v3.25.4
Fair value of financial instruments
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2025
Disclosure of detailed information about financial instruments [abstract]  
Fair value of financial instruments Fair value of financial instruments
Accounting for financial assets and liabilities – fair value
Financial instruments that are held for trading are recognised at fair value through profit or loss. In addition, financial assets
are held at fair value through profit or loss if they do not contain contractual terms that give rise on specified dates to cash
flows that are SPPI, or if the financial asset is not held in a business model that is either (i) a business model to collect the
contractual cash flows or (ii) a business model that is achieved by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling.
Subsequent changes in fair value for these instruments are recognised in the income statement in net investment income,
except if reporting it in trading income reduces an accounting mismatch.
Wherever possible, fair value is determined by reference to a quoted market price for that instrument. For many of the
Barclays Bank Group’s financial assets and liabilities, including derivatives, quoted prices are not available and valuation
models are used to estimate fair value. The models calculate the expected cash flows under the terms of each specific
contract and then discount these values back to a present value. These models use as their basis independently sourced
market inputs including, for example, interest rate yield curves, equities and commodities prices, option volatilities and
currency rates.
For financial liabilities measured at fair value, the carrying amount also reflects the effect on fair value of changes in own
credit spreads derived from observable market data such as in primary issuance and redemption activity for structured
notes.
The Barclays Bank Group uses the portfolio exemption in IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement to measure the fair value of
groups of financial assets and liabilities. Financial instruments are measured using the price that would be received to sell a
net long position (i.e. an asset) for a particular risk exposure or to transfer a net short position (i.e. a liability) for a particular
risk exposure in an orderly transaction between market participants at the balance sheet date under current market
conditions. Accordingly, Barclays Bank Group measures the fair value of the group of financial assets and liabilities
consistently with how market participants would price the net risk exposure at the measurement date.
On initial recognition, the transaction price often reflects the fair value of the asset or liability.  However, in some
circumstances, fair value may differ to the transaction price when there is information to the contrary. If the fair value of the
instrument is observable from current market transactions in the same instrument, or based on a valuation technique whose
inputs only include observable inputs, then the instrument is initially recognised at fair value and the difference to the
transaction price is recognised in profit or loss.
For valuations that have made use of unobservable inputs, the difference between the model valuation and the initial
transaction price (day one profit) is recognised in profit or loss either: on a straight-line basis over the term of the
transaction; or over the period until all inputs will become observable where appropriate; or released in full when previously
unobservable inputs become observable.
Various factors influence the availability of observable inputs, and these may vary from product to product and change over
time. Factors include the depth of activity in the relevant market, the type of product, whether the product is new and not
widely traded in the marketplace, the maturity of market modelling and the nature of the transaction (bespoke or generic).
To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are not observable in the market, the determination of fair
value can be more subjective, dependent on the significance of the unobservable input to the overall valuation.
Unobservable inputs are determined based on the best information available, for example by reference to similar assets,
similar maturities, or other analytical techniques.
The sensitivity of valuations used in the financial statements to possible changes in significant unobservable inputs is shown
on page 226.
Valuation Control Framework
The Barclays Group has an established valuation control framework that oversees valuation methodologies, standards and
procedures.
Critical accounting estimates and judgements
Key areas involving a higher degree of judgement or estimation include:
Judgements
Estimates
Classification of financial instruments with significant unobservable
inputs as Level 3.
Valuation of Level 3 assets and liabilities are typically determined by
referencing observable inputs, historical data, or employing other
analytical techniques.
These estimates are considered to have a significant risk of resulting in a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of
financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value within the next financial year.
The valuation of financial instruments often involves a significant degree of judgement and complexity, in particular where
valuation models make use of unobservable inputs (‘Level 3’ assets and liabilities). This note provides information on these
instruments, including the related unrealised gains and losses recognised in the period, a description of significant valuation
techniques and unobservable inputs, and a sensitivity analysis.
For assets and liabilities traded in active markets, it is determined that the market valuation includes a representation of the
prevailing view of climate-related risks. Within less active markets, for counterparties and instruments identified as being
more susceptible to climate change risk, an impact assessment was performed through increasing their probability of
default. The change in valuation of the assets and liabilities from this assessment was sufficiently immaterial to necessitate
any amendment to the reported 2025 year-end valuations.
Valuation
Assets and liabilities are classified according to a hierarchy that reflects the observability of significant market inputs. The
three levels of the fair value hierarchy are defined below with judgement applied in determining the boundary between Level
2 and 3 classifications.
Valuation techniques using quoted market prices – Level 1
Assets and liabilities are classified as Level 1 if their value is observable in an active market. Such instruments are valued by
reference to unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets where the quoted price is readily
available, and the price represents actual and regularly occurring market transactions. An active market is one in which
transactions occur with sufficient volume and frequency to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
Valuation techniques using observable inputs – Level 2
Assets and liabilities classified as Level 2 have been valued using models whose inputs are observable either directly or
indirectly. A valuation input is considered observable if it can be directly observed from transactions in an active market, or if
there is compelling external evidence demonstrating an executable exit price. Valuations based on observable inputs include
assets and liabilities such as swaps and forwards which are valued using market standard pricing techniques, and options
that are commonly traded in markets where all the inputs to the market standard pricing models are observable. For certain
instruments that derive a fair value using unobservable inputs that are not considered significant, then the asset or liability
may be classified as Level 2.
Valuation techniques using significant unobservable inputs – Level 3
Assets and liabilities are classified as Level 3 if their valuation incorporates significant inputs that are not based on
observable market data (unobservable inputs). Unobservable input levels are generally determined via reference to
observable inputs, historical observations or using other analytical techniques.
The following table shows assets and liabilities that are held at fair value disaggregated by the fair value hierarchy and
balance sheet classification:
Assets and liabilities held at fair value
2025
2024
Valuation techniques used
Valuation techniques used
Quoted
market
price
Observable
inputs
Significant
unobservable
inputs
Quoted
market
price
Observable
inputs
Significant
unobservable
inputs
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Barclays Bank Group
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
Trading portfolio assets
110,773
68,623
10,347
189,743
77,581
78,548
10,115
166,244
Financial assets at fair value through the
income statement
5,015
173,801
6,186
185,002
3,463
182,391
5,991
191,845
Derivative financial assets
108
250,374
1,710
252,192
101
290,182
2,073
292,356
Financial assets at fair value through other
comprehensive income
31,640
8,110
3,068
42,818
19,021
28,315
3,674
51,010
Investment property
—
—
43
43
—
—
9
9
Total assets
147,536
500,908
21,354
669,798
100,166
579,436
21,862
701,464
Trading portfolio liabilities
(42,009)
(14,733)
(87)
(56,829)
(27,033)
(28,754)
(395)
(56,182)
Financial liabilities designated at fair value
(1,702)
(286,972)
(4,853)
(293,527)
(181)
(276,355)
(3,241)
(279,777)
Derivative financial liabilities
(93)
(237,599)
(3,065)
(240,757)
(86)
(276,064)
(3,181)
(279,331)
Total liabilities
(43,804)
(539,304)
(8,005)
(591,113)
(27,300)
(581,173)
(6,817)
(615,290)
The following table shows Barclays Bank Group’s Level 3 assets and liabilities that are held at fair value disaggregated by
product type. Product type is broadly similar for Barclays Bank PLC.
As at 31 December
2025
Loans
Corporate
debt
Asset
backed
securities
Government
and
Government
sponsored
debt
Private
equity
invest-
ments
Issued
debt
Reverse
repurchase
and
repurchase
agreements
Interest
rate
derivatives
Equity
derivatives
Other
products1
Total
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
Trading portfolio
assets
5,667
1,849
874
1,513
—
—
—
—
—
444
10,347
Financial assets at fair
value through the
income statement
4,620
905
188
33
268
—
97
—
—
75
6,186
Derivative financial
assets
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
759
520
431
1,710
Financial assets at fair
value through other
comprehensive
income
2,235
25
756
52
—
—
—
—
—
—
3,068
Investment property
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
43
43
Total assets
12,522
2,779
1,818
1,598
268
—
97
759
520
993
21,354
Trading portfolio
liabilities
—
(36)
—
(34)
—
—
—
—
—
(17)
(87)
Financial liabilities
designated at fair
value
—
—
—
—
—
(3,760)
(887)
—
—
(206)
(4,853)
Derivative financial
liabilities
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(612)
(1,602)
(851)
(3,065)
Total liabilities
—
(36)
—
(34)
—
(3,760)
(887)
(612)
(1,602)
(1,074)
(8,005)
As at 31 December
2024
Loans
Corporate
debt
Asset
backed
securities
Government
and
Government
sponsored
debt
Private
equity
investments
Issued
debt
Reverse
repurchase
and
repurchase
agreements
Interest
rate
derivatives
Equity
derivatives
Other
products1
Total
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
Trading portfolio
assets
6,146
1,590
991
1,018
—
—
—
—
—
370
10,115
Financial assets at fair
value through the
income statement
3,991
913
139
35
219
—
539
—
—
155
5,991
Derivative financial
assets
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,193
477
403
2,073
Financial assets at fair
value through other
comprehensive
income
2,858
47
757
12
—
—
—
—
—
—
3,674
Investment property
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
9
9
Total assets
12,995
2,550
1,887
1,065
219
—
539
1,193
477
937
21,862
Trading portfolio
liabilities
—
(374)
(6)
—
—
—
—
—
—
(15)
(395)
Financial liabilities
designated at fair
value
—
—
—
—
—
(1,842)
(1,379)
—
—
(20)
(3,241)
Derivative financial
liabilities
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1,013)
(1,219)
(949)
(3,181)
Total liabilities
—
(374)
(6)
—
—
(1,842)
(1,379)
(1,013)
(1,219)
(984)
(6,817)
Note
1Other products include certificate of deposits, funds and fund-linked products, equity cash products, investment property, credit derivatives and
foreign exchange derivatives.
Valuation techniques
The valuation techniques and observability used are described below.
Loans
Description: A drawn lending facility issued to corporate clients and customers.
Also includes Prime Brokerage Margin lending, and other similar secured lending agreements. The agreements are primarily
short-term in nature.
Valuation: Loans are valued either using a price-based approach, or through models that discount expected future cash
flows based on interest rates and loan spreads.
Prime Brokerage Margin Lending transactions are generally valued by discounting the expected future cash flows, using
industry standard models that incorporate market interest rates and repurchase rates, based on the specific details of the
transaction.
Observability: Within this loan population, the price or loan spread may be generally unobservable. 
For Margin Lending inputs are deemed observable up to liquid maturities, and are determined based on the specific features
of the transaction. Unobservable inputs are generally set by referencing liquid market instruments and applying
extrapolation techniques, or inferred via another reasonable method.
Corporate debt
Description: Primarily corporate bonds.
Valuation: Corporate bonds are valued using observable market prices sourced from broker quotes, inter-dealer prices or
other reliable pricing sources.
Observability: Prices for actively traded bonds are considered observable. Unobservable bond prices are generally
determined by reference to bond yields or credit default swap (CDS) spreads for actively traded instruments issued by or
referencing the same (or a similar) issuer.
Asset backed securities
Description: Securities that are linked to the cash flows of a pool of referenced assets via securitisation. The category
includes residential mortgage backed securities, commercial mortgage backed securities, collateralised debt obligations
(CDOs), collateralised loan obligations (CLOs) and other asset backed securities.
Valuation: Where available, valuations are based on observable market prices sourced from broker quotes and inter-dealer
prices and external vendors who provide pricing. Otherwise, valuations are determined using industry standard discounted
cash flow analysis that calculates the fair value based on valuation inputs such as constant default rate, conditional
prepayment rate, loss given default and yield. These inputs are determined by reference to a number of sources including
proxying to observed transactions, market indices or market research, and by assessing underlying collateral performance.
Proxying to observed transactions, indices or research requires an assessment and comparison of the relevant securities’
underlying attributes including collateral, tranche, vintage, underlying asset composition (historical losses, borrower
characteristics and loan attributes such as loan to value ratio and geographic concentration) and credit ratings (original and
current).
Observability: Where an asset backed product does not have an observable market price and the valuation is determined
using a discounted cash flow analysis, the instrument is considered unobservable.
Government and Government sponsored debt
Description: Government bonds, supra sovereign bonds and agency bonds.
Valuation: Liquid bonds that are actively traded through an exchange or clearing house are marked to the levels observed in
these markets. Other actively traded bonds are valued using observable market prices sourced from broker quotes, inter-
dealer prices or other reliable pricing sources.
Observability: Observability assessment is performed with reference to bond market trading data. Bonds are assessed at
Level 1 if they are traded in active market with a quoted price in line with requirements of IFRS 13. Unobservable bonds
prices are generally determined by reference to bond yields for actively traded bonds from the same (or a similar) issuer.
Private equity investments
Description: Includes investments in equity holdings in operating companies not quoted on a public exchange.
Valuation: Private equity investments are valued in accordance with the ‘International Private Equity and Venture Capital
Valuation Guidelines’ which require the use of a number of individual pricing benchmarks such as the prices of recent
transactions in the same or similar entities, discounted cash flow analysis and comparison with the earnings or revenue
multiples of listed companies. While the valuation of unquoted equity instruments is subjective by nature, the relevant
methodologies are commonly applied by other market participants and have been consistently applied over time.
Observability: Inputs are considered observable if there is active trading in a liquid market of products with significant
sensitivity to the inputs. Unobservable inputs include earnings or revenue estimates, multiples of comparative companies,
marketability discounts and discount rates.
Issued debt
Description: Debt notes issued by Barclays.
Valuation: Issued debt is valued using discounted cash flow techniques incorporating various inputs observed for each
instrument.
Observability: Barclays issued notes are generally observable. Structured notes are debt instruments containing embedded
derivatives. Where either an input to the embedded derivative or the debt instrument is deemed unobservable and
significant to the overall valuation of the note, the structured note is classified as Level 3.
Reverse repurchase and repurchase agreements
Description: Includes securities purchased under resale agreements, securities sold under repurchase agreements, and other
similar secured lending agreements. The agreements are primarily short-term in nature.
Valuation: Repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements are generally valued by discounting the expected future cash
flows using industry standard models that incorporate market interest rates and repurchase rates, based on the specific
details of the transaction.
Observability: Inputs are deemed observable up to liquid maturities or for consensus pricing with low pricing-range and are
determined based on the specific features of the transaction. Unobservable inputs are generally set by referencing liquid
market instruments and applying extrapolation techniques or inferred via another reasonable method.
Interest rate derivatives
Description: Derivatives linked to interest rates or inflation indices. The category includes futures, interest rate and inflation
swaps, swaptions, caps, floors, inflation options and other exotic interest rate derivatives.
Valuation: Interest rate and inflation derivatives are generally valued using curves of forward rates constructed from market
data to project and discount the expected future cash flows of trades. Instruments with optionality are valued using
volatilities implied from market inputs and use industry standard or bespoke models depending on the product type.
Observability: In general, inputs are considered observable up to liquid maturities which are determined separately for each
input and underlying. Unobservable inputs are generally set by referencing liquid market instruments and applying
extrapolation techniques or inferred via another reasonable method.
Equity derivatives
Description: Exchange traded or OTC derivatives linked to equity indices and single names. The category includes vanilla and
exotic equity products.
Valuation: Equity derivatives are valued using industry standard models. Valuation inputs include stock prices, dividends,
volatilities, interest rates, equity repurchase curves and, for multi-asset products, correlations.
Observability: In general, valuation inputs are observable up to liquid maturities which are determined separately for each
input and underlying. Unobservable inputs are set by referencing liquid market instruments and applying extrapolation
techniques or inferred via another reasonable method.
Foreign exchange derivatives
Description: Derivatives linked to the foreign exchange (FX) market. The category includes FX forward contracts, FX swaps
and FX options. The majority are traded as over the counter (OTC) derivatives.
Valuation: FX derivatives are valued using industry standard and bespoke models depending on the product type. Valuation
inputs include FX rates, interest rates, FX volatilities, interest rate volatilities, FX interest rate correlations and others as
appropriate.
Observability: FX correlations, forwards and volatilities are generally observable up to liquid maturities which are determined
separately for each input and underlying.
Unobservable inputs are set by referencing liquid market instruments and applying extrapolation techniques, or inferred via
another reasonable method.
Credit derivatives
Description: Derivatives linked to the credit spread of a referenced entity, index or basket of referenced entities or a pool of
referenced assets (e.g. a securitised product). The category includes single name and index credit default swaps (CDS) and
total return swaps (TRS).
Valuation: Credit derivatives are valued on industry standard models using curves of credit spreads as the principal input.
Credit spreads are observed directly from broker data, third party vendors or priced to proxies.
Observability: Credit derivative contracts referencing entities that are actively traded are generally considered observable.
Other valuation inputs are considered observable if products with significant sensitivity to the inputs are actively traded in a
liquid market. Unobservable valuation inputs are generally determined with reference to recent benchmark transactions or
inferred from observable trades of the same issuer or similar entities.
Assets and liabilities transferred between levels
During the year ended 31 December 2025, there were £33.5bn assets and £(9.8)bn liabilities transferred from Level 2 to
Level 1 for the Barclays Bank Group (year ended 31 December 2024: there were no material transfers). Additionally, there
were £0.7bn assets and £(2.8)bn liabilities transferred from Level 2 to Level 3 (year ended 31 December 2024: there were no
material transfers). These transfers reflect enhancement to the Bank’s levelling policy, including the use of additional data in
the active market assessment of Level 1 government bonds and updated assessments of unobservable market parameters
for government bonds and issued debt, resulting in an increase in Level 3 balances.
Level 3 movement analysis
The following table summarises the movements in the Level 3 balances during the year. Transfers have been reflected as if
they had taken place at the beginning of the year.
Asset and liability transfers between Level 2 and Level 3 are primarily due to i) an increase or decrease in observable market
activity related to an input or ii) a change in the significance of the unobservable input, with assets and liabilities classified as
Level 3 if an unobservable input is deemed significant.
Analysis of movements in Level 3 assets and liabilities
As at 1
January
2025
Total gains and
(losses) in the
period recognised
in the income
statement
Total gains
and
(losses) in
the period
recognised
in OCI
Transfers
As at 31
Dec 2025
Purchases
Sales
Issues
Settlements
Trading
income2
Other
income
In
Out
Barclays Bank Group
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
Trading portfolio assets
10,115
5,810
(4,157)
—
(1,554)
151
—
—
382
(400)
10,347
Financial assets at fair value
through the income statement
5,991
2,705
(1,156)
—
(1,232)
14
(22)
—
59
(173)
6,186
Financial assets at fair value
through other comprehensive
income
3,674
895
(591)
—
(1,030)
4
(2)
—
118
—
3,068
Investment property
9
34
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
43
Trading portfolio liabilities
(395)
(55)
25
—
352
2
—
—
(28)
12
(87)
Financial liabilities designated at
fair value
(3,241)
—
29
(503)
1,020
43
—
—
(2,954)
753
(4,853)
Net derivative financial
instruments1
(1,108)
(447)
221
—
—
(44)
1
—
3
19
(1,355)
Total
15,045
8,942
(5,629)
(503)
(2,444)
170
(23)
—
(2,420)
211
13,349
Analysis of movements in Level 3 assets and liabilities
As at 1
January
2024
Total gains and
(losses) in the
period recognised
in the income
statement
Total gains
and
(losses) in
the period
recognised
in OCI
Transfers
As at 31 Dec
2024
Purchases
Sales
Issues
Settlements
Trading
income2
Other
income
In
Out
Barclays Bank Group
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
Trading portfolio assets
6,509
5,848
(1,817)
—
(865)
(9)
—
—
775
(326)
10,115
Financial assets at fair value
through the income statement
5,368
2,540
(1,524)
—
(582)
—
56
—
206
(73)
5,991
Financial assets at fair value
through other comprehensive
income
776
3,116
(43)
—
—
3
22
—
—
(200)
3,674
Investment property
2
9
(2)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
9
Trading portfolio liabilities
(368)
(26)
20
—
—
(7)
—
—
(15)
1
(395)
Financial liabilities designated at
fair value
(1,212)
(409)
—
(1,147)
143
(74)
—
—
(892)
350
(3,241)
Net derivative financial
instruments1
(1,113)
(571)
(7)
—
(15)
(66)
—
—
163
501
(1,108)
Total
9,962
10,507
(3,373)
(1,147)
(1,319)
(153)
78
—
237
253
15,045
Notes
1The derivative financial instruments are represented on a net basis. On a gross basis, derivative financial assets are £1,710m (2024: £2,073m) and
derivative financial liabilities are £(3,065)m (2024: £(3,181)m).
2Trading income represents gains and losses on Level 3 financial instruments which in the majority are offset by losses and gains on financial
instruments disclosed in Level 2.
Unrealised gains and losses on Level 3 assets and liabilities
The following tables disclose the unrealised gains and losses recognised in the year arising on Level 3 assets and liabilities
held at year end.
Unrealised gains and (losses) recognised during the period on Level 3 assets and liabilities held at year end
2025
2024
Income statement
Other
compre-
hensive
income
Income statement
Other
compre-
hensive
income
Trading
income1
Other
income
Total
Trading
income1
Other
income
Total
Barclays Bank Group
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
Trading portfolio assets
36
—
—
36
(9)
—
—
(9)
Financial assets at fair value through the income
statement
13
(23)
—
(10)
—
55
—
55
Financial assets at fair value through other
comprehensive income
4
(1)
—
3
3
22
—
25
Investment property
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Trading portfolio liabilities
1
—
—
1
(7)
—
—
(7)
Financial liabilities designated at fair value
43
—
—
43
(77)
—
—
(77)
Net derivative financial instruments
(44)
1
—
(43)
(58)
—
—
(58)
Total
53
(23)
—
30
(148)
77
—
(71)
Note
1Trading income represents gains and losses on Level 3 financial instruments which in the majority are offset by losses and gains on financial
instruments disclosed in Level 2.
Significant unobservable inputs
The following table discloses the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs for material products recognised
at fair value and classified as Level 3 along with the range of values used for those significant unobservable inputs:
Valuation technique(s)1
Significant unobservable
inputs
2025
2024
Range
Range
Min
Max
Min
Max
Units2
Derivative financial
instruments3
Interest rate derivatives
Discounted cash flows
Inflation forwards
n/m4
n/m4
3
3
%
Credit spread
8
2,070
14
1,972
bps
Yield
—
5
—
12
%
Option model
Interest rate volatility
29
152
19
175
bps vol
FX - IR correlation
(36)
30
(36)
30
%
IR - IR correlation
35
98
33
98
%
IR - Inflation correlation
10
10
10
10
%
Inflation - Inflation
correlation
5
5
5
5
%
Equity derivatives
Option model
Equity volatility
1
88
1
133
%
Equity - equity correlation
15
100
40
100
%
Discounted cash flow
Discount margin
(190)
350
(215)
351
bps
Non-derivative financial
instruments
Loans
Discounted cash flows
Loan spread
30
942
35
908
bps
Credit spread
194
420
194
1,011
bps
Discount margin
780
1,170
230
345
bps
Yield
5
8
2
18
%
Comparable pricing
Comparable price
—
186
—
240
points
Private Equity investments
EBITDA multiple
EBITDA multiple
6
17
—
—
Multiple
Asset backed securities
Comparable pricing
Comparable price
—
530
—
125
points
Discounted cash flows
Discount margin
n/m4
n/m4
(137)
(25)
bps
Option Model
Equity volatility
n/m4
n/m4
15
32
%
Corporate debt
Comparable pricing
Comparable price
—
239
—
2,322
points
Government and
Government sponsored
debt
Comparable pricing
Comparable price
—
231
—
123
points
Issued debt
Discounted cash flows
Credit spread
80
120
50
198
bps
Option model
Equity volatility
1
95
1
111
%
Interest rate volatility
37
178
19
211
bps vol
Reverse repurchase and
repurchase agreements
Discounted cash flows
Repo spread
100
148
14
186
bps
Notes
1A range has not been provided for Net Asset Value as there would be a wide range reflecting the diverse nature of the positions.
2The units used to disclose ranges for significant unobservable inputs are percentages, points and basis points. Points are a percentage of par; for
example, 100 points equals 100% of par. A basis point equals 1/100th of 1%; for example, 150 basis points equals 1.5%.
3Certain derivative instruments are classified as Level 3 due to a significant unobservable credit spread input into the calculation of the Credit
Valuation Adjustment for the instruments.
4      Non-material Level 3 balances for these unobservable inputs.
The following section describes the significant unobservable inputs identified in the table above, and the sensitivity of fair
value measurement of the instruments categorised as Level 3 assets or liabilities to increases in significant unobservable
inputs. Where sensitivities are described, the inverse relationship will also generally apply.
Where reliable interrelationships can be identified between significant unobservable inputs used in fair value measurement, a
description of those interrelationships is included below.
Forwards
A price or rate that is applicable to a financial transaction that will take place in the future.
In general, a significant increase in a forward in isolation will result in a fair value increase for the contracted receiver of the
underlying (currency, bond, commodity, etc.), but the sensitivity is dependent on the specific terms of the instrument.
Credit spread
Credit spreads typically represent the difference in yield between an instrument and a benchmark security or reference rate.
Credit spreads reflect the additional yield that a market participant demands for taking on exposure to the credit risk of an
instrument and forms part of the yield used in a discounted cash flow calculation.
In general, a significant increase in credit spread in isolation will result in a fair value decrease for a cash asset.
For a derivative instrument, a significant increase in credit spread in isolation can result in a fair value increase or decrease
depending on the specific terms of the instrument.
Volatility
Volatility is a measure of the variability or uncertainty in return for a given derivative underlying. It is an estimate of how
much a particular underlying instrument input or index will change in value over time. In general, volatilities are implied from
observed option prices. For unobservable options the implied volatility may reflect additional assumptions about the nature
of the underlying risk, and the strike/maturity profile of a specific contract.
In general, a significant increase in volatility in isolation will result in a fair value increase for the holder of a simple option,
but the sensitivity is dependent on the specific terms of the instrument.
There may be interrelationships between unobservable volatilities and other unobservable inputs (e.g. when equity prices
fall, implied equity volatilities generally rise) but these are generally specific to individual markets and may vary over time.
Correlation
Correlation is a measure of the relationship between the movements of two variables. Correlation can be a significant input
into valuation of derivative contracts with more than one underlying instrument. Credit correlation generally refers to the
correlation between default processes for the separate names that make up the reference pool of a collateralised debt
obligation (CDO) structure.
A significant increase in correlation in isolation can result in a fair value increase or decrease depending on the specific terms
of the instrument.
Discount Margin
Discount margin represents the additional yield over a benchmark rate that market participants require to compensate for
credit risk, liquidity risk, and other factors associated with the instrument. Commonly used in discounted cash flow
valuations
In general, a significant increase in discount margin in isolation will result in a fair value decrease for the instrument, as
higher required returns reduce present value. The sensitivity depends on the specific terms of the instrument.
Repo Spread
Repo spread refers to the difference between the repurchase agreement rate and a benchmark funding rate. It reflects
market conditions, counterparty credit risk, and liquidity premiums that influence the cost of financing through repos.
In general, a significant increase in repo spread in isolation will result in a fair value decrease for the instrument, as higher
financing costs reduce its attractiveness. The sensitivity is dependent on the specific contractual terms.
Comparable price
Comparable instrument prices are used in valuation by calculating an implied yield (or spread over a liquid benchmark) from
the price of a comparable observable instrument, then adjusting that yield (or spread) to account for relevant differences
such as maturity or credit quality. Alternatively, a price-to-price basis can be assumed between the comparable and
unobservable instruments in order to establish a value.
Loans include a portfolio of loans extended to clients within the Barclays Bank Group’s leveraged finance business.
Leveraged finance loans are originated where Barclays Bank Group provides financing commitments to clients to facilitate
strategic transactions such as leverage buyouts and acquisitions. The sensitivity of the portfolio to unobservable inputs is
judgmental reflecting their illiquid nature and the significance of unobservable price inputs to the valuation.
In general, a significant increase in comparable price in isolation will result in an increase in the price of the unobservable
instrument. For derivatives, a change in the comparable price in isolation can result in a fair value increase or decrease
depending on the specific terms of the instrument.
Loan spread
Loan spreads typically represent the difference in yield between an instrument and a benchmark security or reference rate.
Loan spreads typically reflect credit quality, the level of comparable assets such as gilts and other factors, and form part of
the yield used in a discounted cash flow calculation.
In general, a significant increase in loan spreads in isolation will result in a fair value decrease for a loan.
Sensitivity Analysis
Sensitivity analysis is performed on products with significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) to generate a range of
reasonably possible alternative valuations. The sensitivity methodologies applied take account of the nature of the valuation
techniques used, as well as the availability and reliability of observable proxy and historical data and the impact of using
alternative models.
Sensitivities are calculated on a monthly basis. The calculation is based on range or spread data of a reliable reference source
or a scenario based on relevant market analysis alongside the impact of using alternative models. Sensitivities are calculated
without reflecting the impact of any diversification in the portfolio.
Sensitivity analysis of valuations using unobservable inputs (relates to Level 3 portfolios)
2025
2024
Favourable changes
Unfavourable changes
Favourable changes
Unfavourable changes
Income
statement
Equity
Income
statement
Equity
Income
statement
Equity
Income
statement
Equity
Barclays Bank Group
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
  Loans
201
21
(297)
(37)
577
43
(742)
(43)
  Corporate debt
88
—
(68)
—
87
—
(56)
—
  Asset backed securities
51
6
(43)
(6)
57
4
(40)
(4)
Government and Government
sponsored debt
45
—
(41)
—
47
—
(56)
—
  Private equity investments
37
—
(37)
—
28
—
(28)
—
  Interest rate derivatives
109
—
(134)
—
98
—
(212)
—
  Equity derivatives
336
—
(336)
—
199
—
(269)
—
Other products1
105
312
(104)
(89)
91
—
(104)
—
Total
972
339
(1,060)
(132)
1,184
47
(1,507)
(47)
Note
1Other products include issued debt, reverse repurchase and repurchase agreements, certificate of deposits, funds and fund-linked products,
equity cash products, credit derivatives and foreign exchange derivatives.
The effect of stressing unobservable inputs to a range of reasonably possible alternatives, alongside considering the impact
of using alternative models, would be to increase fair values by up to £1,311m (2024: £1,231m) or to decrease fair values by
up to £1,192m (2024: £1,554m) with substantially all the potential effect impacting profit and loss. Unfavourable changes
shown in the table above are partly provided for through the capital and prudential valuation adjustment framework.
Fair value adjustments
Key balance sheet valuation adjustments are quantified below:
2025
2024
Barclays Bank Group
£m
£m
Exit price adjustments derived from market bid-offer spreads
(618)
(529)
Uncollateralised derivative funding
62
19
Derivative credit valuation adjustments
(155)
(184)
Derivative debit valuation adjustments
119
108
Exit price adjustments derived from market bid-offer spreads
Barclays Bank Group uses mid-market pricing where it is a market maker and has the ability to transact at, or better than,
mid-price (which is the case for certain equity, bond and vanilla derivative markets). For other financial assets and liabilities,
bid-offer adjustments are recorded to reflect the exit level for the expected close out strategy. The methodology for
determining the bid-offer adjustment for a derivative portfolio involves calculating the net risk exposure by offsetting long
and short positions by strike and term in accordance with the risk management and hedging strategy.
Bid-offer levels are generally derived from market quotes such as broker data. Less liquid instruments may not have a
directly observable bid-offer level. In such instances, an exit price adjustment may be derived from an observable bid-offer
level for a comparable liquid instrument, or determined by calibrating to derivative prices, or by scenario or historical
analysis.
Exit price adjustments derived from market bid-offer spreads have increased by £89m.
Discounting approaches for derivative instruments
Collateralised
In line with market practice, the methodology for discounting collateralised derivatives takes into account the nature and
currency of the collateral that can be posted within the relevant credit support annex (CSA). The CSA aware discounting
approach recognises the ‘cheapest to deliver’ option that reflects the ability of the party posting collateral to change the
currency of the collateral.
Uncollateralised
A fair value adjustment of £62m is applied to account for the impact of incorporating the cost/benefit of funding into the
valuation of uncollateralised and partially collateralised derivative portfolios and collateralised derivatives where the terms of
the agreement do not allow the rehypothecation of collateral received. The derivative funding adjustment has moved by
£43m.
Derivative credit and debit valuation adjustments
Derivative credit valuation adjustments and derivative debit valuation adjustments are incorporated into derivative
valuations to reflect the impact on fair value of counterparty credit risk and Barclays Bank Group’s own credit quality
respectively. These adjustments are calculated for uncollateralised and partially collateralised derivatives across all asset
classes. Derivative credit valuation adjustments and derivative debit valuation adjustments are calculated using estimates of
exposure at default, probability of default and recovery rates, at a counterparty level. Counterparties include (but are not
limited to) corporates, Sovereigns and Sovereign agencies and Supranationals.
Exposure at default is generally estimated through the simulation of underlying risk factors through approximating with a
more vanilla structure, or by using current or scenario-based mark to market as an estimate of future exposure.
Probability of default and recovery rate information is generally sourced from the credit default swap (CDS) markets. Where
this information is not available, or considered unreliable, alternative approaches are taken based on mapping internal
counterparty ratings onto historical or market-based default and recovery information.
Derivative credit valuation adjustments decreased by £29m. Derivative debit valuation adjustments increased by £(11)m.
Correlation between counterparty credit and underlying derivative risk factors, termed ‘wrong-way,’ or ‘right-way’ risk, is not
systematically incorporated into the derivative credit valuation adjustments calculation but is adjusted where the underlying
exposure is directly related to the counterparty.
Barclays Bank Group continues to monitor market practices and activity to ensure the approach to uncollateralised
derivative valuation remains appropriate.
Unrecognised gains as a result of the use of valuation models using unobservable inputs
The amount that is yet to be recognised in income, relating to the difference between the transaction price (the fair value at
initial recognition) and the amount that would have arisen had valuation models using unobservable inputs been used on
initial recognition, is £258m (2024: £267m) for financial instruments measured at fair value. There are additions and FX
revaluation of £54m (2024: £177m) and amortisation and releases of £63m (2024: £104m) for these instruments. For
financial instruments carried at amortised cost, the amount that is yet to be recognised in income is £16m (2024: £17m).
There are additions of £nil (2024: £nil) and amortisation and releases of £1m (2024: £1m) for these instruments.
Third-party credit enhancements
Structured and brokered certificates of deposit issued by Barclays Bank Group are insured up to $250,000 per depositor by
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) in the United States. The FDIC is funded by fees that Barclays Bank Group
and other banks pay for deposit insurance coverage. The carrying value of these issued certificates of deposit that are
designated under the IFRS 9 fair value option includes this third-party credit enhancement. The on-balance sheet value of
these brokered certificates of deposit amounted to £4,156m (2024: £4,844m).
Comparison of carrying amounts and fair values for assets and liabilities not held at fair value
The following table shows the fair value of financial assets and liabilities measured at amortised cost on Barclays Bank
Group’s and Barclays Bank PLC's balance sheet disaggregated by the fair value hierarchy and balance sheet classification.
The fair value is an estimate of the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As a wide range of valuation techniques are available, it
may not be appropriate to directly compare this fair value information to independent market sources or other financial
institutions. Different valuation methodologies and assumptions can have a significant impact on fair values which are based
on unobservable inputs.
Barclays Bank Group
2025
2024
Carrying
amount
Fair value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Carrying
amount
Fair value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
Financial assets
Debt securities at amortised cost
55,153
54,165
31,675
19,043
3,447
50,227
49,400
18,307
29,509
1,584
Loans and advances at
amortised cost
150,786
152,780
7,365
67,077
78,338
144,827
146,369
6,791
67,601
71,977
Reverse repurchase agreements
and other similar secured
lending
17,662
17,662
—
17,662
—
3,393
3,393
—
3,393
—
Assets included in disposal
groups classified as held for sale
5,801
6,065
—
—
6,065
9,544
9,628
—
3,520
6,108
Financial liabilities
Deposits at amortised cost
(344,751)
(344,803)
(215,669)
(128,205)
(929)
(319,376)
(319,135)
(203,393)
(115,172)
(570)
Repurchase agreements and
other similar secured borrowing
(18,651)
(18,651)
—
(18,651)
—
(29,397)
(29,397)
—
(29,397)
—
Debt securities in issue
(57,229)
(57,170)
—
(56,343)
(827)
(35,803)
(35,745)
—
(34,612)
(1,133)
Subordinated liabilities
(45,239)
(47,511)
—
(46,850)
(661)
(41,875)
(43,030)
—
(42,189)
(841)
Liabilities included in disposal
groups classified as held for sale
—
—
—
—
—
(3,647)
(3,647)
—
(3,647)
—
Debt Securities at amortised cost
Debt securities at amortised cost are valued using observable market prices sourced from broker quotes, inter-dealer prices
or other reliable pricing sources. Observability assessment is performed with reference to bond market trading data. Bonds
are assessed at Level 1 if they are traded in active market with a quoted price in line with requirements of IFRS 13.  Where
market data for the underlying bond is unavailable, a number of proxy/extrapolation techniques are employed to determine
the appropriate fair value. The enhancements noted in levelling policy are applicable to the government bonds reported at
amortised cost.
Loans and advances at amortised cost
The fair value of loans and advances, for the purpose of this disclosure, is derived from discounting expected cash flows in a
way that reflects the current market price or loan spreads of the borrowers. Where market data or credit information on the
underlying borrowers is unavailable, a number of proxy/extrapolation techniques are employed to determine the
appropriate discount rates.
Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending
The fair value of reverse repurchase agreements approximates carrying amounts as these balances are generally short dated
and fully collateralised.
Deposits at amortised cost
In many cases, the fair value disclosed approximates carrying value because the instruments are short-term in nature or
have interest rates that reprice frequently, such as customer accounts and other deposits and short-term debt securities.
The fair value for deposits with longer-term maturities, mainly time deposits, are estimated using discounted cash flows
applying either market rates or current rates for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing
The fair value of repurchase agreements approximates carrying amounts as these balances are generally short dated.
Debt securities in issue
Fair values of other debt securities in issue are based on quoted prices where available or, where the instruments are short
dated, carrying amount approximates fair value.
Subordinated liabilities
Fair values for dated and undated convertible and non-convertible loan capital are based on quoted market rates for the
issuer concerned or issuers with similar terms and conditions.
Assets & liabilities included in disposal groups classified as held for sale
The fair value for the purposes of this disclosure has been prepared in accordance with the products held for sale, and
valuation techniques used to determine the expected sales price of these assets and liabilities that will be achieved when the
disposal group is sold.