v3.25.4
Commitments and Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2025
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies
(11) Commitments and Contingencies
Unconditional Purchase Obligations
The minimum required payments for unconditional purchase obligations, as defined in ASC 440, Commitments, related to ancillary production supplies and transportation are as follows:
(in thousands)
Unconditional
Purchase 
Obligations
Year Ending December 31,
2026$4,120 
20274,120 
20284,120 
20294,120 
20304,120 
Thereafter36,047 
$56,647 
Expenses associated with these obligations are included in Direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization), and, for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, totaled $4.1 million, $3.9 million, and $3.7 million, respectively.
Litigation
CRNF Ammonia Release - CVR Energy, CVR Partners and certain of their affiliates have been served with several lawsuits filed in state courts in Fort Bend County, Texas and/or received demand letters each alleging damages arising from an ammonia release that occurred at the Coffeyville Facility in October 2025, following which multiple individuals were transported to hospitals for evaluation and treatment. As these matters are in their earliest stages, the Partnership cannot yet determine whether these matters could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Kansas Environmental Claims - In January 2026, a lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas against CVR Energy, CVR Partners and certain of their affiliates (collectively, the “Kansas Defendants”) by three residents of Coffeyville and a purported class of similarly situated persons seeking compensatory and punitive damages in excess of $5 million for nuisance and other equitable relief arising from alleged environmental abuse from operations at CVR Energy’s Coffeyville refinery and the Coffeyville Facility. On February 3, 2026, the Kansas Defendants were served with the lawsuit. The Kansas Defendants dispute the claims and intend to vigorously defend themselves. As this matter is in its earliest stages, the Partnership cannot yet determine whether this lawsuit could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.