Fund’s entering into a forward contract for the sale of a foreign currency and the date it enters into an offsetting contract for the purchase of the foreign currency, the Fund will realize a gain to the extent the price of the currency it has agreed to sell exceeds the price of the currency it has agreed to purchase. Should forward prices increase, the Fund will suffer a loss to the extent the price of the currency it has agreed to purchase exceeds the price of the currency it has agreed to sell.
|
|
Forward currency contracts in which the Fund may engage include foreign exchange forwards. The consummation of a foreign exchange forward requires the actual exchange of the principal amounts of the two currencies in the contract (i.e., settlement on a physical basis). Because foreign exchange forwards are physically settled through an exchange of currencies, they are traded in the interbank market directly between currency traders (usually large commercial banks) and their customers. A foreign exchange forward generally has no deposit requirement, and no commissions are charged at any stage for trades; foreign exchange dealers realize a profit based on the difference (the spread) between the prices at which they are buying and the prices at which they are selling various currencies. When the Fund enters into a foreign exchange forward, it relies on the counterparty to make or take delivery of the underlying currency at the maturity of the contract. Failure by the counterparty to do so would result in the loss of any expected benefit of the transaction.
|
|
The Fund may be required to obtain the currency that it must deliver under the foreign exchange forward through the sale of portfolio securities denominated in such currency or through conversion of other assets of the Fund into such currency. When the Fund engages in foreign currency transactions for hedging purposes, it will not enter into foreign exchange forwards to sell currency or maintain a net exposure to such contracts if their consummation would obligate the Fund to deliver an amount of foreign currency materially in excess of the value of its portfolio securities or other assets denominated in that currency.
|
|
■
|
Futures Contracts. The Fund may enter into futures contracts. Futures contracts are a type of derivative instrument that obligate the purchaser to take delivery of, or cash settle a specific amount of, a commodity, security or other obligation underlying the contract at a specified time in the future for a specified price. Likewise, the seller incurs an obligation to deliver the specified amount of the underlying obligation against receipt of the specified price. Futures are traded on both U.S. and foreign commodities exchanges. The purchase of futures can serve as a long hedge, and the sale of futures can serve as a short hedge.
No price is paid upon entering into a futures contract. Instead, at the inception of a futures contract, the Fund is required to deposit “initial margin” consisting of cash, U.S. Government securities, suitable money market instruments, or liquid, high-grade debt securities in an amount set by the exchange on which the contract is traded and varying based on the volatility of the underlying asset. Margin must also be deposited when writing a call or put option on a futures contract, in accordance with applicable exchange rules. Unlike margin in securities transactions, initial margin on futures contracts does not represent a borrowing, but rather is in the nature of a performance bond or good-faith deposit that is returned to the Fund at the termination of the transaction if all contractual obligations have been satisfied. Under certain circumstances, such as periods of high volatility, the Fund may be required by a futures exchange to increase the level of its initial margin payment, and initial margin requirements might be increased generally in the future by regulatory action. Subsequent “variation margin” payments (sometimes referred to as “maintenance margin” payments) are made to and from the futures broker daily as the value of the futures position varies, a process known as “marking-to-market.” Variation margin does not involve borrowing, but rather represents a daily settlement of the Fund’s obligations to or from a futures broker. When the |
|
Fund purchases or sells a futures contract, it is subject to daily, or even intraday, variation margin calls that could be substantial in the event of adverse price movements. If the Fund has insufficient cash to meet daily or intraday variation margin requirements, it might need to sell securities at a time when such sales are disadvantageous.
Purchasers and sellers of futures contracts can enter into offsetting closing transactions, by selling or purchasing, respectively, an instrument identical to the instrument purchased or sold. Positions in futures contracts may be closed only on a futures exchange or board of trade that trades that contract. The Fund intends to enter into futures contracts only on exchanges or boards of trade where there appears to be a liquid secondary market. However, there can be no assurance that such a market will exist for a particular contract at a particular time. In such event, it may not be possible to close a futures contract. Although many futures contracts by their terms call for the actual delivery or acquisition of the underlying asset, in most cases the contractual obligation is fulfilled before the date of the contract without having to make or take delivery of the securities or currency. The offsetting of a contractual obligation is accomplished by buying (or selling, as appropriate) on a commodities exchange an identical futures contract calling for delivery in the same month. Such a transaction, which is effected through a member of an exchange, cancels the obligation to make or take delivery of the securities or currency. Since all transactions in the futures market are made, offset or fulfilled through a clearinghouse associated with the exchange on which the contracts are traded, the Fund will incur brokerage fees when it purchases or sells futures contracts. If an offsetting purchase price is less than the original sale price, the Fund realizes a capital gain, or if it is more, the Fund realizes a capital loss. Conversely, if an offsetting sell price is more than the original purchase price, the Fund realizes a capital gain, or if it is less, the Fund realizes a capital loss. The Fund has no current intent to accept physical delivery in connection with the settlement of futures contracts. Under certain circumstances, futures exchanges may establish daily limits on the amount that the price of a futures contract can vary from the previous day’s settlement price; once that limit is reached, no trades may be made that day at a price beyond the limit. Daily price limits do not limit potential losses because prices could move to the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading, thereby preventing liquidation of unfavorable positions. If the Fund were unable to liquidate a futures contract due to the absence of a liquid secondary market or the imposition of price limits, it could incur substantial losses. The Fund would continue to be subject to market risk with respect to the position. In addition, the Fund would continue to be required to make daily variation margin payments and might be required to maintain the position being hedged by the futures contract or option thereon or to maintain cash or securities in a segregated account. The ordinary spreads between prices in the cash and futures markets, due to differences in the nature of those markets, are subject to distortions. The liquidity of the futures market depends on participants entering into offsetting transactions rather than making or taking delivery. To the extent participants decide to make or take delivery, liquidity in the futures market could be reduced, thus producing distortion. Third, from the point of view of speculators, the margin deposit requirements in the futures market are less onerous than margin requirements in the securities market. Therefore, increased participation by speculators in the futures market may cause temporary price distortions. Due to the possibility of distortion, a correct forecast of securities price or currency exchange rate trends by the sub-advisor may still not result in a successful transaction. Futures contracts also entail other risks. Although the use of such contracts may benefit the Fund, if investment judgment about the general direction of, for example, an index is incorrect, the Fund’s overall performance would be worse than if it had not entered into any such contract. The degree of imperfection of correlation depends on circumstances such as variations in speculative market demand for futures, including technical influences in futures trading, and differences between the financial instruments being hedged and the instruments underlying the standard contracts available for trading in such respects as interest rate levels, maturities, and creditworthiness of issuers. A decision as to whether, when and how to hedge involves the exercise of skill and judgment, and even a well-conceived hedge may be unsuccessful to some degree because of market behavior or unexpected interest rate trends. |
|
■
|
Index Futures Contracts. An index futures contract, such as an equity index futures contract or a bond index futures contract, is based on the value of an underlying index. Futures contracts on indices expose the Fund to volatility in an underlying index.
|
|
■
|
Options — The Fund may invest in options contracts on foreign currencies. An option is a contract that gives the purchaser (holder) of the option, in return for a premium, the right to buy from (call) or sell to (put) the seller (writer) of the option the underlying reference asset at a specified exercise price at any time during the term of the option (normally not exceeding nine months). The writer of a currency option has the obligation, upon exercise of the option, to deliver or pay the value of the underlying currency, upon payment of the exercise price, or to pay the exercise price upon delivery of the underlying currency. Transactions for exchange-traded options may be made only on a national securities exchange. It is impossible to predict the volume of trading that may exist in such options, and there can be no assurance that viable exchange markets will develop or continue. There is no assurance that a liquid secondary market will exist for a particular option, or at any particular time, and for some options, such as OTC options, no secondary market may exist. The hours of trading for options may not conform to the hours during which the underlying reference asset is traded. To the extent that the option markets close before the markets for the reference asset, significant price and rate movements can take place in the reference asset that cannot be reflected in the option markets. The Fund may use NDOs, which are foreign exchange products designed to assist in reducing foreign currency exchange risk, in situations where physical delivery of the underlying currency is not required or not possible. Options that trade OTC involve liquidity and credit risks that may not be present in exchange-traded options. The Fund may use options on foreign currencies to protect against decreases in the U.S. dollar value of securities held or increases in the U.S. dollar cost of securities to be acquired by the Fund or to protect the U.S. dollar equivalent of dividends, interest, or other payments on those securities.
|
|
■
|
Rights. Rights are options to purchase an issuer’s securities at a stated price during a stated term, usually at a price below the initial offering price of the securities and before the securities are offered to the general public. Rights are similar to warrants but typically have a shorter duration. Rights are usually freely transferable, but may not be as liquid as exchange-traded options. In addition, the terms of a right may limit the Fund’s ability to exercise the right at such time, or in such quantities, as the Fund would otherwise wish. Rights usually have no voting rights, pay no dividends and have no rights with respect to the assets of the corporation issuing them. A right ceases to have value if it is not exercised prior to its expiration date. As a result, rights may be considered more speculative than certain other types of investments.
|
|
■
|
Swap Agreements. A swap is a transaction in which the Fund and a counterparty agree to pay or receive payments at specified dates based upon or calculated by reference to changes in specified prices or rates (e.g., interest rates in the case of interest rate swaps) or the performance of specified securities or indices based on a specified amount (the “notional” amount). Nearly any type of derivative, including forward contracts, can be structured as a swap. See “Derivatives” for a further discussion of derivatives risks. Swap agreements can be structured to provide exposure to a
|
|
variety of different types of investments or market factors. For example, in an interest rate swap, fixed-rate payments may be exchanged for floating rate payments; in a currency swap, U.S. dollar-denominated payments may be exchanged for payments denominated in a foreign currency; and in a total return swap, payments tied to the investment return on a particular asset, group of assets or index may be exchanged for payments that are effectively equivalent to interest payments or for payments tied to the return on another asset, group of assets, or index. Swaps may have a leverage component, and adverse changes in the value or level of the underlying asset, reference rate or index can result in gains or losses that are substantially greater than the amount invested in the swap itself. Some swaps currently are, and more in the future will be, centrally cleared. Swaps that are centrally-cleared are exposed to the creditworthiness of the clearing organizations (and, consequently, that of their members - generally, banks and broker-dealers) involved in the transaction. For example, an investor could lose margin payments it has deposited with the clearing organization as well as the net amount of gains not yet paid by the clearing organization if it breaches its agreement with the investor or becomes insolvent or goes into bankruptcy. In the event of bankruptcy of the clearing organization, the investor may be able to recover only a portion of the net amount of gains on its transactions and of the margin owed to it, potentially resulting in losses to the investor. Swaps that are not centrally cleared involve the risk that a loss may be sustained as a result of the insolvency or bankruptcy of the counterparty or the failure of the counterparty to make required payments or otherwise comply with the terms of the agreement. If a counterparty’s creditworthiness declines, the value of the swap might decline, potentially resulting in losses to the Fund. Changing conditions in a particular market area, whether or not directly related to the referenced assets that underlie the swap agreement, may have an adverse impact on the creditworthiness of a counterparty. To mitigate this risk, the Fund will only enter into swap agreements with counterparties considered by the sub-advisor to present minimum risk of default, and the Fund normally obtains collateral to secure its exposure. Swaps involve the risk that, if the swap declines in value, additional margin would be required to maintain the margin level. The seller may require the Fund to deposit additional sums to cover this, and this may be at short notice. If additional margin is not provided in time, the seller may liquidate the positions at a loss, which may cause the Fund to owe money to the seller. The centrally cleared and OTC swap agreements into which the Fund enters normally provide for the obligations of the Fund and its counterparty in the event of a default or other early termination to be determined on a net basis. Similarly, periodic payments on a swap transaction that are due by each party on the same day normally are netted. The use of swap agreements requires special skills, knowledge and investment techniques that differ from those required for normal portfolio management. Swaps may be considered illiquid investments, and the Fund may be unable to sell a swap agreement to a third party at a favorable price. The Fund may invest in the following types of swaps:
|
|
■
|
Currency Swaps. A currency swap involves the exchange of payments denominated in one currency for payments denominated in another. Payments are based on a notional principal amount, the value of which is fixed in exchange rate terms at the swap’s inception. Currency swap agreements may be entered into on a net basis or may involve the delivery of the entire principal value of one designated currency in exchange for the entire principal value of another designated currency. In such cases, the entire principal value of a currency swap is subject to the risk that the counterparty will default on its contractual delivery obligations. Currency swaps are also subject to currency risk.
|
|
■
|
Common Stock. Common stock generally takes the form of shares in a corporation which represent an ownership interest. It ranks below preferred stock and debt securities in claims for dividends and for assets of the company in a liquidation or bankruptcy. The value of a company’s common stock may fall as a result of factors directly relating to that company, such as decisions made by its management or decreased demand for the company’s products or services. A stock’s value may also decline because of factors affecting not just the company, but also companies in the same industry or sector. The price of a company’s stock may also be affected by changes in financial markets that are relatively unrelated to the company, such as changes in interest rates, currency exchange rates or industry regulation. Companies that elect to pay dividends on their common stock generally only do so after they invest in their own business and make required payments to bondholders and on other debt, and preferred stock. Therefore, the value of a company’s common stock will usually be more volatile than its bonds, other debt and preferred stock. Common stock may be exchange-traded or traded over-the-counter. OTC stock may be less liquid than exchange-traded stock.
|
|
■
|
Depositary Receipts. The Fund may invest in depositary receipts, which represent ownership interests in securities of foreign companies (an “underlying issuer”) that have been deposited with a bank or trust and that trade on an exchange or OTC. Depositary receipts may not be denominated in the same currency as the securities into which they may be converted, and they are subject to the risk of fluctuation in the currency exchange rate. Investing in depositary receipts entails substantially the same risks as direct investment in foreign securities. There is generally less publicly available information about foreign companies and there may be less governmental regulation and supervision of foreign stock exchanges, brokers, and listed companies. In addition, such companies may use different accounting and financial standards (and certain currencies may become unavailable for transfer from a foreign currency), resulting in the Fund’s possible inability to convert immediately into U.S. currency proceeds realized upon the sale of portfolio securities of the affected foreign companies. In addition, the issuers of unsponsored depositary receipts are not obligated to disclose material information about the underlying securities to investors in the United States. Ownership of unsponsored depositary receipts may not entitle the Fund to the same benefits and rights as ownership of a sponsored depositary receipt or the underlying security. Please see “Foreign Securities” below for a description of the risks associated with investments in foreign securities. The Fund may invest in the following type of depositary receipts:
|
|
■
|
ADRs. ADRs are depositary receipts for foreign issuers in registered form, typically issued by a U.S. financial institution, traded in U.S. securities markets.
|
|
■
|
EDRs. EDRs, which are sometimes called Continental Depositary Receipts, are issued in Europe in bearer form and are traded in European securities markets.
|
|
■
|
GDRs. GDRs are in bearer form and traded in both the U.S. and European securities markets.
|
|
■
|
Initial Public Offerings. The Fund can invest in IPOs. By definition, securities issued in IPOs have not traded publicly until the time of their offerings. Special risks associated with IPOs may include, among others, the fact that there may only be a limited number of shares available for trading. The market for those securities may be unseasoned. The issuer may have a limited operating history. These factors may contribute to price volatility. The limited number of shares available for trading in some IPOs may also make it more difficult for the Fund to buy or sell significant amounts of shares without an unfavorable impact on prevailing prices. In addition, some companies initially offering their shares publicly are involved in relatively new industries or lines of business, which may not be widely understood by investors. Some of the companies involved in new industries may be regarded
|
|
as developmental state companies, without revenues or operating income, or the near-term prospects of them. Many IPOs are by small- or micro-cap companies that are undercapitalized. IPOs may adversely impact the Fund’s performance. However, the impact of IPOs on the Fund’s performance will likely decrease as the Fund’s asset size increases.
|
|
■
|
Chinese Company Securities. Investing in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan involves a high degree of risk, and special considerations not typically associated with investing in other more established economies or securities markets. Such risks may include: (a) the risk of nationalization or expropriation of assets, or confiscatory taxation; (b) greater social, economic and political uncertainty (including the risk of war); (c) dependency on exports and the corresponding importance of international trade; (d) increasing competition from Asia’s other low-cost emerging economies; (e) greater price volatility, substantially less liquidity and significantly smaller market capitalization of securities markets, particularly in China; (f) currency exchange rate fluctuations and the lack of available currency hedging instruments; (g) higher rates of inflation; (h) controls on foreign investment and limitations on repatriation of invested capital and on the Fund’s ability to exchange local currencies for U.S. dollars; (i) greater governmental involvement in and control over the economy, and greater intervention in the Chinese financial markets, such as the imposition of trading restrictions; (j) the risk that the Chinese government may decide not to continue to support economic reform programs currently in place and could return to the completely centrally planned economy that was in place prior to 1978; (k) the fact that Chinese companies, particularly those located in China, may be smaller, less seasoned and newly-organized; (l) the difference in, or lack of, auditing and financial reporting standards that may result in unavailability of material information about issuers, particularly in China; (m) the fact that statistical information regarding the Chinese economy may be inaccurate or not comparable to statistical information regarding the U.S. or other economies; (n) the less extensive, and still developing, regulation of the securities markets, business entities and commercial transactions; (o) the fact that the settlement period of securities transactions in foreign markets may be longer; (p) uncertainty surrounding the willingness and ability of the Chinese government to support the Chinese and Hong Kong economies and markets; (q) the risk that it may be more difficult or impossible, to obtain and/or enforce a judgment than in other countries; (r) the rapidity and erratic nature of growth, particularly in China, resulting in inefficiencies and dislocations; (s) more frequent (and potentially widespread) trading suspensions and government interventions with respect to Chinese issuers; (t) limitations on the use of brokers (or action by the Chinese government that discourages brokers from serving international clients); and (u) the risk that, because of the degree of interconnectivity between the economies and financial markets of China, Hong Kong and Taiwan, any sizable reduction in the demand for goods from China, or an economic downturn in China could negatively affect the economies and financial markets of Hong Kong and Taiwan, as well. In addition, the China Securities Regulatory Commission recently met with local law firms and asked them to tone down negative descriptions of China’s policies in prospectuses of companies going public outside the mainland in markets such as Hong Kong and the United States. Comments in IPO listing documents that misrepresent or disparage laws and policies, the business environment and judicial situation of China are now barred. Such new
|
|
listing regime would inevitably deny approval for offshore listing applications and further dampen the stock market sentiment, which in turn negatively affects markets and the value of the Fund’s investments. China’s economy has transitioned from a rigidly central-planned state-run economy to one that has been only partially reformed by more market-oriented policies. Although the Chinese government has implemented economic reform measures, reduced state ownership of companies and established better corporate governance practices, a substantial portion of productive assets in China are still owned by the Chinese government. The government continues to exercise significant control in regulating industrial development and, ultimately, control over China’s economic growth through the allocation of resources, controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, setting monetary policy and providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies. The Chinese government has from time to time taken actions that influence the prices at which certain goods may be sold, encourage companies to invest or concentrate in particular industries, induce mergers between companies in certain industries and induce private companies to publicly offer their securities to increase or continue the rate of economic growth, control the rate of inflation or otherwise regulate economic expansion. Investments in China involve risk of a total loss due to government action or inaction. China continues to limit direct foreign investments generally in industries deemed important to national interests. Foreign investment in domestic securities are also subject to substantial restrictions. Some believe that China’s currency is undervalued. Currency fluctuations could significantly affect China and its trading partners. China continues to exercise control over the value of its currency, rather than allowing the value of the currency to be determined by market forces. This type of currency regime may experience sudden and significant currency adjustments, which may adversely impact investment returns.
For decades, a state of hostility has existed between Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China. Beijing has long deemed Taiwan a part of the “one China” and has made a nationalist cause of recovering it. This situation poses a threat to Taiwan’s economy and could negatively affect its stock market. By treaty, China has committed to preserve Hong Kong’s autonomy and its economic, political and social freedoms until 2047. However, if China would exert its authority so as to alter the economic, political or legal structures or the existing social policy of Hong Kong, investor and business confidence in Hong Kong could be negatively affected, which in turn could negatively affect markets and business performance. In addition, the Hong Kong dollar trades within a fixed trading bond rate to (or is “pegged” to) the U.S. dollar. This fixed exchange rate has contributed to the growth and stability of the Hong Kong economy. However, some market participants have questioned the continued viability of the currency peg. It is uncertain what affect any discontinuation of the currency peg, and the establishment of an alternative exchange rate system would have on capital markets generally and the Hong Kong economy. As demonstrated by protests in Hong Kong in 2019 and 2020 over political, economic, and legal freedoms, and the Chinese government’s response to the protests, there continues to be a great deal of political unrest, which may result in economic disruption. China could be affected by military events on the Korean peninsula or internal instability within North Korea. North Korea and South Korea each have substantial military capabilities, and historical tensions between the two countries present the risk of war. Any outbreak of hostilities between the two countries could have a severe adverse effect on the South Korean economy and securities market. These situations may cause uncertainty in the Chinese market and may adversely affect performance of the Chinese economy. In addition, China has strained international relations with Japan, India, Russia and other neighbors due to territorial disputes, historical animosities and other defense concerns. China is also alleged to have participated in state-sponsored cyberattacks against foreign companies and foreign governments. Actual and threatened responses to such activity and strained international relations, including purchasing restrictions, sanctions, tariffs or cyberattacks on the Chinese government or Chinese companies, may impact China’s economy and Chinese issuers of securities in which the Fund invests. Investment in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan is subject to certain political risks. The current political climate has intensified concerns about trade tariffs and a potential trade war between China and the United States, despite the United States signing a partial trade agreement with China that reduced some U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods while boosting Chinese purchases of American goods. However, this agreement left in place a number of existing tariffs, and it is unclear whether further trade agreements may be reached in the future. The ability and willingness of China to comply with the trade deal may determine to some degree the extent to which its economy will be adversely affected, which cannot be predicted at the present time. Future tariffs imposed by China and the United States on the other country’s products, or other escalating actions, may trigger a significant reduction in international trade, the oversupply of certain manufactured goods, substantial price reductions of goods and possible failure of individual companies and/or large segments of China’s export industry with a potentially negative impact to the Fund. On June 3, 2021, President Biden issued an executive order prohibiting U.S. persons from entering into transactions in publicly traded securities, as well as derivatives and securities designed to provide investment exposure to, any securities of any issuers designated “Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies,” as designated by the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control. This executive order superseded a prior similar order from then-President Trump. Continued ownership of such securities by U.S. persons is prohibited after June 3, 2022, following a one-year divestment period. A number of Chinese issuers have been designated under this program and more could be added. Certain implementation matters related to the scope of, and compliance with, the executive order have not yet been resolved, and the ultimate application and enforcement of the executive order may change. Under current guidance, U.S. investors may purchase interests in an investment fund that does not make any new purchases of designated securities and is “seeking to” divest its holdings of such securities during the divestment period. As a result, the executive order and related guidance may significantly reduce the liquidity of such securities, force the Fund to sell certain positions at inopportune times or for unfavorable prices, and restrict future investments by the Fund. U.S. investment advisers are permitted to advise non-U.S. funds and non-U.S. persons that purchase and sell such prohibited securities, provided this activity does not indirectly expose U.S. persons to such companies. The Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act (“HFCAA”), requires the SEC to identify reporting public companies that use public accounting firms with a branch or office located in a foreign jurisdiction that the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) determines that it is unable to inspect or investigate completely because of a position taken by a governmental entity in that jurisdiction (“Commission-Identified Issuers”). If an issuer is identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer for three consecutive years, the issuer’s shares will be prohibited in U.S. exchange and over-the-counter markets. On March 8, 2022, pursuant to the implementing regulations established by the SEC as required by the HFCAA, the SEC began to identify companies as provisional Commission-Identified Issuers. On August 26, 2022, the PCAOB signed a Statement of Protocol with the China Securities Regulatory Commission and the Ministry of Finance of the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”), which marked the first step toward opening access for the PCAOB to inspect and investigate registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong completely in accordance with U.S. law. However, as this development is relatively recent, the implementation of the Statement of Protocol remains to be tested. Audits performed by PCAOB registered accounting firms in mainland China and Hong Kong may be less reliable than those performed by firms subject to PCAOB inspection. Accordingly, information about the Chinese securities in which the Fund invest may be less reliable or complete. Listing and other |
|
regulatory requirements applicable to foreign issuers, including Chinese issuers, is evolving and any future legislation, regulations or rules may require the Fund to change its investment process, which could result in substantial investment losses. China has often restricted U.S. regulators’ access to information and limited regulators’ ability to investigate or pursue remedies with respect to China-based issuers, generally citing to state secrecy and national security laws, blocking statutes, or other laws or regulations. In addition, according to Article 177 of the PRC Securities Law, which became effective in March 2020, no overseas securities regulator can directly conduct investigations or evidence collection activities within China and no entity or individual in China may provide documents and information relating to securities business activities to overseas regulators without Chinese government approval. The SEC, U.S. Department of Justice, and other U.S. authorities face substantial challenges in bringing and enforcing actions against China-based issuers and their officers and directors. As a result, the Fund may not benefit from a regulatory environment that fosters effective enforcement of U.S. federal securities laws. From time to time and in recent years, China has experienced outbreaks of infectious illnesses, and the country may be subject to other public health threats, infectious illnesses, diseases or similar issues in the future. Any spread of an infectious illness, public health threat or similar issue, or the government response thereto, could reduce consumer demand or economic output, result in market closures, travel restrictions or quarantines, and generally have a significant impact on the Chinese or global economy, which in turn could adversely affect the Fund’s investments.
For purposes of raising capital offshore on exchanges outside of China, including on U.S. exchanges, many Chinese-based operating companies are structured as Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”). In this structure, the Chinese-based operating company is the VIE and establishes an entity, which is typically offshore in a foreign jurisdiction, such as the Cayman Islands. The offshore entity lists on a foreign exchange and enters into contractual arrangements (“VIE Agreements”) with the VIE. This structure allows Chinese companies, in particular those in which the government restricts foreign ownership to raise capital from foreign investors. While the offshore entity has no equity ownership of the VIE, these VIE Agreements permit the offshore entity to consolidate the VIE’s financial statements with its own for accounting purposes and provide for economic exposure to the performance of the underlying Chinese-based operating company. Therefore, an investor in the listed offshore entity, such as the Fund, will have exposure to the Chinese-based operating company only through contractual arrangements and has no ownership in the Chinese-based operating company. Furthermore, because the offshore entity only has specific rights provided for in these VIE Agreements with the VIE, its abilities to control the activities at the Chinese-based operating company are limited and the Chinese-based operating company may engage in activities that negatively impact investment value. While the VIE structure has been widely adopted, it is not formally recognized under Chinese law and therefore there is a risk that the Chinese government could prohibit the existence of such structures or negatively impact the VIE’s contractual arrangements with the listed offshore entity by making them invalid. If these VIE Agreements were found to be unenforceable under Chinese law, investors in the listed offshore entity, such as the Fund, may suffer significant losses with little or no recourse available. If the Chinese government determines that the VIE Agreements establishing the VIE structures do not comply with Chinese law and regulations, including those related to restrictions on foreign ownership, it could subject a Chinese-based issuer to penalties, revocation of business and operating licenses, or forfeiture of ownership interest. Any change in the operations of entities in a VIE structure, the status of VIE contractual arrangements or the legal or regulatory environment in China or in the U.S. could result in significant losses to the Fund. The listed offshore entity’s control over a VIE may also be jeopardized if a natural person who holds the equity interest in the VIE breaches the terms of the VIE Agreement, is subject to legal proceedings or if any physical instruments for authenticating documentation, such as chops and seals, are used without the Chinese-based issuer’s authorization to enter into contractual arrangements in China. Chops and seals, which are carved stamps used to sign documents, represent a legally binding commitment by the company. Moreover, any future regulatory action may affect the ability of the offshore entity to receive the economic benefits of the Chinese-based operating company, which may cause the value of the Fund’s investment in the listed offshore entity to suffer a significant loss. For example, in 2021, the Chinese government placed various restrictions on after-school tutoring companies. Such restrictions adversely affected the financial performance of those listed offshore entities associated with a Chinese-based operating company in the after-school tutoring industry. There is no guarantee that the Chinese government will not place similar restrictions on other industries and therefore jeopardize the financial performance of the corresponding listed offshore entities. |
|
■
|
Emerging Market Securities. The Fund may invest in emerging market securities. The Fund may consider a country to be an emerging market country based on a number of factors including, but not limited to, if the country is classified as an emerging or developing economy by any supranational organization such as the World Bank, International Finance Corporation or the United Nations, or related entities, or if the country is considered an emerging market country for purposes of constructing emerging markets indices. Investments in emerging market country securities involve special risks. The economies, markets and political structures of a number of the emerging market countries in which the Fund can invest do not compare favorably with the United States and other mature economies in terms of wealth and stability. Therefore, investments in these countries may be riskier, and will be subject to erratic and abrupt price movements. These risks are discussed below.
Economies: The economies of emerging market countries may differ favorably or unfavorably from the U.S. economy in such respects as growth of gross domestic product, rate of inflation, currency depreciation, reliable access to capital, capital reinvestment, resource self-sufficiency, balance of payments and trade difficulties. Some economies are less well developed and less diverse (for example, Latin America, Eastern Europe and certain Asian countries), and may be heavily dependent upon international trade, as well as the economic conditions in the countries with which they trade. Such economies accordingly have been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by trade barriers, exchange controls, managed adjustments in relative currency values and other protectionist or retaliatory measures imposed or negotiated by the countries with which they trade. Similarly, many of these countries have historically experienced, and may continue to experience, high rates of inflation, high interest rates, exchange rate fluctuations, large amounts of national and external debt, severe recession, and extreme poverty and unemployment. The economies of emerging market countries may be based predominately on only a few industries or may be dependent on revenues from participating commodities or on international aid or developmental assistance. Emerging market economies may develop unevenly or may never fully develop. Investments in countries that have recently begun moving away from central planning and state-owned industries toward free markets, such as the Eastern European, Russian or Chinese economies, should be regarded as speculative. Governments: Emerging markets may have uncertain national policies and social, political and economic instability. While government involvement in the private sector varies in degree among emerging market countries, such involvement may in some cases include government ownership of companies in certain sectors, wage and price controls or imposition of trade barriers and other protectionist measures. In the past, governments of such nations have expropriated substantial amounts of private property, and most claims of the property owners have never been fully settled. There |
|
is no assurance that such expropriations will not reoccur. In addition, there is no guarantee that some future economic or political crisis will not lead to price controls, forced mergers of companies, confiscatory taxation or creation of government monopolies to the possible detriment of the Fund’s investments. In such event, it is possible that the Fund could lose the entire value of its investments in the affected markets.
Emerging market countries may have national policies that limit the Fund’s investment opportunities such as restrictions on investment in issuers or industries deemed sensitive to national interests. Repatriation of investment income, capital and the proceeds of sales by foreign investors may require governmental registration and/or approval in some emerging market countries. In addition, if the Fund invests in a market where restrictions are considered acceptable, a country could impose new or additional repatriation restrictions after investment that are unacceptable. This might require, among other things, applying to the appropriate authorities for a waiver of the restrictions or engaging in transactions in other markets designed to offset the risks of decline in that country. Further, some attractive securities may not be available, or may require a premium for purchase, due to foreign shareholders already holding the maximum amount legally permissible. In addition to withholding taxes on investment income, some countries with emerging capital markets may impose differential capital gain taxes on foreign investors. An issuer or governmental authority that controls the repayment of an emerging market country’s debt may not be able or willing to repay the principal and/or interest when due in accordance with the terms of such debt. A debtor’s willingness or ability to repay principal and interest due in a timely manner may be affected by, among other factors, its cash flow situation, and, in the case of a government debtor, the extent of its foreign reserves, the availability of sufficient foreign exchange on the date a payment is due, the relative size of the debt service burden to the economy as a whole and the political constraints to which a government debtor may be subject. Government debtors may default on their debt and may also be dependent on expected disbursements from foreign governments, multilateral agencies and others abroad to reduce principal and interest arrearages on their debt. Holders of government debt may be requested to participate in the rescheduling of such debt and to extend further loans to government debtors. There may be limited legal recourse against the issuer and/or guarantor. Remedies must, in some cases, be pursued in the courts of the defaulting party itself, and the ability of the holder of foreign government fixed-income securities to obtain recourse may be subject to the political climate in the relevant country. In addition, no assurance can be given that the holders of commercial bank debt will not contest payments to the holders of other foreign government debt obligations in the event of default under their commercial bank loan agreements. Capital Markets: The capital markets in emerging market countries may be underdeveloped. They may have low or non-existent trading volume, resulting in a lack of liquidity and increased volatility in prices for such securities, as compared to securities from more developed capital markets. Emerging market securities may be substantially less liquid and more volatile than those of mature markets, and securities may be held by a limited number of investors. This may adversely affect the timing and pricing of the Fund’s acquisition or disposal of securities. There may be less publicly available information about emerging markets than would be available in more developed capital markets, and such issuers may not be subject to accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards and requirements comparable to those to which U.S. companies are subject. In certain countries with emerging capital markets, reporting standards vary widely. As a result, traditional investment measurements used in the U.S., may not be applicable. Investing in certain countries with emerging capital markets may entail purchasing securities issued by or on behalf of entities that are insolvent, bankrupt, in default or otherwise engaged in an attempt to reorganize or reschedule their obligations, and in entities that have little or no proven credit rating or credit history. In any such case, the issuer’s poor or deteriorating financial condition may increase the likelihood that the investing Fund will experience losses or diminution in available gains due to bankruptcy, insolvency or fraud. There may also be custodial restrictions or other non-U.S. or U.S. governmental laws or restrictions applicable to investments in emerging market countries. Practices in relation to settlement of securities transactions in emerging markets involve higher risks than those in developed markets, in part because the Fund may use brokers and counterparties that are less well capitalized, and custody and registration of assets in some countries may be unreliable. Supervisory authorities also may be unable to apply standards comparable to those in developed markets. Thus, there may be risks that settlement may be delayed and that cash or securities belonging to the Fund may be in jeopardy because of failures of or defects in the systems. In particular, market practice may require that payment be made before receipt of the security being purchased or that delivery of a security be made before payment is received. In such cases, default by a broker or bank (the “counterparty”) through whom the transaction is effected might cause the Fund to suffer a loss. There can be no certainty that the Fund will be successful in eliminating counterparty risk, particularly as counterparties operating in emerging market countries frequently lack the substance or financial resources of those in developed countries. There may also be a danger that, because of uncertainties in the operation of settlement systems in individual markets, competing claims may arise with respect to securities held by or to be transferred to the Fund. Regulatory authorities in some emerging markets currently do not provide the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board with the ability to inspect public accounting firms as required by U.S. law, including sufficient access to inspect audit work papers and practices, or otherwise do not cooperate with U.S. regulators, which potentially could expose investors to significant risks. Legal Systems: Investments in emerging market countries may be affected by the lack, or relatively early development, of legal structures governing private and foreign investments and private property. Such capital markets are emerging in a dynamic political and economic environment brought about by events over recent years that have reshaped political boundaries and traditional ideologies. Many emerging market countries have little experience with the corporate form of business organization and may not have well-developed corporation and business laws or concepts of fiduciary duty in the business context. The organizational structures of certain issuers in emerging markets may limit investor rights and recourse. The Fund may encounter substantial difficulties in obtaining and enforcing judgments against individuals and companies located in certain emerging market countries, either individually or in combination with other shareholders. It may be difficult or impossible to obtain or enforce legislation or remedies against governments, their agencies and sponsored entities. Additionally, in certain emerging market countries, fraud, corruption and attempts at market manipulation may be more prevalent than in developed market countries. Shareholder claims that are common in the U.S. and are generally viewed as determining misconduct, including class action securities law and fraud claims, generally are difficult or impossible to pursue as a matter of law or practicality in many emerging markets. The laws in certain countries with emerging capital markets may be based upon or be highly influenced by religious codes or rules. The interpretation of how these laws apply to certain investments may change over time, which could have a negative impact on those investments and the Fund. Russia launched a large-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022. The extent and duration of the military action, resulting sanctions and resulting future market disruptions, including declines in its stock markets and the value of the ruble against the U.S. dollar, are impossible to predict, |
|
but could be significant. Any such disruptions caused by Russian military action or other actions (including cyberattacks and espionage) or resulting actual and threatened responses to such activity, including purchasing and financing restrictions, boycotts or changes in consumer or purchaser preferences, sanctions, tariffs or cyberattacks on the Russian government, Russian companies or Russian individuals, including politicians, may impact Russia’s economy and Russian issuers of securities in which the Fund invests. Actual and threatened responses to such activity, including purchasing restrictions, sanctions, tariffs or cyberattacks on the Russian government or Russian companies, may impact Russia’s economy and Russian issuers of securities in which the Fund invests. Actual and threatened responses to such military action may also impact the markets for certain Russian commodities, such as oil and natural gas, as well as other sectors of the Russian economy, and may likely have collateral impacts on such sectors globally, and may negatively affect global supply chains, inflation and global growth. These and any related events could significantly impact the Fund’s performance and the value of an investment in the Fund, even if the Fund does not have direct exposure to Russian issuers or issuers in other countries affected by the invasion.
Governments in the United States and many other countries (collectively, the “Sanctioning Bodies”) have imposed economic sanctions, which can consist of prohibiting certain securities trades, certain private transactions in the energy sector, asset freezes and prohibition of all business, against certain Russian individuals, including politicians, and Russian corporate and banking entities. The Sanctioning Bodies, or others, could also institute broader sanctions on Russia, including banning Russia from global payments systems that facilitate cross-border payments. These sanctions, or even the threat of further sanctions, may result in the decline of the value and liquidity of Russian securities, a weakening of the ruble or other adverse consequences to the Russian economy. These sanctions could also result in the immediate freeze of Russian securities and/or funds invested in prohibited assets, impairing the ability of the Fund to buy, sell, receive or deliver those securities and/or assets. Sanctions could also result in Russia taking counter measures or retaliatory actions which may further impair the value and liquidity of Russian securities. |
|
■
|
European Securities. The Fund’s performance may be affected by political, social and economic conditions in Europe, such as the growth of the economic output (the gross national product of the countries in the region), the rate of inflation, the rate at which capital is reinvested into European economies, the success of governmental actions to reduce budget deficits, the resource self-sufficiency of European countries, interest rates in European countries, monetary exchange rates between European countries, and conflict between European countries.
The Economic and Monetary Union (“EMU”) of the European Union (“EU”) is comprised of EU members that have adopted the euro currency. By adopting the euro as its currency, a member state relinquishes control of its own monetary policies and is subject to fiscal and monetary controls. The EMU requires Eurozone countries to comply with restrictions on interest rates, deficits, debt levels, and inflation rates, fiscal and monetary controls, and other factors. Although the EMU has adopted a common currency and central bank, there is no fiscal union; therefore, money does not automatically flow from countries with surpluses to those with deficits. These restrictions and characteristics may limit the ability of EMU member countries to implement monetary policy to address regional economic conditions and significantly impact every European country and their economic partners, including those countries that are not members of the EMU. In addition, those EU member states that are not currently in the Eurozone (Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Sweden), excluding Denmark, are required to seek to comply with convergence criteria to permit entry to the Eurozone. The economies and markets of European countries are often closely connected and interdependent, and events in one country in Europe can have an adverse impact on other European countries. Decreasing imports or exports, changes in governmental or other regulations on trade, changes in the exchange rate of the euro or other European currency, the threat of default or actual default by one or more EU member countries, or other European countries, on its sovereign debt, and/or an economic recession in one or more European countries may have a significant adverse effect on the economies of other European countries and major trading partners outside Europe. The European financial markets have experienced and may continue to experience volatility and adverse trends due to concerns relating to economic downturns; rising government debt levels and national unemployment; the possible default of government debt in several European countries; public health crises; political unrest; economic sanctions; inflation; energy crises; the future of the euro as a common currency; and war and military conflict, such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine. These events have adversely affected the exchange rate of the euro and may continue to significantly affect European countries. Responses to financial problems by European governments, central banks, and others, including austerity measures and other reforms, may not produce the desired results, may result in social unrest and may limit future growth and economic recovery or may have unintended consequences. In order to prevent further economic deterioration, certain countries, without prior warning, can institute “capital controls.” Countries may use these controls to restrict volatile movements of capital entering and exiting their country. Such controls may negatively affect the Fund’s investments. In addition, one or more countries may abandon the euro and/or withdraw from the EU. The impact of these actions, especially if they occur in a disorderly fashion, could be significant and far-reaching. Many European nations are susceptible to economic risks associated with high levels of debt. Non-governmental issuers, and even certain governments, have defaulted on, or been forced to restructure, their debts, and other issuers have faced difficulties obtaining credit or refinancing existing obligations. A default or debt restructuring by any European country could adversely impact holders of that country’s debt and sellers of credit default swaps linked to that country’s creditworthiness, which may be located in other countries. Such a default or debt restructuring could affect exposures to other European countries and their financial companies as well. Further defaults on, or restructurings of, the debt of governments or other entities could have additional adverse effects on economies, financial markets and asset valuations around the world. In addition, issuers may face difficulties obtaining credit or refinancing existing obligations; financial institutions may require government or central bank support, or need to raise capital, and/or be impaired in their ability to extend credit. Furthermore, certain European countries have had to accept assistance from supranational agencies such as the International Monetary Fund, the European Stability Mechanism or others. The European Central Bank has also intervened to purchase Eurozone debt in an attempt to stabilize markets and reduce borrowing costs. There can be no assurance that any creditors or supranational agencies will continue to intervene or provide further assistance, and markets may react adversely to any expected reduction in the financial support provided by these creditors. Certain European countries have also developed increasingly strained relationships with the U.S., and if these relationships were to worsen, they could adversely affect European issuers that rely on the U.S. for trade. In addition, the national politics of European countries have been unpredictable and subject to influence by disruptive political groups, ideologies, and polarizing political events such as the conflict between Israel and Hamas. Secessionist movements, as well as government or other responses to such movements, may create instability and uncertainty in a country or region. European governments may be subject to change and such countries may experience social and political unrest. Unanticipated or sudden political or social developments may result in sudden and significant investment |
|
losses. The occurrence of terrorist incidents throughout Europe and in the Middle East also could impact financial markets, as could military conflicts. For example, Houthi attacks on commercial shipping in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, and retaliatory action, may disrupt supply chains and cause difficulties for impacted businesses, including those that wish to ship goods through that route. The impact of these kinds of events could be significant and far-reaching and materially impact the value and liquidity of the Fund’s investments. Russia’s war with Ukraine has negatively impacted European economic activity. The Russia/Ukraine war and Russia’s response to sanctions imposed by the U.S. and other countries are impossible to predict, but have severely impacted the performance of the economies of European and other countries, including through adverse effects to global financial and energy markets, global supply chains and global growth, and consequential inflation. Investments in companies with contractual relationships with Russian counterparties, or with significant operations and/or assets in Russia could be adversely impacted by the new legal, political, and regulatory environment, whether by increased costs or the termination of business plans or operations due to sanctions. Various companies operating in Russia, or with Russian counterparties, have faced difficulties enforcing Russian debts or contractual reliefs due to the Russian court’s hostility towards European companies in response to sanctions.
Certain countries have applied to become new member countries of the EU, and these candidate countries’ accessions may become more controversial to the existing EU members. Some member states may repudiate certain candidate countries joining the EU due to concerns about the possible economic, immigration and cultural implications. Certain other countries have applied to join or, in the case of Finland and Sweden, have recently joined, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (“NATO”). Russia is understood to oppose certain expansions, or potential expansions, of NATO and the EU, and its reaction to such developments could negatively impact European economic activity. The United Kingdom withdrew from the European Union on January 31, 2020 and entered into a transition period, which ended on December 31, 2020. The longer-term economic, legal, and political framework between the United Kingdom and the EU is still developing and may lead to ongoing political and economic uncertainty in the United Kingdom, Europe, and the global market. Investments in companies with significant operations and/or assets in the United Kingdom could be adversely impacted by the new legal, political, and regulatory environment, whether by increased costs or impediments to the implementation of business plans. The uncertainty resulting from any further exits from the EU, or the possibility of such exits, would also be likely to cause market disruption in the EU and more broadly across the global economy, as well as introduce further legal, political, and regulatory uncertainty in Europe. |
|
■
|
United Kingdom Securities. Exposure to issuers located in, or with economic ties to, the United Kingdom, could expose the Fund to risks associated with investments in the United Kingdom to a greater extent than more geographically diverse funds, including regulatory, political, currency, security, and economic risks specific to the United Kingdom. The United Kingdom has one of the largest economies in Europe, and the United States and other European countries are substantial trading partners of the United Kingdom. As a result, the United Kingdom economy may be impacted by changes to the economic condition of the United States and other European countries.
On December 31, 2020, the United Kingdom left the European Union in an event commonly referred to as “Brexit.” The United Kingdom and the European Union then reached a trade agreement that became effective on May 1, 2021, after being ratified by all applicable United Kingdom and European Union governmental bodies. Until the economic effects of Brexit become clearer, and while a period of political, regulatory and commercial uncertainty continues, there remains a risk that Brexit may have a negative impact on the United Kingdom, the broader global economy, or the value of the British pound sterling, any of which may impact the value of Fund investments. The United Kingdom’s economy relies heavily on the export of financial services to the United States and other European countries. At the end of March 2021, the UK and the European Union concluded technical discussions on the content of a Memorandum of Understanding on financial services, setting out how the UK and EU financial services regulators will co-operate and share information. The implementation of this legal framework and basis of co-operation remains to be seen, and so the period following the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union is expected to be one of significant political and economic uncertainty, particularly until the United Kingdom government and EU member states agree and implement the terms of the United Kingdom’s future relationship with the European Union. Although the sub-advisor may hedge Fund currency exposures back to the U.S. dollar, a depreciation of the British pound sterling and/or the Euro in relation to the U.S. dollar as a result of Brexit could adversely affect Fund investments denominated in British pound sterling or Euros that are not fully hedged regardless of the performance of the underlying issuer. |
|
■
|
Pacific Basin Securities. The Pacific Basin geographic region includes many Asian countries bordering the Pacific Rim as well as Australia and New Zealand. Many Asian countries may be subject to a greater degree of social, political and economic instability than is the case in the U.S. and Western European countries. Such instability may result from, among other things, (i) authoritarian governments or military involvement in political and economic decision-making, including changes in government through extra-constitutional means; (ii) popular unrest associated with demands for improved political, economic and social conditions; (iii) internal insurgencies; (iv) hostile relations with neighboring countries; and (v) ethnic, religious and racial disaffection. In addition, the Pacific Basin geographic region has historically been prone to natural disasters. The occurrence of a natural disaster in the region, including the subsequent recovery, could negatively impact the economy of any country in the region. The existence of overburdened infrastructure and obsolete financial systems also presents risks in certain Asian countries, as do environmental problems.
The economies of most Pacific Basin countries are heavily dependent on international trade and are accordingly affected by protective trade barriers and the economic conditions of their trading partners, principally, the U.S., Japan, China and the EU. The enactment by the U.S. or other principal trading partners of protectionist trade legislation, reduction of foreign investment in the local economies and general declines in the international securities markets could have a significant adverse effect upon the securities markets of the Pacific Basin countries. The economies of certain Pacific Basin countries may depend to a significant degree upon only a few industries and/or exports of primary commodities and, therefore, are vulnerable to changes in commodity prices that, in turn, may be affected by a variety of factors. In addition, certain developing Asian countries, such as the Philippines and India, are especially large debtors to commercial banks and foreign governments. Many of the Pacific Basin economies may be intertwined, so an economic downturn in one country may result in, or be accompanied by, an economic downturn in other countries in the region. Furthermore, many of the Pacific Basin economies are characterized by high inflation, underdeveloped financial services sectors, heavy reliance on international trade, frequent currency fluctuations, devaluations, or restrictions, political and social instability, and less efficient markets. The securities markets in Pacific Basin countries are substantially smaller, less liquid and more volatile than the major securities markets in the U.S., |
|
and some of the stock exchanges in the region are in the early stages of their development, as compared to the stock exchanges in the U.S. Equity securities of many companies in the region may be less liquid and more volatile than equity securities of U.S. companies of comparable size. Additionally, many companies traded on stock exchanges in the region are smaller and less seasoned than companies whose securities are traded on stock exchanges in the U.S. A high proportion of the shares of many issuers may be held by a limited number of persons and financial institutions, which may limit the number of shares available for investment by the Fund. In some countries, there is no established secondary market for securities. Therefore, liquidity of securities may be generally low and transaction costs generally high. Similarly, volume and liquidity in the Pacific Basin bond markets are less than in the U.S. and, at times, price volatility can be greater than in the U.S. A limited number of issuers in Pacific Basin securities markets may represent a disproportionately large percentage of market capitalization and trading value. The limited liquidity of securities markets in the region may also affect the Fund’s ability to acquire or dispose of securities at the price and time it wishes to do so. In addition, the region’s securities markets are susceptible to being influenced by large investors trading significant blocks of securities.
The legal systems in certain developing market Pacific Basin countries also may have an adverse impact on the Fund. For example, while the potential liability of a shareholder in a U.S. corporation with respect to acts of the corporation is generally limited to the amount of the shareholder’s investment, the notion of limited liability is less clear in certain Pacific Basin countries. Similarly, the rights of investors in Pacific Basin companies may be more limited than those of shareholders of U.S. corporations. It may be difficult or impossible to obtain and/or enforce a judgment in a Pacific Basin country. Many stock markets are undergoing a period of growth and change which may result in trading volatility and difficulties in the settlement and recording of transactions, and in interpreting and applying the relevant law and regulations. With respect to investments in the currencies of Pacific Basin countries, changes in the value of those currencies against the U.S. dollar will result in corresponding changes in the U.S. dollar value of the Fund’s assets denominated in those currencies. Certain developing economies in the Pacific Basin region have experienced currency fluctuations, devaluations, and restrictions; unstable employment rates; rapid fluctuation in, among other things, inflation and reliance on exports; and less efficient markets. Currency fluctuations or devaluations in any one country can have a significant effect on the entire Pacific Basin region. Holding securities in currencies that are devalued (or in companies whose revenues are substantially in currencies that are devalued) will likely decrease the value of the Fund’s investments. Some developing countries prohibit or impose substantial restrictions on investments in their capital markets, particularly their equity markets, by foreign entities such as the Fund. For example, certain countries may require governmental approval prior to investments by foreign persons or limit the amount of investment by foreign persons in a particular company or limit the investment by foreign persons to only a specific class of securities of a company which may have less advantageous terms (including price and shareholder rights) than securities of the company available for purchase by nationals of the relevant country. There can be no assurance that the Fund will be able to obtain required governmental approvals in a timely manner. In addition, changes to restrictions on foreign ownership of securities subsequent to the Fund’s purchase of such securities may have an adverse effect on the value of such shares. Certain countries may restrict investment opportunities in issuers or industries deemed important to national interests. |
|
■
|
ETFs. The Fund may purchase shares of ETFs. ETFs trade like a common stock and passive ETFs usually represent a fixed portfolio of securities designed to track the performance and dividend yield of a particular domestic or foreign market index. Typically, the Fund would purchase passive ETF shares to obtain exposure to all or a portion of the stock or bond market. As a shareholder of an ETF, the Fund would be subject to its ratable share of the ETF’s expenses, including its advisory and administration expenses. An investment in an ETF generally presents the same primary risks as an investment in a conventional mutual fund (i.e., one that is not exchange traded) that has the same investment objective, strategies, and policies. The price of an ETF can fluctuate within a wide range, and the Fund could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF decline in value. In addition, ETFs are subject to the following risks that do not apply to conventional mutual funds: (1) the market price of the ETF’s shares may trade at a discount or premium to their NAV per share; (2) an active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained; or (3) trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem such action appropriate, the shares are de-listed from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.
|
|
■
|
Money Market Funds. The Fund can invest free cash balances in registered open-end investment companies regulated as money market funds under the Investment Company Act, to provide liquidity or for defensive purposes. The Fund would invest in money market funds rather than purchasing individual short-term investments. Although a money market fund is designed to be a relatively low risk investment, it is not free of risk. Despite the short maturities and high credit quality of a money market fund’s investments, increases in interest rates and deteriorations in the credit quality of the instruments the money market fund has purchased may reduce the money market fund’s yield and can cause the price of a money market security to decrease. In addition, a money market fund is subject to the risk that the value of an investment may be eroded over time by inflation. If the liquidity of a money market fund’s portfolio deteriorates below certain levels, the money market fund may suspend redemptions (i.e., impose a redemption gate) and thereby prevent the Fund from selling its investment in the money market fund, or impose a fee of up to 2% on amounts redeemed from the money market fund.
|
| 1 | Engage in dollar rolls or purchase or sell securities on a when-issued or forward commitment basis. The purchase or sale of when-issued securities enables an investor to hedge against anticipated changes in interest rates and prices by locking in an attractive price or yield. The price of when-issued securities is fixed at the time the commitment to purchase or sell is made, but delivery and payment for the when-issued securities takes place at a later date, normally one to two months after the date of purchase. During the period between purchase and settlement, no payment is made by the purchaser to the issuer and no interest accrues to the purchaser. Such transactions therefore involve a risk of loss if the value of the security to be purchased declines prior to the settlement date or if the value of the security to be sold increases prior to the settlement date. A sale of a when-issued security also involves the risk that the other party will be unable to settle the transaction. Dollar rolls are a type of forward commitment transaction. Purchases and sales of securities on a forward commitment basis involve a commitment to purchase or sell securities with payment and delivery to take place at some future date, normally one to two months after the date of the transaction. As with |
| when-issued securities, these transactions involve certain risks, but they also enable an investor to hedge against anticipated changes in interest rates and prices. Forward commitment transactions are executed for existing obligations, whereas in a when-issued transaction, the obligations have not yet been issued. |
| 2 | Invest in other investment companies (including affiliated investment companies) to the extent permitted by the Investment Company Act, or exemptive relief granted by the SEC. |
| 3 | Loan securities to broker-dealers or other institutional investors. Securities loans will not be made if, as a result, the aggregate amount of all outstanding securities loans by the Fund exceeds 33¹/3% of its total assets (including the market value of collateral received). For purposes of complying with the Fund’s investment policies and restrictions, collateral received in connection with securities loans is deemed an asset of the Fund to the extent required by law. |
| 4 | Enter into repurchase agreements. A repurchase agreement is an agreement under which securities are acquired by the Fund from a securities dealer or bank subject to resale at an agreed upon price on a later date. The acquiring Fund bears a risk of loss in the event that the other party to a repurchase agreement defaults on its obligations and the Fund is delayed or prevented from exercising its rights to dispose of the collateral securities. However, the Manager or the sub-advisor, as applicable, attempts to minimize this risk by entering into repurchase agreements only with financial institutions that are deemed to be of good financial standing. |
| 5 | Purchase securities sold in private placement offerings made in reliance on the “private placement” exemption from registration afforded by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and resold to qualified institutional buyers under Rule 144A under the Securities Act. The Fund will not invest more than 15% of its net assets in Section 4(a)(2) securities and illiquid securities unless the Manager or the sub-advisor, as applicable, determines that any Section 4(a)(2) securities held by the Fund in excess of this level are liquid. |
| 1 | The Fund may not concentrate investments in a particular industry or group of industries, as concentration is defined under the Investment Company Act, the rules and regulations thereunder or any exemption therefrom, as such statute, rules or regulations may be amended or interpreted from time to time, except that the Fund may invest without limitation in securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities and repurchase agreements involving such securities or tax-exempt obligations of state or municipal governments and their political subdivisions. |
| 2 | The Fund may borrow money or issue senior securities (as defined under the Investment Company Act), except as prohibited under the Investment Company Act, the rules and regulations thereunder or any exemption therefrom, as such statute, rules or regulations may be amended or interpreted from time to time. |
| 3 | The Fund may make loans, except as prohibited under the Investment Company Act, the rules and regulations thereunder or any exemption therefrom, as such statute, rules or regulations may be amended or interpreted from time to time. |
| 4 | The Fund may purchase or sell commodities or real estate, except as prohibited under the Investment Company Act, the rules and regulations thereunder or any exemption therefrom, as such statute, rules or regulations may be amended or interpreted from time to time. |
| 5 | The Fund may underwrite securities issued by other persons, except as prohibited under the Investment Company Act, the rules and regulations thereunder or any exemption therefrom, as such statute, rules or regulations may be amended or interpreted from time to time. |
| 6 | The Fund may not purchase securities of an issuer that would cause the Fund to fail to satisfy the diversification requirement for a diversified management company under the Investment Company Act, the rules or regulations thereunder or any exemption therefrom, as such statute, rules or regulations may be amended or interpreted from time to time. |
| 1 | The Fund may not invest more than 15% of its net assets in illiquid securities, including time deposits and repurchase agreements that mature in more than seven days; or |
| 2 | The Fund may not purchase securities on margin, except that (1) a Fund may obtain such short term credits as necessary for the clearance of transactions, and (2) a Fund may make margin payments in connection with foreign currency, futures contracts, options, forward contracts, swaps, caps, floors, collars, securities purchased or sold on a forward-commitment or delayed-delivery basis or other financial instruments. |
| 3 | The Fund may not invest in unmarketable interests in real estate limited partnerships or invest directly in real estate. For the avoidance of doubt, the foregoing policy does not prevent the Fund from, among other things, purchasing marketable securities of companies that deal in real estate or interests therein (including REITs). |
| 4 | The Fund may purchase or sell financial and physical commodities, commodity contracts based on (or relating to) physical commodities or financial commodities and securities and derivative instruments whose values are derived from (in whole or in part) physical commodities or financial commodities. |
| 1 | a complete list of holdings for the Fund on an annual and semi-annual basis within seventy days of the end of each fiscal period in publicly available filings of Form N-CSR with the SEC (available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov) and on the Fund’s website (www.americanbeaconfunds.com); |
| 2 | a complete list of holdings for the Fund as of the end of each fiscal quarter in publicly available filings of Form N-PORT with the SEC within sixty days of the end of the fiscal quarter (available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov); |
| 3 | a complete list of holdings for the Fund as of the end of each calendar quarter on the Funds’ website (www.americanbeaconfunds.com) approximately sixty days after the end of the calendar quarter; and |
| 4 | ten largest holdings for the Fund as of the end of each calendar quarter on the Funds’ website (www.americanbeaconfunds.com) and in sales materials approximately fifteen days after the end of the calendar quarter. |
|
Service Provider
|
Service
|
Holdings Access
|
|
Manager
|
Investment management and administrator
|
Complete list on intraday basis with no lag
|
|
Sub-Advisor
|
Investment management
|
Holdings under sub-advisor’s management on intraday basis with no lag
|
|
State Street Bank and Trust Co. (“State Street”) and its designated foreign sub-custodians
|
Securities lending agent for Funds that participate in securities lending, Funds’ custodian and foreign custody manager, sub-administrator, fund administration service provider, and foreign sub-custodian
|
Complete list on intraday basis with no lag
|
|
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|
Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm
|
Complete list on annual basis with no lag
|
|
Bloomberg, L.P.
|
Performance and portfolio analytics reporting
|
Complete list on daily basis with no lag
|
|
FactSet Research Systems, Inc.
|
Performance and portfolio analytics reporting for the Manager
|
Complete list on daily basis with no lag
|
|
KPMG International
|
Service provider to State Street
|
Complete list on annual basis with lag
|
|
Kurtosys
|
Service Provider to the Manager
|
Partial list on a periodic basis with lag
|
| 1 | Recipients of portfolio holdings information must agree in writing to keep the information confidential until it has been posted to the Fund’s website and not to trade based on the information; |
| 2 | Holdings may only be disclosed as of a month-end date; |
| 3 | No compensation may be paid to the Fund, the Manager or any other party in connection with the disclosure of information about portfolio securities; and |
| 4 | A member of the Manager’s Compliance staff must approve requests for nonpublic holdings information. |
|
Name and Year of Birth*
|
Position and Length of Time Served on the American Beacon Funds and American Beacon Select Funds
|
Position and Length of Time Served on the American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust
|
Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships During Past 5 Years
|
|
INTERESTED TRUSTEE
|
|||
|
Eugene J. Duffy
(1954)** |
Trustee since 2008
|
Trustee since 2017
|
Global Investment Management Distribution, Mesirow Financial Administrative Corporation: Managing Director (2016-Present);American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Trustee (2018–2021);American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Trustee (2018–2021)
|
|
NON-INTERESTED TRUSTEES
|
|||
|
Gilbert G. Alvarado
(1969) |
Trustee since 2015
|
Trustee since 2017
|
The Conrad Prebys Foundation: President, SJVIIF, LLC, Impact Investment Fund: Chief Financial Officer (2022-Present) (2018-2022);Kura MD, Inc. (local telehealth organization): Director (2015-2017);Sierra Health Foundation (health conversion private foundation): Executive Vice President & CCO (2022);Sierra Health Foundation (health conversion private foundation): Senior Vice President & CFO (2006-2022);Sierra Health Foundation: Center for Health Program Management (California public benefit corporation): Executive Vice President & CFO (2022);Sierra Health Foundation: Center for Health Program Management (California public benefit corporation): Senior Vice President & CFO (2012-2022);American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Trustee (2018–2021);American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Trustee (2018–2021).
|
|
Joseph B. Armes
(1962) |
Trustee since 2015
|
Trustee since 2017
|
Switchback Energy Acquisition: Director (2019-2021);CSW Industrials f/k/a Capital Southwest Corporation (investment company): Chairman & CEO (2015-Present);JBA Investment Partners (family investment vehicle): President & CEO (2010-Present);American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Trustee (2018–2021);American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Trustee (2018–2021).
|
|
Gerard J. Arpey
(1958) |
Trustee since 2012
|
Trustee since 2017
|
Emerald Creek Group (private equity firm): Partner (2011-Present); S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. (privately held company): Director (2008-present);
The Home Depot, Inc.: Director (2015-Present);
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Trustee (2018–2021);
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Trustee (2018–2021).
|
|
Claudia A. Holz
(1957) |
Trustee since 2018
|
Trustee since 2018
|
Blue Owl Capital, Inc.: Independent Director (2021-Present);KPMG LLP: Partner (1990–2017);American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Trustee (2018–2021);American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Trustee (2018–2021)
|
|
Douglas A. Lindgren
(1961) |
Chair since 2025
Trustee since 2018 |
Chair since 2025
Trustee since 2018 |
JLL Income Property Trust: Director (2022-Present);Carne Global Financial Services: CEO North America (2016-2017);Carne Financial Services: Consultant (2017-2019);UBS Wealth Management: Managing Director, IPS Investment Management and Global Head, Content Management (2010-2016);American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Trustee (2018–2021);American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Trustee (2018–2021).
|
|
Barbara J. McKenna
(1963) |
Trustee since 2012
|
Trustee since 2017
|
Longfellow Investment Management Company: President and Managing Principal (2005-Present, President since 2009);External Diversity Council of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston: Member (2021-2023);United States Tennis Association: Board Advisor (2021-Present);American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Trustee (2018–2021);American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Trustee (2018–2021).
|
| * | The Board has adopted a retirement policy that requires Trustees to retire no later than the last day of the calendar year in which they reach the age of 75. |
| ** | Mr. Duffy is deemed to be an “interested person” of the Trust, as defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, by virtue of his position with Mesirow Financial, Inc., a broker-dealer. |
|
INTERESTED TRUSTEE
|
||||||
|
Duffy
|
||||||
|
Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities in all Trusts (30 Funds as of December 31, 2024)
|
Over $100,000
|
|||||
|
NON-INTERESTED TRUSTEES
|
||||||
|
Alvarado
|
Armes
|
Arpey
|
Holz
|
Lindgren
|
McKenna
|
|
|
Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities in all Trusts (30 Funds as of December 31, 2024)
|
Over $100,000
|
Over $100,000
|
Over $100,000
|
Over $100,000
|
Over $100,000
|
Over $100,000
|
|
The following table shows estimated compensation (excluding reimbursements) that will be paid by the Trusts to each Trustee for the period from February 24,2025, the Fund’s commencement of operations through August 31, 2025.
|
||
|
Name of Trustee
|
Aggregate Compensation From the Trust
|
Total Compensation From the Trusts
|
|
INTERESTED TRUSTEE
|
||
|
Eugene J. Duffy
|
$150,720
|
$160,500
|
|
NON-INTERESTED TRUSTEES
|
||
|
Gilbert G. Alvarado
|
$150,720
|
$160,500
|
|
Joseph B. Armes
|
$160,580
|
$171,000
|
|
Gerard J. Arpey
|
$153,537
|
$163,500
|
|
Claudia A. Holz
|
$168,327
|
$179,250
|
|
Douglas A. Lindgren
|
$168,327
|
$179,250
|
|
Barbara J. McKenna
|
$153,537
|
$163,500
|
|
Name and Year of Birth
|
Position and Length of Time Served on the American Beacon Funds and American Beacon Select Funds
|
Position and Length of Time Served on the American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust
|
Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships During Past 5 Years
|
|
OFFICERS
|
|||
|
Gregory Stumm
(1981) |
President
since June 2024 Vice President
2022-2024 |
President
since June 2024 Vice President
2022-2024 |
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.: Director (June 2024-Present), President (June 2024-Present), Chief Executive Officer (June 2024-Present), Senior Vice President (2022-2024)
National Investment Services of America, LLC: Director (2024-Present)
Resolute Acquisition, Inc.: Director (June 2024-Present), President (June 2024-Present), Chief Executive Officer (June 2024-Present), Senior Vice President (2022-2024)
Resolute Topco, Inc.: Director (June 2024-Present), President (June 2024-Present), Chief Executive Officer (June 2024-Present)
Resolute Investment Managers, Inc.: Director (June 2024-Present), President (June 2024-Present), Chief Executive Officer (June 2024 -Present), Senior Vice President (2022-2024)
Resolute Investment Services, Inc.: Director (June 2024-Present), President (June 2024-Present), Chief Executive Officer (June 2024-Present), Senior Vice President, (2022-2024)
Resolute Investment Distributors, Inc.: President (2024-Present), Chief Executive Officer (2024-Present), Director (2022-Present), Senior Vice President (2022-2024)
RSW Investments Holdings LLC: Director (2024-Present)
Shapiro Capital Management, LLC: Director (2024-Present)
SSI Investment Management, LLC: Director (2024-Present)
|
|
Rosemary K. Behan
(1959) |
Vice President, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer
since 2006 |
Vice President, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer
since 2017 |
Alpha Quant Advisors, LLC: Secretary and General Counsel (2016-2020)
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.: Senior Vice President (2021-Present), Vice President (2006-2021), Secretary and General Counsel (2006-Present)
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Vice President, Secretary, and Chief Legal Officer (2018-2021)
American Beacon Cayman Managed Futures Strategy Fund, Ltd.: Secretary (2014-Present)
American Beacon Cayman Multi-Alternatives Company, Ltd.: Secretary (2023-Present)
American Beacon Cayman TargetRisk Company, Ltd: Secretary (2018-Present)
American Beacon Cayman Trend Company, Ltd.: Secretary (2023-Present)
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Vice President, Secretary, and Chief Legal Officer (2018-2021)American Private Equity Management, LLC: Secretary (2008-2024)Continuous Capital, LLC: Vice President and Secretary (2018-2022)Green Harvest Asset Management, LLC: Secretary (2019-2021)Resolute Acquisition, Inc.: Secretary (2015-Present)
Resolute Investment Distributors, Inc.: Secretary (2017-Present)
Resolute Investment Holdings, LLC: Secretary (2015-Present)Resolute Investment Managers, Inc.: Senior Vice President (2021-Present), Vice President (2015-2021), Secretary and General Counsel (2015-Present)
Resolute Investment Services, Inc.: Senior Vice President (2021-Present), Vice President (2017-2021), Secretary and General Counsel (2017-Present)
Resolute Topco, Inc.: Secretary (2015-Present)
|
|
Name and Year of Birth
|
Position and Length of Time Served on the American Beacon Funds and American Beacon Select Funds
|
Position and Length of Time Served on the American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust
|
Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships During Past 5 Years
|
|
Paul B. Cavazos
(1969) |
Vice President
since 2016 |
Vice President
since 2017 |
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.: Chief Investment Officer and Senior Vice President (2016-Present)
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Vice President (2018-2021)
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Vice President (2018-2021)
American Private Equity Management, L.L.C.: Vice President (2017-2024)
|
|
Emily P. Dowden
(1980) |
Vice President
since 2024 |
Vice President
since 2024 |
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.: Vice President (2024-Present)
Resolute Investment Managers, Inc.: Vice President (2024-Present)
Resolute Investment Services, Inc.: Vice President (2024-Present)
Westwood Management: Vice President (2022-2024), (2018-2020)
|
|
Terri L. McKinney
(1963) |
Vice President
since 2010 |
Vice President
since 2017 |
Alpha Quant Advisors, LLC: Vice President (2016-2020)
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.: Senior Vice President, (2021-Present) Vice President, (2009-2021)
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Vice President (2018-2021)
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Vice President (2018-2021)
Continuous Capital, LLC: Vice President (2018-2022)
Resolute Investment Managers, Inc.: Senior Vice President (2021-Present), Vice President (2017-2021)
Resolute Investment Services, Inc.: Senior Vice President (2021-Present), Vice President (2018-2021)
Resolute Investment Distributors, Inc.:Director (2024-Present), Vice President (2024-Present)
|
|
Samuel J. Silver
(1963) |
Vice President
since 2011 |
Vice President
since 2017 |
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.: Vice President (2011-Present), Chief Fixed Income Officer (2016-Present)
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Vice President (2018-2021)
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Vice President (2018-2021)
|
|
Rebecca L. Harris
(1966) |
Vice President
2022-May 2024, June 2024-Present President
May 2024-June 2024 Assistant Secretary
2010-2022 |
Vice President
2022-2024, June 2024-Present President
May 2024-June 2024 Assistant Secretary
2017-2022 |
Alpha Quant Advisors, LLC.: Vice President (2016-2020)
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.: Chief Operating Officer (June 2024-Present), Senior Vice President (2021-May 2024, June 2024-Present), Director (May-June 2024), President (May-June 2024), Chief Executive Officer (May-June 2024), Vice President (2011-2021)
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Assistant Secretary (2018-2021)
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Assistant Secretary (2018-2021)Continuous Capital, LLC: Vice President (2018-2022), Director (2022)
National Investment Services of America, LLC: Director (2022-Present)
Resolute Acquisition, Inc.: Senior Vice President (January 2024-May 2024, June 2024-Present), Director (May 2024-June 2024), President May 2024-June 2024), Chief Executive Officer (May 2024-June 2024)
Resolute Investment Managers, Inc.: Chief Operating Officer (June 2024-Present), Senior Vice President (2021-May 2024, June 2024-Present), Director (May-June 2024), President (May-June 2024), Chief Executive Officer (May-June 2024), Vice President (2017-2021)
Resolute Investment Services, Inc.: Senior Vice President (2021-May 2024, June 2024-Present), Director (May-June 2024), President (May-June 2024), Chief Executive Officer (May-June 2024), Vice President (2017-2021)
Resolute Topco, Inc.: Senior Vice President (January 2024-May 2024, June 2024-Present), Director (May 2024-June 2024), President (May 2024-June 2024), Chief Executive Officer (May 2024-June 2024)
RSW Investments Holdings LLC: Director (2022-Present)
Shapiro Capital Management LLC: Director (2022-Present)
SSI Investment Management LLC: Director (2022-Present)
|
|
Name and Year of Birth
|
Position and Length of Time Served on the American Beacon Funds and American Beacon Select Funds
|
Position and Length of Time Served on the American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust
|
Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships During Past 5 Years
|
|
Melinda G. Heika
(1961) |
Vice President
since 2021 |
Vice President
since 2021 |
Alpha Quant Advisors, LLC: Treasurer and CFO (2016-2020)
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.: Senior Vice President (2021-Present), Treasurer and CFO (2010-Present)
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund:Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer (2018-2021), Vice President (2021)
American Beacon Cayman Managed Futures Strategy Fund, Ltd.: Director (2014-Present), Vice President (2022-Present) and Treasurer (2014-2022),
American Beacon Cayman Multi-Alternatives Company, Ltd.: Director and Vice President (2023-Present)
American Beacon Cayman TargetRisk Company, Ltd.: Director and Vice President (2022-Present), and Treasurer (2018-2022)
American Beacon Cayman Trend Company, Ltd.: Director and Vice President (2023-Present)
American Beacon Funds: Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer (2010-2021)
American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust: Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer (2017-2021)
American Beacon Select Funds: Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer (2010-2021)
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer (2018-2021), Vice President (2021)
American Private Equity Management, L.L.C.: Treasurer (2012-2024)Continuous Capital, LLC: Treasurer (2018-2022) Resolute Acquisition, Inc.: Treasurer (2015-Present)Resolute Investment Holdings, LLC: Treasurer (2015-Present)Resolute Investment Managers, Inc.: Senior Vice President (2021-Present), Treasurer and CFO (2017-Present)Resolute Investment Services, Inc.: Senior Vice President (2021-Present), Treasurer and CFO (2017-Present)
Resolute Topco, Inc.: Treasurer (2015-Present)
|
|
Sonia L. Bates
(1956) |
Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer
since 2021 |
Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer
since 2021 |
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.: Assistant Treasurer (2023-Present)
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Assistant Treasurer (2019-2021), Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer (2021)
American Beacon Funds: Assistant Treasurer (2011-2021)
American Beacon Institutional Funds: Trust Assistant Treasurer (2017-2021)
American Beacon Cayman Managed Futures Strategy Fund, Ltd.: Treasurer (2022-Present)
American Beacon Cayman Multi-Alternatives Company, Ltd.: Treasurer (2023-Present)
American Beacon Cayman TargetRisk Company, Ltd.: Treasurer (2022-Present) and Assistant Treasurer (2018-2022)
American Beacon Cayman Trend Company, Ltd.: Treasurer (2023-Present)
American Beacon Select Funds: Assistant Treasurer (2011-2021)
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Assistant Treasurer (2018-2021), Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer (2021)
American Private Equity Management, L.L.C.: Assistant Treasurer (2012-2024)
Resolute Investment Services, Inc: Vice President, Fund and Tax Reporting (2023-Present), Director, Fund and Tax Reporting (2011-2023)
|
|
Name and Year of Birth
|
Position and Length of Time Served on the American Beacon Funds and American Beacon Select Funds
|
Position and Length of Time Served on the American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust
|
Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships During Past 5 Years
|
|
Christina E. Sears
(1971) |
Chief Compliance Officer
since 2004 Assistant Secretary since 1999 |
Chief Compliance Officer and Assistant Secretary
since 2017 |
Alpha Quant Advisors, LLC: Chief Compliance Officer (2016-2019), Vice President (2016-2020)
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.: Chief Compliance Officer (2004-Present), Vice President (2019-Present)
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Chief Compliance Officer and Assistant Secretary (2018-2021)
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund:Chief Compliance Officer and Assistant Secretary (2018-2021)
American Private Equity Management, LLC: Chief Compliance Officer (2012-2024)
Continuous Capital, LLC.: Chief Compliance Officer (2018-2019), Vice President (2018-2022)
Green Harvest Asset Management, LLC: Chief Compliance Officer (2019-2021)
Resolute Investment Distributors, Inc.: Vice President (2017-Present)Resolute Investment Managers, Inc.: Vice President (2017-Present)Resolute Investment Services, Inc.: Vice President (2019-Present)RSW Investments Holdings, LLC: Chief Compliance Officer (2019-Present)Shapiro Capital Management LLC: Chief Compliance Officer (2024-Present)
|
|
Shelley L. Dyson
(1969) |
Assistant Treasurer
since 2021 |
Assistant Treasurer
since 2021 |
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Assistant Treasurer (2021)
American Beacon Cayman Managed Futures Strategy Fund, Ltd.: Assistant Treasurer (2022-Present)
American Beacon Cayman Multi-Alternatives Company, Ltd.: Assistant Treasurer (2023-Present)
American Beacon Cayman TargetRisk Company, Ltd: Assistant Treasurer (2022-Present)
American Beacon Cayman Trend Company, Ltd.: Assistant Treasurer (2023-Present)
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Assistant Treasurer (2021)
Resolute Investment Services, Inc.: Fund Tax Director (2024-Present), Fund Tax Manager (2020-2024), Manager, Tax (2014-2020)
|
|
Shelley D. Abrahams
(1974) |
Assistant Secretary
since 2008 |
Assistant Secretary
since 2017 |
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Assistant Secretary (2018-2021)
American Beacon Cayman Managed Futures Strategy Fund, Ltd.: Assistant Secretary (2022-Present)
American Beacon Cayman Multi-Alternatives Company, Ltd.: Assistant Secretary (2023-Present)
American Beacon Cayman TargetRisk Company, Ltd: Assistant Secretary (2022-Present)
American Beacon Cayman Trend Company, Ltd.: Assistant Secretary (2023-Present)
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Assistant Secretary (2018-2021)
Resolute Investment Services, Inc.: Corporate Governance Manager (2023-Present), Senior Corporate Governance & Regulatory Specialist (2020-2023), Corporate Governance & Regulatory Specialist (2017-2020)
|
|
Teresa A. Oxford
(1958) |
Assistant Secretary
since 2015 |
Assistant Secretary
since 2017 |
Alpha Quant Advisors, LLC: Assistant Secretary (2016-2020)
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.: Deputy General Counsel (2024-Present), Assistant Secretary (2015-Present), Associate General Counsel (2015-2024)
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Assistant Secretary (2018-2021)
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Assistant Secretary (2018-2021)
Continuous Capital, LLC.: Assistant Secretary (2020-2022)
Resolute Investment Distributors, Inc.: Assistant Secretary (2018-2021), (2024-Present)
Resolute Investment Managers, Inc.: Deputy General Counsel (2024-Present), Assistant Secretary (2017-Present), Associate General Counsel (2017-2024)
Resolute Investment Services, Inc: Deputy General Counsel (2024-Present), Assistant Secretary (2018-Present), Associate General Counsel (2018-2024)
|
|
Ninety One North America, Inc. (“Ninety One NA”)
|
||
|
Controlling Person/Entity
|
Basis of Control
|
Nature of Controlling Person/Entity’s Business
|
|
Ninety One International Ltd.
|
Parent Company
|
Holding Company
|
|
Ninety One Global Ltd.
|
Parent Company of Ninety One International Ltd.
|
Holding Company
|
|
Ninety One Plc
|
Ultimate Parent Company; Parent Company of Ninety One Global Ltd.
|
Financial Services
|
|
Controlling Person/Entity
|
Basis of Control
|
Nature of Controlling Person/Entity’s Business
|
|
Resolute Topco, Inc.
|
Ultimate Parent Company
|
Holding Company – Founded in 2015
|
|
First $5 billion
|
0.35%
|
|
Next $5 billion
|
0.325%
|
|
Next $10 billion
|
0.30%
|
|
Over $20 billion
|
0.275%
|
|
■
|
complying with reporting requirements;
|
|
■
|
corresponding with shareholders;
|
|
■
|
maintaining internal bookkeeping, accounting and auditing services and records;
|
|
■
|
supervising the provision of services to the Trust by third parties; and
|
|
■
|
administering the Funds’ interfund lending facility and lines of credit, if applicable.
|
|
Number of Other Accounts Managed
and Assets by Account Type |
Number of Accounts and Assets for Which
Advisory Fee is Performance-Based |
|||||
|
Name of Investment Advisor and Portfolio Manager
|
Registered Investment Companies
|
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
|
Other Accounts
|
Registered Investment Companies
|
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
|
Other Accounts
|
|
Ninety One North America, Inc.
|
||||||
|
Archie Hart
|
1 ($90.3 mil)
|
5 ($3.7 bil)
|
17 ($7.4 bil)
|
None
|
None
|
2 ($312 mil)
|
|
Varun Laijawalla
|
1 ($90.3 mil)
|
5 ($3.7 bil)
|
17 ($7.4 bil)
|
None
|
None
|
2 ($312 mil)
|
|
Name of Investment Advisor and Portfolio Managers
|
Ninety One Emerging Markets Equity Fund
|
|
Ninety One North America, Inc.
|
|
|
Archie Hart
|
None
|
|
Varun Laijawalla
|
None
|
|
■
|
Derive at least 90% of its gross income each taxable year from (1) dividends, interest, payments with respect to securities loans and gains from the sale or other disposition of securities or foreign currencies, or other income, including gains from options, futures or forward contracts, derived with respect to its business of investing in securities or those currencies and (2) net income derived from an interest in a “qualified publicly traded partnership” (“QPTP”) (“Qualifying Income”) (“Gross Income Requirement”). A QPTP is a “publicly traded partnership” (that is, a partnership the interests in which are “traded on an established securities market” or “readily tradable on a secondary market (or the substantial equivalent thereof)” (a “PTP”)) that meets certain qualifying income requirements other than a partnership at least 90% of the gross income of which is Qualifying Income as described in clause (1);
|
|
■
|
Diversify its investments so that, at the close of each quarter of its taxable year, (1) at least 50% of the value of its total assets is represented by cash and cash items, Government securities, securities of other RICs, and other securities, with those other securities limited, in respect of any one issuer, to an amount that does not exceed 5% of the value of the Fund’s total assets and that does not represent more than 10% of the issuer’s outstanding voting securities (equity securities of QPTPs being considered voting securities for these purposes), and (2) not more than 25% of the value of its total assets is invested in (a) the securities (other than Government securities or securities of other RICs) of any one issuer, (b) the securities (other than securities of other RICs) of two or more issuers the Fund control (by owning 20% or more of their voting power) that are determined to be engaged in the same, similar or related trades or businesses, or (c) the securities of one or more QPTPs (“Diversification Requirements”); and
|
|
■
|
Distribute annually to its shareholders at least the sum of 90% of its investment company taxable income (generally, net investment income, the excess (if any) of net short-term capital gain over net long-term capital loss, and net gains and losses (if any) from certain foreign currency transactions, all determined without regard to any deduction for dividends paid) and 90% of its net exempt interest income (“Distribution Requirement”).
|
| 1 | Leadership and strategic control |
| 2 | Alignment with the long term |
| 3 | Climate change |
| 4 | Protecting client capital |
| 5 | Audit and disclosure |
|
The board and its directors
|
|
The board determines the strategic direction of the company, taking into account the interests of the company and all its stakeholders. The board bears ultimate responsibility for the long-term sustainable success of the company.
|
|
Although board structures vary across countries, Ninety One expects boards to:
|
|
■
|
Be sufficiently independent, so as to protect all shareholders’ interests.
|
|
■
|
Have adequate executive representation, so as to provide significant operational insight.
|
|
■
|
Provide strong and diverse oversight, underpinned by a variety of skills and experiences that replicate the business’s key features and geographies.
|
|
■
|
Maintain an optimal board size, with appropriate board refreshment, succession plans and correct attendance to find the right balance between fresh perspectives and company history.
|
|
Ninety One believes directors should stand for re-election regularly, and that there should be clear and detailed disclosures of a director’s background. These should be made available to shareholders to facilitate the assessment of their suitability.
|
|
Ninety One expects a board to include a sufficient number of independent directors. Some common obstacles to independence include:
|
|
■
|
Founder status
|
|
■
|
Family relations with senior executives or founders
|
|
■
|
Excessive tenure
|
|
■
|
Having served as an executive in the previous five years
|
|
■
|
Having business relationships with the company or its executives
|
|
■
|
A shareholding in the company of over 10% of the issued share capital
|
|
Interlocking directorships
|
|
The chair leads the board and is responsible for its overall effectiveness in directing the company. Should the company be large and complex in nature, or the chairperson not be independent, Ninety One would require a suitably experienced and senior board member to be appointed as the Lead/Senior Independent Director (LID/SID). The LID should be able to engage independently with owners on governance-related issues.
|
|
The LID should also assume key governance responsibilities, including the supervision of the annual evaluation of the chairperson. The LID should also handle specific issues relating to conflicts of interest of board members, should the chairperson not be independent. Ninety One considers a combined chairperson and CEO role to be a governance risk.
|
|
The voting guidelines arising from the above are as follows:
|
|
■
|
Unless there is a particular context and explanation, Ninety One may not support the (re)election of the chairperson where:
|
|
■
|
They are considered to be not independent.
|
|
■
|
They are the former CEO.
|
|
■
|
There has been a clear failure to conduct periodic reviews of the performance of the board.
|
|
■
|
They have repeatedly refused to adhere to reasonable disclosure requests.
|
|
■
|
There has been a disregard for the interests of stakeholders, including in relation to the environmental and social risks and impacts of the company.
|
|
■
|
There is a lack of succession planning and there is no engagement on the topic.
|
|
■
|
Shareholder rights and the ability to communicate with the board have been impaired.
|
|
■
|
There are persistent and unaddressed governance failures that pose a material risk, unless the board has provided a strong rationale.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against a combined chair and CEO board structure, although it will consider all circumstances, including duration of the appointment, the potential concentration of power and explicit disclosures on how conflicts of interest have been managed.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may not support non-independent directors where the overall board balance is not majority independent or does not at least meet the local market requirements.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One generally accepts proportional representation of shareholdings on the board, so long as minority shareholders’ interests are respected.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One will, in the first instance, focus on non-independent non-executive directors who also serve as key committee members when the overall board is not majority independent.
|
|
■
|
Where executive directors sit as committee members, Ninety One may vote against the executive directors.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against directors, including the chairperson, if, from a sustainability point of view, there are unmitigated risks, poor disclosure, incidents and failure to appropriately manage and anticipate environmental and social risks which have resulted, or may result, in the destruction of shareholder value.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against the re-election of any director who has not attended 75% of the total number of board and relevant committee meetings in the period since they were last elected to the board, unless an appropriate explanation has been provided.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against directors who, due to having accumulated multiple board roles at other publicly listed companies or large unlisted companies, run the risk of not being able to properly discharge their fiduciary duties. Ninety One will look at the number of external roles, the roles themselves, and the market capitalisation of the companies concerned.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One prefers boards that are adequately sized and may vote against certain directors if it considers the board to be too large and unwieldy.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One expects timely disclosure of names and biographical details of all nominees, and may vote against candidates where such information is not disclosed.
|
|
■
|
As a general principle, Ninety One does not support bundled directors’ elections, although it will be guided by regional best practice.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One does not support proposals that remove directors from being re-elected by either a clean slate (100% of the board) or by rotation (usually 33% per year).
|
|
■
|
Ninety One does not generally support the election of alternate directors.
|
|
Board committees
|
|
Ninety One expects the audit, remuneration and nomination committees to comprise non-executive directors only and be chaired by an independent non-executive director. Ninety One may vote against non-independent directors when the structures below are not in place, or when the discharge of duties by each of the committees does not meet the principles it expects companies to uphold.
|
|
Audit committee
The audit committee has a crucial role in safeguarding investors’ interests, as it is responsible for the integrity of the financial statements, risk management and auditor appointment. Given this key role, Ninety One expects audit committees to comprise independent non-executive directors only. They should comprise a minimum of three members with at least one with recent and relevant financial expertise. |
|
Remuneration committee
The remuneration committee is responsible for designing and implementing the remuneration scheme for the company’s executive directors and senior management, including consideration of remuneration related to the management of the environment and social risks and impacts. In this capacity, it should have knowledge of pay structures across the organisation, including that of the CEO, as well as being aware of the gender-pay-gap ratio and other relevant diversity factors. Ninety One expects remuneration committees to be fully independent where called for by market practice, and prefers at least some remuneration committee members to be, or have been, remuneration committee members at other publicly listed companies or to have had similar experience. |
|
Nomination committee
The nomination committee is responsible for ensuring that the board comprises directors with a good range of relevant skills and knowledge and that they collectively represent diversity. It is tasked with designing and implementing robust board-evaluation and succession-planning policies. Ninety One expects nomination committees to be majority independent. |
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against the chair of the nomination committee if, after engagement, there is a failure to ensure appropriate diversity on the board, including ethnicity and gender for example.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against the nomination committee chairperson or the board chairperson in cases where it believes that the necessary skills/ diversity are lacking on the board, including in relation to climate change and transition.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against the nomination committee chairperson or board chairperson in cases where there is no indication that proper and ongoing board assessments and succession planning are taking place.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against remuneration resolutions where there is insufficient disclosure to assess the schemes, and/or where existing disclosure does not follow the regulatory guidelines of the relevant jurisdiction.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One places special emphasis on clear and meaningful performance metrics and targets, which should be linked to the company’s strategy and include stretching vesting levels. The lowering of targets may only be accepted in exceptional circumstances.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One prefers schemes with several performance metrics that should be relative and under the effective control of the executive directors.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One requires a minimum performance period of three years and favours schemes with a subsequent vesting period.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One require malus and clawback provisions to be in place.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against remuneration resolutions if the remuneration approach fails to ensure appropriate remuneration related to the management of environmental and social risks and impacts.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against remuneration resolutions if it is concerned about pay outcomes and not all the members of the remuneration committee are independent.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against remuneration resolutions where there is not a healthy balance between fixed and variable pay and, within the latter, a relevant split between short- and long-term compensation.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One will consider not only maximum pay-outs allowed under the policy, but also year-on-year granted amounts, and will consider this in the context of the company’s size, sector, maturity and previous payment history. Remuneration committees should have the ability to exercise discretion within the boundaries of applicable employment laws and regulations. However, discretion should be exercised with caution and its use publicly justified.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against untoward salary increases without appropriate justification and excessive pension arrangements. Ninety One will vote against proposals that include variable pay within pension entitlement or where pension arrangements are not aligned with the broader workforce, and may vote against increases that are triggered entirely by benchmarking exercises.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One will vote against plans that can be materially amended without shareholder approval.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One does not support retrospective/inflight amendments to incentive schemes, nor the repricing of options, except in exceptional circumstances when not doing so may result in the interests of management and shareholders not being aligned.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One does not typically support transaction bonuses.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One expects dilution levels to be kept to a minimum.
|
|
■
|
On recruitment, Ninety One expects companies to pay no more than is strictly necessary. If buy-out awards are agreed, it expects like-for-like structures together with an explanation of the link between pay and performance in the old and new schemes. Ninety One may vote against such schemes if these conditions are not met.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against severance payments that are not aligned with the company’s remuneration policy and those exceeding contractual requirements. Severance payments should be subject to the same performance tests and pro- rated for time served. Ninety One will vote against accelerated vesting provisions and severance payments lacking disclosure of their terms.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against any option schemes where there is automatic vesting on a change in control of the company.
|
|
■
|
Vote against the general authority to issue shares with an attached right of pre-emption of more than 33% of the issued share capital of the company.
|
|
■
|
Vote against the general authority to issue shares without attached right of pre-emption of more than 10% of the issued share capital of the company. In the UK, Ninety One accepts a 20% issuance authority if it follows the Pre-Emption Rights Group principles.
|
|
■
|
Vote against any general authority to issue shares for cash above 5%.
|
|
■
|
Vote against any issue of shares for cash where the discount limit is more than 5%.
|
|
■
|
Vote against all general authorities where management has a record of destroying company value as assessed by Ninety One’s own investment process.
|
|
■
|
Vote against the issue of shares to option schemes that it has actively opposed, or where it has opposed the adoption of the remuneration report.
|
|
■
|
There is sufficient liquidity in the market.
|
|
■
|
The company has substantial cash resources and the repurchase scheme is a viable and tax-efficient method of returning cash to shareholders.
|
|
■
|
The company has a track record of cancelling treasury shares rather than re-issuing them to share option schemes (unless this intention has been declared in advance).
|
|
■
|
There is no conflict of interest with the company’s management incentive policy.
|
|
■
|
The share price at the time of the general authority is substantially below its intrinsic value as assessed by Ninety One’s own investment process.
|
|
■
|
There is a robust argument as to how the share repurchase scheme will add more value to shareholders than a cash dividend, repaying debt or making appropriate investments to enhance efficiency or expand operations.
|
|
■
|
The company has sufficient balance-sheet strength and cash resources not to place it under any form of financial strain.
|
|
■
|
Making a symbolic vote against the adoption of the financial statements.
|
|
■
|
Voting against the re-election of incumbent directors.
|
|
■
|
‘Poison pill’ proposals in any form.
|
|
■
|
Any resolutions that propose new share classes that have proportionately higher voting rights than existing share classes.
|
|
■
|
Any resolutions that absolve directors from either their fiduciary responsibilities to owners or their re-election through an ordinary resolution.
|
|
■
|
There are repeated and material misstatements in the annual financial statements.
|
|
■
|
A disproportionate (+40%) amount of the auditor’s total fee over the previous three years is derived from non-audit services. In markets where it is not required or best practice to disclose non-audit fees, Ninety One aims to engage with companies to encourage such disclosure.
|
|
■
|
The auditor is engaged with conducting the internal audit.
|
|
■
|
The auditor has been in place for more than 10 years and there has not been a recent tender process and there are no plans to put the audit out to tender. This may also result in the withdrawal of support for the audit committee chairperson.
|
|
■
|
There is a clear deficiency in information.
|
|
■
|
There has been an attempt to hide or obfuscate materials.
|
|
■
|
There are serious omissions, or there has been an audit qualification.
|
|
American Beacon or the Manager
|
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.
|
|
Beacon Funds or Trust
|
American Beacon Funds
|
|
Board
|
Board of Trustees
|
|
Brexit
|
The United Kingdom’s departure from the European Union
|
|
CCO
|
Chief Compliance Officer
|
|
CDSC
|
Contingent Deferred Sales Charge
|
|
CFTC
|
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
|
|
CPO
|
Commodity Pool Operator
|
|
Denial of Services
|
A cybersecurity incident that results in customers or employees being unable to access electronic systems
|
|
Dividends
|
Distributions from a Fund’s net investment income
|
|
Dodd-Frank Act
|
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
|
|
DRD
|
Dividends-received deduction.
|
|
ETF
|
Exchange-Traded Fund
|
|
ETN
|
Exchange-Traded Note
|
|
EU
|
European Union
|
|
FINRA
|
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
|
|
Forwards
|
Forward Currency Contracts
|
|
Holdings Policy
|
Policies and Procedures for Disclosure of Portfolio Holdings
|
|
Internal Revenue Code
|
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
|
|
Investment Company Act
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended
|
|
IRA
|
Individual Retirement Account
|
|
IRS
|
Internal Revenue Service
|
|
Junk Bonds
|
High yield, non-investment grade bonds
|
|
LOI
|
Letter of Intent
|
|
Management Agreement
|
A Fund’s Management Agreement with the Manager
|
|
Manager
|
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.
|
|
Moody’s
|
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.
|
|
NAV
|
Net asset value
|
|
NDF
|
Non-deliverable forward contracts
|
|
NYSE
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
|
OID
|
Original Issue Discount
|
|
OTC
|
Over-the-Counter
|
|
Proxy Policy
|
Proxy Voting Policy and Procedures
|
|
QDI
|
Qualified Dividend Income
|
|
RIC
|
Regulated Investment Company
|
|
S&P Global
|
S&P Global Ratings
|
|
SAI
|
Statement of Additional Information
|
|
SEC
|
Securities and Exchange Commission
|
|
Securities Act
|
Securities Act of 1933, as amended
|
|
State Street
|
State Street Bank and Trust Co.
|
|
TIPS
|
Treasury Inflation Protected Securities
|
|
Trustee Retirement Plan
|
Trustee Retirement and Trustee Emeritus and Retirement Plan
|
|
UK
|
United Kingdom
|
![]() |
|
American Beacon
|
|
|
Share Class
|
||
|
|
Y
|
R6
|
R5
|
|
American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund
|
ZGFAX
|
ZGFRX
|
ZGFIX
|
|
American Beacon Ninety One International Franchise Fund
|
ZIFAX
|
ZIFRX
|
ZIFIX
|
|
Back Cover
|
|
|
American Beacon
Ninety One Global Franchise FundSM |
![]() |
|
Share Class
|
Y
|
R6
|
R5
|
|
Maximum sales charge imposed on purchases (as a percentage of offering price)
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum deferred sales charge (as a percentage of the lower of original offering price or redemption proceeds)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Class
|
Y
|
R6
|
R5
|
|
Management Fees
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) Fees
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Other Expenses1
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses2
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Fee Waiver and/or expense reimbursement3
|
(
%)
|
(
%)
|
(
%)
|
|
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
| 1 |
| 2 | The Fund is the successor to the Ninety One Global Franchise Fund (the “Predecessor Fund”), pursuant to a reorganization that occurred on November 15, 2024 (“Closing Date”), in which the Y Class and the R5 Class shares of the Fund adopted the financial statements and performance history of the A Shares and I Shares, respectively, of the Predecessor Fund. The Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses of the Fund’s Y Class and R5 Class shares do not correlate to the ratio of expenses to average net assets provided in the Financial Highlights for the A Shares and I Shares, respectively, of the Predecessor Fund, but instead reflect the Fund’s estimated expenses. |
| 3 | American Beacon Advisors, Inc. (the “Manager”) has contractually agreed to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses of the Fund’s Y Class, R6 Class, and R5 Class shares, as applicable, through November 30, 2027 to the extent that Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses exceed 0.85% for the Y Class, 0.82% for the R6 Class, and 0.85% for the R5 Class (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, securities lending fees, expenses associated with securities sold short, litigation, and other extraordinary expenses). The contractual expense reimbursement can be changed or terminated only in the discretion and with the approval of a majority of the Fund’s Board of Trustees. The Manager will itself waive fees and/or reimburse expenses of the Fund to maintain the contractual expense ratio caps for each applicable class of shares or make arrangements with other service providers to do so. The Manager can be reimbursed by the Fund for any contractual fee waivers or expense reimbursements if reimbursement to the Manager (a) occurs within three years from the date of the Manager’s waiver/reimbursement and (b) does not cause the Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses of a class to exceed the lesser of the contractual percentage limit in effect at the time of the waiver/reimbursement or the time of the recoupment. |
|
Share Class
|
1 Year
|
3 Years
|
|
Y
|
$
|
$
|
|
R6
|
$
|
$
|
|
R5
|
$
|
$
|
|
■
|
Common Stock Risk. The value of a company’s common stock may fall as a result of factors affecting the company, companies in the same industry or sector, or the financial markets overall. Common stock generally is subordinate to preferred stock upon the liquidation or bankruptcy of the issuing company.
|
|
■
|
Depositary Receipts Risk. Depositary receipts are subject to certain of the risks associated with investing directly in foreign securities, including, but not limited to, currency exchange rate fluctuations, political and financial instability in the home country of a particular depositary receipt, less liquidity, more volatility, less government regulation and supervision and delays in transaction settlement.
|
|
■
|
U.S. Dollar-Denominated Foreign Stocks Traded on U.S. Exchanges Risk. Foreign (non-U.S.) companies that list their stocks on U.S. exchanges may be exempt from certain accounting and corporate governance standards that apply to U.S. companies that list on the same exchange. Performance of these stocks can be impacted by political and financial instability in the home country of a particular foreign company, and delisting of these stocks could impact the Fund‘s ability to transact in such securities and could significantly impact their liquidity and market price.
|
|
■
|
European Securities Risk. The Fund’s performance may be affected by political, social and economic conditions in Europe, such as growth of economic output (the gross national product of the countries in the region), the rate of inflation, the rate at which capital is reinvested into European economies, the success of governmental actions to reduce budget deficits, the resource self-sufficiency of European countries, the monetary exchange rates between European countries, and conflict between European countries. The European financial markets have experienced and may continue to experience volatility and adverse trends due to concerns relating to economic downturns; rising government debt levels and the possible default on government debt; national unemployment in several European countries; public health crises; political unrest; economic sanctions; inflation; energy crises; and war and military conflict, such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine. A default or debt restructuring by any European country could adversely impact holders of that country’s debt and sellers of credit default swaps linked to that country’s creditworthiness, which may be located in other countries. Such a default or debt restructuring could affect exposures to European countries. In addition, issuers have faced difficulties obtaining credit or refinancing existing obligations, and financial markets have experienced extreme volatility and declines in asset values and liquidity. These events have affected the exchange rate of the Euro and may continue to significantly affect European countries.
|
|
Responses to financial problems by European governments, central banks, and others, including austerity measures and other reforms, may not produce the desired results, may result in social unrest and may limit future growth and economic recovery or may have unintended consequences. The Fund makes investments in securities of issuers that are domiciled in member states of the European Union (the “EU”). The economies and markets of European countries are often closely connected and interdependent, and events in one country in Europe can have an adverse impact on other European countries. One or more countries may abandon the Euro and/or withdraw from the EU. The impact of these actions, especially if they occur in a disorderly fashion, could be significant and far-reaching. The United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the EU could be an indication that one or more other countries may withdraw from the EU and/or abandon the Euro. These events and actions have affected, and may in the future affect, the value and exchange rate of the Euro and may continue to significantly affect the economies of every country in Europe, including countries that do not use the Euro and non-EU member states.
|
|
The continuing effects on the economies of European countries of the Russia/Ukraine war and Russia’s response to sanctions imposed by the U.S., EU, UK and others, are impossible to predict, but have been and could continue to be significant. For example, exports in Eastern Europe have been disrupted for certain key commodities, pushing commodity prices to record highs. Also, both wholesale energy prices and energy prices charged to consumers in Europe have increased significantly.
|
|
■
|
Recent Market Events Risk. Both U.S. and international markets have experienced significant volatility in recent months and years. As a result of such volatility, investment returns may fluctuate significantly. Moreover, the risks discussed herein associated with an investment in the Fund may be increased.
Although interest rates were unusually low in the U.S. and abroad for a period of time, in 2022, the U.S. Federal Reserve (the “Federal Reserve”) and certain foreign central banks began to raise interest rates as part of their efforts to address rising inflation. The Federal Reserve and certain foreign central banks have started to lower interest rates, though economic or other factors, such as inflation, could stop such changes. It is difficult to accurately predict the pace at which interest rates might change, the timing, frequency or magnitude of any such changes in interest rates, or when such changes might stop or again reverse course. Additionally, various economic and political factors could cause the Federal Reserve or foreign central banks to change their approach in the future and such actions may result in an economic slowdown in the U.S. and abroad. Unexpected changes in interest rates could lead to significant market volatility or reduce liquidity in certain sectors of the market. Deteriorating economic fundamentals may, in turn, increase the risk of default or insolvency of particular issuers, negatively impact market value, cause credit spreads to widen, and reduce bank balance sheets. Any of these could cause an increase in market volatility, reduce liquidity across various markets or decrease confidence in the markets. High public debt in the U.S. and other countries creates ongoing systemic and market risks and policymaking uncertainty. There is no assurance that the U.S. Congress will act to raise the nation’s debt ceiling; a failure to do so could cause market turmoil and substantial investment risks that cannot be fully predicted. Unexpected political, regulatory and diplomatic events within the U.S. and abroad may affect investor and consumer confidence and may adversely impact financial markets and the broader economy. Some countries, including the U.S., have adopted more protectionist trade policies. Slowing global economic growth, imposition of tariffs and resulting impacts on global prices and supply chains; the rise in protectionist trade policies, inflationary pressures, changes to some major international trade agreements, risks associated with trade negotiations between countries and regions, including the U.S. and certain foreign nations, political or economic dysfunction within some nations, including the U.S., and dramatic changes in commodity and currency prices could have adverse effects that cannot be foreseen at the present time. In addition, if the U.S. dollar continues to be strong, it may decrease foreign demand for U.S. assets, which could have a negative impact on certain issuers and/or industries. Tensions, war, or open conflict between nations, such as between Russia and Ukraine, in the Middle East or in eastern Asia could affect the economies of many nations, including the United States. The duration of ongoing hostilities in the Middle East and between Russia and Ukraine, and any sanctions and related events cannot be predicted. Those events present material uncertainty and risk with respect to markets globally and the performance of the Fund and its investments or operations could be negatively impacted. Regulators in the U.S. have adopted a number of changes to regulations involving the markets and issuers, some of which apply to the Fund. The full effect of various newly adopted regulations is not currently known. Certain of these changes could limit the Fund’s ability to pursue its investment strategies or make certain investments, or may make it more costly for the Fund to operate, which may impact performance. Additionally, it is possible that recently adopted regulations could be further revised or rescinded, which creates material uncertainty on their impact to the Fund. Economists and others have expressed increasing concern about the potential effects of global climate change on property and security values. Certain issuers, industries and regions may be adversely affected by the impacts of climate change in ways that cannot be foreseen, including on the demand for and the development of goods and services and related production costs, and the impacts of legislation, regulation and international accords related to climate change, as well as any indirect consequences of regulation or business trends driven by climate change. |
|
■
|
Government Money Market Funds Risk. Investments in government money market funds are subject to interest rate risk, credit risk, and market risk. Interest rate risk is the risk that rising interest rates could cause the value of such an investment to decline. Credit risk is the risk that the issuer, guarantor or insurer of an obligation, or the counterparty to a transaction, may fail or become less able or unwilling, to make timely payment of interest or principal or otherwise honor its obligations, or that it may default completely.
|
|
■
|
Information Technology Sector Risk. The Information Technology sector includes companies engaged in software and services, technology hardware and storage peripherals, electronic equipment and components, and semiconductors and semiconductor equipment. Information technology companies face intense competition, both domestically and internationally, which may have an adverse effect on profit margins. Information technology companies may have limited product lines, markets, financial resources or personnel. The products of information technology companies may face rapid product obsolescence due to technological developments and frequent new product introduction, unpredictable changes in growth rates and competition for the services of qualified personnel. Failure to introduce new products, develop and maintain a loyal customer base or achieve general market acceptance for their products could have a material adverse effect on a company’s business. Companies in the Information Technology sector also may be subject to increased government scrutiny or adverse government or regulatory action. Additionally, companies in the Information Technology sector are heavily dependent on intellectual property and the loss of patent, copyright or trademark protections may adversely affect the profitability of these companies. The market prices of information technology-related securities tend to exhibit a greater degree of market risk and sharp price fluctuations than other types of securities. These securities may fall in and out of favor with investors rapidly, which may cause sudden selling and dramatically lower market prices.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
Inception Date
|
1 Year
|
5 Years
|
Since Inception (12/11/2017)
|
|
R5 Class
|
|
|
|
|
|
Returns Before Taxes
|
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Returns After Taxes on Distributions
|
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Returns After Taxes on Distributions and Sales of Fund Shares
|
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
|
Inception Date
|
1 Year
|
5 Years
|
Since Inception (09/28/2018)
|
Since Inception (12/11/2017)
|
|
Share Class (Before Taxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y
|
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
N/A
|
|
R6
|
|
%
|
%
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
1 Year
|
5 Years
|
Since Inception (From Inception Date of Y Class Shares) (09/28/2018)
|
Since Inception (From Inception Date of R5 Class and R6 Class Shares) (12/11/2017)
|
|
Index (Reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes, other than withholding taxes, as noted)
|
||||
|
MSCI® ACWI Index (USD)*
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
| * | Reflects the reinvestment of dividends after the deduction of withholding taxes, using a tax rate applicable to non-resident individuals who do not benefit from double taxation treaties. |
|
Ninety One North America, Inc.
|
Elias Erickson
Portfolio Manager Since 20241 |
Clyde Rossouw
Portfolio Manager2 Since Fund Inception (2017)3 |
|
|
Abrie Pretorius
Portfolio Manager Since 20241 |
Paul Vincent
Portfolio Manager4 Since 20241 |
| 1 | Includes Predecessor Fund. |
| 2 | The position shown for the indicated portfolio manager is held with Ninety One SA (Pty) Ltd., a participating affiliate of Ninety One North America, Inc. |
| 3 | Predecessor Fund inception date. |
| 4 | The position shown for the indicated portfolio manager is held with Ninety One UK Ltd., a participating affiliate of Ninety One North America, Inc. |
|
|
New Account
|
Existing Account
|
|
|
Share Class
|
Minimum Initial Investment Amount
|
Purchase/Redemption Minimum by Check/ACH/Exchange
|
Purchase/Redemption Minimum by Wire
|
|
Y
|
$100,000
|
$50
|
None
|
|
R6
|
None
|
$50
|
None
|
|
R5
|
$250,000
|
$50
|
None
|
|
American Beacon
Ninety One International Franchise FundSM |
![]() |
|
Share Class
|
Y
|
R6
|
R5
|
|
Maximum sales charge imposed on purchases (as a percentage of offering price)
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum deferred sales charge (as a percentage of the lower of original offering price or redemption proceeds)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y
|
R6
|
R5
|
|
|
Management Fees
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) Fees
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Other Expenses1
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses2
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Fee Waiver and/or expense reimbursement3
|
(
%)
|
(
%)
|
(
%)
|
|
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
| 1 |
| 2 | The Fund is the successor to the Ninety One International Franchise Fund (the “Predecessor Fund”), pursuant to a reorganization that occurred on November 15, 2024 (“Closing Date”), in which the R5 Class shares of the Fund adopted the financial statements and performance history of the I Shares of the Predecessor Fund. The Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses of the Fund’s R5 Class shares do not correlate to the ratio of expenses to average net assets provided in the Financial Highlights for the I Shares of the Predecessor Fund, but instead reflect the Fund’s estimated expenses. |
| 3 | American Beacon Advisors, Inc. (the “Manager”) has contractually agreed to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses of the Fund’s Y Class, R6 Class, and R5 Class shares, as applicable, through November 30, 2027 to the extent that Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses exceed 0.92% for the Y Class, 0.82% for the R6 Class, and 0.85% for the R5 Class (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, securities lending fees, expenses associated with securities sold short, litigation, and other extraordinary expenses). The contractual expense reimbursement can be changed or terminated only in the discretion and with the approval of a majority of the Fund’s Board of Trustees. The Manager will itself waive fees and/or reimburse expenses of the Fund to maintain the contractual expense ratio caps for each applicable class of shares or make arrangements with other service providers to do so. The Manager can be reimbursed by the Fund for any contractual fee waivers or expense reimbursements if reimbursement to the Manager (a) occurs within three years from the date of the Manager’s waiver/reimbursement and (b) does not cause the Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses of a class to exceed the lesser of the contractual percentage limit in effect at the time of the waiver/reimbursement or the time of the recoupment. |
|
1 Year
|
3 Years
|
|
|
Y
|
$
|
$
|
|
R6
|
$
|
$
|
|
R5
|
$
|
$
|
|
■
|
Common Stock Risk. The value of a company’s common stock may fall as a result of factors affecting the company, companies in the same industry or sector, or the financial markets overall. Common stock generally is subordinate to preferred stock upon the liquidation or bankruptcy of the issuing company.
|
|
■
|
Depositary Receipts Risk. Depositary receipts are subject to certain of the risks associated with investing directly in foreign securities, including, but not limited to, currency exchange rate fluctuations, political and financial instability in the home country of a particular depositary receipt, less liquidity, more volatility, less government regulation and supervision and delays in transaction settlement.
|
|
■
|
U.S. Dollar-Denominated Foreign Stocks Traded on U.S. Exchanges Risk. Foreign (non-U.S.) companies that list their stocks on U.S. exchanges may be exempt from certain accounting and corporate governance standards that apply to U.S. companies that list on the same exchange. Performance of these stocks can be impacted by political and financial instability in the home country of a particular foreign company, and delisting of these stocks could impact the Fund‘s ability to transact in such securities and could significantly impact their liquidity and market price.
|
|
■
|
European Securities Risk. The Fund’s performance may be affected by political, social and economic conditions in Europe, such as growth of economic output (the gross national product of the countries in the region), the rate of inflation, the rate at which capital is reinvested into European economies, the success of governmental actions to reduce budget deficits, the resource self-sufficiency of European countries, the monetary exchange rates between European countries, and conflict between European countries. The European financial markets have experienced and may continue to experience volatility and adverse trends due to concerns relating to economic downturns; rising government debt levels and the possible default on government debt; national unemployment in several European countries; public health crises; political unrest; economic sanctions; inflation; energy crises; and war and military conflict, such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine. A default or debt restructuring by any European country could adversely impact holders of that country’s debt and sellers of credit default swaps linked to that country’s creditworthiness, which may be located in other countries. Such a default or debt restructuring could affect exposures to European countries. In addition, issuers have faced difficulties obtaining credit or refinancing existing obligations, and financial markets have experienced extreme volatility and declines in asset values and liquidity. These events have affected the exchange rate of the Euro and may continue to significantly affect European countries.
|
|
Responses to financial problems by European governments, central banks, and others, including austerity measures and other reforms, may not produce the desired results, may result in social unrest and may limit future growth and economic recovery or may have unintended consequences. The Fund makes investments in securities of issuers that are domiciled in member states of the European Union (the “EU”). The economies and markets of European countries are often closely connected and interdependent, and events in one country in Europe can have an adverse impact on other European countries. One or more countries may abandon the Euro and/or withdraw from the EU. The impact of these actions, especially if they occur in a disorderly fashion, could be significant and far-reaching. The United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the EU could be an indication that one or more other countries may withdraw from the EU and/or abandon the Euro. These events and actions have affected, and may in the future affect, the value and exchange rate of the Euro and may continue to significantly affect the economies of every country in Europe, including countries that do not use the Euro and non-EU member states.
|
|
The continuing effects on the economies of European countries of the Russia/Ukraine war and Russia’s response to sanctions imposed by the U.S., EU, UK and others, are impossible to predict, but have been and could continue to be significant. For example, exports in Eastern Europe have been disrupted for certain key commodities, pushing commodity prices to record highs. Also, both wholesale energy prices and energy prices charged to consumers in Europe have increased significantly.
|
|
■
|
Pacific Basin Securities Risk. The Pacific Basin region includes countries in various stages of economic development. Many Pacific Basin countries are considered undeveloped or developing and may be subject to greater social, political and economic instability than is the case in the U.S. and Western European countries. In addition, the region has historically been prone to natural disasters, the occurrence of which could negatively impact the economy of any country in the region. The economies of most countries in this region are heavily dependent on international trade and are accordingly affected by protective trade barriers and the economic conditions of their trading partners. These economies may depend upon only a few industries and/or exports of primary commodities and, therefore, are vulnerable to changes in commodity prices. The securities markets in the Pacific Basin may be substantially smaller,
|
|
less liquid and more volatile than the major securities markets in the U.S., which may affect the Fund’s ability to acquire or dispose of securities at the price and time it wishes. Changes in the value of those countries’ currencies against the U.S. dollar will result in corresponding changes in the U.S. dollar value of the Fund’s assets denominated in those currencies.
|
|
■
|
Recent Market Events Risk. Both U.S. and international markets have experienced significant volatility in recent months and years. As a result of such volatility, investment returns may fluctuate significantly. Moreover, the risks discussed herein associated with an investment in the Fund may be increased.
Although interest rates were unusually low in the U.S. and abroad for a period of time, in 2022, the U.S. Federal Reserve (the “Federal Reserve”) and certain foreign central banks began to raise interest rates as part of their efforts to address rising inflation. The Federal Reserve and certain foreign central banks have started to lower interest rates, though economic or other factors, such as inflation, could stop such changes. It is difficult to accurately predict the pace at which interest rates might change, the timing, frequency or magnitude of any such changes in interest rates, or when such changes might stop or again reverse course. Additionally, various economic and political factors could cause the Federal Reserve or foreign central banks to change their approach in the future and such actions may result in an economic slowdown in the U.S. and abroad. Unexpected changes in interest rates could lead to significant market volatility or reduce liquidity in certain sectors of the market. Deteriorating economic fundamentals may, in turn, increase the risk of default or insolvency of particular issuers, negatively impact market value, cause credit spreads to widen, and reduce bank balance sheets. Any of these could cause an increase in market volatility, reduce liquidity across various markets or decrease confidence in the markets. High public debt in the U.S. and other countries creates ongoing systemic and market risks and policymaking uncertainty. There is no assurance that the U.S. Congress will act to raise the nation’s debt ceiling; a failure to do so could cause market turmoil and substantial investment risks that cannot be fully predicted. Unexpected political, regulatory and diplomatic events within the U.S. and abroad may affect investor and consumer confidence and may adversely impact financial markets and the broader economy. Some countries, including the U.S., have adopted more protectionist trade policies. Slowing global economic growth, imposition of tariffs and resulting impacts on global prices and supply chains; the rise in protectionist trade policies, inflationary pressures, changes to some major international trade agreements, risks associated with trade negotiations between countries and regions, including the U.S. and certain foreign nations, political or economic dysfunction within some nations, including the U.S., and dramatic changes in commodity and currency prices could have adverse effects that cannot be foreseen at the present time. In addition, if the U.S. dollar continues to be strong, it may decrease foreign demand for U.S. assets, which could have a negative impact on certain issuers and/or industries. Tensions, war, or open conflict between nations, such as between Russia and Ukraine, in the Middle East or in eastern Asia could affect the economies of many nations, including the United States. The duration of ongoing hostilities in the Middle East and between Russia and Ukraine, and any sanctions and related events cannot be predicted. Those events present material uncertainty and risk with respect to markets globally and the performance of the Fund |
|
and its investments or operations could be negatively impacted.
Regulators in the U.S. have adopted a number of changes to regulations involving the markets and issuers, some of which apply to the Fund. The full effect of various newly adopted regulations is not currently known. Certain of these changes could limit the Fund’s ability to pursue its investment strategies or make certain investments, or may make it more costly for the Fund to operate, which may impact performance. Additionally, it is possible that recently adopted regulations could be further revised or rescinded, which creates material uncertainty on their impact to the Fund. Economists and others have expressed increasing concern about the potential effects of global climate change on property and security values. Certain issuers, industries and regions may be adversely affected by the impacts of climate change in ways that cannot be foreseen, including on the demand for and the development of goods and services and related production costs, and the impacts of legislation, regulation and international accords related to climate change, as well as any indirect consequences of regulation or business trends driven by climate change. |
|
■
|
Government Money Market Funds Risk. Investments in government money market funds are subject to interest rate risk, credit risk, and market risk. Interest rate risk is the risk that rising interest rates could cause the value of such an investment to decline. Credit risk is the risk that the issuer, guarantor or insurer of an obligation, or the counterparty to a transaction, may fail or become less able or unwilling, to make timely payment of interest or principal or otherwise honor its obligations, or that it may default completely.
|
|
■
|
Information Technology Sector Risk. The Information Technology sector includes companies engaged in software and services, technology hardware and storage peripherals, electronic equipment and components, and semiconductors and semiconductor equipment. Information technology companies face intense competition, both domestically and internationally, which may have an adverse effect on profit margins. Information technology companies may have limited product lines, markets, financial resources or personnel. The products of information technology companies may face rapid product obsolescence due to technological developments and frequent new product introduction, unpredictable changes in growth rates and competition for the services of qualified personnel. Failure to introduce new products, develop and maintain a loyal customer base or achieve general market acceptance for their products could have a material adverse effect on a company’s business. Companies in the Information Technology sector also may be subject to increased government scrutiny or adverse government or regulatory action. Additionally, companies in the Information Technology sector are heavily dependent on intellectual property and the loss of patent, copyright or trademark protections may adversely affect the profitability of these companies. The market prices of information technology-related securities tend to exhibit a greater degree of market risk and sharp price fluctuations than other types of securities. These securities may fall in and out of favor with investors rapidly, which may cause sudden selling and dramatically lower market prices.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
Inception Date
|
1 Year
|
Since Inception
|
|
R5 Class
|
|
|
|
|
Returns Before Taxes
|
|
%
|
%
|
|
Returns After Taxes on Distributions
|
|
%
|
%
|
|
Returns After Taxes on Distributions and Sales of Fund Shares
|
|
%
|
%
|
|
|
Inception Date
|
1 Year
|
Since Inception (8/31/2021)
|
|
Share Class (Before Taxes)
|
|
|
|
|
Y
|
|
%
|
%
|
|
R6
|
|
%
|
%
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
Since Inception (8/31/2021)
|
|
Index (Reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes, other than withholding taxes, as noted)
|
|
|
|
|
MSCI® ACWI ex-USA Index (USD)*
|
|
%
|
%
|
| * | Reflects the reinvestment of dividends after the deduction of withholding taxes, using a tax rate applicable to non-resident individuals who do not benefit from double taxation treaties. |
|
Ninety One North America, Inc.
|
Elias Erickson
Portfolio Manager Since Fund Inception (2021)1 |
Clyde Rossouw
Portfolio Manager2 Since 20243 |
|
|
Abrie Pretorius
Portfolio Manager Since 20243 |
| 1 | Predecessor Fund inception date. |
| 2 | The position shown for the indicated portfolio manager is held with Ninety One SA (Pty) Ltd., a participating affiliate of Ninety One North America, Inc. |
| 3 | Includes Predecessor Fund. |
|
|
New Account
|
Existing Account
|
|
|
Share Class
|
Minimum Initial Investment Amount
|
Purchase/Redemption Minimum by Check/ACH/Exchange
|
Purchase/Redemption Minimum by Wire
|
|
Y
|
$100,000
|
$50
|
None
|
|
R6
|
None
|
$50
|
None
|
|
R5
|
$250,000
|
$50
|
None
|
|
■
|
The American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund has a non-fundamental policy to invest under normal circumstances at least 80% of its net assets (plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that the sub-advisor believes have recognized franchise or brand value.
|
|
■
|
The American Beacon Ninety One International Franchise Fund has a non-fundamental policy to invest under normal circumstances at least 80% of its net assets (plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that the sub-advisor believes have recognized franchise or brand value.
|
|
■
|
develops overall investment strategies for each Fund,
|
|
■
|
selects and changes sub-advisors,
|
|
■
|
allocates assets among sub-advisors,
|
|
■
|
monitors and evaluates the sub-advisor’s investment performance,
|
|
■
|
monitors the sub-advisor’s compliance with each Fund’s investment objectives, policies and restrictions,
|
|
■
|
oversees each Fund’s securities lending activities and actions taken by the securities lending agent to the extent applicable, and
|
|
■
|
directs the investment of the portion of Fund assets that the sub-advisors determine should be allocated to short-term investments.
|
|
■
|
Government Money Market Funds. A Fund may invest cash balances in government money market funds that are registered as investment companies under the Investment Company Act, including a government money market fund advised by the Manager, with respect to which the Manager also receives a management fee. If a Fund invests in government money market funds, the Fund becomes a shareholder of that investment company. As a result, Fund shareholders will bear their proportionate share of the expenses, including, for example, advisory and administrative fees of the government money market funds in which a Fund invests, such as advisory fees charged by the Manager to any applicable government money market funds advised by the Manager, in addition to the fees and expenses Fund shareholders directly bear in connection with a Fund’s own operations. Shareholders also would be exposed to the risks associated with government money market funds and the portfolio investments of such government money market funds, including the risk that a government money market fund’s yield will be lower than the return that a Fund would have received from other investments that provide liquidity. Investments in government money market funds are not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency.
|
|
■
|
Foreign Currencies
|
|
■
|
Foreign Currency-Denominated Securities
|
|
■
|
Common Stock. Common stock generally takes the form of shares in a corporation which represent an equity or ownership interest. Holders of common stock generally have voting rights in the issuer and are entitled to receive common stock dividends when, as and if declared by the company’s board of directors. Returns on common stock investments consist of any dividends received plus the amount of appreciation or depreciation in the value of the stock. Common stock normally occupies the most subordinated position in an issuer’s capital structure. It ranks below preferred stock and debt securities in claims for dividends and for assets of the company in a liquidation or bankruptcy. Common stock may be traded via an exchange or over-the-counter. Over-the-counter stock may be less liquid than exchange-traded stock.
|
|
■
|
Depositary Receipts. American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”) are U.S. dollar-denominated receipts representing interests in the securities of a foreign issuer. ADRs typically are issued by domestic banks and trust companies and represent the deposit with the bank of the securities of a foreign issuer. Depositary receipts may not be denominated in the same currency as the securities into which they may be converted. Investing in depositary receipts entails substantially the same risks as direct investment in foreign securities. In addition, a Fund may invest in unsponsored depositary receipts, which are implemented by a depositary bank with no direct involvement of the foreign issuers, and the issuers are not obligated to disclose material information about the underlying securities to investors in the United States. Ownership of unsponsored depositary receipts may not entitle a Fund to the same benefits and rights as ownership of the underlying securities or of sponsored depositary receipts, which are implemented in collaboration with the foreign issuers. GDRs may be offered in one or more foreign countries and represent the deposit with a foreign bank of securities of a foreign issuer. EDRs, which are sometimes called Continental Depositary Receipts, are issued in Europe in bearer form and are traded in European securities markets.
|
|
■
|
U.S. Dollar-Denominated Foreign Stocks Traded on U.S. Exchanges. Non-U.S. companies may list their common stock on U.S. exchanges subject to meeting the relevant exchange’s listing requirements and U.S. regulatory requirements applicable to non-U.S. companies that list their shares in the U.S.
|
|
■
|
Government Money Market Funds. A Fund can invest free cash balances in registered open-end investment companies regulated as government money market funds under the Investment Company Act to provide liquidity or for defensive purposes. A Fund could invest in government money market funds rather than purchasing individual short-term investments. If a Fund invests in government money market funds, shareholders will bear their proportionate share of the expenses, including for example, advisory and administrative fees, of the government money market funds in which a Fund invests, including advisory fees charged by the Manager to any applicable government money market funds advised by the Manager. Although a government money market fund is designed to be a relatively low risk investment, it is not free of risk. Despite the short maturities and high credit quality of a government money market fund’s investments, increases in interest rates and deteriorations in the credit quality of the instruments the government money market fund has purchased may reduce the government money market fund’s yield and can cause the price of a government money market security to decrease. In addition, a government money market fund is subject to the risk that the value of an investment may be eroded over time by inflation.
|
|
Risk
|
American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund
|
American Beacon Ninety One International Franchise Fund
|
|
Currency Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Cybersecurity and Operational Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Emerging Markets Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Environmental, Social, and/or Governance Investing Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Equity Investments Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Common Stock Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Depositary Receipts Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
U.S. Dollar-Denominated Foreign Stocks Traded on U.S. Exchanges Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Foreign Investing Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Franchise Investing Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Geographic Concentration Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
European Securities Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Pacific Basin Securities Risk
|
|
X
|
|
Growth Companies Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Investment Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Issuer Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Large-Capitalization Companies Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Market Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Risk
|
American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund
|
American Beacon Ninety One International Franchise Fund
|
|
Recent Market Events Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Market Timing Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Mid-Capitalization Companies Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Non-Diversification Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Other Investment Companies Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Government Money Market Funds Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Redemption Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Sector Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Information Technology Sector Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Securities Lending Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Securities Selection Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Small Fund Risk
|
|
X
|
|
Valuation Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Value Stocks Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
■
|
Common Stock Risk. The value of a company’s common stock may fall as a result of factors directly relating to that company, such as decisions made by its management or decreased demand for the company’s products or services. A stock’s value may also decline because of factors affecting not just the company, but also companies in the same industry or sector. The price of a company’s stock may also be affected by changes in financial markets that are relatively unrelated to the company, such as changes in interest rates, exchange rates or industry regulation. Companies that pay dividends on their common stock generally only do so after they invest in their own business and make required payments to bondholders and on other debt and preferred stock. Therefore, the value of a company’s common stock will usually be more volatile than its bonds, other debt and preferred stock. Common stock generally is subordinate to preferred stock upon the liquidation or bankruptcy of the issuing company. In the event of an issuer’s bankruptcy, there is substantial risk that there will be nothing left to pay common stockholders after payments, if any, to bondholders and preferred stockholders have been made.
|
|
■
|
Depositary Receipts Risk. A Fund may invest in securities issued by foreign companies through ADRs. These securities are generally subject to many of the same risks of investing in the foreign securities that they evidence or into which they may be converted, including, but not limited to, currency exchange rate fluctuations, political and financial instability in the home country of a particular depositary receipt, less liquidity, more volatility, less government regulation and supervision and delays in transaction settlement. There may be an imperfect correlation between the market value of depositary receipts and the underlying foreign securities. In addition, because the underlying securities of depositary receipts trade on foreign exchanges at times when the U.S. markets are not open for trading, the value of the securities underlying the depositary receipts may change materially at times when the U.S. markets are not open for trading, regardless of whether there is an active U.S. market for shares of a Fund. Depositary receipts may be sponsored or unsponsored. Unsponsored depositary receipts are organized independently, without the cooperation of the issuer of the underlying securities. As a result, there may be less information available about the underlying issuer than there is about an issuer of sponsored depositary receipts and the prices may be more volatile than if such instruments were sponsored by the issuer. Any distributions paid to the holders of depositary receipts are usually subject to a fee charged by the depositary. Holders of depositary receipts may have limited voting rights, and investment restrictions in certain countries may adversely impact the value of depositary receipts because such restrictions may limit the ability to convert the equity shares into depositary receipts and vice versa. Such restrictions may cause the equity shares of the underlying issuer to trade at a discount or premium to the market price of the depositary receipts.
|
|
■
|
U.S. Dollar-Denominated Foreign Stocks Traded on U.S. Exchanges Risk. Foreign (non-U.S.) companies that list their stocks on U.S. exchanges may be exempt from certain accounting and corporate governance standards that apply to U.S. companies that list on the same exchange. Foreign stocks traded on U.S. exchanges transact and settle in U.S. dollars, but performance of these stocks can be impacted by political and financial instability in the home country of a particular foreign company. To the extent a Fund invests in U.S. dollar-denominated foreign stocks traded on U.S. exchanges, delisting of these stocks could impact a Fund‘s ability to transact in such securities and could significantly impact their liquidity and market price. In addition, a Fund would have to seek other markets in which to transact in such securities which would also increase a Fund’s costs.
|
|
■
|
European Securities Risk. A Fund’s performance may be affected by political, social and economic conditions in Europe, such as growth of economic output (the gross national product of the countries in the region), the rate of inflation, the rate at which capital is reinvested into European economies, the success of governmental actions to reduce budget deficits, the resource self-sufficiency of European countries, interest rates in European countries, monetary exchange rates between European countries, and conflict between European countries. Most developed countries in Western Europe are members of the European Union (“EU”) and many are also members of the Economic and Monetary Union (“EMU” or “Eurozone”). European countries can be significantly affected by the tight fiscal and monetary controls that the EMU imposes on its members and with which candidates for EMU membership are required to comply.
|
|
While certain EU countries continue to use their own currency, Eurozone countries use the Euro as their currency. Changes in imports or exports, changes in governmental or EU regulations on trade, changes in the exchange rate of the Euro and the currencies of other EU countries which are not in the Eurozone, the threat of default or actual default by one or more EU member states on its sovereign debt, and/or an economic recession in one or more EU member states may have a significant adverse effect on the economies of other EU member states and their trading partners, including non-EU European countries. A breakup of the Eurozone, particularly a disorderly breakup, would pose special challenges for the financial markets and could lead to exchange controls and/or market closures. The economies and markets of European countries are often closely connected and interdependent, and events in one country in Europe can have an adverse impact on other European countries.
|
|
The European financial markets have experienced and may continue to experience volatility and adverse trends due to concerns relating to economic downturns; rising government debt levels and the possible default on government debt; national unemployment in several European countries; public health crises; political unrest; economic sanctions; inflation; energy crises; the future of the Euro as a common currency; and war and military conflict, such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine. These events have affected the exchange rate of the Euro and may continue to significantly affect European countries. Responses to financial problems by European governments, central banks, and others, including austerity measures, interest rate rises and other reforms, may not produce the desired results, may result in social unrest and may limit future growth and economic recovery or may have unintended consequences. Many European nations are susceptible to economic risks associated with high levels of debt. Non-governmental issuers, and even certain governments, have defaulted on, or been forced to restructure, their debts, and other issuers have faced difficulties obtaining credit or refinancing existing obligations. A default or debt restructuring by any European country could adversely impact holders of that country’s debt and sellers of credit default swaps linked to that country’s creditworthiness, which may be located in other countries. Such a default or debt restructuring could affect exposures to other European countries and their companies as well. In addition, issuers have faced difficulties obtaining credit or refinancing existing obligations, and financial markets have experienced extreme volatility and declines in asset values and liquidity. Furthermore, certain European countries have had to accept assistance from supranational agencies such as the International Monetary Fund, the European Stability Mechanism or others. There can be no assurance that any creditors or supranational agencies will continue to intervene or provide further assistance, and markets may react adversely to any expected reduction in the financial support provided by these creditors.
|
|
The United Kingdom has withdrawn from the EU, and one or more other countries may withdraw from the EU and/or abandon the Euro. These events and actions have affected, and may in the future affect, the value and exchange rate of the Euro and may continue to significantly affect the economies of every country in Europe, including countries that do not use the Euro and non-EU member states. The impact of these actions, especially if they occur in a disorderly fashion, is not clear but could be significant and far reaching.
|
|
The national politics of European countries have been unpredictable and subject to influence by disruptive political groups and ideologies. European governments may be subject to change and such countries may experience social and political unrest. Unanticipated or sudden political or social developments may result in sudden and significant investment losses. Russia’s war with Ukraine has negatively impacted European economic activity. The effects on the economies of European countries of the Russia/Ukraine war and Russia’s response to sanctions imposed by the U.S., the EU, UK and others are impossible to predict but have been and could continue to be significant and have a severe adverse impact on the region, including significant impacts on the regional, European, and global economies and the markets for certain securities and commodities, such as oil and natural gas. For example, exports in Eastern Europe have been disrupted for certain key commodities, pushing certain commodity prices to record highs. Also, both wholesale energy prices and energy prices charged to consumers in Europe have increased significantly.
|
|
■
|
Pacific Basin Securities Risk. The Pacific Basin region includes countries in various stages of economic development. Many Pacific Basin countries are considered undeveloped or developing and may be subject to greater social, political and economic instability than is the case in the U.S. and Western European countries. This may include the influence of authoritarian governments and military involvement in decision-making, popular unrest, ethnic, religious and racial disaffection, and hostilities with neighboring countries. In addition, the region has historically been prone to natural disasters, the occurrence of which could negatively impact the economy of any country in the region. The economies of most countries in this region may be heavily
|
|
dependent on international trade and may accordingly be affected by protective trade barriers and the economic conditions of their trading partners. These economies may depend to a significant degree upon only a few industries and/or exports of primary commodities and, therefore, be vulnerable to changes in commodity prices that, in turn, may be affected by a variety of factors. Furthermore, many of the Pacific Basin economies may be characterized by higher inflation than other economies, frequent currency fluctuations, devaluations, or restrictions, and less efficient markets.
The securities markets in the Pacific Basin may be substantially smaller, less liquid and more volatile than the major securities markets in the U.S., and many companies traded on stock exchanges in the region may be smaller and less seasoned than companies whose securities are traded on stock exchanges in the U.S. The limited liquidity of securities markets in the Pacific Basin may also affect a Fund’s ability to acquire or dispose of securities at the price and time it wishes to do so. Changes in the value of those countries’ currencies against the U.S. dollar will result in corresponding changes in the U.S. dollar value of a Fund’s assets denominated in those currencies. Some countries prohibit or impose substantial restrictions on investments in their capital markets, particularly their equity markets, by foreign entities such as a Fund. There can be no assurance that the Fund will be able to obtain required governmental approvals in a timely manner. In addition, changes to restrictions on foreign ownership of securities subsequent to a Fund’s purchase of such securities may have an adverse effect on the value of such shares. Certain countries may restrict investment opportunities in issuers or industries deemed important to national interests. |
|
■
|
Recent Market Events Risk. Both U.S. and international markets have experienced significant volatility in recent months and years. As a result of such volatility, investment returns may fluctuate significantly. Moreover, the risks discussed herein associated with an investment in a Fund may be increased. Deteriorating economic fundamentals may increase the risk of default or insolvency of particular issuers, negatively impact market value, increase market volatility, cause credit spreads to widen, reduce bank balance sheets and cause unexpected changes in interest rates. Any of these could cause an increase in market volatility, reduce liquidity across various sectors or markets or decrease confidence in the markets. Historical patterns of correlation among asset classes may break down in unanticipated ways during times of high volatility, disrupting investment programs and potentially causing losses.
Although interest rates were unusually low in the U.S. and abroad for a period of time, in 2022, the U.S. Federal Reserve (the “Federal Reserve”) and certain foreign central banks began to raise interest rates as part of their efforts to address rising inflation. The Federal Reserve and certain foreign central banks have started to lower interest rates, though economic or other factors, such as inflation, could stop such changes. It is difficult to accurately predict the pace at which interest rates might change, the timing, frequency or magnitude of any such changes in interest rates, or when such changes might stop or again reverse course. Additionally, various economic and political factors could cause the Federal Reserve or foreign central banks to change their approach in the future as such actions may result in an economic slowdown both in the U.S. and abroad. Unexpected changes in interest rates could lead to significant market volatility or reduce liquidity in certain sectors of the market. It is difficult to predict the impact on various markets of significant interest rate changes or other significant policy changes. Some countries, including the U.S., have adopted more protectionist trade policies. Slowing global economic growth, imposition of tariffs and resulting impacts on global prices and supply chains; the rise in protectionist trade policies, inflationary pressures, changes to some major international trade agreements, risks associated with trade negotiations between countries and regions, including the U.S. and certain foreign nations, political or economic dysfunction within some nations, including the U.S., and dramatic changes in commodity and currency prices could have adverse effects that cannot be foreseen at the present time. In addition, if the U.S. dollar continues to be strong, it may decrease foreign demand for U.S. assets, which could have a negative on certain issuers and/or industries. Tensions, war or open conflict between nations, such as between Russia and Ukraine, in the Middle East or in eastern Asia could affect the economies of many nations, including the United States. The duration of ongoing hostilities and any sanctions and related events cannot be predicted. Those events present material uncertainty and risk with respect to markets globally and the performance of a Fund and its investments or operations could be negatively impacted. Regulators in the U.S. have adopted a number of changes to regulations involving the markets and issuers, some of which apply to a Fund. The full effect of various newly adopted regulations is not currently known. Certain of these changes could limit a Fund’s ability to pursue its investment strategies or make certain investments, or may make it more costly for a Fund to operate, which may impact performance. Additionally, it is possible that recently adopted regulations could be further revised or rescinded, which creates material uncertainty on their impact to a Fund. Further, advancements in technology may also adversely impact market movements and liquidity and may affect the overall performance of a Fund. For example, the advanced development and increased regulation of artificial intelligence may impact the economy and the performance of a Fund. As artificial intelligence is used more widely, the value of the Fund’s holdings may be impacted, which could impact the overall performance of a Fund. High public debt in the U.S. and other countries creates ongoing systemic and market risks and policymaking uncertainty. There is no assurance that the U.S. Congress will act to raise the nation’s debt ceiling; a failure to do so could cause market turmoil and substantial investment risks that cannot be fully predicted. Unexpected political, regulatory and diplomatic events within the U.S. and abroad may affect investor and consumer confidence and may adversely impact financial markets and the broader economy. Certain illnesses spread rapidly and have the potential to significantly and adversely affect the global economy. The impact of epidemics and/or pandemics that may arise in the future could negatively affect the economies of many nations, individual companies and the global securities and commodities markets, including their liquidity, in ways that cannot necessarily be foreseen at the present time and could last for an extended period of time. China’s economy, which has been sustained through debt-financed spending on housing and infrastructure, appears to be experiencing a significant slowdown and growing at a lower rate than prior years. Due to the size of China’s economy, such a slowdown could impact financial markets and the broader economy. Economists and others have expressed increasing concern about the potential effects of global climate change on property and security values. Impacts from climate change may include significant risks to global financial assets and economic growth. A rise in sea levels, an increase in powerful storms and/or a climate-driven increase in sea levels or flooding could cause coastal properties to lose value or become unmarketable altogether. Certain issuers, industries and regions may be adversely affected by the impacts of climate change in ways that cannot be foreseen, including on the demand for and the development of goods and services and related production costs, and the impacts of legislation, regulation and international accords related to climate change, as well as any indirect consequences of regulation or business trends driven by climate change. Regulatory changes and divestment movements tied to concerns about climate change could adversely affect the value of certain land and the viability of industries whose activities or products are seen as accelerating climate change. Losses related to climate change could adversely affect, among others, corporate issuers and mortgage lenders, the value of mortgage-backed securities, the bonds of municipalities that depend on tax or other revenues and tourist dollars generated by affected properties, and insurers of the property and/or of corporate, municipal or mortgage-backed securities. |
|
■
|
Government Money Market Funds Risk. Investments in government money market funds are subject to interest rate risk, credit risk, and market risk. Interest rate risk is the risk that rising interest rates could cause the Fund’s investment to lose value. A decline in short-term interest rates or a low interest rate environment would lower a government money market fund’s yield and the return on the Fund’s investment. Credit risk is the risk that the issuer, guarantor or insurer of an obligation, or the counterparty to a transaction, may fail or become less able or unwilling, to make timely payment of interest or principal or otherwise honor its obligations, or that it may default completely. There is the risk that the issuers or guarantors of securities owned by a government money market fund, including securities issued by U.S. Government agencies, which are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government, will default on the payment of principal or interest or the obligation to repurchase securities from the government money market fund. This could cause the government money market fund’s NAV to decline below $1.00 per share, which would cause the Fund’s investment to lose value.
|
|
■
|
Information Technology Sector Risk. The Information Technology sector includes companies engaged in internet software and services, technology hardware and storage peripherals, electronic equipment instruments and components, and semiconductors and semiconductor equipment. Information Technology companies face intense competition, both domestically and internationally, which may have an adverse effect on profit margins. Information Technology companies may have limited product lines, markets, financial resources or personnel. The products of Information Technology companies may face rapid product obsolescence due to technological developments and frequent new product introduction, unpredictable changes in growth rates and competition for the services of qualified personnel. Failure to introduce new products, develop and maintain a loyal customer base or achieve general market acceptance for their products could have a material adverse effect on a company’s business. Companies in the Information Technology sector may be subject to increased government scrutiny or adverse government or regulatory action. Additionally, companies in the Information Technology sector are heavily dependent on intellectual property and the loss of patent, copyright and trademark protections may adversely affect the profitability of these companies. The market prices of Information Technology-related securities tend to exhibit a greater degree of market risk and sharp price fluctuations than other types of securities. These securities may fall in and out of favor with investors rapidly, which may cause sudden selling and dramatically lower market prices.
|
|
■
|
The MSCI® ACWI Index (USD) captures large and mid cap representation across 23 Developed Markets (DM) and 24 Emerging Markets (EM) countries. With 2,647 constituents as of December 31, 2024, the index covers approximately 85% of the global investable equity opportunity set. The MSCI® ACWI Index (USD) returns reflect invested dividends net of withholding taxes, but reflect no deduction for fees, expenses, or other taxes.
|
|
■
|
The MSCI® ACWI ex-USA Index (USD) captures large and mid cap representation across 22 of 23 Developed Markets (DM) countries (excluding the US) and 24 Emerging Markets (EM) countries. With 2,058 constituents as of December 31, 2024, the index covers approximately 85% of the global equity opportunity set outside of the US. The MSCI® ACWI ex-USA Index (USD) returns reflect invested dividends net of withholding taxes, but reflect no deduction for fees, expenses, or other taxes.
|
|
First $5 billion
|
0.35%
|
|
Next $5 billion
|
0.325%
|
|
Next $10 billion
|
0.30%
|
|
Over $20 billion
|
0.275%
|
|
American Beacon Fund
|
Expiration Date
|
Y Class
|
R6 Class
|
R5 Class
|
|
American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund
|
November 30, 2027
|
0.85%
|
0.82%
|
0.85%
|
|
American Beacon Ninety One International Franchise Fund
|
November 30, 2027
|
0.92%
|
0.82%
|
0.85%
|
|
■
|
How long you expect to own the shares;
|
|
■
|
How much you intend to invest;
|
|
■
|
Total expenses associated with owning shares of each class;
|
|
■
|
Whether you plan to take any distributions in the near future; and
|
|
■
|
Availability of share classes.
|
|
|
New Account
|
Existing Account
|
|
|
Share Class
|
Minimum Initial Investment Amount
|
Purchase/Redemption Minimum by check/ACH/Exchange
|
Purchase/Redemption Minimum by Wire
|
|
Y
|
$100,000
|
$50
|
None
|
|
R6
|
None
|
$50
|
None
|
|
R5
|
$250,000
|
$50
|
None
|
|
• Your name/account registration
|
|
• Your account number
|
|
• Type of transaction requested
|
|
• Fund name(s) and fund number(s)
|
|
• Dollar amount or number of shares
|
|
Internet
|
www.americanbeaconfunds.com
|
|
|
Phone
|
To reach an American Beacon representative call 1-800-658-5811, option 1
|
|
|
Mail
|
American Beacon Funds
PO Box 219643
Kansas City, MO 64121-9643
|
Overnight Delivery:
American Beacon Funds
801 Pennsylvania Ave., Suite 219643
Kansas City, MO 64105-1307
|
|
■
|
ABA# 0110-0002-8; AC-9905-342-3,
|
|
■
|
Attn: American Beacon Funds,
|
|
■
|
the fund name and fund number, and
|
|
■
|
shareholder account number and registration.
|
|
|
New Account
|
Existing Account
|
|
|
Share Class
|
Minimum Initial Investment Amount
|
Purchase/Redemption Minimum by check/ACH/Exchange
|
Purchase/Redemption Minimum by Wire
|
|
Y
|
$100,000
|
$50
|
None
|
|
R6
|
None
|
$50
|
None
|
|
R5
|
$250,000
|
$50
|
None
|
|
■
|
with a request to send the proceeds to an address or commercial bank account other than the address or commercial bank account designated on the account application, or
|
|
■
|
for an account whose address has changed within the last 30 days if proceeds are sent by check.
|
|
Share Class
|
Account Balance
|
|
Y
|
$25,000
|
|
R6
|
$0
|
|
R5
|
$75,000
|
|
■
|
The Fund, its officers, trustees, employees, or agents are not responsible for the authenticity of instructions provided by telephone, nor for any loss, liability, cost or expense incurred for acting on them.
|
|
■
|
The Fund employs procedures reasonably designed to confirm that instructions communicated by telephone are genuine.
|
|
■
|
Due to the volume of calls or other unusual circumstances, telephone redemptions may be difficult to implement during certain time periods.
|
|
■
|
liquidate a shareholder’s account at the current day’s NAV per share and remit proceeds via check if the Fund or a financial institution is unable to verify the shareholder’s identity within three business days of account opening,
|
|
■
|
seek reimbursement from the shareholder for any related loss incurred by the Fund if payment for the purchase of Fund shares by check does not clear the shareholder’s bank, and
|
|
■
|
reject a purchase order and seek reimbursement from the shareholder for any related loss incurred by the Fund if funds are not received by the applicable wire deadline.
|
|
■
|
Send a letter to American Beacon Funds via the United States Post Office,
|
|
■
|
Speak to a Customer Service Representative on the phone after you go through a security verification process. For residents of certain states, contact cannot be made by phone but must be in writing or through the Fund’s secure web application,
|
|
■
|
Access your account through the Fund’s secure web application,
|
|
■
|
Cashing checks that are received and are made payable to the owner of the account.
|
|
American Beacon Funds
P.O. Box 219643 Kansas City, MO 64121-9643 1-800-658-5811 www.americanbeaconfunds.com |
|
■
|
shares acquired through the reinvestment of dividends and other distributions;
|
|
■
|
systematic purchases and redemptions;
|
|
■
|
shares redeemed to return excess IRA contributions; or
|
|
■
|
certain transactions made within a retirement or employee benefit plan, such as payroll contributions, minimum required distributions, loans, and hardship withdrawals, or other transactions that are initiated by a party other than the plan participant.
|
|
American Beacon Fund
|
Dividends Paid
|
Other Distributions Paid
|
|
American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund
|
Annually
|
Annually
|
|
American Beacon Ninety One International Franchise Fund
|
Annually
|
Annually
|
|
■
|
Reinvest All Distributions. You can elect to reinvest all distributions by a Fund in additional shares of the distributing class of that Fund.
|
|
■
|
Reinvest Only Some Distributions. You can elect to reinvest some types of distributions by a Fund in additional shares of the distributing class of that Fund while receiving the other types of distributions by that Fund by check or having them sent directly to your bank account by ACH (“in cash”).
|
|
■
|
Receive All Distributions in Cash. You can elect to receive all distributions in cash.
|
|
■
|
Reinvest Your Distributions in shares of another American Beacon Fund. You can reinvest all of your distributions by a Fund on a particular class of shares in shares of the same class of another American Beacon Fund that is available for exchanges. You must have an existing account in the same share class of the selected fund.
|
|
Type of Transaction
|
Federal Tax Status
|
|
Dividends from net investment income*
|
Ordinary income**
|
|
Distributions of the excess of net short-term capital gain over net long-term capital loss*
|
Ordinary income
|
|
Distributions of net gains from certain foreign currency transactions*
|
Ordinary income
|
|
Distributions of the excess of net long-term capital gain over net short-term capital loss (“net capital gain”)*
|
Long-term capital gains
|
|
Redemptions or exchanges of shares owned for more than one year
|
Long-term capital gains or losses
|
|
Redemptions or exchanges of shares owned for one year or less
|
Net gains are taxed at the same rate as ordinary income; net losses are subject to special rules
|
| * | Whether reinvested or taken in cash. |
| ** | Except for dividends that are attributable to ‘‘qualified dividend income,’’ if any. |
|
American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise FundSM
|
|||||
|
|
Y Class(1)
|
||||
|
|
Year Ended October 31, 2024
|
Year Ended October 31, 2023
|
Year Ended October 31, 2022
|
Year Ended October 31, 2021
|
Year Ended October 31, 2020
|
|
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Year
|
$14.49
|
$13.21
|
$16.54
|
$12.31
|
$11.64
|
|
Income from Investment Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income*
|
–
|
0.02
|
0.01
|
–
|
0.05
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)
|
2.67
|
1.26
|
(3.34
)
|
4.25
|
0.71
|
|
Total from Investment Operations
|
2.67
|
1.28
|
(3.33
)
|
4.25
|
0.76
|
|
Dividends and Distributions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
(0.02
)
|
–
|
–
|
(0.02
)
|
(0.05
)
|
|
Capital Gains
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
(0.04
)
|
|
Total Dividends and Distributions
|
(0.02
)
|
–
|
–
|
(0.02
)
|
(0.09
)
|
|
Net Asset Value, End of Year
|
$17.14
|
$14.49
|
$13.21
|
$16.54
|
$12.31
|
|
Total Return†
|
18.43
%
|
9.73
%
|
(20.13
)%
|
34.58
%
|
6.54
%
|
|
Ratios and Supplemental Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets, End of Year (Thousands)
|
$5,340
|
$4,738
|
$4,173
|
$6,448
|
$4,266
|
|
Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets
|
1.10
%
|
1.10
%
|
1.10
%
|
1.10
%
|
1.10
%
|
|
Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets (Excluding Waivers and Reimbursements)
|
1.22
%
|
1.23
%
|
1.24
%
|
1.28
%
|
1.49
%
|
|
Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets
|
0.02
%
|
0.13
%
|
0.06
%
|
–
|
0.38
%
|
|
Portfolio Turnover Rate
|
28
%
|
8
%
|
3
%
|
5
%
|
9
%
|
|
(1)
|
Prior to the reorganization on November 15, 2024, the Y Class was known as A Shares.
|
|
*
|
Per share calculations were performed using average shares for the period.
|
|
†
|
Total return is for the period indicated and has not been annualized. Returns shown do not reflect the deductions of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Amounts designated as “—” are either not applicable, $0 or have been rounded to $0.
|
|
|
Amounts designated as “—” are either not applicable, $0 or have been rounded to $0.
|
|
American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise FundSM
|
|||||
|
|
R5 Class(1)
|
||||
|
|
Year Ended October 31, 2024
|
Year Ended October 31, 2023
|
Year Ended October 31, 2022
|
Year Ended October 31, 2021
|
Year Ended October 31, 2020
|
|
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Year
|
$14.54
|
$13.27
|
$16.59
|
$12.35
|
$11.67
|
|
Income from Investment Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income*
|
0.04
|
0.06
|
0.05
|
0.03
|
0.07
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)
|
2.69
|
1.26
|
(3.35
)
|
4.26
|
0.72
|
|
Total from Investment Operations
|
2.73
|
1.32
|
(3.30
)
|
4.29
|
0.79
|
|
Dividends and Distributions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
(0.05
)
|
(0.05
)
|
(0.02
)
|
(0.05
)
|
(0.07
)
|
|
Capital Gains
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
(0.04
)
|
|
Total Dividends and Distributions
|
(0.05
)
|
(0.05
)
|
(0.02
)
|
(0.05
)
|
(0.11
)
|
|
Net Asset Value, End of Year
|
$17.22
|
$14.54
|
$13.27
|
$16.59
|
$12.35
|
|
Total Return†
|
18.82
%
|
9.97
%
|
(19.91
)%
|
34.85
%
|
6.77
%
|
|
Ratios and Supplemental Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets, End of Year (Thousands)
|
$352,343
|
$295,961
|
$249,939
|
$235,443
|
$96,258
|
|
Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets
|
0.85
%
|
0.85
%
|
0.85
%
|
0.85
%
|
0.85
%
|
|
Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets (Excluding Waivers and Reimbursements)
|
0.97
%
|
0.98
%
|
0.99
%
|
1.02
%
|
1.24
%
|
|
Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets
|
0.27
%
|
0.39
%
|
0.32
%
|
0.17
%
|
0.60
%
|
|
Portfolio Turnover Rate
|
28
%
|
8
%
|
3
%
|
5
%
|
9
%
|
|
(1)
|
Prior to the reorganization on November 15, 2024, the R5 Class was known as I Shares.
|
|
*
|
Per share calculations were performed using average shares for the period.
|
|
†
|
Total return is for the period indicated and has not been annualized. Returns shown do not reflect the deductions of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Amounts designated as “—” are either not applicable, $0 or have been rounded to $0.
|
|
|
Amounts designated as “—” are either not applicable, $0 or have been rounded to $0.
|
|
American Beacon Ninety One International Franchise FundSM
|
||||
|
|
R5 Class(2)
|
|||
|
|
Year Ended October 31, 2024
|
Year Ended October 31, 2023
|
Year Ended October 31, 2022
|
Period Ended October 31, 2021(1)
|
|
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Year or Period
|
$8.46
|
$7.39
|
$9.80
|
$10.00
|
|
Income from Investment Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income (Loss)*
|
0.06
|
0.05
|
0.04
|
(0.01
)
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)
|
2.11
|
1.06
|
(2.45
)
|
(0.19
)
|
|
Total from Investment Operations
|
2.17
|
1.11
|
(2.41
)
|
(0.20
)
|
|
Dividends and Distributions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
(0.08
)
|
(0.04
)
|
–
|
–
|
|
Total Dividends and Distributions
|
(0.08
)
|
(0.04
)
|
–
|
–
|
|
Net Asset Value, End of Year or Period
|
$10.55
|
$8.46
|
$7.39
|
$9.80
|
|
Total Return†
|
25.78
%
|
15.02
%
|
(24.59
)%
|
(2.00
)%
|
|
Ratios and Supplemental Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets, End of Year or Period (Thousands)
|
$4,901
|
$1,186
|
$1,403
|
$1,809
|
|
Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets
|
0.85
%
|
0.85
%
|
0.85
%
|
0.85
%
††
|
|
Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets (Excluding Waivers and Reimbursements)
|
5.94
%
|
12.98
%
|
11.88
%
|
37.19
%
††
|
|
Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets
|
0.56
%
|
0.58
%
|
0.52
%
|
(0.54
)%
††
|
|
Portfolio Turnover Rate
|
8
%
|
8
%
|
18
%
|
0
%
‡
|
|
(1)
|
Commenced operations on August 31, 2021.
|
|
(2)
|
Prior to the reorganization on November 15, 2024, the R5 Class was known as I Shares.
|
|
*
|
Per share data calculated using average shares method.
|
|
†
|
Total return is for the period indicated and has not been annualized. Returns shown do not reflect the deductions of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares.
|
|
††
|
Annualized
|
|
‡
|
Portfolio turnover is for the period indicated and has not been annualized.
|
|
|
Amounts designated as “—” are either not applicable, $0 or have been rounded to $0.
|
|
By Telephone:
|
Call
1-800-658-5811 |
|
By Mail:
|
American Beacon Funds
P.O. Box 219643 Kansas City, MO 64121-9643 |
|
By E-mail:
|
americanbeaconfunds@ambeacon.com
|
|
On the Internet:
|
|
American Beacon is a registered service mark of American Beacon Advisors, Inc. The American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund and American Beacon Ninety One International Franchise Fund are service marks of American Beacon Advisors, Inc.
|
![]() |
|
ACH
|
Automated Clearing House
|
|
|
Advisers Act
|
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended
|
|
|
American Beacon or Manager
|
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.
|
|
|
Beacon Funds or Trust
|
American Beacon Funds
|
|
|
Board
|
Board of Trustees
|
|
|
Brexit
|
The United Kingdom’s departure from the European Union
|
|
|
Capital Gains Distributions
|
Distributions of realized net capital gains
|
|
|
CDSC
|
Contingent Deferred Sales Charge
|
|
|
CFTC
|
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
|
|
|
CPO
|
Commodity Pool Operator
|
|
|
Denial of Services
|
A cybersecurity incident that results in shareholders or service providers being unable to access electronic systems
|
|
|
Distributor
|
Resolute Investment Distributors, Inc.
|
|
|
Dividends
|
Distributions from the Fund’s net investment income
|
|
|
DRD
|
Dividends-received deduction
|
|
|
EU
|
European Union
|
|
|
FCA
|
UK Financial Conduct Authority
|
|
|
FHLB
|
Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
Forwards
|
Forward Currency Contracts
|
|
|
GNMA
|
Government National Mortgage Association
|
|
|
Internal Revenue Code
|
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
|
|
|
Investment Company Act
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended
|
|
|
IRA
|
Individual Retirement Account
|
|
|
IRS
|
Internal Revenue Service
|
|
|
Junk Bonds
|
High yield, non-investment grade bonds
|
|
|
LOI
|
Letter of Intent
|
|
|
Management Agreement
|
The Fund’s Management Agreement with the Manager
|
|
|
Model
|
Proprietary Mathematical Quantitative Model
|
|
|
Moody’s
|
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.
|
|
|
NAV
|
Fund’s net asset value
|
|
|
NDF
|
Non-deliverable foreign currency forward contract
|
|
|
NYSE
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
|
|
Other Distributions
|
Distributions of net gains from foreign currency transactions
|
|
|
OTC
|
Over-the-Counter
|
|
|
QDI
|
Qualified Dividend Income
|
|
|
REIT
|
Real Estate Investment Trust
|
|
|
RIC
|
Regulated Investment Company
|
|
|
SAI
|
Statement of Additional Information
|
|
|
SEC
|
Securities and Exchange Commission
|
|
|
State Street
|
State Street Bank and Trust Company
|
|
|
SVP
|
Signature Validation Program
|
|
|
UGMA
|
Uniform Gifts to Minors Act
|
|
|
UK
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
UTMA
|
Uniform Transfers to Minors Act
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Ticker
|
||
|
Share Class
|
Y
|
R6
|
R5
|
|
American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund
|
ZGFAX
|
ZGFRX
|
ZGFIX
|
|
American Beacon Ninety One International Franchise Fund
|
ZIFAX
|
ZIFRX
|
ZIFIX
|
|
Strategy/Risk
|
American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund
|
American Beacon Ninety One International Franchise Fund
|
|
Borrowing Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Cash Equivalents and Other Short-Term Investments
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
Corporate Actions
|
X
|
X
|
|
Currencies Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Cybersecurity and Operational Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Derivatives
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
Equity Investments
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
Strategy/Risk
|
American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund
|
American Beacon Ninety One International Franchise Fund
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
ESG Considerations
|
X
|
X
|
|
Expense Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Foreign Investing
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
Growth Companies
|
X
|
X
|
|
Issuer Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Large-Capitalization Companies Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Mid-Capitalization Companies Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Other Investment Company Securities and Exchange-Traded Products
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
X
|
X
|
|
Real Estate Related Investments
|
X
|
X
|
|
Redemption Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Valuation Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
Value Companies Risk
|
X
|
X
|
|
■
|
Government Money Market Funds. A Fund may invest cash balances in money market funds that are registered as investment companies under the Investment Company Act, including money market funds that are advised by the Manager. Money market funds invest in highly-liquid, short-term instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, and debt securities with high credit ratings and short-term maturities, such as U.S. Treasuries. A “government money market fund” is required to invest at least 99.5% of its total assets in cash, U.S. government securities, and/or repurchase agreements that are fully collateralized by government securities or cash. Government securities include any security issued or guaranteed as to principal or interest by the U.S. government and its agencies or instrumentalities. By investing in a money market fund, a Fund becomes a shareholder of that money market fund. As a result, Fund shareholders indirectly bear their proportionate share of the expenses of the money market funds in which a Fund invests in addition to any fees and expenses Fund shareholders directly bear in connection with a Fund’s own operations. These expenses may include, for example, advisory and administrative fees, including advisory fees charged by the Manager to any applicable money market funds advised by the Manager. These other fees and expenses are reflected in the Fees and Expenses Table for a Fund in its Prospectus, if applicable. Shareholders also would be exposed to the risks associated with money market funds and the portfolio investments of such money market funds, including that a money market fund’s yield will be lower than the return that a Fund would have derived from other investments that would provide liquidity. Although a money market fund is designed to be a relatively low risk investment, it is not free of risk. Despite the short maturities and high credit quality of a money market fund’s investments, increases in interest rates and deteriorations in the credit quality of the instruments the money market fund has purchased can cause the price of a money market security to decrease and may reduce the money market fund’s yield. In addition, a money market fund is subject to the risk that the value of an investment may be eroded over time by inflation. Factors that could adversely affect the value of a money market fund’s shares include, among other things, a sharp rise in interest rates, an illiquid market for the securities held by the money market fund, a high volume of redemption activity in a money market fund’s shares, and a credit event or credit rating downgrade affecting one or more of the issuers of securities held by the money market fund. There can be no assurance that a money market fund will maintain a $1.00 per share net asset value (“NAV”) at all times.
|
|
■
|
Government Obligations. Government obligations may include U.S. Treasury securities, Treasury inflation-protected securities, and other debt instruments backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, or debt obligations of U.S. Government-sponsored entities.
|
|
■
|
Forward Foreign Currency Contracts. A Fund may enter into forward foreign currency contracts (“forward currency contracts”), which are a type of derivative instrument, for a variety of reasons. A forward currency contract involves an obligation to purchase or sell a specified currency at a future date, which may be any fixed number of days from the date of the contract agreed upon by the parties at a price set at the time of the contract. Because these forward currency contracts normally are settled through an exchange of currencies, they are traded in the interbank market directly between currency traders (usually large commercial banks) and their customers.
|
|
Forward currency contracts may serve as long hedges. For example, a Fund may purchase a forward currency contract to lock in the U.S. dollar price of a security denominated in a foreign currency that it intends to acquire. Forward currency contract transactions also may serve as short hedges. For example, a Fund may sell a forward currency contract to lock in the U.S. dollar equivalent of the proceeds from the anticipated sale of a security or from a dividend or interest payment on a security denominated in a foreign currency.
|
|
A Fund may enter into forward currency contracts to sell a foreign currency for a fixed U.S. dollar amount approximating the value of some or all of its respective portfolio securities denominated in such foreign currency. In addition, a Fund may use forward currency contracts when the sub-advisor
|
|
wishes to “lock in” the U.S. dollar price of a security when a Fund is purchasing or selling a security denominated in a foreign currency or anticipates receiving a dividend or interest payment denominated in a foreign currency.
|
|
A Fund may enter into forward currency contracts for the purchase or sale of a specified currency at a specified future date either with respect to specific transactions or with respect to portfolio positions in order to minimize the risk to a Fund from adverse changes in the relationship between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies.
|
|
A Fund may use forward currency contracts to seek to hedge against, or profit from, changes in the value of a particular currency by using forward currency contracts on another foreign currency or a basket of currencies, the value of which the sub-advisor believes will have a positive correlation to the values of the currency being hedged. When hedging, use of a different foreign currency magnifies the risk that movements in the price of the forward contract will not correlate or will correlate unfavorably with the foreign currency being hedged.
|
|
In addition, a Fund may use forward currency contracts to shift exposure to foreign currency fluctuations from one country to another. For example, if a Fund owned securities denominated in a foreign currency that the sub-advisor believed would decline relative to another currency, it might enter into a forward currency contract to sell an appropriate amount of the first foreign currency, with payment to be made in the second currency. Transactions that involve two foreign currencies are sometimes referred to as “cross hedging.” Use of a different foreign currency magnifies a Fund’s exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.
|
|
A Fund also may enter into forward currency contracts for non-hedging purposes if a foreign currency is anticipated to appreciate or depreciate in value, but securities denominated in that currency do not present attractive investment opportunities and are not held in a Fund’s investment portfolio.
|
|
The cost to a Fund of engaging in forward currency contracts varies with factors such as the currency involved, the length of the contract period and the market conditions then prevailing. Because forward currency contracts usually are entered into on a principal basis, no fees or commissions are involved. When a Fund enters into a forward currency contract, it relies on the counterparty to make or take delivery of the underlying currency at the maturity of the contract. Failure by the counterparty to do so would result in the loss of any expected benefit of the transaction.
|
|
Sellers or purchasers of forward currency contracts can enter into offsetting closing transactions, similar to closing transactions on futures, by purchasing or selling, respectively, an instrument identical to the instrument sold or bought, respectively. Secondary markets generally do not exist for forward currency contracts, however, with the result that closing transactions generally can be made for forward currency contracts only by negotiating directly with the counterparty. Thus, there can be no assurance that a Fund will in fact be able to close out a forward currency contract at a favorable price prior to maturity. In addition, in the event of insolvency of the counterparty, a Fund might be unable to close out a forward currency contract at any time prior to maturity. In either event, a Fund would continue to be subject to market risk with respect to the position, and would continue to be required to maintain a position in the securities or currencies that are the subject of the hedge or to maintain cash or securities.
|
|
The precise matching of forward currency contract amounts and the value of securities whose U.S. dollar value is being hedged by those contracts involved generally will not be possible because the value of such securities, measured in the foreign currency, will change after the forward currency contract has been established. Thus, a Fund might need to purchase or sell foreign currencies in the spot (cash) market to the extent such foreign currencies are not covered by forward contracts. The projection of short-term currency market movements is extremely difficult, and the successful execution of a short-term hedging strategy is highly uncertain.
|
|
A Fund bears the risk of loss of the amount expected to be received under a forward currency contract in the event of the default or bankruptcy of a counterparty. If such a default occurs, a Fund may have contractual remedies pursuant to the forward currency contract, but such remedies may be subject to bankruptcy and insolvency laws which could affect a Fund’s rights as a creditor.
|
|
At the maturity of a forward contract, a Fund may sell the portfolio security and make delivery of the foreign currency, or it may retain the security and either extend the maturity of the forward contract (by “rolling” that contract forward) or may initiate a new forward contract. If a Fund retains the portfolio security and engages in an offsetting transaction, a Fund will incur a gain or a loss (as described below) to the extent that there has been movement in forward contract prices. If a Fund engages in an offsetting transaction, it may subsequently enter into a new forward contract to sell the foreign currency.
|
|
Should forward prices decline during the period between a Fund’s entering into a forward contract for the sale of a foreign currency and the date it enters into an offsetting contract for the purchase of the foreign currency, a Fund will realize a gain to the extent the price of the currency it has agreed to sell exceeds the price of the currency it has agreed to purchase. Should forward prices increase, a Fund will suffer a loss to the extent the price of the currency it has agreed to purchase exceeds the price of the currency it has agreed to sell.
|
|
Forward currency contracts in which a Fund may engage include foreign exchange forwards. The consummation of a foreign exchange forward requires the actual exchange of the principal amounts of the two currencies in the contract (i.e., settlement on a physical basis). Because foreign exchange forwards are physically settled through an exchange of currencies, they are traded in the interbank market directly between currency traders (usually large commercial banks) and their customers. A foreign exchange forward generally has no deposit requirement, and no commissions are charged at any stage for trades; foreign exchange dealers realize a profit based on the difference (the spread) between the prices at which they are buying and the prices at which they are selling various currencies. When a Fund enters into a foreign exchange forward, it relies on the counterparty to make or take delivery of the underlying currency at the maturity of the contract. Failure by the counterparty to do so would result in the loss of any expected benefit of the transaction.
|
|
A Fund may be required to obtain the currency that it must deliver under the foreign exchange forward through the sale of portfolio securities denominated in such currency or through conversion of other assets of a Fund into such currency. When a Fund engages in foreign currency
|
|
transactions for hedging purposes, it will not enter into foreign exchange forwards to sell currency or maintain a net exposure to such contracts if their consummation would obligate a Fund to deliver an amount of foreign currency materially in excess of the value of its portfolio securities or other assets denominated in that currency.
|
|
■
|
Futures Contracts. A Fund may enter into futures contracts. Futures contracts are a type of derivative instrument that obligate the purchaser to take delivery of, or cash settle a specific amount of, a commodity, security or other obligation underlying the contract at a specified time in the future for a specified price. Likewise, the seller incurs an obligation to deliver the specified amount of the underlying obligation against receipt of the specified price. Futures are traded on both U.S. and foreign commodities exchanges. The purchase of futures can serve as a long hedge, and the sale of futures can serve as a short hedge.
No price is paid upon entering into a futures contract. Instead, at the inception of a futures contract, a Fund is required to deposit “initial margin” consisting of cash, U.S. Government securities, suitable money market instruments, or liquid, high-grade debt securities in an amount set by the exchange on which the contract is traded and varying based on the volatility of the underlying asset. Margin must also be deposited when writing a call or put option on a futures contract, in accordance with applicable exchange rules. Unlike margin in securities transactions, initial margin on futures contracts does not represent a borrowing, but rather is in the nature of a performance bond or good-faith deposit that is returned to a Fund at the termination of the transaction if all contractual obligations have been satisfied. Under certain circumstances, such as periods of high volatility, a Fund may be required by a futures exchange to increase the level of its initial margin payment, and initial margin requirements might be increased generally in the future by regulatory action. Subsequent “variation margin” payments (sometimes referred to as “maintenance margin” payments) are made to and from the futures broker daily as the value of the futures position varies, a process known as “marking-to-market.” Variation margin does not involve borrowing, but rather represents a daily settlement of a Fund’s obligations to or from a futures broker. When a Fund purchases or sells a futures contract, it is subject to daily, or even intraday, variation margin calls that could be substantial in the event of adverse price movements. If a Fund has insufficient cash to meet daily or intraday variation margin requirements, it might need to sell securities at a time when such sales are disadvantageous. Purchasers and sellers of futures contracts can enter into offsetting closing transactions, by selling or purchasing, respectively, an instrument identical to the instrument purchased or sold. Positions in futures contracts may be closed only on a futures exchange or board of trade that trades that contract. A Fund intends to enter into futures contracts only on exchanges or boards of trade where there appears to be a liquid secondary market. However, there can be no assurance that such a market will exist for a particular contract at a particular time. In such event, it may not be possible to close a futures contract. Although many futures contracts by their terms call for the actual delivery or acquisition of the underlying asset, in most cases the contractual obligation is fulfilled before the date of the contract without having to make or take delivery of the securities or currency. The offsetting of a contractual obligation is accomplished by buying (or selling, as appropriate) on a commodities exchange an identical futures contract calling for delivery in the same month. Such a transaction, which is effected through a member of an exchange, cancels the obligation to make or take delivery of the securities or currency. Since all transactions in the futures market are made, offset or fulfilled through a clearinghouse associated with the exchange on which the contracts are traded, a Fund will incur brokerage fees when it purchases or sells futures contracts. If an offsetting purchase price is less than the original sale price, a Fund realizes a capital gain, or if it is more, a Fund realizes a capital loss. Conversely, if an offsetting sell price is more than the original purchase price, a Fund realizes a capital gain, or if it is less, a Fund realizes a capital loss. The Funds have no current intent to accept physical delivery in connection with the settlement of futures contracts. Under certain circumstances, futures exchanges may establish daily limits on the amount that the price of a futures contract can vary from the previous day’s settlement price; once that limit is reached, no trades may be made that day at a price beyond the limit. Daily price limits do not limit potential losses because prices could move to the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading, thereby preventing liquidation of unfavorable positions. If a Fund were unable to liquidate a futures contract due to the absence of a liquid secondary market or the imposition of price limits, it could incur substantial losses. A Fund would continue to be subject to market risk with respect to the position. In addition, a Fund would continue to be required to make daily variation margin payments and might be required to maintain the position being hedged by the futures contract or option thereon or to maintain cash or securities in a segregated account. The ordinary spreads between prices in the cash and futures markets, due to differences in the nature of those markets, are subject to distortions. The liquidity of the futures market depends on participants entering into offsetting transactions rather than making or taking delivery. To the extent participants decide to make or take delivery, liquidity in the futures market could be reduced, thus producing distortion. Third, from the point of view of speculators, the margin deposit requirements in the futures market are less onerous than margin requirements in the securities market. Therefore, increased participation by speculators in the futures market may cause temporary price distortions. Due to the possibility of distortion, a correct forecast of securities price or currency exchange rate trends by the sub-advisor may still not result in a successful transaction. Futures contracts also entail other risks. Although the use of such contracts may benefit a Fund, if investment judgment about the general direction of, for example, an index is incorrect, a Fund’s overall performance would be worse than if it had not entered into any such contract. The degree of imperfection of correlation depends on circumstances such as variations in speculative market demand for futures, including technical influences in futures trading, and differences between the financial instruments being hedged and the instruments underlying the standard contracts available for trading in such respects as interest rate levels, maturities, and creditworthiness of issuers. A decision as to whether, when and how to hedge involves the exercise of skill and judgment, and even a well-conceived hedge may be unsuccessful to some degree because of market behavior or unexpected interest rate trends. |
|
■
|
Options — A Fund may invest in options contracts on foreign currencies. An option is a contract that gives the purchaser (holder) of the option, in return for a premium, the right to buy from (call) or sell to (put) the seller (writer) of the option the underlying reference asset at a specified exercise price at any time during the term of the option (normally not exceeding nine months). The writer of a currency option has the obligation, upon exercise of the option, to deliver or pay the value of the underlying currency, upon payment of the exercise price, or to pay the exercise price upon delivery of the underlying currency. Transactions for exchange-traded options may be made only on a national securities exchange. It is impossible to predict the volume of trading that may exist in such options, and there can be no assurance that viable exchange markets will develop or continue. There is no assurance that a liquid secondary market will exist for a particular option, or at any particular time, and for some options, such as OTC options, no secondary market may exist. The hours of trading for options may not conform to the hours during which the underlying reference asset
|
|
is traded. To the extent that the option markets close before the markets for the reference asset, significant price and rate movements can take place in the reference asset that cannot be reflected in the option markets. A Fund may use NDOs, which are foreign exchange products designed to assist in reducing foreign currency exchange risk, in situations where physical delivery of the underlying currency is not required or not possible. Options that trade OTC involve liquidity and credit risks that may not be present in exchange-traded options. A Fund may use options on foreign currencies to protect against decreases in the U.S. dollar value of securities held or increases in the U.S. dollar cost of securities to be acquired by a Fund or to protect the U.S. dollar equivalent of dividends, interest, or other payments on those securities.
|
|
■
|
Rights. Rights are options to purchase an issuer’s securities at a stated price during a stated term, usually at a price below the initial offering price of the securities and before the securities are offered to the general public. Rights are similar to warrants but typically have a shorter duration. Rights are usually freely transferable, but may not be as liquid as exchange-traded options. In addition, the terms of a right may limit a Fund’s ability to exercise the right at such time, or in such quantities, as a Fund would otherwise wish. Rights usually have no voting rights, pay no dividends and have no rights with respect to the assets of the corporation issuing them. A right ceases to have value if it is not exercised prior to its expiration date. As a result, rights may be considered more speculative than certain other types of investments.
|
|
■
|
Swap Agreements. A swap is a transaction in which a Fund and a counterparty agree to pay or receive payments at specified dates based upon or calculated by reference to changes in specified prices or rates (e.g., interest rates in the case of interest rate swaps) or the performance of specified securities or indices based on a specified amount (the “notional” amount). Nearly any type of derivative, including forward contracts, can be structured as a swap. See “Derivatives” for a further discussion of derivatives risks. Swap agreements can be structured to provide exposure to a variety of different types of investments or market factors. For example, in an interest rate swap, fixed-rate payments may be exchanged for floating rate payments; in a currency swap, U.S. dollar-denominated payments may be exchanged for payments denominated in a foreign currency; and in a total return swap, payments tied to the investment return on a particular asset, group of assets or index may be exchanged for payments that are effectively equivalent to interest payments or for payments tied to the return on another asset, group of assets, or index. Swaps may have a leverage component, and adverse changes in the value or level of the underlying asset, reference rate or index can result in gains or losses that are substantially greater than the amount invested in the swap itself. Some swaps currently are, and more in the future will be, centrally cleared. Swaps that are centrally-cleared are exposed to the creditworthiness of the clearing organizations (and, consequently, that of their members - generally, banks and broker-dealers) involved in the transaction. For example, an investor could lose margin payments it has deposited with the clearing organization as well as the net amount of gains not yet paid by the clearing organization if it breaches its agreement with the investor or becomes insolvent or goes into bankruptcy. In the event of bankruptcy of the clearing organization, the investor may be able to recover only a portion of the net amount of gains on its transactions and of the margin owed to it, potentially resulting in losses to the investor. Swaps that are not centrally cleared involve the risk that a loss may be sustained as a result of the insolvency or bankruptcy of the counterparty or the failure of the counterparty to make required payments or otherwise comply with the terms of the agreement. If a counterparty’s creditworthiness declines, the value of the swap might decline, potentially resulting in losses to a Fund. Changing conditions in a particular market area, whether or not directly related to the referenced assets that underlie the swap agreement, may have an adverse impact on the creditworthiness of a counterparty. To mitigate this risk, a Fund will only enter into swap agreements with counterparties considered by the sub-advisor to present minimum risk of default, and a Fund normally obtains collateral to secure its exposure. Swaps involve the risk that, if the swap declines in value, additional margin would be required to maintain the margin level. The seller may require a Fund to deposit additional sums to cover this, and this may be at short notice. If additional margin is not provided in time, the seller may liquidate the positions at a loss, which may cause a Fund to owe money to the seller. The centrally cleared and OTC swap agreements into which a Fund enters normally provide for the obligations of a Fund and its counterparty in the event of a default or other early termination to be determined on a net basis. Similarly, periodic payments on a swap transaction that are due by each party on the same day normally are netted. The use of swap agreements requires special skills, knowledge and investment techniques that differ from those required for normal portfolio management. Swaps may be considered illiquid investments, and a Fund may be unable to sell a swap agreement to a third party at a favorable price. A Fund may invest in the following types of swaps:
|
|
■
|
Currency Swaps. A currency swap involves the exchange of payments denominated in one currency for payments denominated in another. Payments are based on a notional principal amount, the value of which is fixed in exchange rate terms at the swap’s inception. Currency swap agreements may be entered into on a net basis or may involve the delivery of the entire principal value of one designated currency in exchange for the entire principal value of another designated currency. In such cases, the entire principal value of a currency swap is subject to the risk that the counterparty will default on its contractual delivery obligations. Currency swaps are also subject to currency risk.
|
|
■
|
Common Stock. Common stock generally takes the form of shares in a corporation which represent an ownership interest. It ranks below preferred stock and debt securities in claims for dividends and for assets of the company in a liquidation or bankruptcy. The value of a company’s common stock may fall as a result of factors directly relating to that company, such as decisions made by its management or decreased demand for the company’s products or services. A stock’s value may also decline because of factors affecting not just the company, but also companies in the same industry or sector. The price of a company’s stock may also be affected by changes in financial markets that are relatively unrelated to the company, such as changes in interest rates, currency exchange rates or industry regulation. Companies that elect to pay dividends on their common stock generally only do so after they invest in their own business and make required payments to bondholders and on other debt, and preferred stock. Therefore, the value of a company’s common stock will usually be more volatile than its bonds, other debt and preferred stock. Common stock may be exchange-traded or traded over-the-counter. OTC stock may be less liquid than exchange-traded stock.
|
|
■
|
Depositary Receipts. A Fund may invest in depositary receipts, which represent ownership interests in securities of foreign companies (an “underlying issuer”) that have been deposited with a bank or trust and that trade on an exchange or OTC. Depositary receipts may not be denominated in the same currency as the securities into which they may be converted, and they are subject to the risk of fluctuation in the currency exchange rate. Investing in depositary receipts entails substantially the same risks as direct investment in foreign securities. There is generally less publicly available information about foreign companies and there may be less governmental regulation and supervision of foreign stock exchanges, brokers, and listed companies. In addition, such companies may use different accounting and financial standards (and certain currencies may become unavailable for transfer from a foreign currency), resulting in a Fund’s possible inability to convert immediately into U.S. currency proceeds realized
|
|
upon the sale of portfolio securities of the affected foreign companies. In addition, the issuers of unsponsored depositary receipts are not obligated to disclose material information about the underlying securities to investors in the United States. Ownership of unsponsored depositary receipts may not entitle a Fund to the same benefits and rights as ownership of a sponsored depositary receipt or the underlying security. Please see “Foreign Securities” below for a description of the risks associated with investments in foreign securities. A Fund may invest in the following type of depositary receipts:
|
|
■
|
ADRs. ADRs are depositary receipts for foreign issuers in registered form, typically issued by a U.S. financial institution, traded in U.S. securities markets.
|
|
■
|
EDRs. EDRs, which are sometimes called Continental Depositary Receipts, are issued in Europe in bearer form and are traded in European securities markets.
|
|
■
|
GDRs. GDRs are in bearer form and traded in both the U.S. and European securities markets.
|
|
■
|
Initial Public Offerings. A Fund can invest in IPOs. By definition, securities issued in IPOs have not traded publicly until the time of their offerings. Special risks associated with IPOs may include, among others, the fact that there may only be a limited number of shares available for trading. The market for those securities may be unseasoned. The issuer may have a limited operating history. These factors may contribute to price volatility. The limited number of shares available for trading in some IPOs may also make it more difficult for a Fund to buy or sell significant amounts of shares without an unfavorable impact on prevailing prices. In addition, some companies initially offering their shares publicly are involved in relatively new industries or lines of business, which may not be widely understood by investors. Some of the companies involved in new industries may be regarded as developmental state companies, without revenues or operating income, or the near-term prospects of them. Many IPOs are by small- or micro-cap companies that are undercapitalized. IPOs may adversely impact a Fund’s performance. However, the impact of IPOs on a Fund’s performance will likely decrease as a Fund’s asset size increases.
|
|
■
|
Chinese Company Securities. Investing in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan involves a high degree of risk, and special considerations not typically associated with investing in other more established economies or securities markets. Such risks may include: (a) the risk of nationalization or expropriation of assets, or confiscatory taxation; (b) greater social, economic and political uncertainty (including the risk of war); (c) dependency on exports and the corresponding importance of international trade; (d) increasing competition from Asia’s other low-cost emerging economies; (e) greater price volatility, substantially less liquidity and significantly smaller market capitalization of securities markets, particularly in China; (f) currency exchange rate fluctuations and the lack of available currency hedging instruments; (g) higher rates of inflation; (h) controls on foreign investment and limitations on repatriation of invested capital and on a Fund’s ability to exchange local currencies for U.S. dollars; (i) greater governmental
|
|
involvement in and control over the economy, and greater intervention in the Chinese financial markets, such as the imposition of trading restrictions; (j) the risk that the Chinese government may decide not to continue to support economic reform programs currently in place and could return to the completely centrally planned economy that was in place prior to 1978; (k) the fact that Chinese companies, particularly those located in China, may be smaller, less seasoned and newly-organized; (l) the difference in, or lack of, auditing and financial reporting standards that may result in unavailability of material information about issuers, particularly in China; (m) the fact that statistical information regarding the Chinese economy may be inaccurate or not comparable to statistical information regarding the U.S. or other economies; (n) the less extensive, and still developing, regulation of the securities markets, business entities and commercial transactions; (o) the fact that the settlement period of securities transactions in foreign markets may be longer; (p) uncertainty surrounding the willingness and ability of the Chinese government to support the Chinese and Hong Kong economies and markets; (q) the risk that it may be more difficult or impossible, to obtain and/or enforce a judgment than in other countries; (r) the rapidity and erratic nature of growth, particularly in China, resulting in inefficiencies and dislocations; (s) more frequent (and potentially widespread) trading suspensions and government interventions with respect to Chinese issuers; (t) limitations on the use of brokers (or action by the Chinese government that discourages brokers from serving international clients); and (u) the risk that, because of the degree of interconnectivity between the economies and financial markets of China, Hong Kong and Taiwan, any sizable reduction in the demand for goods from China, or an economic downturn in China could negatively affect the economies and financial markets of Hong Kong and Taiwan, as well. In addition, the China Securities Regulatory Commission recently met with local law firms and asked them to tone down negative descriptions of China’s policies in prospectuses of companies going public outside the mainland in markets such as Hong Kong and the United States. Comments in IPO listing documents that misrepresent or disparage laws and policies, the business environment and judicial situation of China are now barred. Such new listing regime would inevitably deny approval for offshore listing applications and further dampen the stock market sentiment, which in turn negatively affects markets and the value of a Fund’s investments. China’s economy has transitioned from a rigidly central-planned state-run economy to one that has been only partially reformed by more market-oriented policies. Although the Chinese government has implemented economic reform measures, reduced state ownership of companies and established better corporate governance practices, a substantial portion of productive assets in China are still owned by the Chinese government. The government continues to exercise significant control in regulating industrial development and, ultimately, control over China’s economic growth through the allocation of resources, controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, setting monetary policy and providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies. The Chinese government has from time to time taken actions that influence the prices at which certain goods may be sold, encourage companies to invest or concentrate in particular industries, induce mergers between companies in certain industries and induce private companies to publicly offer their securities to increase or continue the rate of economic growth, control the rate of inflation or otherwise regulate economic expansion. Investments in China involve risk of a total loss due to government action or inaction. China continues to limit direct foreign investments generally in industries deemed important to national interests. Foreign investment in domestic securities are also subject to substantial restrictions. Some believe that China’s currency is undervalued. Currency fluctuations could significantly affect China and its trading partners. China continues to exercise control over the value of its currency, rather than allowing the value of the currency to be determined by market forces. This type of currency regime may experience sudden and significant currency adjustments, which may adversely impact investment returns.
For decades, a state of hostility has existed between Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China. Beijing has long deemed Taiwan a part of the “one China” and has made a nationalist cause of recovering it. This situation poses a threat to Taiwan’s economy and could negatively affect its stock market. By treaty, China has committed to preserve Hong Kong’s autonomy and its economic, political and social freedoms until 2047. However, if China would exert its authority so as to alter the economic, political or legal structures or the existing social policy of Hong Kong, investor and business confidence in Hong Kong could be negatively affected, which in turn could negatively affect markets and business performance. In addition, the Hong Kong dollar trades within a fixed trading bond rate to (or is “pegged” to) the U.S. dollar. This fixed exchange rate has contributed to the growth and stability of the Hong Kong economy. However, some market participants have questioned the continued viability of the currency peg. It is uncertain what affect any discontinuation of the currency peg, and the establishment of an alternative exchange rate system would have on capital markets generally and the Hong Kong economy. As demonstrated by protests in Hong Kong in 2019 and 2020 over political, economic, and legal freedoms, and the Chinese government’s response to the protests, there continues to be a great deal of political unrest, which may result in economic disruption. China could be affected by military events on the Korean peninsula or internal instability within North Korea. North Korea and South Korea each have substantial military capabilities, and historical tensions between the two countries present the risk of war. Any outbreak of hostilities between the two countries could have a severe adverse effect on the South Korean economy and securities market. These situations may cause uncertainty in the Chinese market and may adversely affect performance of the Chinese economy. In addition, China has strained international relations with Japan, India, Russia and other neighbors due to territorial disputes, historical animosities and other defense concerns. China is also alleged to have participated in state-sponsored cyberattacks against foreign companies and foreign governments. Actual and threatened responses to such activity and strained international relations, including purchasing restrictions, sanctions, tariffs or cyberattacks on the Chinese government or Chinese companies, may impact China’s economy and Chinese issuers of securities in which a Fund invests. Investment in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan is subject to certain political risks. The current political climate has intensified concerns about trade tariffs and a potential trade war between China and the United States, despite the United States signing a partial trade agreement with China that reduced some U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods while boosting Chinese purchases of American goods. However, this agreement left in place a number of existing tariffs, and it is unclear whether further trade agreements may be reached in the future. The ability and willingness of China to comply with the trade deal may determine to some degree the extent to which its economy will be adversely affected, which cannot be predicted at the present time. Future tariffs imposed by China and the United States on the other country’s products, or other escalating actions, may trigger a significant reduction in international trade, the oversupply of certain manufactured goods, substantial price reductions of goods and possible failure of individual companies and/or large segments of China’s export industry with a potentially negative impact to a Fund. On June 3, 2021, President Biden issued an executive order prohibiting U.S. persons from entering into transactions in publicly traded securities, as well as derivatives and securities designed to provide investment exposure to, any securities of any issuers designated “Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies,” as designated by the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control. This executive order superseded a prior similar order from then-President Trump. Continued ownership of such securities by U.S. persons is prohibited after June 3, 2022, following a one-year divestment period. A number of Chinese issuers have been designated under this program and more could be added. Certain implementation matters related to the scope of, and |
|
compliance with, the executive order have not yet been resolved, and the ultimate application and enforcement of the executive order may change. Under current guidance, U.S. investors may purchase interests in an investment fund that does not make any new purchases of designated securities and is “seeking to” divest its holdings of such securities during the divestment period. As a result, the executive order and related guidance may significantly reduce the liquidity of such securities, force a Fund to sell certain positions at inopportune times or for unfavorable prices, and restrict future investments by a Fund. U.S. investment advisers are permitted to advise non-U.S. funds and non-U.S. persons that purchase and sell such prohibited securities, provided this activity does not indirectly expose U.S. persons to such companies. The Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act (“HFCAA”), requires the SEC to identify reporting public companies that use public accounting firms with a branch or office located in a foreign jurisdiction that the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) determines that it is unable to inspect or investigate completely because of a position taken by a governmental entity in that jurisdiction (“Commission-Identified Issuers”). If an issuer is identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer for three consecutive years, the issuer’s shares will be prohibited in U.S. exchange and over-the-counter markets. On March 8, 2022, pursuant to the implementing regulations established by the SEC as required by the HFCAA, the SEC began to identify companies as provisional Commission-Identified Issuers. On August 26, 2022, the PCAOB signed a Statement of Protocol with the China Securities Regulatory Commission and the Ministry of Finance of the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”), which marked the first step toward opening access for the PCAOB to inspect and investigate registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong completely in accordance with U.S. law. However, as this development is relatively recent, the implementation of the Statement of Protocol remains to be tested. Audits performed by PCAOB registered accounting firms in mainland China and Hong Kong may be less reliable than those performed by firms subject to PCAOB inspection. Accordingly, information about the Chinese securities in which the Funds invest may be less reliable or complete. Listing and other regulatory requirements applicable to foreign issuers, including Chinese issuers, is evolving and any future legislation, regulations or rules may require a Fund to change its investment process, which could result in substantial investment losses. China has often restricted U.S. regulators’ access to information and limited regulators’ ability to investigate or pursue remedies with respect to China-based issuers, generally citing to state secrecy and national security laws, blocking statutes, or other laws or regulations. In addition, according to Article 177 of the PRC Securities Law, which became effective in March 2020, no overseas securities regulator can directly conduct investigations or evidence collection activities within China and no entity or individual in China may provide documents and information relating to securities business activities to overseas regulators without Chinese government approval. The SEC, U.S. Department of Justice, and other U.S. authorities face substantial challenges in bringing and enforcing actions against China-based issuers and their officers and directors. As a result, a Fund may not benefit from a regulatory environment that fosters effective enforcement of U.S. federal securities laws. From time to time and in recent years, China has experienced outbreaks of infectious illnesses, and the country may be subject to other public health threats, infectious illnesses, diseases or similar issues in the future. Any spread of an infectious illness, public health threat or similar issue, or the government response thereto, could reduce consumer demand or economic output, result in market closures, travel restrictions or quarantines, and generally have a significant impact on the Chinese or global economy, which in turn could adversely affect a Fund’s investments.
For purposes of raising capital offshore on exchanges outside of China, including on U.S. exchanges, many Chinese-based operating companies are structured as Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”). In this structure, the Chinese-based operating company is the VIE and establishes an entity, which is typically offshore in a foreign jurisdiction, such as the Cayman Islands. The offshore entity lists on a foreign exchange and enters into contractual arrangements (“VIE Agreements”) with the VIE. This structure allows Chinese companies, in particular those in which the government restricts foreign ownership to raise capital from foreign investors. While the offshore entity has no equity ownership of the VIE, these VIE Agreements permit the offshore entity to consolidate the VIE’s financial statements with its own for accounting purposes and provide for economic exposure to the performance of the underlying Chinese-based operating company. Therefore, an investor in the listed offshore entity, such as the Fund, will have exposure to the Chinese-based operating company only through contractual arrangements and has no ownership in the Chinese-based operating company. Furthermore, because the offshore entity only has specific rights provided for in these VIE Agreements with the VIE, its abilities to control the activities at the Chinese-based operating company are limited and the Chinese-based operating company may engage in activities that negatively impact investment value. While the VIE structure has been widely adopted, it is not formally recognized under Chinese law and therefore there is a risk that the Chinese government could prohibit the existence of such structures or negatively impact the VIE’s contractual arrangements with the listed offshore entity by making them invalid. If these VIE Agreements were found to be unenforceable under Chinese law, investors in the listed offshore entity, such as the Fund, may suffer significant losses with little or no recourse available. If the Chinese government determines that the VIE Agreements establishing the VIE structures do not comply with Chinese law and regulations, including those related to restrictions on foreign ownership, it could subject a Chinese-based issuer to penalties, revocation of business and operating licenses, or forfeiture of ownership interest. Any change in the operations of entities in a VIE structure, the status of VIE contractual arrangements or the legal or regulatory environment in China or in the U.S. could result in significant losses to a Fund. The listed offshore entity’s control over a VIE may also be jeopardized if a natural person who holds the equity interest in the VIE breaches the terms of the VIE Agreement, is subject to legal proceedings or if any physical instruments for authenticating documentation, such as chops and seals, are used without the Chinese-based issuer’s authorization to enter into contractual arrangements in China. Chops and seals, which are carved stamps used to sign documents, represent a legally binding commitment by the company. Moreover, any future regulatory action may affect the ability of the offshore entity to receive the economic benefits of the Chinese-based operating company, which may cause the value of the Fund’s investment in the listed offshore entity to suffer a significant loss. For example, in 2021, the Chinese government placed various restrictions on after-school tutoring companies. Such restrictions adversely affected the financial performance of those listed offshore entities associated with a Chinese-based operating company in the after-school tutoring industry. There is no guarantee that the Chinese government will not place similar restrictions on other industries and therefore jeopardize the financial performance of the corresponding listed offshore entities. |
|
■
|
Emerging Market Securities. A Fund may invest in emerging market securities. A Fund may consider a country to be an emerging market country based on a number of factors including, but not limited to, if the country is classified as an emerging or developing economy by any supranational organization such as the World Bank, International Finance Corporation or the United Nations, or related entities, or if the country is considered an emerging market country for purposes of constructing emerging markets indices. Investments in emerging market country securities involve special risks. The economies, markets and political structures of a number of the emerging market countries in which a Fund can invest do not compare favorably with the United States and other mature economies in terms of wealth and stability. Therefore, investments in these countries may be
|
|
riskier, and will be subject to erratic and abrupt price movements. These risks are discussed below.
Economies: The economies of emerging market countries may differ favorably or unfavorably from the U.S. economy in such respects as growth of gross domestic product, rate of inflation, currency depreciation, reliable access to capital, capital reinvestment, resource self-sufficiency, balance of payments and trade difficulties. Some economies are less well developed and less diverse (for example, Latin America, Eastern Europe and certain Asian countries), and may be heavily dependent upon international trade, as well as the economic conditions in the countries with which they trade. Such economies accordingly have been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by trade barriers, exchange controls, managed adjustments in relative currency values and other protectionist or retaliatory measures imposed or negotiated by the countries with which they trade. Similarly, many of these countries have historically experienced, and may continue to experience, high rates of inflation, high interest rates, exchange rate fluctuations, large amounts of national and external debt, severe recession, and extreme poverty and unemployment. The economies of emerging market countries may be based predominately on only a few industries or may be dependent on revenues from participating commodities or on international aid or developmental assistance. Emerging market economies may develop unevenly or may never fully develop. Investments in countries that have recently begun moving away from central planning and state-owned industries toward free markets, such as the Eastern European, Russian or Chinese economies, should be regarded as speculative. Governments: Emerging markets may have uncertain national policies and social, political and economic instability. While government involvement in the private sector varies in degree among emerging market countries, such involvement may in some cases include government ownership of companies in certain sectors, wage and price controls or imposition of trade barriers and other protectionist measures. In the past, governments of such nations have expropriated substantial amounts of private property, and most claims of the property owners have never been fully settled. There is no assurance that such expropriations will not reoccur. In addition, there is no guarantee that some future economic or political crisis will not lead to price controls, forced mergers of companies, confiscatory taxation or creation of government monopolies to the possible detriment of a Fund’s investments. In such event, it is possible that a Fund could lose the entire value of its investments in the affected markets. Emerging market countries may have national policies that limit a Fund’s investment opportunities such as restrictions on investment in issuers or industries deemed sensitive to national interests. Repatriation of investment income, capital and the proceeds of sales by foreign investors may require governmental registration and/or approval in some emerging market countries. In addition, if a Fund invests in a market where restrictions are considered acceptable, a country could impose new or additional repatriation restrictions after investment that are unacceptable. This might require, among other things, applying to the appropriate authorities for a waiver of the restrictions or engaging in transactions in other markets designed to offset the risks of decline in that country. Further, some attractive securities may not be available, or may require a premium for purchase, due to foreign shareholders already holding the maximum amount legally permissible. In addition to withholding taxes on investment income, some countries with emerging capital markets may impose differential capital gain taxes on foreign investors. An issuer or governmental authority that controls the repayment of an emerging market country’s debt may not be able or willing to repay the principal and/or interest when due in accordance with the terms of such debt. A debtor’s willingness or ability to repay principal and interest due in a timely manner may be affected by, among other factors, its cash flow situation, and, in the case of a government debtor, the extent of its foreign reserves, the availability of sufficient foreign exchange on the date a payment is due, the relative size of the debt service burden to the economy as a whole and the political constraints to which a government debtor may be subject. Government debtors may default on their debt and may also be dependent on expected disbursements from foreign governments, multilateral agencies and others abroad to reduce principal and interest arrearages on their debt. Holders of government debt may be requested to participate in the rescheduling of such debt and to extend further loans to government debtors. There may be limited legal recourse against the issuer and/or guarantor. Remedies must, in some cases, be pursued in the courts of the defaulting party itself, and the ability of the holder of foreign government fixed-income securities to obtain recourse may be subject to the political climate in the relevant country. In addition, no assurance can be given that the holders of commercial bank debt will not contest payments to the holders of other foreign government debt obligations in the event of default under their commercial bank loan agreements. Capital Markets: The capital markets in emerging market countries may be underdeveloped. They may have low or non-existent trading volume, resulting in a lack of liquidity and increased volatility in prices for such securities, as compared to securities from more developed capital markets. Emerging market securities may be substantially less liquid and more volatile than those of mature markets, and securities may be held by a limited number of investors. This may adversely affect the timing and pricing of a Fund’s acquisition or disposal of securities. There may be less publicly available information about emerging markets than would be available in more developed capital markets, and such issuers may not be subject to accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards and requirements comparable to those to which U.S. companies are subject. In certain countries with emerging capital markets, reporting standards vary widely. As a result, traditional investment measurements used in the U.S., may not be applicable. Investing in certain countries with emerging capital markets may entail purchasing securities issued by or on behalf of entities that are insolvent, bankrupt, in default or otherwise engaged in an attempt to reorganize or reschedule their obligations, and in entities that have little or no proven credit rating or credit history. In any such case, the issuer’s poor or deteriorating financial condition may increase the likelihood that the investing Fund will experience losses or diminution in available gains due to bankruptcy, insolvency or fraud. There may also be custodial restrictions or other non-U.S. or U.S. governmental laws or restrictions applicable to investments in emerging market countries. Practices in relation to settlement of securities transactions in emerging markets involve higher risks than those in developed markets, in part because a Fund may use brokers and counterparties that are less well capitalized, and custody and registration of assets in some countries may be unreliable. Supervisory authorities also may be unable to apply standards comparable to those in developed markets. Thus, there may be risks that settlement may be delayed and that cash or securities belonging to a Fund may be in jeopardy because of failures of or defects in the systems. In particular, market practice may require that payment be made before receipt of the security being purchased or that delivery of a security be made before payment is received. In such cases, default by a broker or bank (the “counterparty”) through whom the transaction is effected might cause a Fund to suffer a loss. There can be no certainty that a Fund will be successful in eliminating counterparty risk, particularly as counterparties operating in emerging market countries frequently lack the substance or financial resources of those in developed countries. There may also be a danger that, because of uncertainties in the operation of settlement systems in individual markets, competing claims may arise with respect to securities held by or to be transferred to a Fund. Regulatory authorities in some emerging markets currently do not provide the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board with the ability to inspect public accounting firms as required by U.S. law, including sufficient access to inspect audit work papers and practices, or otherwise do not |
|
cooperate with U.S. regulators, which potentially could expose investors to significant risks.
Legal Systems: Investments in emerging market countries may be affected by the lack, or relatively early development, of legal structures governing private and foreign investments and private property. Such capital markets are emerging in a dynamic political and economic environment brought about by events over recent years that have reshaped political boundaries and traditional ideologies. Many emerging market countries have little experience with the corporate form of business organization and may not have well-developed corporation and business laws or concepts of fiduciary duty in the business context. The organizational structures of certain issuers in emerging markets may limit investor rights and recourse. A Fund may encounter substantial difficulties in obtaining and enforcing judgments against individuals and companies located in certain emerging market countries, either individually or in combination with other shareholders. It may be difficult or impossible to obtain or enforce legislation or remedies against governments, their agencies and sponsored entities. Additionally, in certain emerging market countries, fraud, corruption and attempts at market manipulation may be more prevalent than in developed market countries. Shareholder claims that are common in the U.S. and are generally viewed as determining misconduct, including class action securities law and fraud claims, generally are difficult or impossible to pursue as a matter of law or practicality in many emerging markets. The laws in certain countries with emerging capital markets may be based upon or be highly influenced by religious codes or rules. The interpretation of how these laws apply to certain investments may change over time, which could have a negative impact on those investments and a Fund. Russia launched a large-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022. The extent and duration of the military action, resulting sanctions and resulting future market disruptions, including declines in its stock markets and the value of the ruble against the U.S. dollar, are impossible to predict, but could be significant. Any such disruptions caused by Russian military action or other actions (including cyberattacks and espionage) or resulting actual and threatened responses to such activity, including purchasing and financing restrictions, boycotts or changes in consumer or purchaser preferences, sanctions, tariffs or cyberattacks on the Russian government, Russian companies or Russian individuals, including politicians, may impact Russia’s economy and Russian issuers of securities in which a Fund invests. Actual and threatened responses to such activity, including purchasing restrictions, sanctions, tariffs or cyberattacks on the Russian government or Russian companies, may impact Russia’s economy and Russian issuers of securities in which a Fund invests. Actual and threatened responses to such military action may also impact the markets for certain Russian commodities, such as oil and natural gas, as well as other sectors of the Russian economy, and may likely have collateral impacts on such sectors globally, and may negatively affect global supply chains, inflation and global growth. These and any related events could significantly impact a Fund’s performance and the value of an investment in a Fund, even if a Fund does not have direct exposure to Russian issuers or issuers in other countries affected by the invasion. Governments in the United States and many other countries (collectively, the “Sanctioning Bodies”) have imposed economic sanctions, which can consist of prohibiting certain securities trades, certain private transactions in the energy sector, asset freezes and prohibition of all business, against certain Russian individuals, including politicians, and Russian corporate and banking entities. The Sanctioning Bodies, or others, could also institute broader sanctions on Russia, including banning Russia from global payments systems that facilitate cross-border payments. These sanctions, or even the threat of further sanctions, may result in the decline of the value and liquidity of Russian securities, a weakening of the ruble or other adverse consequences to the Russian economy. These sanctions could also result in the immediate freeze of Russian securities and/or funds invested in prohibited assets, impairing the ability of a Fund to buy, sell, receive or deliver those securities and/or assets. Sanctions could also result in Russia taking counter measures or retaliatory actions which may further impair the value and liquidity of Russian securities. |
|
■
|
European Securities. A Fund’s performance may be affected by political, social and economic conditions in Europe, such as the growth of the economic output (the gross national product of the countries in the region), the rate of inflation, the rate at which capital is reinvested into European economies, the success of governmental actions to reduce budget deficits, the resource self-sufficiency of European countries, interest rates in European countries, monetary exchange rates between European countries, and conflict between European countries.
The Economic and Monetary Union (“EMU”) of the European Union (“EU”) is comprised of EU members that have adopted the euro currency. By adopting the euro as its currency, a member state relinquishes control of its own monetary policies and is subject to fiscal and monetary controls. The EMU requires Eurozone countries to comply with restrictions on interest rates, deficits, debt levels, and inflation rates, fiscal and monetary controls, and other factors. Although the EMU has adopted a common currency and central bank, there is no fiscal union; therefore, money does not automatically flow from countries with surpluses to those with deficits. These restrictions and characteristics may limit the ability of EMU member countries to implement monetary policy to address regional economic conditions and significantly impact every European country and their economic partners, including those countries that are not members of the EMU. In addition, those EU member states that are not currently in the Eurozone (Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Sweden), excluding Denmark, are required to seek to comply with convergence criteria to permit entry to the Eurozone. The economies and markets of European countries are often closely connected and interdependent, and events in one country in Europe can have an adverse impact on other European countries. Decreasing imports or exports, changes in governmental or other regulations on trade, changes in the exchange rate of the euro or other European currency, the threat of default or actual default by one or more EU member countries, or other European countries, on its sovereign debt, and/or an economic recession in one or more European countries may have a significant adverse effect on the economies of other European countries and major trading partners outside Europe. The European financial markets have experienced and may continue to experience volatility and adverse trends due to concerns relating to economic downturns; rising government debt levels and national unemployment; the possible default of government debt in several European countries; public health crises; political unrest; economic sanctions; inflation; energy crises; the future of the euro as a common currency; and war and military conflict, such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine. These events have adversely affected the exchange rate of the euro and may continue to significantly affect European countries. Responses to financial problems by European governments, central banks, and others, including austerity measures and other reforms, may not produce the desired results, may result in social unrest and may limit future growth and economic recovery or may have unintended consequences. In order to prevent further economic deterioration, certain countries, without prior warning, can institute “capital controls.” Countries may use these controls to restrict volatile movements of capital entering and exiting their country. Such controls may negatively affect a Fund’s investments. In addition, one or more countries may abandon the euro and/or withdraw from the EU. The impact of these actions, especially if they occur in a disorderly fashion, could be significant and far-reaching. Many European nations are susceptible to economic |
|
risks associated with high levels of debt. Non-governmental issuers, and even certain governments, have defaulted on, or been forced to restructure, their debts, and other issuers have faced difficulties obtaining credit or refinancing existing obligations. A default or debt restructuring by any European country could adversely impact holders of that country’s debt and sellers of credit default swaps linked to that country’s creditworthiness, which may be located in other countries. Such a default or debt restructuring could affect exposures to other European countries and their financial companies as well. Further defaults on, or restructurings of, the debt of governments or other entities could have additional adverse effects on economies, financial markets and asset valuations around the world. In addition, issuers may face difficulties obtaining credit or refinancing existing obligations; financial institutions may require government or central bank support, or need to raise capital, and/or be impaired in their ability to extend credit. Furthermore, certain European countries have had to accept assistance from supranational agencies such as the International Monetary Fund, the European Stability Mechanism or others. The European Central Bank has also intervened to purchase Eurozone debt in an attempt to stabilize markets and reduce borrowing costs. There can be no assurance that any creditors or supranational agencies will continue to intervene or provide further assistance, and markets may react adversely to any expected reduction in the financial support provided by these creditors. Certain European countries have also developed increasingly strained relationships with the U.S., and if these relationships were to worsen, they could adversely affect European issuers that rely on the U.S. for trade.
In addition, the national politics of European countries have been unpredictable and subject to influence by disruptive political groups, ideologies, and polarizing political events such as the conflict between Israel and Hamas. Secessionist movements, as well as government or other responses to such movements, may create instability and uncertainty in a country or region. European governments may be subject to change and such countries may experience social and political unrest. Unanticipated or sudden political or social developments may result in sudden and significant investment losses. The occurrence of terrorist incidents throughout Europe and in the Middle East also could impact financial markets, as could military conflicts. For example, Houthi attacks on commercial shipping in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, and retaliatory action, may disrupt supply chains and cause difficulties for impacted businesses, including those that wish to ship goods through that route. The impact of these kinds of events could be significant and far-reaching and materially impact the value and liquidity of a Fund’s investments. Russia’s war with Ukraine has negatively impacted European economic activity. The Russia/Ukraine war and Russia’s response to sanctions imposed by the U.S. and other countries are impossible to predict, but have severely impacted the performance of the economies of European and other countries, including through adverse effects to global financial and energy markets, global supply chains and global growth, and consequential inflation. Investments in companies with contractual relationships with Russian counterparties, or with significant operations and/or assets in Russia could be adversely impacted by the new legal, political, and regulatory environment, whether by increased costs or the termination of business plans or operations due to sanctions. Various companies operating in Russia, or with Russian counterparties, have faced difficulties enforcing Russian debts or contractual reliefs due to the Russian court’s hostility towards European companies in response to sanctions. Certain countries have applied to become new member countries of the EU, and these candidate countries’ accessions may become more controversial to the existing EU members. Some member states may repudiate certain candidate countries joining the EU due to concerns about the possible economic, immigration and cultural implications. Certain other countries have applied to join or, in the case of Finland and Sweden, have recently joined, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (“NATO”). Russia is understood to oppose certain expansions, or potential expansions, of NATO and the EU, and its reaction to such developments could negatively impact European economic activity. The United Kingdom withdrew from the European Union on January 31, 2020 and entered into a transition period, which ended on December 31, 2020. The longer-term economic, legal, and political framework between the United Kingdom and the EU is still developing and may lead to ongoing political and economic uncertainty in the United Kingdom, Europe, and the global market. Investments in companies with significant operations and/or assets in the United Kingdom could be adversely impacted by the new legal, political, and regulatory environment, whether by increased costs or impediments to the implementation of business plans. The uncertainty resulting from any further exits from the EU, or the possibility of such exits, would also be likely to cause market disruption in the EU and more broadly across the global economy, as well as introduce further legal, political, and regulatory uncertainty in Europe. |
|
■
|
United Kingdom Securities. Exposure to issuers located in, or with economic ties to, the United Kingdom, could expose a Fund to risks associated with investments in the United Kingdom to a greater extent than more geographically diverse funds, including regulatory, political, currency, security, and economic risks specific to the United Kingdom. The United Kingdom has one of the largest economies in Europe, and the United States and other European countries are substantial trading partners of the United Kingdom. As a result, the United Kingdom economy may be impacted by changes to the economic condition of the United States and other European countries.
On December 31, 2020, the United Kingdom left the European Union in an event commonly referred to as “Brexit.” The United Kingdom and the European Union then reached a trade agreement that became effective on May 1, 2021, after being ratified by all applicable United Kingdom and European Union governmental bodies. Until the economic effects of Brexit become clearer, and while a period of political, regulatory and commercial uncertainty continues, there remains a risk that Brexit may have a negative impact on the United Kingdom, the broader global economy, or the value of the British pound sterling, any of which may impact the value of Fund investments. The United Kingdom’s economy relies heavily on the export of financial services to the United States and other European countries. At the end of March 2021, the UK and the European Union concluded technical discussions on the content of a Memorandum of Understanding on financial services, setting out how the UK and EU financial services regulators will co-operate and share information. The implementation of this legal framework and basis of co-operation remains to be seen, and so the period following the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union is expected to be one of significant political and economic uncertainty, particularly until the United Kingdom government and EU member states agree and implement the terms of the United Kingdom’s future relationship with the European Union. Although the sub-advisor may hedge Fund currency exposures back to the U.S. dollar, a depreciation of the British pound sterling and/or the Euro in relation to the U.S. dollar as a result of Brexit could adversely affect Fund investments denominated in British pound sterling or Euros that are not fully hedged regardless of the performance of the underlying issuer. |
|
■
|
Pacific Basin Securities. The Pacific Basin geographic region includes many Asian countries bordering the Pacific Rim as well as Australia and New Zealand. Many Asian countries may be subject to a greater degree of social, political and economic instability than is the case in the U.S. and Western European countries. Such instability may result from, among other things, (i) authoritarian governments or military involvement in political and economic decision-making, including changes in government through extra-constitutional means; (ii) popular unrest associated with demands for improved political, economic and social conditions; (iii) internal insurgencies; (iv) hostile relations with neighboring countries; and (v) ethnic, religious and racial disaffection. In addition, the Pacific Basin geographic region has historically been prone to natural disasters. The occurrence of a natural disaster in the region, including the subsequent recovery, could negatively impact the economy of any country in the region. The existence of overburdened infrastructure and obsolete financial systems also presents risks in certain Asian countries, as do environmental problems.
The economies of most Pacific Basin countries are heavily dependent on international trade and are accordingly affected by protective trade barriers and the economic conditions of their trading partners, principally, the U.S., Japan, China and the EU. The enactment by the U.S. or other principal trading partners of protectionist trade legislation, reduction of foreign investment in the local economies and general declines in the international securities markets could have a significant adverse effect upon the securities markets of the Pacific Basin countries. The economies of certain Pacific Basin countries may depend to a significant degree upon only a few industries and/or exports of primary commodities and, therefore, are vulnerable to changes in commodity prices that, in turn, may be affected by a variety of factors. In addition, certain developing Asian countries, such as the Philippines and India, are especially large debtors to commercial banks and foreign governments. Many of the Pacific Basin economies may be intertwined, so an economic downturn in one country may result in, or be accompanied by, an economic downturn in other countries in the region. Furthermore, many of the Pacific Basin economies are characterized by high inflation, underdeveloped financial services sectors, heavy reliance on international trade, frequent currency fluctuations, devaluations, or restrictions, political and social instability, and less efficient markets. The securities markets in Pacific Basin countries are substantially smaller, less liquid and more volatile than the major securities markets in the U.S., and some of the stock exchanges in the region are in the early stages of their development, as compared to the stock exchanges in the U.S. Equity securities of many companies in the region may be less liquid and more volatile than equity securities of U.S. companies of comparable size. Additionally, many companies traded on stock exchanges in the region are smaller and less seasoned than companies whose securities are traded on stock exchanges in the U.S. A high proportion of the shares of many issuers may be held by a limited number of persons and financial institutions, which may limit the number of shares available for investment by a Fund. In some countries, there is no established secondary market for securities. Therefore, liquidity of securities may be generally low and transaction costs generally high. Similarly, volume and liquidity in the Pacific Basin bond markets are less than in the U.S. and, at times, price volatility can be greater than in the U.S. A limited number of issuers in Pacific Basin securities markets may represent a disproportionately large percentage of market capitalization and trading value. The limited liquidity of securities markets in the region may also affect a Fund’s ability to acquire or dispose of securities at the price and time it wishes to do so. In addition, the region’s securities markets are susceptible to being influenced by large investors trading significant blocks of securities. The legal systems in certain developing market Pacific Basin countries also may have an adverse impact on a Fund. For example, while the potential liability of a shareholder in a U.S. corporation with respect to acts of the corporation is generally limited to the amount of the shareholder’s investment, the notion of limited liability is less clear in certain Pacific Basin countries. Similarly, the rights of investors in Pacific Basin companies may be more limited than those of shareholders of U.S. corporations. It may be difficult or impossible to obtain and/or enforce a judgment in a Pacific Basin country. Many stock markets are undergoing a period of growth and change which may result in trading volatility and difficulties in the settlement and recording of transactions, and in interpreting and applying the relevant law and regulations. With respect to investments in the currencies of Pacific Basin countries, changes in the value of those currencies against the U.S. dollar will result in corresponding changes in the U.S. dollar value of a Fund’s assets denominated in those currencies. Certain developing economies in the Pacific Basin region have experienced currency fluctuations, devaluations, and restrictions; unstable employment rates; rapid fluctuation in, among other things, inflation and reliance on exports; and less efficient markets. Currency fluctuations or devaluations in any one country can have a significant effect on the entire Pacific Basin region. Holding securities in currencies that are devalued (or in companies whose revenues are substantially in currencies that are devalued) will likely decrease the value of a Fund’s investments. Some developing countries prohibit or impose substantial restrictions on investments in their capital markets, particularly their equity markets, by foreign entities such as a Fund. For example, certain countries may require governmental approval prior to investments by foreign persons or limit the amount of investment by foreign persons in a particular company or limit the investment by foreign persons to only a specific class of securities of a company which may have less advantageous terms (including price and shareholder rights) than securities of the company available for purchase by nationals of the relevant country. There can be no assurance that a Fund will be able to obtain required governmental approvals in a timely manner. In addition, changes to restrictions on foreign ownership of securities subsequent to a Fund’s purchase of such securities may have an adverse effect on the value of such shares. Certain countries may restrict investment opportunities in issuers or industries deemed important to national interests. |
|
■
|
ETFs. A Fund may purchase shares of ETFs. ETFs trade like a common stock and passive ETFs usually represent a fixed portfolio of securities designed to track the performance and dividend yield of a particular domestic or foreign market index. Typically, a Fund would purchase passive ETF shares to obtain exposure to all or a portion of the stock or bond market. As a shareholder of an ETF, a Fund would be subject to its ratable share of the ETF’s expenses, including its advisory and administration expenses. An investment in an ETF generally presents the same primary risks as an investment in a conventional mutual fund (i.e., one that is not exchange traded) that has the same investment objective, strategies, and policies. The price of an ETF can fluctuate within a wide range, and a Fund could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF decline in value. In addition, ETFs are subject to the following risks that do not apply to conventional mutual funds: (1) the market price of the ETF’s shares may trade at a discount or premium to their NAV per share; (2) an active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained; or (3) trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem such action appropriate, the shares are de-listed from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.
|
|
■
|
Money Market Funds. A Fund can invest free cash balances in registered open-end investment companies regulated as money market funds under the Investment Company Act, to provide liquidity or for defensive purposes. A Fund would invest in money market funds rather than purchasing individual short-term investments. Although a money market fund is designed to be a relatively low risk investment, it is not free of risk. Despite the short maturities and high credit quality of a money market fund’s investments, increases in interest rates and deteriorations in the credit quality of the instruments the money market fund has purchased may reduce the money market fund’s yield and can cause the price of a money market security to decrease. In addition, a money market fund is subject to the risk that the value of an investment may be eroded over time by inflation. If the liquidity of a money market fund’s portfolio deteriorates below certain levels, the money market fund may suspend redemptions (i.e., impose a redemption gate) and thereby prevent a Fund from selling its investment in the money market fund, or impose a fee of up to 2% on amounts redeemed from the money market fund.
|
| 1 | Engage in dollar rolls or purchase or sell securities on a when-issued or forward commitment basis. The purchase or sale of when-issued securities enables an investor to hedge against anticipated changes in interest rates and prices by locking in an attractive price or yield. The price of when-issued securities is fixed at the time the commitment to purchase or sell is made, but delivery and payment for the when-issued securities takes place at a later date, normally one to two months after the date of purchase. During the period between purchase and settlement, no payment is made by the purchaser to the issuer and no interest accrues to the purchaser. Such transactions therefore involve a risk of loss if the value of the security to be purchased declines prior to the settlement date or if the value of the security to be sold increases prior to the settlement date. A sale of a when-issued security also involves the risk that the other party will be unable to settle the transaction. Dollar rolls are a type of forward commitment transaction. Purchases and sales of securities on a forward commitment basis involve a commitment to purchase or sell securities with payment and delivery to take place at some future date, normally one to two months after the date of the transaction. As with |
| when-issued securities, these transactions involve certain risks, but they also enable an investor to hedge against anticipated changes in interest rates and prices. Forward commitment transactions are executed for existing obligations, whereas in a when-issued transaction, the obligations have not yet been issued. |
| 2 | Invest in other investment companies (including affiliated investment companies) to the extent permitted by the Investment Company Act, or exemptive relief granted by the SEC. |
| 3 | Loan securities to broker-dealers or other institutional investors. Securities loans will not be made if, as a result, the aggregate amount of all outstanding securities loans by a Fund exceeds 33¹/3% of its total assets (including the market value of collateral received). For purposes of complying with a Fund’s investment policies and restrictions, collateral received in connection with securities loans is deemed an asset of a Fund to the extent required by law. |
| 4 | Enter into repurchase agreements. A repurchase agreement is an agreement under which securities are acquired by a Fund from a securities dealer or bank subject to resale at an agreed upon price on a later date. The acquiring Fund bears a risk of loss in the event that the other party to a repurchase agreement defaults on its obligations and a Fund is delayed or prevented from exercising its rights to dispose of the collateral securities. However, the Manager or the sub-advisor, as applicable, attempts to minimize this risk by entering into repurchase agreements only with financial institutions that are deemed to be of good financial standing. |
| 5 | Purchase securities sold in private placement offerings made in reliance on the “private placement” exemption from registration afforded by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, and resold to qualified institutional buyers under Rule 144A under the Securities Act. A Fund will not invest more than 15% of its net assets in Section 4(a)(2) securities and illiquid securities unless the Manager or the sub-advisor, as applicable, determines that any Section 4(a)(2) securities held by such Fund in excess of this level are liquid. |
| 1 | Each Fund may not concentrate investments in a particular industry or group of industries, as concentration is defined under the Investment Company Act, the rules and regulations thereunder or any exemption therefrom, as such statute, rules or regulations may be amended or interpreted from time to time, except that the Fund may invest without limitation in securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities and repurchase agreements involving such securities or tax-exempt obligations of state or municipal governments and their political subdivisions. |
| 2 | Each Fund may borrow money or issue senior securities (as defined under the Investment Company Act), except as prohibited under the Investment Company Act, the rules and regulations thereunder or any exemption therefrom, as such statute, rules or regulations may be amended or interpreted from time to time. |
| 3 | Each Fund may make loans, except as prohibited under the Investment Company Act, the rules and regulations thereunder or any exemption therefrom, as such statute, rules or regulations may be amended or interpreted from time to time. |
| 4 | Each Fund may purchase or sell commodities or real estate, except as prohibited under the Investment Company Act, the rules and regulations thereunder or any exemption therefrom, as such statute, rules or regulations may be amended or interpreted from time to time. |
| 5 | Each Fund may underwrite securities issued by other persons, except as prohibited under the Investment Company Act, the rules and regulations thereunder or any exemption therefrom, as such statute, rules or regulations may be amended or interpreted from time to time. |
| 1 | Each Fund may not invest more than 15% of its net assets in illiquid securities, including time deposits and repurchase agreements that mature in more than seven days; or |
| 2 | Each Fund may not purchase securities on margin, except that (1) a Fund may obtain such short term credits as necessary for the clearance of transactions, and (2) a Fund may make margin payments in connection with foreign currency, futures contracts, options, forward contracts, swaps, caps, floors, collars, securities purchased or sold on a forward-commitment or delayed-delivery basis or other financial instruments. |
| 3 | Each Fund may not invest in unmarketable interests in real estate limited partnerships or invest directly in real estate. For the avoidance of doubt, the foregoing policy does not prevent the Fund from, among other things, purchasing marketable securities of companies that deal in real estate or interests therein (including REITs). |
| 4 | Each Fund may purchase or sell financial and physical commodities, commodity contracts based on (or relating to) physical commodities or financial commodities and securities and derivative instruments whose values are derived from (in whole or in part) physical commodities or financial commodities. |
| 1 | a complete list of holdings for each Fund on an annual and semi-annual basis within seventy days of the end of each fiscal period in publicly available filings of Form N-CSR with the SEC (available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov) and on the Funds’ website (www.americanbeaconfunds.com); |
| 2 | a complete list of holdings for each Fund as of the end of each fiscal quarter in publicly available filings of Form N-PORT with the SEC within sixty days of the end of the fiscal quarter (available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov); |
| 3 | a complete list of holdings for each Fund as of the end of each calendar quarter on the Funds’ website (www.americanbeaconfunds.com) approximately sixty days after the end of the calendar quarter; and |
| 4 | ten largest holdings for each Fund as of the end of each calendar quarter on the Funds’ website (www.americanbeaconfunds.com) and in sales materials approximately fifteen days after the end of the calendar quarter. |
|
Service Provider
|
Service
|
Holdings Access
|
|
Manager
|
Investment management and administrator
|
Complete list on intraday basis with no lag
|
|
Sub-Advisor
|
Investment management
|
Holdings under sub-advisor’s management on intraday basis with no lag
|
|
State Street Bank and Trust Co. (“State Street”) and its designated foreign sub-custodians
|
Securities lending agent for Funds that participate in securities lending, Funds’ custodian and foreign custody manager, sub-administrator, fund administration service provider, and foreign sub-custodian
|
Complete list on intraday basis with no lag
|
|
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|
Funds’ independent registered public accounting firm
|
Complete list on annual basis with no lag
|
|
Bloomberg, L.P.
|
Performance and portfolio analytics reporting
|
Complete list on daily basis with no lag
|
|
FactSet Research Systems, Inc.
|
Performance and portfolio analytics reporting for the Manager
|
Complete list on daily basis with no lag
|
|
KPMG International
|
Service provider to State Street
|
Complete list on annual basis with lag
|
|
Kurtosys
|
Service Provider to the Manager
|
Partial list on a periodic basis with lag
|
| 1 | Recipients of portfolio holdings information must agree in writing to keep the information confidential until it has been posted to the Funds’ website and not to trade based on the information; |
| 2 | Holdings may only be disclosed as of a month-end date; |
| 3 | No compensation may be paid to the Funds, the Manager or any other party in connection with the disclosure of information about portfolio securities; and |
| 4 | A member of the Manager’s Compliance staff must approve requests for nonpublic holdings information. |
|
Name and Year of Birth*
|
Position and Length of Time Served on the American Beacon Funds and American Beacon Select Funds
|
Position and Length of Time Served on the American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust
|
Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships During Past 5 Years
|
|
INTERESTED TRUSTEE
|
|||
|
Eugene J. Duffy
(1954)** |
Trustee since 2008
|
Trustee since 2017
|
Global Investment Management Distribution, Mesirow Financial Administrative Corporation: Managing Director (2016-Present);
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Trustee (2018–2021);
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Trustee (2018–2021)
|
|
NON-INTERESTED TRUSTEES
|
|||
|
Gilbert G. Alvarado
(1969) |
Trustee since 2015
|
Trustee since 2017
|
The Conrad Prebys Foundation: President, SJVIIF, LLC, Impact Investment Fund: Chief Financial Officer (2022-Present) (2018-2022);
Kura MD, Inc. (local telehealth organization): Director (2015-2017);
Sierra Health Foundation (health conversion private foundation): Executive Vice President & CCO (2022);
Sierra Health Foundation (health conversion private foundation): Senior Vice President & CFO (2006-2022);
Sierra Health Foundation: Center for Health Program Management (California public benefit corporation): Executive Vice President & CFO (2022);
Sierra Health Foundation: Center for Health Program Management (California public benefit corporation): Senior Vice President & CFO (2012-2022);
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Trustee (2018–2021);
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Trustee (2018–2021).
|
|
Joseph B. Armes
(1962) |
Trustee since 2015
|
Trustee since 2017
|
Switchback Energy Acquisition: Director (2019-2021);
CSW Industrials f/k/a Capital Southwest Corporation (investment company): Chairman & CEO (2015-Present);
JBA Investment Partners (family investment vehicle): President & CEO (2010-Present);
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Trustee (2018–2021);
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Trustee (2018–2021).
|
|
Gerard J. Arpey
(1958) |
Trustee since 2012
|
Trustee since 2017
|
Emerald Creek Group (private equity firm): Partner (2011-Present); S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. (privately held company): Director (2008-present);
The Home Depot, Inc.: Director (2015-Present);
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Trustee (2018–2021);
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Trustee (2018–2021).
|
|
Claudia A. Holz
(1957) |
Trustee since 2018
|
Trustee since 2018
|
Blue Owl Capital, Inc.: Independent Director (2021-Present);
KPMG LLP: Partner (1990–2017);
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Trustee (2018–2021);
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Trustee (2018–2021)
|
|
Douglas A. Lindgren
(1961) |
Chair since 2025
Trustee since 2018 |
Chair since 2025
Trustee since 2018 |
JLL Income Property Trust: Director (2022-Present);
Carne Global Financial Services: CEO North America (2016-2017);
Carne Financial Services: Consultant (2017-2019);
UBS Wealth Management: Managing Director, IPS Investment Management and Global Head, Content Management (2010-2016);
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Trustee (2018–2021);
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Trustee (2018–2021).
|
|
Barbara J. McKenna
(1963) |
Trustee since 2012
|
Trustee since 2017
|
Longfellow Investment Management Company: President and Managing Principal (2005-Present, President since 2009);
External Diversity Council of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston: Member (2021-2023);
United States Tennis Association: Board Advisor (2021-Present);
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Trustee (2018–2021);
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Trustee (2018–2021).
|
| * | The Board has adopted a retirement policy that requires Trustees to retire no later than the last day of the calendar year in which they reach the age of 75. |
| ** | Mr. Duffy is deemed to be an “interested person” of the Trust, as defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, by virtue of his position with Mesirow Financial, Inc., a broker-dealer. |
|
INTERESTED TRUSTEE
|
||||||
|
Duffy
|
||||||
|
Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities in all Trusts (30 Funds as of December 31, 2024)
|
Over $100,000
|
|||||
|
NON-INTERESTED TRUSTEES
|
||||||
|
Alvarado
|
Armes
|
Arpey
|
Holz
|
Lindgren
|
McKenna
|
|
|
Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities in all Trusts (30 Funds as of December 31, 2024)
|
Over $100,000
|
Over $100,000
|
Over $100,000
|
Over $100,000
|
Over $100,000
|
Over $100,000
|
|
The following table shows estimated compensation (excluding reimbursements) that will be paid by the Trusts to each Trustee for the period from November 18, 2024, the Funds’ commencement of operations, through August 31, 2025.
|
||
|
Name of Trustee
|
Aggregate Compensation From the Trust
|
Total Compensation From the Trusts
|
|
INTERESTED TRUSTEE
|
||
|
Eugene J. Duffy
|
$150,720
|
$160,500
|
|
NON-INTERESTED TRUSTEES
|
||
|
Gilbert G. Alvarado
|
$150,720
|
$160,500
|
|
Joseph B. Armes
|
$160,580
|
$171,000
|
|
Gerard J. Arpey
|
$153,537
|
$163,500
|
|
Brenda A. Cline1
|
$59,161
|
$63,000
|
|
Claudia A. Holz
|
$168,327
|
$179,250
|
|
Douglas A. Lindgren
|
$168,327
|
$179,250
|
|
Barbara J. McKenna
|
$153,537
|
$163,500
|
| 1 | Ms. Cline received compensation from the Trusts up to her retirement from the Board on December 31, 2024. Upon her retirement from the Board, Ms. Cline became eligible for the benefits afforded to Eligible Trustees who served on the Boards prior to September 12, 2008 as described below. |
|
Name and Year of Birth
|
Position and Length of Time Served on the American Beacon Funds and American Beacon Select Funds
|
Position and Length of Time Served on the American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust
|
Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships During Past 5 Years
|
|
OFFICERS
|
|||
|
Gregory Stumm
(1981) |
President
since June 2024 Vice President
2022-2024 |
President
since June 2024 Vice President
2022-2024 |
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.: Director (June 2024-Present), President (June 2024-Present), Chief Executive Officer (June 2024-Present), Senior Vice President (2022-2024)
National Investment Services of America, LLC: Director (2024-Present)
Resolute Acquisition, Inc.: Director (June 2024-Present), President (June 2024-Present), Chief Executive Officer (June 2024-Present), Senior Vice President (2022-2024)
Resolute Topco, Inc.: Director (June 2024-Present), President (June 2024-Present), Chief Executive Officer (June 2024-Present)
Resolute Investment Managers, Inc.: Director (June 2024-Present), President (June 2024-Present), Chief Executive Officer (June 2024 -Present), Senior Vice President (2022-2024)
Resolute Investment Services, Inc.: Director (June 2024-Present), President (June 2024-Present), Chief Executive Officer (June 2024-Present), Senior Vice President, (2022-2024)
Resolute Investment Distributors, Inc.: President (2024-Present), Chief Executive Officer (2024-Present), Director (2022-Present), Senior Vice President (2022-2024)
RSW Investments Holdings LLC: Director (2024-Present)
Shapiro Capital Management, LLC: Director (2024-Present)
SSI Investment Management, LLC: Director (2024-Present)
|
|
Rosemary K. Behan
(1959) |
Vice President, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer
since 2006 |
Vice President, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer
since 2017 |
Alpha Quant Advisors, LLC: Secretary and General Counsel (2016-2020)
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.: Senior Vice President (2021-Present), Vice President (2006-2021), Secretary and General Counsel (2006-Present)
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Vice President, Secretary, and Chief Legal Officer (2018-2021)
American Beacon Cayman Managed Futures Strategy Fund, Ltd.: Secretary (2014-Present)
American Beacon Cayman Multi-Alternatives Company, Ltd.: Secretary (2023-Present)
American Beacon Cayman TargetRisk Company, Ltd: Secretary (2018-Present)
American Beacon Cayman Trend Company, Ltd.: Secretary (2023-Present)
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Vice President, Secretary, and Chief Legal Officer (2018-2021)American Private Equity Management, LLC: Secretary (2008-2024)Continuous Capital, LLC: Vice President and Secretary (2018-2022)Green Harvest Asset Management, LLC: Secretary (2019-2021)Resolute Acquisition, Inc.: Secretary (2015-Present)
Resolute Investment Distributors, Inc.: Secretary (2017-Present)
Resolute Investment Holdings, LLC: Secretary (2015-Present)Resolute Investment Managers, Inc.: Senior Vice President (2021-Present), Vice President (2015-2021), Secretary and General Counsel (2015-Present)
Resolute Investment Services, Inc.: Senior Vice President (2021-Present), Vice President (2017-2021), Secretary and General Counsel (2017-Present)
Resolute Topco, Inc.: Secretary (2015-Present)
|
|
Name and Year of Birth
|
Position and Length of Time Served on the American Beacon Funds and American Beacon Select Funds
|
Position and Length of Time Served on the American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust
|
Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships During Past 5 Years
|
|
Paul B. Cavazos
(1969) |
Vice President
since 2016 |
Vice President
since 2017 |
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.: Chief Investment Officer and Senior Vice President (2016-Present)
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Vice President (2018-2021)
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Vice President (2018-2021)
American Private Equity Management, L.L.C.: Vice President (2017-2024)
|
|
Emily P. Dowden
(1980) |
Vice President
since 2024 |
Vice President
since 2024 |
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.: Vice President (2024-Present)
Resolute Investment Managers, Inc.: Vice President (2024-Present)
Resolute Investment Services, Inc.: Vice President (2024-Present)
Westwood Management: Vice President (2022-2024), (2018-2020)
|
|
Terri L. McKinney
(1963) |
Vice President
since 2010 |
Vice President
since 2017 |
Alpha Quant Advisors, LLC: Vice President (2016-2020)
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.: Senior Vice President, (2021-Present) Vice President, (2009-2021)
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Vice President (2018-2021)
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Vice President (2018-2021)
Continuous Capital, LLC: Vice President (2018-2022)
Resolute Investment Managers, Inc.: Senior Vice President (2021-Present), Vice President (2017-2021)
Resolute Investment Services, Inc.: Senior Vice President (2021-Present), Vice President (2018-2021)
Resolute Investment Distributors, Inc.:Director (2024-Present), Vice President (2024-Present)
|
|
Samuel J. Silver
(1963) |
Vice President
since 2011 |
Vice President
since 2017 |
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.: Vice President (2011-Present), Chief Fixed Income Officer (2016-Present)
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Vice President (2018-2021)
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Vice President (2018-2021)
|
|
Rebecca L. Harris
(1966) |
Vice President
2022-May 2024, June 2024-Present President
May 2024-June 2024 Assistant Secretary
2010-2022 |
Vice President
2022-2024, June 2024-Present President
May 2024-June 2024 Assistant Secretary
2017-2022 |
Alpha Quant Advisors, LLC.: Vice President (2016-2020)
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.: Chief Operating Officer (June 2024-Present), Senior Vice President (2021-May 2024, June 2024-Present), Director (May-June 2024), President (May-June 2024), Chief Executive Officer (May-June 2024), Vice President (2011-2021)
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Assistant Secretary (2018-2021)
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Assistant Secretary (2018-2021)Continuous Capital, LLC: Vice President (2018-2022), Director (2022)
National Investment Services of America, LLC: Director (2022-Present)
Resolute Acquisition, Inc.: Senior Vice President (January 2024-May 2024, June 2024-Present), Director (May 2024-June 2024), President May 2024-June 2024), Chief Executive Officer (May 2024-June 2024)
Resolute Investment Managers, Inc.: Chief Operating Officer (June 2024-Present), Senior Vice President (2021-May 2024, June 2024-Present), Director (May-June 2024), President (May-June 2024), Chief Executive Officer (May-June 2024), Vice President (2017-2021)
Resolute Investment Services, Inc.: Senior Vice President (2021-May 2024, June 2024-Present), Director (May-June 2024), President (May-June 2024), Chief Executive Officer (May-June 2024), Vice President (2017-2021)
Resolute Topco, Inc.: Senior Vice President (January 2024-May 2024, June 2024-Present), Director (May 2024-June 2024), President (May 2024-June 2024), Chief Executive Officer (May 2024-June 2024)
RSW Investments Holdings LLC: Director (2022-Present)
Shapiro Capital Management LLC: Director (2022-Present)
SSI Investment Management LLC: Director (2022-Present)
|
|
Name and Year of Birth
|
Position and Length of Time Served on the American Beacon Funds and American Beacon Select Funds
|
Position and Length of Time Served on the American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust
|
Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships During Past 5 Years
|
|
Melinda G. Heika
(1961) |
Vice President
since 2021 |
Vice President
since 2021 |
Alpha Quant Advisors, LLC: Treasurer and CFO (2016-2020)
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.: Senior Vice President (2021-Present), Treasurer and CFO (2010-Present)
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund:Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer (2018-2021), Vice President (2021)
American Beacon Cayman Managed Futures Strategy Fund, Ltd.: Director (2014-Present), Vice President (2022-Present) and Treasurer (2014-2022),
American Beacon Cayman Multi-Alternatives Company, Ltd.: Director and Vice President (2023-Present)
American Beacon Cayman TargetRisk Company, Ltd.: Director and Vice President (2022-Present), and Treasurer (2018-2022)
American Beacon Cayman Trend Company, Ltd.: Director and Vice President (2023-Present)
American Beacon Funds: Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer (2010-2021)
American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust: Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer (2017-2021)
American Beacon Select Funds: Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer (2010-2021)
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer (2018-2021), Vice President (2021)
American Private Equity Management, L.L.C.: Treasurer (2012-2024)Continuous Capital, LLC: Treasurer (2018-2022) Resolute Acquisition, Inc.: Treasurer (2015-Present)Resolute Investment Holdings, LLC: Treasurer (2015-Present)Resolute Investment Managers, Inc.: Senior Vice President (2021-Present), Treasurer and CFO (2017-Present)Resolute Investment Services, Inc.: Senior Vice President (2021-Present), Treasurer and CFO (2017-Present)
Resolute Topco, Inc.: Treasurer (2015-Present)
|
|
Sonia L. Bates
(1956) |
Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer
since 2021 |
Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer
since 2021 |
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.: Assistant Treasurer (2023-Present)
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Assistant Treasurer (2019-2021), Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer (2021)
American Beacon Funds: Assistant Treasurer (2011-2021)
American Beacon Institutional Funds: Trust Assistant Treasurer (2017-2021)
American Beacon Cayman Managed Futures Strategy Fund, Ltd.: Treasurer (2022-Present)
American Beacon Cayman Multi-Alternatives Company, Ltd.: Treasurer (2023-Present)
American Beacon Cayman TargetRisk Company, Ltd.: Treasurer (2022-Present) and Assistant Treasurer (2018-2022)
American Beacon Cayman Trend Company, Ltd.: Treasurer (2023-Present)
American Beacon Select Funds: Assistant Treasurer (2011-2021)
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Assistant Treasurer (2018-2021), Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer (2021)
American Private Equity Management, L.L.C.: Assistant Treasurer (2012-2024)
Resolute Investment Services, Inc: Vice President, Fund and Tax Reporting (2023-Present), Director, Fund and Tax Reporting (2011-2023)
|
|
Name and Year of Birth
|
Position and Length of Time Served on the American Beacon Funds and American Beacon Select Funds
|
Position and Length of Time Served on the American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust
|
Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships During Past 5 Years
|
|
Christina E. Sears
(1971) |
Chief Compliance Officer
since 2004 Assistant Secretary since 1999 |
Chief Compliance Officer and Assistant Secretary
since 2017 |
Alpha Quant Advisors, LLC: Chief Compliance Officer (2016-2019), Vice President (2016-2020)
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.: Chief Compliance Officer (2004-Present), Vice President (2019-Present)
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Chief Compliance Officer and Assistant Secretary (2018-2021)
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund:Chief Compliance Officer and Assistant Secretary (2018-2021)
American Private Equity Management, LLC: Chief Compliance Officer (2012-2024)
Continuous Capital, LLC.: Chief Compliance Officer (2018-2019), Vice President (2018-2022)
Green Harvest Asset Management, LLC: Chief Compliance Officer (2019-2021)
Resolute Investment Distributors, Inc.: Vice President (2017-Present)Resolute Investment Managers, Inc.: Vice President (2017-Present)Resolute Investment Services, Inc.: Vice President (2019-Present)RSW Investments Holdings, LLC: Chief Compliance Officer (2019-Present)Shapiro Capital Management LLC: Chief Compliance Officer (2024-Present)
|
|
Shelley L. Dyson
(1969) |
Assistant Treasurer
since 2021 |
Assistant Treasurer
since 2021 |
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Assistant Treasurer (2021)
American Beacon Cayman Managed Futures Strategy Fund, Ltd.: Assistant Treasurer (2022-Present)
American Beacon Cayman Multi-Alternatives Company, Ltd.: Assistant Treasurer (2023-Present)
American Beacon Cayman TargetRisk Company, Ltd: Assistant Treasurer (2022-Present)
American Beacon Cayman Trend Company, Ltd.: Assistant Treasurer (2023-Present)
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Assistant Treasurer (2021)
Resolute Investment Services, Inc.: Fund Tax Director (2024-Present), Fund Tax Manager (2020-2024), Manager, Tax (2014-2020)
|
|
Shelley D. Abrahams
(1974) |
Assistant Secretary
since 2008 |
Assistant Secretary
since 2017 |
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Assistant Secretary (2018-2021)
American Beacon Cayman Managed Futures Strategy Fund, Ltd.: Assistant Secretary (2022-Present)
American Beacon Cayman Multi-Alternatives Company, Ltd.: Assistant Secretary (2023-Present)
American Beacon Cayman TargetRisk Company, Ltd: Assistant Secretary (2022-Present)
American Beacon Cayman Trend Company, Ltd.: Assistant Secretary (2023-Present)
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Assistant Secretary (2018-2021)
Resolute Investment Services, Inc.: Corporate Governance Manager (2023-Present), Senior Corporate Governance & Regulatory Specialist (2020-2023), Corporate Governance & Regulatory Specialist (2017-2020)
|
|
Teresa A. Oxford
(1958) |
Assistant Secretary
since 2015 |
Assistant Secretary
since 2017 |
Alpha Quant Advisors, LLC: Assistant Secretary (2016-2020)
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.: Deputy General Counsel (2024-Present), Assistant Secretary (2015-Present), Associate General Counsel (2015-2024)
American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund: Assistant Secretary (2018-2021)
American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund: Assistant Secretary (2018-2021)
Continuous Capital, LLC.: Assistant Secretary (2020-2022)
Resolute Investment Distributors, Inc.: Assistant Secretary (2018-2021), (2024-Present)
Resolute Investment Managers, Inc.: Deputy General Counsel (2024-Present), Assistant Secretary (2017-Present), Associate General Counsel (2017-2024)
Resolute Investment Services, Inc: Deputy General Counsel (2024-Present), Assistant Secretary (2018-Present), Associate General Counsel (2018-2024)
|
American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund
| Shareholder Address | Fund Percentage (listed if over 25%) |
Y CLASS | R6 CLASS | R5 CLASS |
| CHARLES SCHWAB & CO INC* | 23.30% | |||
| SPECIAL CUST A/C | ||||
| EXCLUSIVE BENEFIT OF CUSTOMERS | ||||
| ATTN MUTUAL FUNDS | ||||
| 211 MAIN ST | ||||
| SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105-1901 | ||||
| MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC* | 71.99% | |||
| FOR THE EXCLUSIVE BENE OF ITS CUST | ||||
| 1 NEW YORK PLZ FL 12 | ||||
| NEW YORK NY 10004-1965 | ||||
| NATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC* | 38.82% | 45.36% | ||
| FOR THE EXCLUSIVE BENEFIT OF OUR | ||||
| CUSTOMERS | ||||
| 499 WASHINGTON BLVD FL 4 | ||||
| JERSEY CITY NJ 07310-2010 | ||||
| PERSHING LLC* | 22.12% | |||
| 1 PERSHING PLZ | ||||
| JERSEY CITY NJ 07399-0001 | ||||
| UBS WM USA* | 17.52% | |||
| OMNI ACCOUNT M/F | ||||
| SPEC CDY A/C EBOC UBSFSI | ||||
| 1000 HARBOR BLVD | ||||
| WEEHAWKEN NJ 07086-6761 | ||||
| AMERICAN BEACON ADVISORS | 100% | |||
| 220 LAS COLINAS BLVD E STE 1200 | ||||
| IRVING TX 75039-5500 |
* Denotes record owner of Fund shares only
American Beacon Ninety One International Franchise Fund
| Shareholder Address | Fund Percentage (listed if over 25%) |
Y CLASS | R6 CLASS | R5 CLASS |
| PERSHING LLC* | 72.13% | 72.16% | ||
| 1 PERSHING PLZ | ||||
| JERSEY CITY NJ 07399-0001 | ||||
| AMERICAN BEACON ADVISORS | 100% | 100% | ||
| 220 LAS COLINAS BLVD E STE 1200 | ||||
| IRVING TX 75039-5500 | ||||
| JOHN HANCOCK TRUST COMPANY LLC | 26.09% | 26.10% | ||
| 200 BERKELEY ST STE 7 | ||||
| BOSTON MA 02116-5038 |
* Denotes record owner of Fund shares only
|
Ninety One North America, Inc. (“Ninety One NA”)
|
||
|
Controlling Person/Entity
|
Basis of Control
|
Nature of Controlling Person/Entity’s Business
|
|
Ninety One International Ltd.
|
Parent Company
|
Holding Company
|
|
Ninety One Global Ltd.
|
Parent Company of Ninety One International Ltd.
|
Holding Company
|
|
Ninety One Plc
|
Ultimate Parent Company; Parent Company of Ninety One Global Ltd.
|
Financial Services
|
|
Controlling Person/Entity
|
Basis of Control
|
Nature of Controlling Person/Entity’s Business
|
|
Resolute Topco, Inc.
|
Ultimate Parent Company
|
Holding Company – Founded in 2015
|
|
First $5 billion
|
0.35%
|
|
Next $5 billion
|
0.325%
|
|
Next $10 billion
|
0.30%
|
|
Over $20 billion
|
0.275%
|
|
■
|
complying with reporting requirements;
|
|
■
|
corresponding with shareholders;
|
|
■
|
maintaining internal bookkeeping, accounting and auditing services and records;
|
|
■
|
supervising the provision of services to the Trust by third parties; and
|
|
■
|
administering the Funds’ interfund lending facility and lines of credit, if applicable.
|
|
Number of Other Accounts Managed
and Assets by Account Type |
Number of Accounts and Assets for Which
Advisory Fee is Performance-Based |
|||||
|
Name of Investment Advisor and Portfolio Manager
|
Registered Investment Companies
|
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
|
Other Accounts
|
Registered Investment Companies
|
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
|
Other Accounts
|
|
Ninety One North America, Inc.
|
||||||
|
Abrie Pretorius
|
1 ($78.3 mil)
|
9 ($13.1 bil)
|
25 ($12.8 bil)
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Clyde Rossouw
|
1 ($78.3 mil)
|
14 ($18.6 bil)
|
48 ($13.7 bil)
|
None
|
None
|
3 ($85 mil)
|
|
Elias Erickson
|
1 ($78.3 mil)
|
8 ($12.8 bil)
|
24 ($11.3 bil)
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Paul Vincent
|
1 ($78.3 mil)
|
8 ($13.8 bil)
|
15 ($10.3 bil)
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Name of Investment Advisor and Portfolio Managers
|
American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund
|
American Beacon Ninety One International Franchise Fund
|
|
Ninety One North America, Inc.
|
||
|
Elias Erickson
|
$100,001 - $500,000
|
$100,001 - $500,000
|
|
Abrie Pretorius
|
$10,001 - $50,000
|
$100,001 - $500,000
|
|
Clyde Rossouw
|
None
|
None
|
|
Paul Vincent
|
None
|
N/A
|
|
■
|
Derive at least 90% of its gross income each taxable year from (1) dividends, interest, payments with respect to securities loans and gains from the sale or other disposition of securities or foreign currencies, or other income, including gains from options, futures or forward contracts, derived with respect to its business of investing in securities or those currencies and (2) net income derived from an interest in a “qualified publicly traded partnership” (“QPTP”) (“Qualifying Income”) (“Gross Income Requirement”). A QPTP is a “publicly traded partnership” (that is, a partnership the interests in which are “traded on an established securities market” or “readily tradable on a secondary market (or the substantial equivalent thereof)” (a “PTP”)) that meets certain qualifying income requirements other than a partnership at least 90% of the gross income of which is Qualifying Income as described in clause (1);
|
|
■
|
Diversify its investments so that, at the close of each quarter of its taxable year, (1) at least 50% of the value of its total assets is represented by cash and cash items, Government securities, securities of other RICs, and other securities, with those other securities limited, in respect of any one issuer, to an amount that does not exceed 5% of the value of the Fund’s total assets and that does not represent more than 10% of the issuer’s outstanding voting securities (equity securities of QPTPs being considered voting securities for these purposes), and (2) not more than 25% of the value of its total assets is invested in (a) the securities (other than Government securities or securities of other RICs) of any one issuer, (b) the securities (other than securities of other RICs) of two or more issuers the Funds control (by owning 20% or more of their voting power) that are determined to be engaged in the same, similar or related trades or businesses, or (c) the securities of one or more QPTPs (“Diversification Requirements”); and
|
|
■
|
Distribute annually to its shareholders at least the sum of 90% of its investment company taxable income (generally, net investment income, the excess (if any) of net short-term capital gain over net long-term capital loss, and net gains and losses (if any) from certain foreign currency transactions, all determined without regard to any deduction for dividends paid) and 90% of its net exempt interest income (“Distribution Requirement”).
|
| 1 | Leadership and strategic control |
| 2 | Alignment with the long term |
| 3 | Climate change |
| 4 | Protecting client capital |
| 5 | Audit and disclosure |
|
The board and its directors
|
|
The board determines the strategic direction of the company, taking into account the interests of the company and all its stakeholders. The board bears ultimate responsibility for the long-term sustainable success of the company.
|
|
Although board structures vary across countries, Ninety One expects boards to:
|
|
■
|
Be sufficiently independent, so as to protect all shareholders’ interests.
|
|
■
|
Have adequate executive representation, so as to provide significant operational insight.
|
|
■
|
Provide strong and diverse oversight, underpinned by a variety of skills and experiences that replicate the business’s key features and geographies.
|
|
■
|
Maintain an optimal board size, with appropriate board refreshment, succession plans and correct attendance to find the right balance between fresh perspectives and company history.
|
|
Ninety One believes directors should stand for re-election regularly, and that there should be clear and detailed disclosures of a director’s background. These should be made available to shareholders to facilitate the assessment of their suitability.
|
|
Ninety One expects a board to include a sufficient number of independent directors. Some common obstacles to independence include:
|
|
■
|
Founder status
|
|
■
|
Family relations with senior executives or founders
|
|
■
|
Excessive tenure
|
|
■
|
Having served as an executive in the previous five years
|
|
■
|
Having business relationships with the company or its executives
|
|
■
|
A shareholding in the company of over 10% of the issued share capital
|
|
Interlocking directorships
|
|
The chair leads the board and is responsible for its overall effectiveness in directing the company. Should the company be large and complex in nature, or the chairperson not be independent, Ninety One would require a suitably experienced and senior board member to be appointed as the Lead/Senior Independent Director (LID/SID). The LID should be able to engage independently with owners on governance-related issues.
|
|
The LID should also assume key governance responsibilities, including the supervision of the annual evaluation of the chairperson. The LID should also handle specific issues relating to conflicts of interest of board members, should the chairperson not be independent. Ninety One considers a combined chairperson and CEO role to be a governance risk.
|
|
The voting guidelines arising from the above are as follows:
|
|
■
|
Unless there is a particular context and explanation, Ninety One may not support the (re)election of the chairperson where:
|
|
■
|
They are considered to be not independent.
|
|
■
|
They are the former CEO.
|
|
■
|
There has been a clear failure to conduct periodic reviews of the performance of the board.
|
|
■
|
They have repeatedly refused to adhere to reasonable disclosure requests.
|
|
■
|
There has been a disregard for the interests of stakeholders, including in relation to the environmental and social risks and impacts of the company.
|
|
■
|
There is a lack of succession planning and there is no engagement on the topic.
|
|
■
|
Shareholder rights and the ability to communicate with the board have been impaired.
|
|
■
|
There are persistent and unaddressed governance failures that pose a material risk, unless the board has provided a strong rationale.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against a combined chair and CEO board structure, although it will consider all circumstances, including duration of the appointment, the potential concentration of power and explicit disclosures on how conflicts of interest have been managed.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may not support non-independent directors where the overall board balance is not majority independent or does not at least meet the local market requirements.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One generally accepts proportional representation of shareholdings on the board, so long as minority shareholders’ interests are respected.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One will, in the first instance, focus on non-independent non-executive directors who also serve as key committee members when the overall board is not majority independent.
|
|
■
|
Where executive directors sit as committee members, Ninety One may vote against the executive directors.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against directors, including the chairperson, if, from a sustainability point of view, there are unmitigated risks, poor disclosure, incidents and failure to appropriately manage and anticipate environmental and social risks which have resulted, or may result, in the destruction of shareholder value.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against the re-election of any director who has not attended 75% of the total number of board and relevant committee meetings in the period since they were last elected to the board, unless an appropriate explanation has been provided.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against directors who, due to having accumulated multiple board roles at other publicly listed companies or large unlisted companies, run the risk of not being able to properly discharge their fiduciary duties. Ninety One will look at the number of external roles, the roles themselves, and the market capitalisation of the companies concerned.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One prefers boards that are adequately sized and may vote against certain directors if it considers the board to be too large and unwieldy.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One expects timely disclosure of names and biographical details of all nominees, and may vote against candidates where such information is not disclosed.
|
|
■
|
As a general principle, Ninety One does not support bundled directors’ elections, although it will be guided by regional best practice.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One does not support proposals that remove directors from being re-elected by either a clean slate (100% of the board) or by rotation (usually 33% per year).
|
|
■
|
Ninety One does not generally support the election of alternate directors.
|
|
Board committees
|
|
Ninety One expects the audit, remuneration and nomination committees to comprise non-executive directors only and be chaired by an independent non-executive director. Ninety One may vote against non-independent directors when the structures below are not in place, or when the discharge of duties by each of the committees does not meet the principles it expects companies to uphold.
|
|
Audit committee
The audit committee has a crucial role in safeguarding investors’ interests, as it is responsible for the integrity of the financial statements, risk management and auditor appointment. Given this key role, Ninety One expects audit committees to comprise independent non-executive directors only. They should comprise a minimum of three members with at least one with recent and relevant financial expertise. |
|
Remuneration committee
The remuneration committee is responsible for designing and implementing the remuneration scheme for the company’s executive directors and senior management, including consideration of remuneration related to the management of the environment and social risks and impacts. In this capacity, it should have knowledge of pay structures across the organisation, including that of the CEO, as well as being aware of the gender-pay-gap ratio and other relevant diversity factors. Ninety One expects remuneration committees to be fully independent where called for by market practice, and prefers at least some remuneration committee members to be, or have been, remuneration committee members at other publicly listed companies or to have had similar experience. |
|
Nomination committee
The nomination committee is responsible for ensuring that the board comprises directors with a good range of relevant skills and knowledge and that they collectively represent diversity. It is tasked with designing and implementing robust board-evaluation and succession-planning policies. Ninety One expects nomination committees to be majority independent. |
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against the chair of the nomination committee if, after engagement, there is a failure to ensure appropriate diversity on the board, including ethnicity and gender for example.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against the nomination committee chairperson or the board chairperson in cases where it believes that the necessary skills/ diversity are lacking on the board, including in relation to climate change and transition.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against the nomination committee chairperson or board chairperson in cases where there is no indication that proper and ongoing board assessments and succession planning are taking place.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against remuneration resolutions where there is insufficient disclosure to assess the schemes, and/or where existing disclosure does not follow the regulatory guidelines of the relevant jurisdiction.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One places special emphasis on clear and meaningful performance metrics and targets, which should be linked to the company’s strategy and include stretching vesting levels. The lowering of targets may only be accepted in exceptional circumstances.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One prefers schemes with several performance metrics that should be relative and under the effective control of the executive directors.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One requires a minimum performance period of three years and favours schemes with a subsequent vesting period.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One require malus and clawback provisions to be in place.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against remuneration resolutions if the remuneration approach fails to ensure appropriate remuneration related to the management of environmental and social risks and impacts.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against remuneration resolutions if it is concerned about pay outcomes and not all the members of the remuneration committee are independent.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against remuneration resolutions where there is not a healthy balance between fixed and variable pay and, within the latter, a relevant split between short- and long-term compensation.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One will consider not only maximum pay-outs allowed under the policy, but also year-on-year granted amounts, and will consider this in the context of the company’s size, sector, maturity and previous payment history. Remuneration committees should have the ability to exercise discretion within the boundaries of applicable employment laws and regulations. However, discretion should be exercised with caution and its use publicly justified.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against untoward salary increases without appropriate justification and excessive pension arrangements. Ninety One will vote against proposals that include variable pay within pension entitlement or where pension arrangements are not aligned with the broader workforce, and may vote against increases that are triggered entirely by benchmarking exercises.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One will vote against plans that can be materially amended without shareholder approval.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One does not support retrospective/inflight amendments to incentive schemes, nor the repricing of options, except in exceptional circumstances when not doing so may result in the interests of management and shareholders not being aligned.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One does not typically support transaction bonuses.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One expects dilution levels to be kept to a minimum.
|
|
■
|
On recruitment, Ninety One expects companies to pay no more than is strictly necessary. If buy-out awards are agreed, it expects like-for-like structures together with an explanation of the link between pay and performance in the old and new schemes. Ninety One may vote against such schemes if these conditions are not met.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against severance payments that are not aligned with the company’s remuneration policy and those exceeding contractual requirements. Severance payments should be subject to the same performance tests and pro- rated for time served. Ninety One will vote against accelerated vesting provisions and severance payments lacking disclosure of their terms.
|
|
■
|
Ninety One may vote against any option schemes where there is automatic vesting on a change in control of the company.
|
|
■
|
Vote against the general authority to issue shares with an attached right of pre-emption of more than 33% of the issued share capital of the company.
|
|
■
|
Vote against the general authority to issue shares without attached right of pre-emption of more than 10% of the issued share capital of the company. In the UK, Ninety One accepts a 20% issuance authority if it follows the Pre-Emption Rights Group principles.
|
|
■
|
Vote against any general authority to issue shares for cash above 5%.
|
|
■
|
Vote against any issue of shares for cash where the discount limit is more than 5%.
|
|
■
|
Vote against all general authorities where management has a record of destroying company value as assessed by Ninety One’s own investment process.
|
|
■
|
Vote against the issue of shares to option schemes that it has actively opposed, or where it has opposed the adoption of the remuneration report.
|
|
■
|
There is sufficient liquidity in the market.
|
|
■
|
The company has substantial cash resources and the repurchase scheme is a viable and tax-efficient method of returning cash to shareholders.
|
|
■
|
The company has a track record of cancelling treasury shares rather than re-issuing them to share option schemes (unless this intention has been declared in advance).
|
|
■
|
There is no conflict of interest with the company’s management incentive policy.
|
|
■
|
The share price at the time of the general authority is substantially below its intrinsic value as assessed by Ninety One’s own investment process.
|
|
■
|
There is a robust argument as to how the share repurchase scheme will add more value to shareholders than a cash dividend, repaying debt or making appropriate investments to enhance efficiency or expand operations.
|
|
■
|
The company has sufficient balance-sheet strength and cash resources not to place it under any form of financial strain.
|
|
■
|
Making a symbolic vote against the adoption of the financial statements.
|
|
■
|
Voting against the re-election of incumbent directors.
|
|
■
|
‘Poison pill’ proposals in any form.
|
|
■
|
Any resolutions that propose new share classes that have proportionately higher voting rights than existing share classes.
|
|
■
|
Any resolutions that absolve directors from either their fiduciary responsibilities to owners or their re-election through an ordinary resolution.
|
|
■
|
There are repeated and material misstatements in the annual financial statements.
|
|
■
|
A disproportionate (+40%) amount of the auditor’s total fee over the previous three years is derived from non-audit services. In markets where it is not required or best practice to disclose non-audit fees, Ninety One aims to engage with companies to encourage such disclosure.
|
|
■
|
The auditor is engaged with conducting the internal audit.
|
|
■
|
The auditor has been in place for more than 10 years and there has not been a recent tender process and there are no plans to put the audit out to tender. This may also result in the withdrawal of support for the audit committee chairperson.
|
|
■
|
There is a clear deficiency in information.
|
|
■
|
There has been an attempt to hide or obfuscate materials.
|
|
■
|
There are serious omissions, or there has been an audit qualification.
|
|
American Beacon or the Manager
|
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.
|
|
Beacon Funds or Trust
|
American Beacon Funds
|
|
Board
|
Board of Trustees
|
|
Brexit
|
The United Kingdom’s departure from the European Union
|
|
CCO
|
Chief Compliance Officer
|
|
CDSC
|
Contingent Deferred Sales Charge
|
|
CFTC
|
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
|
|
CPO
|
Commodity Pool Operator
|
|
Denial of Services
|
A cybersecurity incident that results in customers or employees being unable to access electronic systems
|
|
Dividends
|
Distributions from a Fund’s net investment income
|
|
Dodd-Frank Act
|
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
|
|
DRD
|
Dividends-received deduction.
|
|
ETF
|
Exchange-Traded Fund
|
|
ETN
|
Exchange-Traded Note
|
|
EU
|
European Union
|
|
FINRA
|
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
|
|
Forwards
|
Forward Currency Contracts
|
|
Holdings Policy
|
Policies and Procedures for Disclosure of Portfolio Holdings
|
|
Internal Revenue Code
|
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
|
|
Investment Company Act
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended
|
|
IRA
|
Individual Retirement Account
|
|
IRS
|
Internal Revenue Service
|
|
Junk Bonds
|
High yield, non-investment grade bonds
|
|
LOI
|
Letter of Intent
|
|
Management Agreement
|
A Fund’s Management Agreement with the Manager
|
|
Manager
|
American Beacon Advisors, Inc.
|
|
Moody’s
|
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.
|
|
NAV
|
Net asset value
|
|
NDF
|
Non-deliverable forward contracts
|
|
NYSE
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
|
OID
|
Original Issue Discount
|
|
OTC
|
Over-the-Counter
|
|
Proxy Policy
|
Proxy Voting Policy and Procedures
|
|
QDI
|
Qualified Dividend Income
|
|
RIC
|
Regulated Investment Company
|
|
S&P Global
|
S&P Global Ratings
|
|
SAI
|
Statement of Additional Information
|
|
SEC
|
Securities and Exchange Commission
|
|
Securities Act
|
Securities Act of 1933, as amended
|
|
State Street
|
State Street Bank and Trust Co.
|
|
TIPS
|
Treasury Inflation Protected Securities
|
|
Trustee Retirement Plan
|
Trustee Retirement and Trustee Emeritus and Retirement Plan
|
|
UK
|
United Kingdom
|
PART
C
OTHER
INFORMATION
Item 28. Exhibits
|
Number |
Exhibit Description | |
|
(a) |
(1) |
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated August 27, 2024, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 418, filed October 28, 2024 (“PEA 418”) |
|
|
(2)(i) |
Certificates of Designation for American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund and American Beacon Global Evolution Frontier Markets Income Fund, are incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 208, filed December 19, 2014 |
|
|
(2)(ii) |
Certificate of Designation for American Beacon Frontier Markets Income Fund, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 317, filed July 31, 2018 |
|
|
(2)(iii) |
Amendment to Designation of Series for American Beacon Developing World Income Fund, dated January 4, 2023, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 401, filed February 27, 2023 (“PEA No. 401”) |
|
|
(3)(i) |
Certificates of Designation for American Beacon Bridgeway Large Cap Growth Fund and American Beacon Sound Point Floating Rate Income Fund, are incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 239, filed December 23, 2015 |
|
|
(3)(ii) |
Amendment to Designation of Series for American Beacon FEAC Floating Rate Income Fund, dated January 3, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 401 |
|
|
(3)(iii) |
Amendment to Designation of Series for American Beacon Man Large Cap Growth Fund and American Beacon Man Large Cap Value Fund, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 414, filed May 24, 2024 (“PEA No. 414”) |
|
|
(4) |
Certificate of Designation for American Beacon Garcia Hamilton Quality Bond Fund, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 253, filed April 1, 2016 |
|
|
(5) |
Certificate of Designation for American Beacon ARK Disruptive Innovation Fund, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 266, filed November 9, 2016 |
|
|
(6) |
Certificate of Designation for American Beacon TwentyFour Strategic Income Fund, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 286, filed March 30, 2017 |
|
|
(7) |
Certificate of Designation for American Beacon ARK Transformational Innovation Fund, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 291, filed May 26, 2017 |
|
|
(8) |
Certificate of Designation for American Beacon Shapiro Equity Opportunities Fund and American Beacon Shapiro SMID Cap Equity Fund, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 297, filed September 11, 2017 |
|
|
(9)(i) |
Certificate of Designation for American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund and American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund, dated September 10, 2018, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 321, filed October 17, 2018 |
|
|
(9)(ii) |
Certificate of Designation for American Beacon AHL Target Risk Fund, dated June 6, 2018, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 348, filed April 30, 2019 (“PEA No. 348”) |
|
|
(9)(iii) |
Amendment to Designation of Series for American Beacon EAM International Small Cap Fund, dated January 23, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 401 |
|
|
(10) |
Certificate of Designation for American Beacon SSI Alternative Income Fund, dated March 5, 2019, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 348 |
|
|
(11)(i) |
Certificate of Designation for American Beacon TwentyFour Short Term Bond Fund, dated December 2, 2019, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 358, filed December 23, 2019 |
|
|
(11)(ii) |
Amended Certificate of Designation for American Beacon TwentyFour Sustainable Short Term Bond Fund, dated October 7, 2021, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 391, filed October 28, 2021 (“PEA No. 391”) |
|
|
(12) |
Certificate of Designation for American Beacon NIS Core Plus Bond Fund, dated August 17, 2020, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 377, filed September 10, 2020 (“PEA No. 377”) |
|
|
(13) |
Certificate of Designation for American Beacon AHL Multi-Alternatives Fund, dated May 25, 2023, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 407, filed August 16, 2023 (“PEA No. 407”) |
|
|
(14) |
Certificate of Designation for American Beacon Ninety One Emerging Markets Equity Fund, American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund, and American Beacon Ninety One International Franchise Fund, dated June 25, 2024, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 415, filed August 14, 2024 (“PEA No. 415”) |
|
(b) |
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws, effective as of August 27, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 418 |
|
(c) |
|
Rights of holders of the securities being registered are contained in Articles III, VIII, X, XI and XII of the Registrant’s Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Articles II, III, VI, VII and VIII of the Registrant’s Amended and Restated By-Laws |
2
|
Number |
Exhibit Description | |
|
(d) |
(1)(A)(i) |
Management Agreement by and among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., dated December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 411, filed February 9, 2024 (“PEA No. 411”) |
|
|
(1)(A)(ii) |
First Amendment to Management Agreement Schedule B by and among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., dated January 9, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(1)(A)(iii) |
Second Amendment to Management Agreement Schedule B by and among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., dated January 26, 2024, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 412, filed February 23, 2024 |
|
|
(1)(A)(iv) |
Third Amendment to Management Agreement Schedule B by and among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., dated February 27, 2024, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 413, filed April 29, 2024 (“PEA No. 413”) |
|
|
(1)(A)(v) |
Fourth Amendment to Management Agreement Schedule B by and among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., dated March 14, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 413 |
|
|
(1)(A)(vi) |
Fifth Amendment to Management Agreement Schedule B by and among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., dated April 15, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 414 |
|
|
(1)(A)(vii) |
Sixth Amendment to Management Agreement Schedule B by and among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., dated October 21, 2024, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 419, filed November 14, 2024 (“PEA No. 419”) |
|
|
(1)(B) |
Management Agreement between American Beacon Cayman Managed Futures Strategy Fund, Ltd. and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., dated December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(1)(C) |
Management Agreement between American Beacon Cayman TargetRisk Company, Ltd. and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., dated December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(1)(D) |
Management Agreement between American Beacon Cayman Multi-Alternatives Company, Ltd. and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., dated December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(2)(A)(i) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc., and Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC, dated December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(2)(A)(ii) |
First Amendment to Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc., and Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC, dated March 14, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 413 |
|
|
(2)(B) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc., and Brandywine Global Investment Management, LLC, dated March 14, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 413 |
|
|
(2)(C) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc., and Causeway Capital Management LLC, dated December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(2)(D)(i) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc., and Hotchkis and Wiley Capital Management LLC, dated December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(2)(D)(ii) |
First Amendment to Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc., and Hotchkis and Wiley Capital Management LLC, dated March 14, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 413 |
|
|
(2)(E) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc., and Lazard Asset Management LLC, dated December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(2)(F)(i) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc., and Strategic Income Management, LLC, dated December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(2)(F)(ii) |
First Amendment to Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc., and Strategic Income Management, LLC, effective as of November 19, 2024, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 422, filed December 23, 2024 (“PEA No. 422”) |
|
|
(2)(G) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc., and Massachusetts Financial Services Company, dated March 14, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 413 |
|
|
(2)(H) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc., and Stephens Investment Management Group, LLC, dated December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(2)(I) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc., and The London Company of Virginia, LLC, dated December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(2)(J) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc., and Global Evolution USA, LLC, dated December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(2)(K) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc., and AHL Partners LLP, dated December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
3
|
Number |
Exhibit Description | |
|
|
(2)(L) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Cayman Managed Futures Strategy Fund, Ltd., American Beacon Advisors, Inc., and AHL Partners LLP, dated December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(2)(M) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc., and Garcia Hamilton & Associates, L.P., dated December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(2)(N) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc., and ARK Investment Management LLC, dated January 9, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(2)(O) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc., and TwentyFour Asset Management (US) LP, dated December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(2)(P)(i) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc., and Shapiro Capital Management, LLC, dated January 26, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 413 |
|
|
(2)(P)(ii) |
First Amendment to Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc., and Shapiro Capital Management, LLC, dated February 27, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 413 |
|
|
(2)(Q) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc., and Newton Investment Management North America, LLC, dated March 14, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 413 |
|
|
(2)(R) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc. and abrdn Investments Limited, dated December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(2)(S) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Cayman TargetRisk Company, Ltd., American Beacon Advisors, Inc., and AHL Partners LLP, dated December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(2)(T) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc. and SSI Investment Management LLC, dated December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(2)(U) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc. and American Century Investment Management, Inc., dated December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(2)(V) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc. and National Investment Services of America, LLC, dated December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(2)(W) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc. and DePrince, Race & Zollo, Inc., dated March 14, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 413 |
|
|
(2)(X) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc. and EAM Global Investors LLC, effective December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(2)(Y) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc. and First Eagle Alternative Credit, LLC, effective December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(2)(Z) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Cayman Multi-Alternatives Company, Ltd., American Beacon Advisors, Inc., and AHL Partners LLP, dated December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(2)(AA) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc. and Numeric Investors LLC, dated April 16, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 414 |
|
|
(2)(BB) |
Investment Advisory Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Advisors, Inc. and Ninety One North America, Inc., dated August 21, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 419 |
|
(e) |
(1) |
Distribution Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds and Resolute Investment Distributors, Inc., dated December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(2) |
First Amendment to Distribution Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds and Resolute Investment Distributors, Inc., dated May 1, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 414 |
|
|
(3) |
Second Amendment to Distribution Agreement among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds and Resolute Investment Distributors, Inc., effective October 21, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 419 |
|
(f) |
|
Bonus, profit sharing or pension plans – (none) |
|
(g) |
(1) |
Custodian Agreement between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated December 1, 1997, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 24, filed February 26, 1998 |
|
|
(2) |
Amendment to Custodian Agreement between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated May 9, 2019, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 353, filed May 30, 2019 |
|
|
(3) |
Amendment to Custodian Agreement between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated May 13, 2019, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 355, filed October 25, 2019 |
|
|
(4) |
Amendment to Custodian Agreement between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 15, 2019, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 357, filed November 22, 2019 (“PEA No. 357”) |
|
|
(5) |
Amendment to Custodian Agreement between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, effective January 22, 2020, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 362, filed February 14, 2020 |
4
|
Number |
Exhibit Description | |
|
|
(6) |
Amendment to Custodian Agreement between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated April 15, 2020, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 368, filed May 28, 2020 (“PEA No. 368”) |
|
|
(7) |
Amendment to Custodian Agreement between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated July 31, 2020, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 374, filed August 28, 2020 (“PEA No. 374”) |
|
|
(8) |
Amendment to Custodian Agreement between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated August 27, 2020, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 377 |
|
|
(9) |
Amendment to Custodian Agreement between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 8, 2020, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 381, filed October 28, 2020 (“PEA No. 381”) |
|
|
(10) |
Amendment to Custodian Agreement between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, effective November 2, 2020, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 383, filed December 14, 2020 (“PEA No. 383”) |
|
|
(11) |
Amendment to Custodian Agreement between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, effective August 3, 2021, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 389, filed August 27, 2021 (“PEA No. 389”) |
|
|
(12) |
Amendment to Custodian Agreement between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated February 14, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 401 |
|
|
(13) |
Amendment to Custodian Agreement between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated August 4, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 407 |
|
|
(14) |
Amendment to Custodian Agreement between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated May 15, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 414 |
|
|
(15) |
Amendment to Custodian Agreement between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated October 29, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 419 |
|
(h) |
(1)(A) |
Transfer Agency Services Agreement between SS&C GIDS, Inc. and American Beacon Funds, effective February 1, 2023, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 402, filed March 22, 2023 |
|
|
(1)(B) |
First Amendment to Transfer Agency Services Agreement between SS&C GIDS, Inc. and American Beacon Funds, effective August 3, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 407 |
|
|
(1)(C) |
Amendment to Transfer Agency Services Agreement between SS&C GIDS, Inc. and American Beacon Funds, effective May 1, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 414 |
|
|
(1)(D) |
Amendment to Transfer Agency Services Agreement between SS&C GIDS, Inc. and American Beacon Funds, effective November 1, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 419 |
|
|
(2)(A) |
Sub-Administrative Services Fee Agreement between American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust, American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund, American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund, and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., dated April 30, 2017, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 407 |
|
|
(2)(B) |
First Amendment to the Sub-Administrative Services Fee Agreement between American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust, American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund, American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund, and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., dated May 8, 2018, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 381 |
|
|
(2)(C) |
Second Amendment to the Sub-Administrative Services Fee Agreement between American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust, American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund, American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund, and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., dated August 26, 2018, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 381 |
|
|
(2)(D) |
Third Amendment to the Sub-Administrative Services Fee Agreement between American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust, American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund, American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., dated March 26, 2019, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 381 |
|
|
(2)(E) |
Fourth Amendment to the Sub-Administrative Services Fee Agreement between American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust, American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund, American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., dated October 15, 2019, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 381 |
|
|
(2)(F) |
Fifth Amendment to the Sub-Administrative Services Fee Agreement between American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust, American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund, American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., dated January 13, 2020, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 381 |
|
|
(2)(G) |
Sixth Amendment to the Sub-Administrative Services Fee Agreement between American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust, American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund, American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., effective April 30, 2020, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 381 |
5
|
Number |
Exhibit Description | |
|
|
(2)(H) |
Seventh Amendment to the Sub-Administrative Services Fee Agreement between American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust, American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund, American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., effective July 31, 2020, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 381 |
|
|
(2)(I) |
Eighth Amendment to the Sub-Administrative Services Fee Agreement between American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust, American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund, American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., effective September 10, 2020, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 381 |
|
|
(2)(J) |
Ninth Amendment to the Sub-Administrative Services Fee Agreement between American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust, American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund, American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., effective September 30, 2020, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 381 |
|
|
(2)(K) |
Tenth Amendment to the Sub-Administrative Services Fee Agreement between American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust, American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund, American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., effective November 2, 2020, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 383 |
|
|
(2)(L) |
Eleventh Amendment to the Sub-Administrative Services Fee Agreement between American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust, American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund, American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., effective August 2, 2021, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 389 |
|
|
(2)(M) |
Twelfth Amendment to the Sub-Administrative Services Fee Agreement between American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., effective May 23, 2022, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 395, filed May 27, 2022 |
|
|
(2)(N) |
Thirteenth Amendment to the Sub-Administrative Services Fee Agreement between American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., effective January 31, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 401 |
|
|
(2)(O) |
Fourteenth Amendment to the Sub-Administrative Services Fee Agreement between American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., effective as of August 15, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 407 |
|
|
(2)(P) |
Fifteenth Amendment to the Sub-Administrative Services Fee Agreement between American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., effective as of January 19, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(2)(Q) |
Sixteenth Amendment to the Sub-Administrative Services Fee Agreement between American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., effective as of May 1, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 414 |
|
|
(2)(R) |
Seventeenth Amendment to the Sub-Administrative Services Fee Agreement between American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., effective as of October 21, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 419 |
|
|
(3)(A) |
Securities Lending Authorization Agreement between the American Beacon Funds and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated February 16, 2017, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 300, filed October 23, 2017 (“PEA No. 300”) |
|
|
(3)(B) |
Joinder and First Amendment to Securities Lending Authorization Agreement between the American Beacon Funds and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated June 21, 2017, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 300 |
|
|
(3)(C) |
Second Amendment to Securities Lending Authorization Agreement between the American Beacon Funds and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated September 18, 2017, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 300 |
|
|
(3)(D) |
Third Amendment to Securities Lending Authorization Agreement between the American Beacon Funds and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated December 31, 2018, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 351, filed May 15, 2019 |
|
|
(3)(E) |
Fourth Amendment to Securities Lending Authorization Agreement between the American Beacon Funds and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated September 6, 2019, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 374 |
|
|
(3)(F) |
Fifth Amendment to Securities Lending Authorization Agreement between the American Beacon Funds and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated May 12, 2020, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 368 |
|
|
(3)(G) |
Sixth Amendment to Securities Lending Authorization Agreement between the American Beacon Funds and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated May 27, 2020, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 370, filed June 18, 2020 |
|
|
(3)(H) |
Seventh Amendment to Securities Lending Authorization Agreement between the American Beacon Funds and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated November 29, 2022, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 399, filed December 23, 2022 (“PEA No. 399”) |
|
|
(3)(I) |
Eighth Amendment to Securities Lending Authorization Agreement between the American Beacon Funds and State Street Bank and Trust Company, effective January 31, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 401 |
6
|
Number |
Exhibit Description | |
|
|
(3)(J) |
Ninth Amendment to Securities Lending Authorization Agreement between the American Beacon Funds and State Street Bank and Trust Company, effective August 4, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 407 |
|
|
(3)(K) |
Tenth Amendment to Securities Lending Authorization Agreement between the American Beacon Funds and State Street Bank and Trust Company, effective May 1, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 414 |
|
|
(3)(L) |
Eleventh Amendment to Securities Lending Authorization Agreement between the American Beacon Funds and State Street Bank and Trust Company, effective October 14, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 419 |
|
|
(4) |
Administration Agreement between American Beacon Cayman Managed Futures Strategy Fund, Ltd. and American Beacon Advisors, Inc., dated April 30, 2015, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 269, filed December 23, 2016 |
|
|
(5)(A) |
Administrative Services Agreement by and among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust, American Beacon Advisors, Inc. and Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC, dated June 10, 2019, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 357 |
|
|
(5)(B) |
First Amendment to Administrative Services Agreement by and among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust, American Beacon Advisors, Inc. and Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC, effective April 30, 2020, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 368 |
|
|
(5)(C) |
Second Amendment to Administrative Services Agreement by and among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust, American Beacon Advisors, Inc. and Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC, dated August 19, 2022, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 399 |
|
|
(5)(D) |
Third Amendment to Administrative Services Agreement by and among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust, American Beacon Advisors, Inc. and Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC, dated October 25, 2022, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 399 |
|
|
(5)(E) |
Fourth Amendment to Administrative Services Agreement by and among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust, American Beacon Advisors, Inc. and Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC, effective as of August 9, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 407 |
|
|
(5)(F) |
Fifth Amendment to Administrative Services Agreement by and among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust, American Beacon Advisors, Inc. and Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC, dated December 7, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 414 |
|
|
(5)(G) |
Sixth Amendment to Administrative Services Agreement by and among American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust, American Beacon Advisors, Inc. and Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC, effective as of May 1, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 414 |
|
|
(6) |
Service Plan Agreement for the American Beacon Funds Investor Class, dated March 6, 2009, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 77, filed August 3, 2009 |
|
|
(7) |
Service Plan Agreement for the American Beacon Funds Advisor Class (formerly known as the AAdvantage Funds Service Class), dated May 1, 2003, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 45, filed May 1, 2003 (“PEA No. 45”) |
|
|
(8)(A) |
Service Plan Agreement for the American Beacon Funds A Class, dated February 16, 2010, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 84, filed March 16, 2010 |
|
|
(8)(B) |
Amended and Restated Schedule A to the Service Plan Agreement for the American Beacon Funds A Class, effective May 1, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 414 |
|
|
(9)(A) |
Service Plan Agreement for the American Beacon Funds C Class, dated May 25, 2010, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 90, filed June 15, 2010 (“PEA No. 90”) |
|
|
(9)(B) |
Amended and Restated Schedule A to the Service Plan Agreement for the American Beacon Funds C Class, effective May 1, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 414 |
|
|
(10)(A) |
Fee Waiver/Expense Reimbursement Agreement for American Beacon NIS Core Plus Bond Fund, American Beacon ARK Transformational Innovation Fund, American Beacon SSI Alternative Income Fund, American Beacon Shapiro Equity Opportunities Fund, American Beacon Shapiro SMID Cap Equity Fund, American Beacon TwentyFour Strategic Income Fund, American Beacon TwentyFour Sustainable Short Term Bond Fund, American Beacon Garcia Hamilton Quality Bond Fund, American Beacon International Equity Fund, American Beacon EAM International Small Cap Fund R5 Class Shares, American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund, American Beacon Man Large Cap Growth Fund (formerly named the American Beacon Bridgeway Large Cap Growth Fund), American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Growth Fund, American Beacon Stephens Small Cap Growth Fund, effective December 15, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(10)(B) |
Fee Waiver/Expense Reimbursement Agreement for American Beacon FEAC Floating Rate Income Fund, American Beacon SiM High Yield Opportunities Fund and American Beacon The London Company Income Equity Fund, effective January 1, 2024, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 410, filed December 29, 2023 (“PEA No. 410”) |
|
|
(10)(C) |
Investment Adviser Fee Waiver Agreement for American Beacon SSI Alternative Income Fund, effective December 29, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
7
|
Number |
Exhibit Description | |
|
|
(10)(D) |
Fee Waiver/Expense Reimbursement Agreement for American Beacon AHL Multi-Alternatives Fund, effective January 1, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 413 |
|
|
(10)(E) |
Fee Waiver/Expense Reimbursement Agreement for American Beacon EAM International Small Cap Fund Y and Investor Class Shares, effective March 1, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 413 |
|
|
(10)(F) |
Fee Waiver/Expense Reimbursement Agreement for American Beacon Ninety One Emerging Markets Equity Fund, American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund’s R6 and R5 Class shares, and American Beacon Ninety One International Franchise Fund, effective July 31, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 415 |
|
|
(10)(G) |
Fee Waiver/Expense Reimbursement Agreement for American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund’s Y Class shares, effective November 25, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 422 |
|
(i) |
|
|
|
(j) |
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - (filed herewith) |
|
(k) |
|
Financial statements omitted from prospectus — (none) |
|
(l) |
|
Letter of Investment Intent, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 23, filed December 18, 1997 |
|
(m) |
(1) |
Distribution Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for the Advisor Class (formerly known as the Service Class), dated May 1, 2003, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 45 |
|
|
(2)(A) |
Distribution Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for the A Class, dated February 16, 2010, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 88, filed May 17, 2010 |
|
|
(2)(B) |
Amended and Restated Schedule A to the Distribution Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for the A Class, effective May 1, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 414 |
|
|
(3)(A) |
Distribution Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for the C Class, dated May 25, 2010, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 90 |
|
|
(3)(B) |
Amended and Restated Schedule A to the Distribution Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for the C Class, effective May 1, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 414 |
|
(n) |
|
Amended and Restated Plan Pursuant to Rule 18f-3, dated November 12, 2019, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 391 |
|
(p) |
(1) |
Code of Ethics of American Beacon Advisors, Inc., American Beacon Funds, American Beacon Select Funds, American Beacon Institutional Funds Trust, and Resolute Investment Distributors, Inc., dated August 11, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 407 |
|
|
(2) |
Code of Ethics of Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, Inc., revised December 31, 2022, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(3) |
Code of Ethics of Brandywine Global Investment Management, LLC, dated February 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(4) |
Code of Ethics of Causeway Capital Management LLC, dated April 25, 2005, as revised December 30, 2022, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(5) |
Code of Ethics of Hotchkis and Wiley Capital Management, LLC, dated September 1, 2021, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 393, filed February 22, 2022 (“PEA No. 393”) |
|
|
(6) |
Code of Ethics and Personal Investment Policy of Lazard Asset Management LLC, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 393 |
|
|
(7) |
Code of Conduct for The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, parent company of Newton Investment Management North America, LLC, dated 2022, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(8) |
Code of Ethics of Strategic Income Management, LLC, dated February 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 422 |
|
|
(9) |
Code of Ethics of Massachusetts Financial Services Company, dated December 8, 2022, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 401 |
|
|
(10) |
Code of Ethics for Stephens Investment Management Group, LLC, dated February 2023, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 403, filed April 27, 2023 |
|
|
(11) |
Code of Ethics for The London Company of Virginia, LLC, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 410 |
|
|
(12) |
Code of Ethics for Global Evolution USA, LLC, dated February 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 414 |
|
|
(13) |
Code of Ethics for AHL Partners LLP, amended October 11, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 414 |
|
|
(14) |
Code of Ethics for Garcia Hamilton & Associates, L.P., dated February 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(15) |
Code of Ethics for ARK Investment Management LLC, dated October 2, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 418 |
|
|
(16) |
Code of Ethics for TwentyFour Asset Management (US) LP, dated February 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 418 |
8
|
Number |
Exhibit Description | |
|
|
(17) |
Code of Ethics for Shapiro Capital Management, LLC, dated June 30, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 418 |
|
|
(18) |
Code of Ethics for abrdn Investments Limited, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 414 |
|
|
(19) |
Code of Ethics for SSI Investment Management LLC, dated June 24, 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 418 |
|
|
(20) |
Code of Ethics for American Century Investment Management, Inc., dated October 29, 1999, as revised September 1, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(21) |
Code of Ethics for National Investment Services of America, LLC, dated February 2024, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 414 |
|
|
(22) |
Code of Ethics for DePrince, Race & Zollo, Inc., dated August 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 411 |
|
|
(23) |
Code of Ethics for EAM Global Investors LLC, effective October 31, 2022, is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 400, filed December 30, 2022 |
|
|
(24) |
Code of Ethics for First Eagle Alternative Credit, LLC, effective April 2012 and revised January 1, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 410 |
|
|
(25) |
Code of Ethics for Numeric Investors LLC, amended October 11, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 414 |
|
|
(26) |
Code of Ethics for Ninety One North America, Inc., effective November 1, 2023, is incorporated by reference to PEA No. 415 |
|
Other Exhibits | ||
|
|
|
|
Item 29. Persons Controlled by or under Common Control with Registrant
The Trust through the American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund, a separate series of the Trust, wholly owns and controls the American Beacon Cayman Managed Futures Strategy Fund, Ltd. (“Managed Futures Subsidiary”), a company organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands. The Managed Futures Subsidiary’s financial statements will be included, on a consolidated basis, in the American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund’s annual and semi-annual reports to shareholders.
The Trust through the American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund, a separate series of the Trust, wholly owns and controls the American Beacon Cayman TargetRisk Company, Ltd. (“TargetRisk Subsidiary”), a company organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands. The TargetRisk Subsidiary’s financial statements will be included, on a consolidated basis, in the American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund’s annual and semi-annual reports to shareholders.
The Trust through the American Beacon AHL Multi-Alternatives Fund, a separate series of the Trust, wholly owns and controls the American Beacon Cayman Multi-Alternatives Company, Ltd. (“Multi-Alternatives Subsidiary”), a company organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands. The Multi-Alternatives Subsidiary’s financial statements will be included, on a consolidated basis, in the American Beacon AHL Multi-Alternatives Fund’s annual and semi-annual reports to shareholders.
Item 30. Indemnification
Article XI of the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of the Trust provides that:
Limitation of Liability
Section 1. Provided they have exercised reasonable care and have acted under the reasonable belief that their actions are in the best interest of the Trust, the Trustees and officers of the Trust shall not be responsible for or liable in any event for neglect or wrongdoing of them or any officer, agent, employee or investment advisor of the Trust, and shall not be liable for errors of judgment or mistakes of fact or law, but nothing contained herein shall protect any Trustee or officer against any liability to which he or she would otherwise be subject by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of his or her office.
Indemnification
Section 2.
| (a) Subject to the exceptions and limitations contained in paragraph (b) below: |
| (i) every person who is, or has been, a Trustee or officer or employee of the Trust or is or was serving at the request of the Trust as a trustee, director, officer, employee or agent of another organization in which the Trust has an interest as a shareholder, creditor or otherwise (“Covered Person”) shall be indemnified by the Trust and each Series to the fullest extent permitted by law, including the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder as amended from time to time and interpretations thereunder, against liability and against all expenses reasonably incurred or paid by him or her in connection with any claim, action, suit or proceeding in which he or she becomes involved as a party or otherwise by virtue of his or her being or having been a Covered Person and against amounts paid or incurred by him or her in the settlement thereof; |
| (ii) subject to the provisions of this Section 2, each Covered Person shall, in the performance of his or her duties, be fully and completely justified and protected with regard to any act or any failure to act resulting from reliance in good faith upon the records, books and accounts of the Trust or, as applicable, any Series, upon an opinion or other advice of legal counsel, or upon reports made or advice given to the Trust or, as applicable, |
9
| any Series, by any Trustee or any of its officers, employees, or a service provider selected with reasonable care by the Trustees or officers of the Trust, regardless of whether the person rendering such report or advice may also be a Trustee, officer or employee of the Trust or, as applicable, any Series. |
| (iii) as used herein, the words “claim,” “action,” “suit,” or “proceeding” shall apply to all claims, actions, suits or proceedings (civil, criminal, investigative or other, including appeals), actual or threatened, and the words “liability” and “expenses” shall include, without limitation, attorneys’ fees, costs, judgments, amounts paid in settlement, fines, penalties and other liabilities whatsoever. |
| (b) To the extent required under the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder as amended from time to time and interpretations thereunder, but only to such extent no indemnification shall be provided hereunder to a Covered Person: |
| (i) who shall have been adjudicated by a court or body before which the proceeding was brought to be liable to the Trust or its Shareholders by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of his or her office; or |
| (ii) in the event of a settlement, unless there has been a determination that such Covered Person did not engage in willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of his or her office: (A) by the court or other body approving the settlement; (B) by at least a majority of those Trustees who are neither interested persons of the Trust nor are parties to the matter based upon a review of readily available facts (as opposed to a full trial-type inquiry); or (C) by written opinion of independent legal counsel based upon a review of readily available facts (as opposed to a full trial-type inquiry). |
| (c) The rights of indemnification herein provided may be insured against by policies maintained by the Trust, shall be severable, shall not be exclusive of or affect any other rights to which any Covered Person may now or hereafter be entitled, shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be such Covered Person and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators of such Covered Person. Nothing contained herein shall affect any rights to indemnification to which any Covered Person or other person may be entitled by contract or otherwise under law or prevent the Trust from entering into any contract to provide indemnification to any Covered Person or other Person. |
| (d) To the extent that any determination is required to be made as to whether a Covered Person engaged in conduct for which indemnification is not provided as described herein, or as to whether there is reason to believe that a Covered Person ultimately will be found entitled to indemnification, the Person or Persons making the determination shall afford the Covered Person a rebuttable presumption that the Covered Person has not engaged in such conduct and that there is reason to believe that the Covered Person ultimately will be found entitled to indemnification. |
| (e) To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, including Section 17(h) of the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder as amended from time to time and interpretations thereunder, expenses in connection with the preparation and presentation of a defense to any claim, action, suit or proceeding of the character described in paragraph (a) of this Section 2 shall be paid by the Trust or the applicable Series from time to time prior to final disposition thereof upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of such Covered Person that such amount will be paid over by him or her to the Trust or a Series, as applicable, if it is ultimately determined that he or she is not entitled to indemnification under this Section 2; provided, however, that any such advancement will be made in accordance with any conditions required by the Commission. |
| The advancement of any expenses pursuant to this Section 2(e) shall under no circumstances be considered a “loan” under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended from time to time, or for any other reason. |
| (f) Any repeal or modification of this Article XI or adoption or modification of any other provision of this Declaration of Trust inconsistent with this Article XI shall be prospective only to the extent that such repeal or modification would, if applied retrospectively, adversely affect any limitation on the liability of any Covered Person or indemnification or right to advancement of expenses available to any Covered Person with respect to any act or omission that occurred prior to such repeal, modification or adoption. |
| (g) Notwithstanding any other provision in this Declaration of Trust to the contrary, any liability and/or expense against which any Covered Person is indemnified under this Section 2 and any advancement of expenses that any Covered Person is entitled to be paid under Section 2(e) shall be deemed to be joint and several obligations of the Trust and each Series, and the assets of the Trust and each Series shall be subject to the claims of any Covered Person therefor under this Article XI; provided that (a) any such liability, expense or obligation may be allocated and charged by the Trustees between or among the Trust and/or any one or more Series (and Classes) in such manner as the Trustees in their sole discretion deem fair and equitable; and (b) the Trustees may determine that any such liability, expense or obligation should not be allocated to one or more Series (and Classes), and such Series or Classes shall not be liable therefor as provided under Article III, Section 4. |
| (h) Without limiting the foregoing, the Trust may, in connection with any transaction permitted by this Declaration of Trust, including the acquisition of assets subject to liabilities or a merger or consolidation pursuant to Article XII, Section 2, assume the obligation to indemnify any person including a Covered Person or otherwise contract to provide such indemnification, and such indemnification shall not be subject to the terms of this Article XI, Section 2 unless otherwise required under applicable law. |
According to Article XII, Section 1 of the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, nothing in the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust shall be construed to make the Shareholders, either by themselves or with the Trustees, partners or members of a joint stock association. Trustees are not liable personally to any person extending credit to, contracting with or having any claim against the Trust, a particular Portfolio or the Trustees. A Trustee, however, is not protected from liability due to willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of his or her office.
Article V, Section 5 provides that, subject to the provisions of Article XI, the Trustees shall not be liable for any act or omission in accordance with certain advice of counsel or other experts or for failing to follow such advice. Article XI, Section 1 provides that the Trustees are not liable for errors of judgment or mistakes of fact or law, but a Trustee is not protected from liability due to willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of his or her office, for any act or omission in accordance with advice of counsel or other experts or for failing to follow such advice.
10
Numbered Paragraph 10 of the Management Agreement provides that:
10. Limitation of Liability of the Manager. The Manager shall not be liable for any error of judgment or mistake of law or for any loss suffered by a Trust or any Fund in connection with the matters to which this Agreement relate except a loss resulting from the willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence on its part in the performance of its duties or from reckless disregard by it of its obligations and duties under this Agreement. Any person, even though also an officer, partner, employee, or agent of the Manager, who may be or become an officer, Board member, employee or agent of a Trust shall be deemed, when rendering services to a Trust or acting in any business of a Trust, to be rendering such services to or acting solely for a Trust and not as an officer, partner, employee, or agent or one under the control or direction of the Manager even though paid by it. The U.S. federal and state securities laws impose liabilities on persons who act in good faith, and, therefore, nothing in this Agreement is intended to limit the obligations of the Manager under such laws. This Paragraph 10 does not in any manner preempt any separate written indemnification commitments made by the Manager with respect to any matters encompassed by this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with abrdn Investment Limited provides that:
9. Liability of Adviser. The Adviser shall have no liability to the Trust, its shareholders or any third party arising out of or related to this Agreement, provided however, the Adviser agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, the Manager, any affiliated person within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act, and each person, if any, who, within the meaning of Section 15 of the Securities Act, controls the Manager, against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities or litigation (including reasonable legal and other expenses), to which the Manager or such affiliated person or controlling person may become subject under the securities laws, any other federal or state law, at common law or otherwise, arising out of and to the extent of the Adviser’s responsibilities to the Trust which may be based upon any willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of, the Adviser’s obligations and/or duties under this Agreement by the Adviser or by any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, or any affiliate acting on behalf of the Adviser. The indemnification in this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with AHL Partners LLP provides, in relevant part, that:
9. Liability. The Adviser shall have no liability to the Trust, its shareholders, the Manager or any third party arising out of or related to this Agreement, provided however, the Adviser agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, the Manager, any affiliated person within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act, and each person, if any, who, within the meaning of Section 15 of the Securities Act, controls the Manager, against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities or litigation (including reasonable legal and other expenses), to which the Manager or such affiliated person or controlling person may become subject under the securities or commodities laws, any other federal or state law, at common law or otherwise, arising out of the Adviser’s responsibilities to the Trust which may be based upon any willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of, the Adviser’s obligations and/or duties under this Agreement, relating to its trading activities or information provided to the Manager regarding the Adviser, by the Adviser or by any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, or any affiliate acting on behalf of the Adviser. The U.S. federal and state securities laws impose liabilities on persons who act in good faith, and therefore, nothing in this Agreement is intended to limit the obligations of the Adviser under such laws.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with American Century Investment Management, Inc. provides, in relevant part, that:
9. Liability of Adviser. The Adviser shall have no liability to the Trust, its shareholders or any third party arising out of or related to this Agreement, provided however, the Adviser agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, the Manager, any affiliated person within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act, and each person, if any, who, within the meaning of Section 15 of the Securities Act, controls the Manager, against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities or litigation (including reasonable legal and other expenses), to which the Manager or such affiliated person or controlling person may become subject under the securities laws, any other federal or state law, at common law or otherwise, arising out of the Adviser’s responsibilities to the Trust which may be based upon any willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of, the Adviser’s obligations and/or duties under this Agreement by the Adviser or by any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, or any affiliate acting on behalf of the Adviser. The indemnification in this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with ARK Investment Management LLC provides, in relevant part, that:
9. Liability of the Parties. The Adviser shall have no liability to the Trust, its shareholders or any third party arising out of or related to this Agreement, provided however, the Adviser agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, the Manager, any affiliated person of the Adviser within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act (“Affiliated Person”), and each person, if any, who, within the meaning of Section 15 of the Securities Act, controls the Manager (“Controlling Person”), against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities or litigation (including reasonable legal and other expenses), to which the Manager or such Affiliated Person or Controlling Person may become subject under the securities laws, any other federal or state law, at common law or otherwise, arising out of the Adviser’s responsibilities to the Trust or the Funds that may be based upon any willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of the Adviser’s obligations and/or duties under this Agreement by the Adviser or by any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, or any Affiliate Person acting on behalf of the Adviser. The indemnification in this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
The Manager agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, the Adviser, any Affiliated Person of the Adviser, and each Controlling Person of the Adviser, against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities or litigation (including reasonable legal and other expenses), to which the Adviser or its Affiliated Persons or Controlling Person may become subject under the securities laws, any other federal or state law, at common law or otherwise, arising out of the Manager’s responsibilities to the Trust or the Funds that may be based upon any willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard by the Manager or by any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, or any Affiliated Person acting on behalf of the Manager of the Manager’s obligations and/or duties under its agreements with the Trust or the Funds. The indemnification in this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, Inc. provides that:
11
9. Liability of Adviser. The Adviser shall have no liability to the Trust, its shareholders or any third party arising out of or related to this Agreement except with respect to claims which occur due to any willful misfeasance, bad faith, or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or the reckless disregard of its obligations under this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with Brandywine Global Investment Management, LLC provides that:
9. Liability of Adviser. No provision of this Agreement shall be deemed to protect the Adviser against any liability to the Trust or its shareholders to which it might otherwise be subject by reason of any willful misfeasance, bad faith, or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or the reckless disregard of its obligations under this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with Causeway Capital Management LLC provides that:
9. Liability of Adviser. No provision of this Agreement shall be deemed to protect the Adviser against any liability to the Trust or its shareholders to which it might otherwise be subject by reason of any willful misfeasance, bad faith, or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or the reckless disregard of its obligations under this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with DePrince, Race & Zollo, Inc. provides that:
9. Liability of Adviser; Indemnification. The Adviser shall have no liability to the Trust, its shareholders or any third party arising out of or related to this Agreement, provided however, the Adviser shall not be protected against any liability to, and shall indemnify and hold harmless, the Trust and its shareholders, the Manager, any affiliated person thereof within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act, and any controlling person thereof as described in Section 15 of the Securities Act, against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities or litigation (including reasonable legal and other expenses), to which the Trust and its shareholders, the Manager or such affiliated person or controlling person may become subject under the securities laws, any other federal or state law, at common law or otherwise, however arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Adviser’s responsibilities to the Trust which may be based upon: (i) any willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of, the Adviser’s obligations and/or duties under this Agreement by the Adviser or by any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, or any affiliate acting on behalf of the Adviser; or (ii) any untrue statement of a material fact contained in the Trust’s prospectus and statement of additional information applicable to a Fund, or any other Trust filings, proxy materials, reports, advertisements, sales literature or other materials pertaining to a Fund, the Trust or the Manager, or the omission to state therein a material fact known to the Adviser which was required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, if such statement or omission was made in reliance upon information furnished to the Manager or the Trust by the Adviser for use therein. The indemnification in this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with EAM Global Investors LLC provides that:
9. Liability of Adviser; Indemnification. The Adviser shall have no liability to the Trust, its shareholders or any third party arising out of or related to this Agreement, provided however, the Adviser shall not be protected against any liability to, and shall indemnify and hold harmless, the Trust and its shareholders, the Manager, any affiliated person thereof within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act, and any controlling person thereof as described in Section 15 of the Securities Act, against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities or litigation (including reasonable legal and other expenses), to which the Trust and its shareholders, the Manager or such affiliated person or controlling person may become subject under the securities laws, any other federal or state law, at common law or otherwise, however arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Adviser’s responsibilities to the Trust which may be based upon: (i) any willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of, the Adviser’s obligations and/or duties under this Agreement by the Adviser or by any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, or any affiliate acting on behalf of the Adviser; or (ii) any untrue statement of a material fact contained in the Trust’s prospectus and statement of additional information applicable to a Fund, or any other Trust filings, proxy materials, reports, advertisements, sales literature or other materials pertaining to a Fund, the Trust or the Manager, or the omission to state therein a material fact known to the Adviser which was required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, if such statement or omission was made in reliance upon information furnished to the Manager or the Trust by the Adviser for use therein. The indemnification in this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with First Eagle Alternative Credit, LLC provides that:
9. Liability of Adviser; Indemnification. The Adviser shall have no liability to the Trust, its shareholders, the Manager, any affiliated person thereof within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act, and any controlling person thereof as described in Section 15 of the Securities Act (“Manager Affiliate”) or any third party arising out of or related to this Agreement, provided however, the Adviser shall not be protected against any liability to, and shall indemnify and hold harmless, the Trust and its shareholders, the Manager, and any Manager Affiliate, against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities or litigation (including reasonable legal and other expenses), to which the Trust and its shareholders, the Manager or such affiliated person or controlling person may become subject under the securities laws, any other federal or state law, at common law or otherwise, however arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Adviser’s responsibilities to the Trust which may be based upon: (i) any willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of, the Adviser’s obligations and/or duties under this Agreement by the Adviser or by any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, or any affiliate acting on behalf of the Adviser; or (ii) any untrue statement of a material fact contained in the Trust’s prospectus and statement of additional information applicable to a Fund, or any other Trust filings, proxy materials, reports, advertisements, sales literature or other materials pertaining to a Fund, the Trust or the Manager, or the omission to state therein a material fact known to the Adviser which was required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, if such statement or omission was made in reliance upon information furnished to the Manager or the Trust by the Adviser for use therein; provided, however, that in no case is the Adviser’s indemnity in favor of the Trust, the Manager or Manager Affiliate deemed to protect such person against any liability to which any such person would otherwise be subject by reason of willful misconduct, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of its reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under this Agreement. The indemnification in this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with Garcia Hamilton & Associates, L.P. provides that:
12
9. Liability of Adviser. The Adviser shall have no liability to the Trust, its shareholders or any third party arising out of or related to this Agreement, provided however, the Adviser agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, the Manager, any affiliated person within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act, and each person, if any, who, within the meaning of Section 15 of the Securities Act, controls the Manager, against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities or litigation (including reasonable legal and other expenses), to which the Manager or such affiliated person or controlling person may become subject under the securities laws, any other federal or state law, at common law or otherwise, arising out of the Adviser’s responsibilities to the Trust which may be based upon any willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of, the Adviser’s obligations and/or duties under this Agreement by the Adviser or by any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, or any affiliate acting on behalf of the Adviser. The indemnification in this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with Global Evolution USA, LLC provides that:
9. Liability of Adviser. The Adviser shall have no liability to the Trust, its shareholders or any third party arising out of or related to this Agreement, provided however, the Adviser agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, the Manager, any affiliated person within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act, and each person, if any, who, within the meaning of Section 15 of the Securities Act, controls the Manager, against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities or litigation (including reasonable legal and other expenses), to which the Manager or such affiliated person or controlling person may become subject under the securities laws, any other federal or state law, at common law or otherwise, arising out of the Adviser’s responsibilities to the Trust which may be based upon any willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of, the Adviser’s obligations and/or duties under this Agreement by the Adviser or by any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, or any affiliate acting on behalf of the Adviser. The indemnification in this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with Hotchkis and Wiley Capital Management LLC provides that:
9. Liability of Adviser. No provision of this Agreement shall be deemed to protect the Adviser against any liability to the Trust or its shareholders to which it might otherwise be subject by reason of any willful misfeasance, bad faith, or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or the reckless disregard of its obligations under this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with Lazard Asset Management LLC provides that:
9. Liability of Adviser. No provision of this Agreement shall be deemed to protect the Adviser against any liability to the Trust or its shareholders to which it might otherwise be subject by reason of any willful misfeasance, bad faith, or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or the reckless disregard of its obligations under this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with Massachusetts Financial Services Company provides that:
9. Liability of Adviser. The Adviser shall have no liability to the Trust, its shareholders or any other third party arising out of or related to this Agreement except with respect to claims which occur due to any willful misfeasance, bad faith, or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or the reckless disregard of its obligations under this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with National Investment Services of America, LLC provides that
9. (a) Liability of Adviser and Indemnification by Adviser. The Adviser shall have no liability to the Trust, its shareholders or any third party arising out of or related to this Agreement, provided however, the Adviser agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, the Trust and its shareholders, the Manager, any affiliated person thereof within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act, and any controlling person thereof as described in Section 15 of the Securities Act, from and against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities or litigation (including reasonable legal and other expenses), to which the Trust and its shareholders, the Manager or such affiliated person or controlling person may become subject under the securities laws, any other federal or state law, at common law or otherwise, however arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Adviser’s responsibilities to the Trust which may be based upon: (i) any willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of, the Adviser’s obligations and/or duties under this Agreement by the Adviser or by any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, or any affiliate acting on behalf of the Adviser, or (ii) any untrue statement of a material fact contained in the Trust’s prospectus and statement of additional information applicable to a Fund, or any other Trust filings, proxy materials, reports, advertisements, sales literature or other materials pertaining to a Fund, the Trust or the Manager, or the omission to state therein a material fact known to the Adviser which was required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, if such statement or omission was made in reliance upon information furnished to the Manager or the Trust by the Adviser for use therein. The indemnification in this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with Newton Investment Management North America, LLC provides that:
9. Liability of Adviser. No provision of this Agreement shall be deemed to protect the Adviser against any liability to the Trust or its shareholders to which it might otherwise be subject by reason of any willful misfeasance, bad faith, or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or the reckless disregard of its obligations under this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with Ninety One North America, Inc. provides that:
9. Liability of Adviser; Indemnification. The Adviser shall have no liability to the Trust, its shareholders or any third party arising out of or related to this Agreement, provided however, the Adviser shall not be protected against any liability to, and shall indemnify and hold harmless, the Trust and its shareholders, the Manager, any affiliated person thereof within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act, and any controlling person thereof as described in Section 15 of the Securities Act, against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities or litigation (including reasonable legal and other expenses), to which the Trust and its shareholders, the Manager or such affiliated person or controlling person may become subject under the securities laws, any other federal or state law, at common law or otherwise, however arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Adviser’s responsibilities to the Trust which may be based upon: (i) any willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of, the Adviser’s obligations and/or duties under this Agreement by the Adviser or by any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, or any affiliate acting on behalf of the Adviser; or (ii) any untrue statement of a material fact contained in the Trust’s prospectus and statement of additional information
13
applicable to a Fund, or any other Trust filings, proxy materials, reports, advertisements, sales literature or other materials pertaining to a Fund, the Trust or the Manager, or the omission to state therein a material fact known to the Adviser which was required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, if such statement or omission was made in reliance upon information furnished to the Manager or the Trust by the Adviser for use therein. The indemnification in this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with Numeric Investors LLC provides that:
9. Liability. The Adviser, its affiliates or their respective officers, directors, employees and agents (collectively, the “Covered Persons”) shall have no liability to the Trust, its shareholders, the Manager or any third party arising out of or related to this Agreement, provided, however, that the Adviser agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, the Manager, any affiliated person within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act, and each person, if any, who, within the meaning of Section 15 of the Securities Act, controls the Manager, against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities or litigation (including reasonable legal and other expenses), to which the Trust and its Shareholders, the Manager or such affiliated person or controlling person may become subject under the securities or commodities laws, any other federal or state law, at common law or otherwise, arising out of any Covered Person’s responsibilities to the Trust and the Manager which may be based upon any willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of, any Covered Person’s obligations and/or duties under this Agreement, relating to its trading activities or information provided to the Manager regarding the Covered Persons. The U.S. federal and state securities laws impose liabilities on persons who act in good faith, and therefore, nothing in this Agreement is intended to limit the obligations of any Covered Person under such laws. Neither the Manager nor the Trust shall have any liability to the Covered Persons or any third party arising out of or related to this Agreement, provided however, that the Manager and the Trust agree to indemnify and hold harmless, the Covered Persons against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities or litigation (including reasonable legal and other expenses), to which the Covered Persons may become subject under the securities or commodities laws, any other federal or state law, at common law or otherwise, arising out of the Manager’s or the Trust’s responsibilities to the Covered Persons which may be based upon any willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of, the Manager’s or the Trust’s obligations and/or duties under this Agreement by either of the Manager or the Trust or by any of their directors, officers, employees, agents, or any affiliate acting on behalf of either. The indemnification in this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with Shapiro Capital Management, LLC provides that:
9. Liability of Adviser. The Adviser shall have no liability to the Trust, its shareholders or any third party arising out of or related to this Agreement, provided however, the Adviser agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, the Manager, any affiliated person within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act, and each person, if any, who, within the meaning of Section 15 of the Securities Act, controls the Manager, against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities or litigation (including reasonable legal and other expenses), to which the Manager or such affiliated person or controlling person may become subject under the securities laws, any other federal or state law, at common law or otherwise, arising out of the Adviser’s responsibilities to the Trust which may be based upon any willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of, the Adviser’s obligations and/or duties under this Agreement by the Adviser or by any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, or any affiliate acting on behalf of the Adviser. The indemnification in this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Form of Investment Advisory Agreement with SSI Investment Management LLC provides that:
9. Liability of Adviser and Manager. The Adviser shall have no liability to the Trust, its shareholders or any third party arising out of or related to this Agreement. Each of the Adviser and the Manager agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, the other party, any affiliated person within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act, and each person, if any, who, within the meaning of Section 15 of the Securities Act, controls the other party, against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities or litigation (including reasonable legal and other expenses), to which the other party or such affiliated person or controlling person may become subject under the securities laws, any other federal or state law, at common law or otherwise, arising out of the indemnifying party’s responsibilities to the Trust based upon any willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of, the indemnifying party’s obligations and/or duties under this Agreement by the indemnifying party or by any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, or any affiliate acting on behalf of the indemnifying party. The indemnification in this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with Stephens Investment Management Group, LLC provides that:
9. Liability of Adviser. The Adviser shall have no liability to the Trust, its shareholders or any third party arising out of or related to this Agreement except with respect to claims which occur due to any willful misfeasance, bad faith, or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or the reckless disregard of its obligations under this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with Strategic Income Management, LLC provides that:
9. Liability of Adviser. The Adviser shall have no liability to the Trust, its shareholders or any other third party arising out of or related to this Agreement except with respect to claims which occur due to any willful misfeasance, bad faith, or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or the reckless disregard of its obligations under this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with The London Company of Virginia, LLC provides that:
9. Liability of Adviser. The Adviser shall have no liability to the Trust, its shareholders or any third party arising out of or related to this Agreement except with respect to claims which occur due to any willful misfeasance, bad faith, or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or the reckless disregard of its obligations under this Agreement.
Numbered Paragraph 9 of the Investment Advisory Agreement with TwentyFour Asset Management (US) LP provides that:
9. Liability. The Adviser, including its officers, directors, employees and agents shall have no liability to the Trust, its shareholders or any third party arising out of or related to this Agreement, provided however, the Adviser agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, the Manager, its officers, directors, employees and agents (each such person, a “Manager Indemnified Persons”) against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities or litigation
14
(including reasonable legal and related expenses) (“Losses”), to which a Manager Indemnified Persons may become subject under the securities laws, any other federal or state law, at common law or otherwise, arising out of the Adviser’s responsibilities to the Trust which may be based upon any willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of, the Adviser’s obligations and/or duties under this Agreement by the Adviser or by any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, or any affiliate acting on behalf of the Adviser, provided, however that the Manager’s obligation under this paragraph 9 shall be reduced to the extent that the Losses experienced by a Manager Indemnified Person are caused by or are otherwise directly related to a Manager Indemnified Person’s own willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under this Agreement.
The Manager, including its officers, directors, employees and agents shall have no liability to the Adviser, its shareholders or any third party arising out of or related to this Agreement, provided however, the Manager agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, the Adviser, its officers, directors, employees and agents (each such person, an “Adviser Indemnified Persons”) against any and all Losses, to which an Adviser Indemnified Persons may become subject under the securities laws, any other federal or state law, at common law or otherwise, arising out of the Manager’s responsibilities to the Trust, its shareholders or any third party, provided, however that the Manager’s obligation under this paragraph 9 shall be reduced to the extent that the Losses experienced by an Adviser Indemnified Person are caused by or are otherwise directly related to an Adviser Indemnified Person’s own willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under this Agreement.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, neither the Adviser nor the Manager will be liable for any indirect, special, incidental or consequential damage.
The indemnification in this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
Section 4.2 of the Distribution Agreement provides that:
| (a) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, Resolute shall not be responsible for, and the Client shall on behalf of each applicable Fund or Class thereof, indemnify and hold harmless Resolute, its employees, directors, officers and managers and any person who controls Resolute within the meaning of section 15 of the Securities Act or section 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (for purposes of this Section 4.2(a), “Resolute Indemnitees”) from and against, any and all losses, damages, costs, charges, reasonable counsel fees, payments, liabilities and other expenses of every nature and character (including, but not limited to, direct and indirect reasonable reprocessing costs) arising out of or attributable to all and any of the following (for purposes of this Section 4.2(a), a “Resolute Claim”) |
| (i) any material action (or omission to act) of Resolute or its agents taken in connection with this Agreement; provided, that such action (or omission to act) is taken in good faith and without willful misfeasance, negligence or reckless disregard by Resolute, or its affiliates, of its duties and obligations under this Agreement; |
| (ii) any untrue statement of a material fact contained in the Registration Statement or arising out of or based upon any alleged omission to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, unless such statement or omission was made in reliance upon, and in conformity with, information furnished to the Client in connection with the preparation of the Registration Statement or exhibits to the Registration Statement by or on behalf of Resolute; |
| (iii) any material breach of the Clients’ agreements, representations, warranties, and covenants in Sections 2.9 and 5.2 of this Agreement; or |
| (iv) the reliance on or use by Resolute or its agents or subcontractors of information, records, documents or services which have been prepared, maintained or performed by the Client or any agent of the Client, including but not limited to any Predecessor Records provided pursuant to Section 2.9(b). |
| (b) Resolute will indemnify, defend and hold the Client and their several officers and members of their Governing Bodies and any person who controls the Client within the meaning of section 15 of the Securities Act or section 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (collectively, the “Client Indemnitees” and, with the Resolute Indemnitees, an “Indemnitee”), free and harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, suits, judgments, liabilities, losses, damages, costs, charges, reasonable counsel fees and other expenses of every nature and character (including the cost of investigating or defending such claims, demands, actions, suits or liabilities and any reasonable counsel fees incurred in connection therewith), but only to the extent that such claims, demands, actions, suits, judgments, liabilities, losses, damages, costs, charges, reasonable counsel fees and other expenses result from, arise out of or are based upon all and any of the following (for purposes of this Section 4.2(c), a “Client Claim” and, with a Resolute Claim, a “Claim”): |
| (i) any material action (or omission to act) of Resolute or its agents taken in connection with this Agreement, provided that such action (or omission to act) is taken in good faith and without willful misfeasance, negligence or reckless disregard by Resolute, or its affiliates, of its duties and obligations under this Agreement. |
| (ii) any untrue statement of a material fact contained in the Registration Statement or any alleged omission of a material fact required to be stated or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, if such statement or omission was made in reliance upon, and in conformity with, information furnished to the Client in writing in connection with the preparation of the Registration Statement by or on behalf of Resolute; or |
| (iii) any material breach of Resolute’s agreements, representations, warranties and covenants set forth in Section 2.4 and 5.1 hereof. |
| (c) The Client or Resolute (for purpose of this Section 4.2(d), an “Indemnifying Party”) may assume the defense of any suit brought to enforce any Resolute Claim or Client Claim, respectively, and may retain counsel chosen by the Indemnifying Party and approved by the other Party, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The Indemnifying Party shall advise the other Party that it will assume the defense of the suit and retain counsel within ten (10) days of receipt of the notice of the claim. If the Indemnifying Party assumes the defense of any such suit and retains counsel, the other Party shall bear the fees and expenses of any additional counsel that they retain. If the Indemnifying Party does not assume the defense of any such suit, or if other Party does not approve of counsel chosen by the Indemnifying Party, or if the other Party has been advised that it may have available defenses or claims that are not available to or conflict with those available to the Indemnifying Party, the Indemnifying |
15
| Party will reimburse any Indemnitee named as defendant in such suit for the reasonable fees and expenses of any counsel that the Indemnitee retains. An Indemnitee shall not settle or confess any claim without the prior written consent of the applicable Client, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. |
| (d) An Indemnifying Party’s obligation to provide indemnification under this section is conditioned upon the Indemnifying Party receiving notice of any action brought against an Indemnitee within twenty (20) days after the summons or other first legal process is served. Such notice shall refer to the Person or Persons against whom the action is brought. The failure to provide such notice shall not relieve the Indemnifying Party of any liability that it may have to any Indemnitee except to the extent that the ability of the party entitled to such notice to defend such action has been materially adversely affected by the failure to provide notice. |
| (e) The provisions of this section and the parties’ representations and warranties in this Agreement shall remain operative and in full force and effect regardless of any investigation made by or on behalf of any Indemnitee and shall survive the sale and redemption of any Shares made pursuant to subscriptions obtained by Resolute. The indemnification provisions of this section will inure exclusively to the benefit of each person that may be an Indemnitee at any time and their respective successors and assigns (it being intended that such persons be deemed to be third party beneficiaries under this Agreement). |
Section 4.3 of the Distribution Agreement provides that:
Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, except as specifically set forth below:
| (a) Neither Party shall be liable for losses, delays, failure, errors, interruption or loss of data occurring directly or indirectly by reason of circumstances beyond its reasonable control, including, without limitation, acts of God; action or inaction of civil or military authority; public enemy; war; terrorism; riot; fire; flood; sabotage; epidemics; labor disputes; civil commotion; interruption, loss or malfunction of utilities, transportation, computer or communications capabilities; insurrection; or elements of nature; |
| (b) Neither Party shall be liable for any consequential, special or indirect losses or damages suffered by the other Party, whether or not the likelihood of such losses or damages was known by the Party; |
| (c) No affiliate, director, officer, employee, manager, shareholder, partner, agent, counsel or consultant of either Party shall be liable at law or in equity for the obligations of such Party under this Agreement or for any damages suffered by the other Party related to this Agreement; |
| (d) There are no third-party beneficiaries of this Agreement; |
| (e) Each Party shall have a duty to mitigate damages for which the other Party may become responsible; |
| (f) The assets and liabilities of each Fund are separate and distinct from the assets and liabilities of each other Fund, and no Fund shall be liable or shall be charged for any debt, obligation or liability of any other Fund, whether arising under this Agreement or otherwise; and in asserting any rights or claims under this Agreement, Resolute shall look only to the assets and property of the Fund to which Resolute’s rights or claims relate in settlement of such rights or claims; and |
| (g) Each Party agrees promptly to notify the other party of the commencement of any litigation or proceeding of which it becomes aware arising out of or in any way connected with the issuance or sale of Shares. |
Insofar as indemnification for liability arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to trustees, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a trustee, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such trustee, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
Supplemental Limited Indemnification from the Manager
ABA shall indemnify and hold harmless Indemnitee, in his or her individual capacity, from and against any cost, asserted claim, liability or expense, including reasonable legal fees (collectively, “Liability”) based upon or arising out of (i) any duty of ABA under the Management Agreement (including ABA’s failure or omission to perform such duty), and (ii) any liability or claim against Indemnitee arising pursuant to Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Rule 10b-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any similar or related federal, state or common law statutes, rules or interpretations. ABA’s indemnification obligations under this Letter Agreement shall be limited to civil and administrative claims or proceedings.
Item 31.I. Business and Other Connections of Investment Manager
American Beacon Advisors, Inc. (the “Manager”) offers investment management and administrative services to the Registrant. It acts in the same capacity to other investment companies, including those listed below.
Set forth below is information as to any other business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature in which each officer and director of American Beacon Advisors, Inc. is, or at any time during the past two fiscal years has been, engaged for his/her own account or in the capacity of director, officer, employee, partner or trustee.
16
|
Name; Current Position with American Beacon Advisors, Inc. |
Other Substantial Business and Connections |
|
Patrick J. Bartels; Director |
Redan Advisors LLC: Managing Member |
|
Sonia L. Bates; Assistant Treasurer, Vice President, Tax and Fund Reporting |
Resolute
Investment Services, Inc.: Vice President, Fund and Tax Reporting |
|
Rosemary K. Behan; Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel |
Resolute
Investment Holdings, LLC: Secretary |
|
Melinda S. Blackwill; Assistant Treasurer, Vice President and Controller |
Resolute
Investment Managers, Inc.: Vice President and Controller |
|
Paul B. Cavazos; Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer |
American
Beacon Funds Complex: Vice President |
|
Jame Donath; Director |
Greenscape
Financial Group: Chairman |
|
Emily Dowden; Vice President, Marketing |
Westwood
Management: Vice President (2022-2024) |
|
Richard M. Goldman; Director |
Becket
Capital: Founder and Managing Partner |
|
Rebecca L. Harris; Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President |
Resolute
Investment Managers, Inc.: Chief Operating Officer (June 2024-Present) Senior
Vice President (2021-May 2024, June 2024-Present), Director (May-June 2024),
President (May-June 2024), Chief Executive Officer (May-June 2024) |
17
|
Name; Current Position with American Beacon Advisors, Inc. |
Other Substantial Business and Connections |
|
Melinda G. Heika; Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
Resolute
Topco, Inc.: Treasurer |
|
Kirstin Hill; Director |
Social Finance: President & COO |
|
Terri L. McKinney; Senior Vice President, Enterprise Services |
Resolute
Investment Managers, Inc.: Senior Vice President, Enterprise Services |
|
Teresa A. Oxford; Assistant Secretary and Deputy General Counsel |
Resolute
Investment Managers, Inc.: Deputy General Counsel, Assistant Secretary,
Associate General Counsel |
|
Bo Ragsdale; Vice President, Information Technology |
Resolute
Investment Managers, Inc.: Vice President, Information Technology |
|
Christina E. Sears; Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer |
Resolute
Investment Managers, Inc.: Vice President |
|
Samuel J. Silver; Vice President and Chief Fixed Income Officer |
American Beacon Funds Complex: Vice President |
|
Claire L. Stervinou; Assistant Treasurer and Corporate Tax Manager |
Resolute
Investment Managers, Inc.: Assistant Treasurer |
|
Gregory J. Stumm; Director, President and Chief Executive Officer |
Resolute
Acquisition, Inc.: Director (June 2024-Present), President (June 2024-Present),
Chief Executive Officer (June 2024-Present), Senior Vice President (2022-2024) |
The principal address of each of the entities referenced above, other than RSW Investment Holdings LLC, Shapiro Capital Management LLC, SSI Investment Management LLC, and National Investment Services of America, LLC is 220 East Las Colinas Blvd., Suite 1200, Irving, Texas 75039. The principal address of RSW Investment Holdings LLC is 47 Maple Street, Suite 304, Summit, New Jersey 07901. The principal address of Shapiro Capital Management LLC is 3060 Peachtree Road NW #1555, Atlanta, Georgia 30305. The principal address of SSI Investment Management LLC is 2121 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2050, Los Angeles, California 90067. The principal address of National Investment Services of America, LLC is 777 E. Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2350, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202.
18
II. Business and Other Connections of Investment Advisers
The investment advisers listed below provide investment advisory services to the Trust.
American Beacon Advisors, Inc., 220 East Las Colinas Blvd., Suite 1200, Irving, TX 75039.
abrdn Investments Limited (“aIL”) is a registered investment adviser and is an investment sub-adviser for the American Beacon Developing World Income Fund. The principal address of aIL is 10 Queens Terrace, Aberdeen, UK, AB10 1XL. Information as to the officers and directors of abrdn is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 162309), and is incorporated herein by reference.
AHL Partners LLP (“AHL”) is a registered investment adviser and is an investment sub-advisor for the American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund, American Beacon AHL Multi-Alternatives Fund, and American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund. The principal address of AHL is 2 Swan Lane, London, UK EC4R 3AD. Information as to the officers and directors of AHL is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 167882), and is incorporated herein by reference.
American Century Investment Management, Inc. (“American Century”) is a registered investment adviser and is an investment sub-advisor for the American Beacon International Equity Fund. The principal address for American Century is 4500 Main Street, Kansas City, MO 64111. Information as to the Officers and Directors of American Century is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 105778), and is incorporated herein by reference.
ARK Investment Management LLC (“ARK”) is a registered investment adviser and is an investment sub-advisor for the American Beacon ARK Transformational Innovation Fund. The principal address for ARK is 200 Central Avenue, Suite 1850, St. Petersburg, FL 33701. ARK was formed in June 2013 and registered as an investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in January 2014. Information as to the Officers and Directors of ARK is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 169525), and is incorporated herein by reference.
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC (“Barrow”) is a registered investment adviser and is an investment sub-advisor for the American Beacon Balanced Fund, American Beacon Large Cap Value Fund and American Beacon Small Cap Value Fund. The principal business address of Barrow is 2200 Ross Avenue, 31st Floor, Dallas, TX 75201-2761. Information as to the officers and directors of Barrow is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 105519), and is incorporated herein by reference.
Brandywine Global Investment Management, LLC (“Brandywine”) is a registered investment adviser and is an investment sub-advisor for the American Beacon Small Cap Value Fund. The principal address of Brandywine is 1735 Market Street, Suite 1800, Philadelphia, PA 19103. Information as to the officers and directors of Brandywine is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 110783), and is incorporated herein by reference.
Causeway Capital Management LLC (“Causeway”), a Delaware limited liability company, is a registered investment adviser and is an investment sub-advisor for the American Beacon International Equity Fund. The principal address of Causeway is 11111 Santa Monica Boulevard, 15th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90025. Information as to the officers and directors of Causeway is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 113308), and is incorporated herein by reference.
DePrince, Race & Zollo, Inc. (“DRZ”), a Florida corporation, is a registered investment adviser and is an investment sub-advisor for the American Beacon Small Cap Value Fund. The principal office of DRZ is 250 Park Avenue South, Winter Park, FL 32789. Information as to the officers and directors of DRZ is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 112099), and is incorporated herein by reference.
EAM Global Investors LLC (“EAM”), is a registered investment adviser and is an investment sub-advisor for the American Beacon EAM International Small Cap Fund. The principal address of EAM is 215 Highway 101, Suite 216, Solana Beach, CA 92075. Information as to the officers and directors of EAM is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 170870), and is incorporated herein by reference.
First Eagle Alternative Credit, LLC (“First Eagle”), is a registered investment adviser and is an investment sub-advisor for the American Beacon FEAC Floating Rate Income Fund. The principal address of First Eagle is 500 Boylston Street, Suite 1250, Boston, MA 02116. Information as to the officers and directors of First Eagle is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 150900), and is incorporated herein by reference.
Garcia Hamilton & Associates, L.P. (“Garcia Hamilton”) is a registered investment adviser and is the investment sub-adviser for the American Beacon Garcia Hamilton Quality Bond Fund. The principal address of Garcia Hamilton is 1401 McKinney Street, Suite 1600, Houston, TX 77010. Information as to the officers and directors of Garcia Hamilton is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 108017), and is incorporated herein by reference.
Global Evolution USA, LLC (“Global Evolution”) is a registered investment adviser and is an investment sub-advisor for the American Beacon Developing World Income Fund. The principal address of Global Evolution is 250 Park Avenue, 15th floor, New York, NY 10177, United States. Global Evolution’s parent company is Global Evolution Financial ApS and is located at Buen 11, 2nd floor, DK-6000 Kolding, Denmark. Information as to the officers and directors of Global Evolution is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 161677), and is incorporated herein by reference.
Hotchkis and Wiley Capital Management LLC (“Hotchkis”) is a registered investment adviser and is an investment sub-advisor for the American Beacon Balanced Fund, American Beacon Large Cap Value Fund, and American Beacon Small Cap Value Fund. The principal address of Hotchkis is 601 South Figueroa Street, 39th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90017-5439. Information as to the officers and directors of Hotchkis is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 114649), and is incorporated herein by reference.
19
Lazard Asset Management LLC (“Lazard”) is a registered investment adviser and is an investment sub-advisor for the American Beacon International Equity Fund. The principal address of Lazard is 30 Rockefeller Plaza, 55th Floor, New York, NY 10112. Information as to the officers and directors of Lazard is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 122836), and is incorporated herein by reference.
Massachusetts Financial Services Company (“MFS”) is a registered investment adviser and is an investment sub-adviser for the American Beacon Large Cap Value Fund. The principal address of MFS is 111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02199. MFS is a subsidiary of Sun Life of Canada (U.S.) Financial Services Holdings Inc., which in turn is an indirect majority-owned subsidiary of Sun Life Financial, Inc. (a diversified financial services company), located at Sun Life Financial Centre, 150 King Street West, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Information as to the officers and directors of MFS is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 110045), and is incorporated herein by reference.
National Investment Services of America, LLC (“NIS”) is a registered investment adviser and is an investment sub-advisor for the American Beacon NIS Core Plus Bond Fund. The principal address of NIS is 777 E. Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2350, Milwaukee, WI 53202. NIS is a majority-owned subsidiary of Resolute Investment Managers, Inc., which is a subsidiary of Resolute Topco, Inc. (“Topco”). Topco is owned primarily by various institutional investment funds that are managed by financial institutions and other investment advisory firms. No owner of Topco owns 25% or more of the outstanding equity or voting interests of Topco. Information as to the officers and directors of NIS is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 307169), and is incorporated herein by reference.
Newton Investment Management North America, LLC (“NIMNA”) is a registered investment adviser and is an investment sub-advisor for the American Beacon Small Cap Value Fund. NIMNA is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon Corp”). The principal address of NIMNA is BNY Mellon Center, 201 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02108. Information as to the officers and directors of NIMNA is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 312937), and is incorporated herein by reference.
Ninety One North America, Inc (“Ninety One”) is a registered investment adviser and is an investment sub-advisor for the American Beacon Ninety One Emerging Markets Equity Fund, American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund, and American Beacon Ninety One International Franchise Fund. The principal address of Ninety One is 65 East 55th Street, 30th Floor, New York, NY 10022. Information as to the officers and directors of Ninety One is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 167922), and is incorporated herein by reference.
Numeric Investors LLC (“Numeric”), is a registered investment advisory firm formed in 1989. Numeric is a limited liability company that is a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of Man Group plc (“Man”) and is an investment sub-advisor to the American Beacon Man Large Cap Growth Fund and American Beacon Man Large Cap Value Fund. The principal address of Numeric is 200 Pier 4 Boulevard, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA, 02210. Information as to the Officers and Directors of Numeric is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 131684) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Shapiro Capital Management LLC (“Shapiro”) is a registered investment adviser and is an investment subadvisor for the American Beacon Shapiro SMID Cap Equity Fund and American Beacon Shapiro Equity Opportunities Fund. The principal address of Shapiro is 3060 Peachtree Road NW #1555, Atlanta, GA 30305. Shapiro is a majority-owned subsidiary of Resolute Investment Managers, Inc., which is a subsidiary of Resolute Topco, Inc. (“Topco”). Topco is owned primarily by various institutional investment funds that are managed by financial institutions and other investment advisory firms. No owner of Topco owns 25% or more of the outstanding equity or voting interests of Topco. Shapiro was founded in 1990. Information as to the Officers and Directors of Shapiro is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 105581), and is incorporated herein by reference.
SSI Investment Management LLC (“SSI”) is a registered investment adviser and is the investment sub-advisor for the American Beacon SSI Alternative Income Fund. The principal address of SSI is 2211 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2050, Los Angeles, CA 90067. SSI is a majority-owned subsidiary of Resolute Investment Managers, Inc., which is a subsidiary of Resolute Topco, Inc. (“Topco”). Topco is owned primarily by various institutional investment funds that are managed by financial institutions and other investment advisory firms. No owner of Topco owns 25% or more of the outstanding equity or voting interests of Topco. Information as to the officers and directors of SSI is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 104889), and is incorporated herein by reference.
Stephens Investment Management Group, LLC (“SIMG”) is a registered investment adviser and is the investment sub-advisor for the American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Growth Fund and American Beacon Stephens Small Cap Growth Fund. The principal address of SIMG and Stephens Inc. is 111 Center Street, Little Rock, AK 72201. Information as to the officers and directors of SIMG is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 136369), and is incorporated herein by reference.
Strategic Income Management, LLC (“SiM”) is a registered investment adviser and is the investment sub-advisor for the American Beacon SiM High Yield Opportunities Fund. The principal address of SiM is 1200 Westlake Avenue North, Suite 713, Seattle, WA 98109. Information as to the officers and directors of SiM is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 151956), and is incorporated herein by reference.
The London Company Of Virginia, LLC (“London Company”) is a registered investment adviser and is the investment sub-adviser for the American Beacon The London Company Income Equity Fund. The principal place of business address of London Company is 1800 Bayberry Court, Suite 301, Richmond, VA 23226. Information as to the officers and directors of London Company is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 106654), and is incorporated herein by reference.
TwentyFour Asset Management (US) LP (“TwentyFour”) is a registered investment adviser and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Vontobel Holding AG and is the investment sub-advisor for the American Beacon TwentyFour Strategic Income Fund and the American Beacon TwentyFour
20
Sustainable Short Term Bond Fund. The principal address of TwentyFour is 66 Hudson Boulevard, 34th Floor, Suite 3401, New York, NY 10001. Information as to the officers and directors of TwentyFour is included in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD number 285791), and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 32. Principal Underwriter
(a) Resolute Investment Distributors, Inc. (the “Distributor”) serves as principal underwriter for the following investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended:
| 1 | American Beacon Funds |
| 2 | American Beacon Select Funds - American Beacon U.S. Government Money Market Select Fund |
(b) The following are the Officers and Managers of the Distributor, the Registrant’s underwriter. The Distributor’s main business address is 220 E. Las Colinas Blvd, STE 1200, Irving, TX 75039.
|
Name |
Address |
Position with Underwriter |
Position with Registrant |
|
Gregory J. Stumm |
220 E. Las Colinas Blvd, STE 1200, Irving, TX 75039 |
Director, Chief Executive Officer and President |
President |
|
Rosemary K. Behan |
220 E. Las Colinas Blvd, STE 1200, Irving, TX 75039 |
Secretary |
Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary |
|
Christina E. Sears |
220 E. Las Colinas Blvd, STE 1200, Irving, TX 75039 |
Vice President |
Chief Compliance Officer and Assistant Secretary |
|
Teresa A. Oxford |
220 E. Las Colinas Blvd, STE 1200, Irving, TX 75039 |
Assistant Secretary |
Assistant Secretary |
(c) Not applicable.
Item 33. Location of Accounts and Records
The books and other documents required by Section 31(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 are maintained in the physical possession of 1) the Trust’s custodian and fund accounting agent at State Street Bank and Trust Company, One Congress Street, Suite 1, Boston, Massachusetts 02114-2016; 2) the Manager at American Beacon Advisors, Inc., 220 East Las Colinas Blvd., Suite 1200, Irving, Texas 75039; 3) the Trust’s transfer agent, SS&C GIDS, Inc., 330 West 9th St., Kansas City, Missouri 64105; 4) Mastercraft, 3021 Wichita Court, Fort Worth, Texas 76140; or 5) the Trust’s investment advisers at the addresses listed in Item 31 above.
Item 34. Management Services
Not applicable.
Item 35. Undertakings
Not applicable.
21
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“1933 Act”), and the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, the Registrant represents that this Amendment meets all the requirements for effectiveness pursuant to Rule 485(b) under the 1933 Act and has duly caused this Post-Effective Amendment No. 426 to its Registration Statement on Form N-1A to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Irving and the State of Texas, on February 21, 2025.
| AMERICAN BEACON FUNDS | ||
| By: | /s/ Gregory J. Stumm | |
| Gregory J. Stumm | ||
| President | ||
Pursuant to the requirements of the 1933 Act, this Post-Effective Amendment No. 426 to the Registration Statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| Signature | Title | Date | ||
| /s/ Gregory J. Stumm | President (Principal Executive Officer) | February 21, 2025 | ||
| Gregory J. Stumm | ||||
| /s/ Sonia L. Bates | Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and | February 21, 2025 | ||
| Sonia L. Bates | Principal Accounting Officer) | |||
| Gilbert G. Alvarado* | Trustee | February 21, 2025 | ||
| Gilbert G. Alvarado | ||||
| Joseph B. Armes* | Trustee | February 21, 2025 | ||
| Joseph B. Armes | ||||
| Gerard J. Arpey* | Trustee | February 21, 2025 | ||
| Gerard J. Arpey | ||||
| Eugene J. Duffy* | Trustee | February 21, 2025 | ||
| Eugene J. Duffy | ||||
| Claudia A. Holz* | Trustee | February 21, 2025 | ||
| Claudia A. Holz | ||||
| Douglas A. Lindgren* | Chair and Trustee | February 21, 2025 | ||
| Douglas A. Lindgren | ||||
| Barbara J. McKenna* | Trustee | February 21, 2025 | ||
| Barbara J. McKenna |
| *By: | /s/ Rosemary K. Behan | |
| Rosemary K. Behan | ||
| Attorney-In-Fact |
22
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
Type |
Description |
|
99.(i) |
|
|
99.(j) |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
23