Commitments and Contingencies |
9 Months Ended |
|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2025 | |
| Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] | |
| Commitments and Contingencies | 13. Commitments and Contingencies Legal Proceedings On March 4, 2011, Relator Marc Silver, on behalf of the U.S. Government and various state governments, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (“the District Court”) against PharMerica, seeking relief, with respect to alleged violations of the federal False Claims Act and state false claims acts. The U.S. Government and state governments declined to intervene in the case. The District Court issued an order dismissing the case in full in 2016. In 2018, however, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued an order reinstating the case. In June 2023, the District Court issued an order setting a trial date of December 4, 2023. In November 2023, the District Court denied our motion for summary judgment and the Company subsequently agreed to settle the matter without admitting liability. On May 29, 2024, the parties entered into a final settlement agreement, which was approved by both the United States Department of Justice and the District Court. The total financial impact of the settlement was $120.0 million; $90.0 million was paid in June 2024, $20.0 million was paid in July 2024, and the remaining $10.0 million was paid in April 2025. The District Court entered an order dismissing the Silver action in its entirety, with prejudice, on July 3, 2024. The Company is also party to various legal and/or administrative proceedings arising out of the operation of our programs and arising in the ordinary course of business. We record accruals for such contingencies to the extent that we conclude it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. We do not believe the ultimate liability, if any, for outstanding proceedings or claims, individually or in the aggregate, in excess of amounts already provided, will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. It is reasonably possible that an adverse determination might have an impact on a particular period. While we believe our provision for legal contingencies is adequate, the outcome of legal proceedings is difficult to predict, and we may settle legal claims or be subject to judgments for amounts that exceed our estimates. |