v3.25.4
REGULATORY MATTERS
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2025
Broker-Dealer, Net Capital Requirement, SEC Regulation [Abstract]  
REGULATORY MATTERS REGULATORY MATTERS
We are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Failure to meet these requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, regulatory actions that could materially impact our financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, we must maintain specific quantitative measures of capital relative to our assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet exposures, as calculated under regulatory accounting standards. These measures include minimum amounts and ratios for common equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) to risk-weighted assets, Tier 1 capital, total capital, and Tier 1 capital to average assets (Tier 1 leverage ratio). At December 31, 2025 and 2024, we met all capital requirements under the Basel III capital rules.
Regulatory capital guidelines also establish “well-capitalized” thresholds as benchmarks for evaluating capital strength. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, all of our capital amounts and ratios exceeded the well-capitalized levels under the prompt corrective action framework.
Dividends declared by us may not exceed specified regulatory criteria unless otherwise approved by our regulators. In determining dividend levels, we consider current and historical earnings, retained earnings, and applicable risk-based and other regulatory capital requirements and limitations.
Our internal stress tests are designed to comprehensively evaluate the risks to which we are exposed, the potential losses under adverse scenarios, and the resulting impact on our capital levels. These stress tests subject our balance sheet and other risk characteristics to rigorous analysis using internal models.
The following schedule presents our capital amounts and ratios and the minimum requirements to be well capitalized under Basel III at December 31, 2025 and 2024:
December 31, 2025
Minimum requirement to be “well capitalized”
(Dollar amounts in millions)AmountRatioAmountRatio
Basel III regulatory capital amounts and ratios
Common equity tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)$7,936 11.5 %$4,494 6.5 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)8,003 11.6 5,531 8.0 
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)9,510 13.8 6,914 10.0 
Tier 1 leverage ratio8,003 9.0 4,451 5.0 
December 31, 2024
Minimum requirement to be “well capitalized”
(Dollar amounts in millions)AmountRatioAmountRatio
Basel III regulatory capital amounts and ratios
Common equity tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)$7,363 10.9 %$4,400 6.5 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)7,430 11.0 5,415 8.0 
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)9,026 13.3 6,769 10.0 
Tier 1 leverage ratio7,430 8.3 4,454 5.0 
The Basel III capital rules require us to maintain certain minimum capital ratios, as well as a 2.5% “capital conservation buffer,” designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. This buffer is composed entirely of CET1. The following schedule presents the minimum capital ratios and capital conservation buffer requirements, compared with our capital ratios at December 31, 2025:
December 31, 2025
Minimum capital requirementCapital conservation bufferMinimum capital ratio requirement with capital conservation bufferCurrent capital
ratio
CET1 to risk-weighted assets4.5%2.5%7.0%11.5%
Tier 1 risk-based capital
(i.e., CET1 plus additional Tier 1 capital) to risk-weighted assets
6.0%2.5%8.5%11.6%
Total risk-based capital
(i.e., Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted assets
8.0%2.5%10.5%13.8%
Tier 1 leverage ratio
(i.e., Tier 1 risk-based capital) to average consolidated assets
4.0%N/A4.0%9.0%
Financial institutions with a CET1 to risk-weighted assets ratio above the minimum, but below the capital conservation buffer, face constraints on dividends, equity repurchases, and compensation based on the amount of the shortfall. Our internal triggers and limits, both under actual conditions and baseline projections, are more stringent than the capital conservation buffer requirements.